Scottie Sighting

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you understand?
I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink, wack
job.

What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick game")
*after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand?

See, it doesn't wash Scotty.

First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because
you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick
games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was
already up.

And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given
you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to, why
did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless?


--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, Alan. You COULD have shown up, since you have admitted that you
knew
exactly where you were supposed to show up.

And I said at the time precisely *why* I was unwilling to show up unless
you met my condition.

But rather than provide the one sentence clarification that was
necessary -- a sentence you provided only afterwards when it became
useless -- you decline.

You were just playing a sick game, and I don't play your sick games.

But you happily "played the game" afterwards, right? Then, when it was
safe, you happily provided the *one sentence* that was necessary.

You didn't show. Because you're insane, not crazy. And not a man. Just
another nutless, gutless rsa coward making laughable excuses for his
dicklessness.

And if I hadn't shown after you'd met my condition, you're claim would
be ironclad. So why didn't you meet it?


--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Sven Golly" wrote in message
...
"Two Buddha" wrote in
news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231
@newsfe13.lga:

Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient for me.

PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded.

Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable identity,
too.
How
burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak.

And I demanded a one sentence clarification...

...but that was too much effort...


...until afterwards...


...when the effort had not point at all...


...and then it wasn't too much.

Interesting, that.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very
carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you
understand?
I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink, wack
job.

What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick game")
*after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand?

I didn't play your sick game, Baker. I told you how sick you are. You do
not understand the difference, because you are mentally ill.

See, it doesn't wash Scotty.

Of course it doesn't. Reality never does with you.

First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because
you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick
games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was
already up.

Yeah, but I wasn't reading your posts, dumb****. Because I wasn't playing
your sick games. I'd set a time and a place. You didn't show. Reality.
Go get help, freak.

And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given
you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to, why
did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless?

That is a truly insane statement. Get help.


--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, Alan. You COULD have shown up, since you have admitted that you
knew
exactly where you were supposed to show up.

And I said at the time precisely *why* I was unwilling to show up
unless
you met my condition.

But rather than provide the one sentence clarification that was
necessary -- a sentence you provided only afterwards when it became
useless -- you decline.

You were just playing a sick game, and I don't play your sick games.

But you happily "played the game" afterwards, right? Then, when it was
safe, you happily provided the *one sentence* that was necessary.

You didn't show. Because you're insane, not crazy. And not a man.
Just
another nutless, gutless rsa coward making laughable excuses for his
dicklessness.

And if I hadn't shown after you'd met my condition, you're claim would
be ironclad. So why didn't you meet it?


--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Sven Golly" wrote in message
...
"Two Buddha" wrote in
news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231
@newsfe13.lga:

Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient for
me.

PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded.

Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable identity,
too.
How
burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak.

And I demanded a one sentence clarification...

...but that was too much effort...


...until afterwards...


...when the effort had not point at all...


...and then it wasn't too much.

Interesting, that.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very
carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he
missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very
carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, I reason with you. You continue your delusional and insane
postings.
Get help. That is reason, you sick freak.

You'll reason by avoiding answering a simple question?

And here's another:

After I showed you up by providing the name of my employer, as you said
I'd never dare do, why didn't you send them my "insane ramblings", as
you said you'd do?

I took pity on you because you are insane.
But I talked to him on Wednesday. Want me to have another chat, this time
with a fair sampling of rsa insanity, and tell him you are right in the
middle of this ****?
I can and will, Alan, if it makes you get psychiatric help. You need it.
Desperately.

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you
understand?
I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink, wack
job.

What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick game")
*after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand?

I didn't play your sick game, Baker. I told you how sick you are. You do
not understand the difference, because you are mentally ill.

Actually, you just stopped replying (another explanation in which you
contradict yourself, BTW) But afterwards -- when it didn't matter at all
-- then you played!


See, it doesn't wash Scotty.

Of course it doesn't. Reality never does with you.

First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because
you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick
games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was
already up.

Yeah, but I wasn't reading your posts, dumb****. Because I wasn't playing
your sick games. I'd set a time and a place. You didn't show. Reality.
Go get help, freak.

Make up your mind, Scott. Did you not tell me where because you
*couldn't* respond because you'd already left (excuse 1), because you
*wouldn't* respond because you'd be playing my "sick game" (excuse 2),
or (now) that you weren't reading my posts?

Do you even realize that each of your excuses is mutually contradictory?


And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given
you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to, why
did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless?

That is a truly insane statement. Get help.

Actually, it was a *question*. One which should be simple for you to
answer.



--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, Alan. You COULD have shown up, since you have admitted that you
knew
exactly where you were supposed to show up.

And I said at the time precisely *why* I was unwilling to show up
unless
you met my condition.

But rather than provide the one sentence clarification that was
necessary -- a sentence you provided only afterwards when it became
useless -- you decline.

You were just playing a sick game, and I don't play your sick games.

But you happily "played the game" afterwards, right? Then, when it was
safe, you happily provided the *one sentence* that was necessary.

You didn't show. Because you're insane, not crazy. And not a man.
Just
another nutless, gutless rsa coward making laughable excuses for his
dicklessness.

And if I hadn't shown after you'd met my condition, you're claim would
be ironclad. So why didn't you meet it?


--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Sven Golly" wrote in message
...
"Two Buddha" wrote in
news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231
@newsfe13.lga:

Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient for
me.

PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded.

Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable identity,
too.
How
burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak.

And I demanded a one sentence clarification...

...but that was too much effort...


