If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
legs-only skating for itself
Some skiers skate without poles as a means to improve their
skate-with-poling technique for freestyle races. I like skating with only my legs as a skiing thing on its own. Several days in the past year that's all the skiing I've done for the day: two or three or more hours with no poling. No races to prepare for -- just to do it. Personal achievement is the big reason for legs-only skating for me. Trying to get through a trail without the help of poles is a new challenge for me. My tough challenge to skate up each long and/or steep hill without pausing or resting in the middle. As I keep working on it, I'm finding I can do things I never imagined. Yesterday at Lake Placid NY, I left my poles in the car and skated 1980 Olympic Men's 15km course without pausing or resting on any of the hill-climb sections. Two years ago I don't think I could have done that even with poles, and last year I was amazed to get up just one of those hills in ideal conditions. The Olympic 15 km course has 477 vertical meters of climbing -- I think the hilliest race in the 1980 Olympics. Most sections are the same as the hilly first 16-17km section of the Lake Placid Loppet, but it adds three more hills (including Hi Notch). Of course lots of Lake Placid racers have skated this with no poles (or could if they cared to), but it felt like a great achievement for me. * Competition: Will all this hilly legs-only skating give me an advantage in racing? I doubt at the lengths I've been pushing it. Because the key skill for me to accomplish these tough hills is to get better at skating _slow_, both on the hills and between the hills. * Public recognition: Skating up hills with no poles puts me in a "can't lose" situation -- since if somebody using poles passes me, I've got an obviously visible excuse. And if I pass somebody else (which happens), there's no need to wait for two hours until the race results get posted. Special moment yesterday was when I had climbed partway up East and reached the bottom of the notorious "Russian" hill. The start is so steep that the grooming snowmobile had gotten stuck at the bottom. The driver of the other groomer walked down and helped push and together they got it going up the hill. Meanwhile an audience of eight more skiers arrived. So as soon as the groomers cleared out, I made sure to be the first one climbing up, the only one with no poles. Halfway up it occurred to me that some of those young guys might easily catch me. But they didn't. (I finished up the original American extension, alone for a little downhill, then the discovery that no good deed goes unpunished: Hi Notch.) * Legs-only as a separate thing: Some people choose to ski Classic for variety, even though their skating is faster. Now I'm choosing to skate with my legs only, even though my skating with poling is faster. Instead of alternating Skate versus Classic workouts, I can vary skating-No-poles challenges with pure-Double-Pole-no-skating workouts. When will I ever do skate-With-poles? or poles-with-Classic-striding? Those are for ungroomed golf courses and backcountry touring. Ken |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I have probably missed some of the technique threads where you were
talking about this...what do you find are the key factors in becoming able to skate up the really steep stuff without poles? You say it's by skating slow but it seems like you'd run out of glide as the hills get steeper...is it a short steps / high turnover approach (analogous to cycling)? thx Ken Roberts wrote: Some skiers skate without poles as a means to improve their skate-with-poling technique for freestyle races. I like skating with only my legs as a skiing thing on its own. Several days in the past year that's all the skiing I've done for the day: two or three or more hours with no poling. No races to prepare for -- just to do it. Personal achievement is the big reason for legs-only skating for me. Trying to get through a trail without the help of poles is a new challenge for me. My tough challenge to skate up each long and/or steep hill without pausing or resting in the middle. As I keep working on it, I'm finding I can do things I never imagined. Yesterday at Lake Placid NY, I left my poles in the car and skated 1980 Olympic Men's 15km course without pausing or resting on any of the hill-climb sections. Two years ago I don't think I could have done that even with poles, and last year I was amazed to get up just one of those hills in ideal conditions. The Olympic 15 km course has 477 vertical meters of climbing -- I think the hilliest race in the 1980 Olympics. Most sections are the same as the hilly first 16-17km section of the Lake Placid Loppet, but it adds three more hills (including Hi Notch). Of course lots of Lake Placid racers have skated this with no poles (or could if they cared to), but it felt like a great achievement for me. * Competition: Will all this hilly legs-only skating give me an advantage in racing? I doubt at the lengths I've been pushing it. Because the key skill for me to accomplish these tough hills is to get better at skating _slow_, both on the hills and between the hills. * Public recognition: Skating up hills with no poles puts me in a "can't lose" situation -- since if somebody using poles passes me, I've got an obviously visible excuse. And if I pass somebody else (which happens), there's no need to wait for two hours until the race results get posted. Special moment yesterday was when I had climbed partway up East and reached the bottom of the notorious "Russian" hill. The start is so steep that the grooming snowmobile had gotten stuck at the bottom. The driver of the other groomer walked down and helped push and together they got it going up the hill. Meanwhile an audience of eight more skiers arrived. So as soon as the groomers cleared out, I made sure to be the first one climbing up, the only one with no poles. Halfway up it occurred to me that some of those young guys might easily catch me. But they didn't. (I finished up the original American extension, alone for a little downhill, then the discovery that no good deed goes unpunished: Hi Notch.) * Legs-only as a separate thing: Some people choose to ski Classic for variety, even though their skating is faster. Now I'm choosing to skate with my legs only, even though my skating with poling is faster. Instead of alternating Skate versus Classic workouts, I can vary skating-No-poles challenges with pure-Double-Pole-no-skating workouts. When will I ever do skate-With-poles? or poles-with-Classic-striding? Those are for ungroomed golf courses and backcountry touring. Ken |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Well 2 weeks ago I