...until afterwards...


...when the effort had not point at all...


...and then it wasn't too much.

Interesting, that.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very
carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he
missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very
carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, I reason with you. You continue your delusional and insane
postings.
Get help. That is reason, you sick freak.

You'll reason by avoiding answering a simple question?

And here's another:

After I showed you up by providing the name of my employer, as you said
I'd never dare do, why didn't you send them my "insane ramblings", as
you said you'd do?

I took pity on you because you are insane.

LOL

But I talked to him on Wednesday. Want me to have another chat, this time
with a fair sampling of rsa insanity, and tell him you are right in the
middle of this ****?

Absolutely! BTW, what was "his" name?

Ooooh. Tricky.

I can and will, Alan, if it makes you get psychiatric help. You need it.
Desperately.

Bring it on, big boy!

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

You are insane. Get help.

--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you
understand?
I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink,
wack
job.

What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick
game")
*after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand?

I didn't play your sick game, Baker. I told you how sick you are. You
do
not understand the difference, because you are mentally ill.

Actually, you just stopped replying (another explanation in which you
contradict yourself, BTW) But afterwards -- when it didn't matter at all
-- then you played!


See, it doesn't wash Scotty.

Of course it doesn't. Reality never does with you.

First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because
you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick
games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was
already up.

Yeah, but I wasn't reading your posts, dumb****. Because I wasn't
playing
your sick games. I'd set a time and a place. You didn't show. Reality.
Go get help, freak.

Make up your mind, Scott. Did you not tell me where because you
*couldn't* respond because you'd already left (excuse 1), because you
*wouldn't* respond because you'd be playing my "sick game" (excuse 2),
or (now) that you weren't reading my posts?

Do you even realize that each of your excuses is mutually contradictory?


And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given
you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to,
why
did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless?

That is a truly insane statement. Get help.

Actually, it was a *question*. One which should be simple for you to
answer.



--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, Alan. You COULD have shown up, since you have admitted that
you
knew
exactly where you were supposed to show up.

And I said at the time precisely *why* I was unwilling to show up
unless
you met my condition.

But rather than provide the one sentence clarification that was
necessary -- a sentence you provided only afterwards when it became
useless -- you decline.

You were just playing a sick game, and I don't play your sick
games.

But you happily "played the game" afterwards, right? Then, when it
was
safe, you happily provided the *one sentence* that was necessary.

You didn't show. Because you're insane, not crazy. And not a man.
Just
another nutless, gutless rsa coward making laughable excuses for
his
dicklessness.

And if I hadn't shown after you'd met my condition, you're claim
would
be ironclad. So why didn't you meet it?


--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Sven Golly" wrote in message
...
"Two Buddha" wrote in
news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231
@newsfe13.lga:

Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient
for
me.

PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded.

Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable
identity,
too.
How
burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak.

And I demanded a one sentence clarification...

...but that was too much effort...


...until afterwards...


...when the effort had not point at all...


...and then it wasn't too much.

Interesting, that.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very
carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he
missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very
carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he
missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very
carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

You are insane. Get help.

--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, I reason with you. You continue your delusional and insane
postings.
Get help. That is reason, you sick freak.

You'll reason by avoiding answering a simple question?

And here's another:

After I showed you up by providing the name of my employer, as you said
I'd never dare do, why didn't you send them my "insane ramblings", as
you said you'd do?

I took pity on you because you are insane.

LOL

But I talked to him on Wednesday. Want me to have another chat, this
time
with a fair sampling of rsa insanity, and tell him you are right in the
middle of this ****?

Absolutely! BTW, what was "his" name?

Ooooh. Tricky.

I can and will, Alan, if it makes you get psychiatric help. You need it.
Desperately.

Bring it on, big boy!

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

You are insane. Get help.

Right on time!


--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you
understand?
I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink,
wack
job.

What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick
game")
*after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand?

I didn't play your sick game, Baker. I told you how sick you are. You
do
not understand the difference, because you are mentally ill.

Actually, you just stopped replying (another explanation in which you
contradict yourself, BTW) But afterwards -- when it didn't matter at all
-- then you played!

Ooops.



See, it doesn't wash Scotty.

Of course it doesn't. Reality never does with you.

First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because
you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick
games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was
already up.

Yeah, but I wasn't reading your posts, dumb****. Because I wasn't
playing
your sick games. I'd set a time and a place. You didn't show. Reality.
Go get help, freak.

Make up your mind, Scott. Did you not tell me where because you
*couldn't* respond because you'd already left (excuse 1), because you
*wouldn't* respond because you'd be playing my "sick game" (excuse 2),
or (now) that you weren't reading my posts?

Ooops.


Do you even realize that each of your excuses is mutually contradictory?

Ooops.



And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given
you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to,
why
did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless?

That is a truly insane statement. Get help.

Actually, it was a *question*. One which should be simple for you to
answer.

Ooops.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

On Mar 30, 1:53 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Sven Golly" wrote in message
.. .
"Two Buddha" wrote in news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231
@newsfe13.lga:

Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient for me.

PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded.

Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable identity, too. How
burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak.

And I demanded a one sentence clarification...

...but that was too much effort...

...until afterwards...

...when the effort had not point at all...

...and then it wasn't too much.

Interesting, that.

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

Drop it Alan. He has an identity for me. It doesn't matter when it
comes down to it.

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

I think you rescinded your balls a long time ago.

Yeah, I was born with an unrescinded testicle, but got it fixed when I
was 5.

Dave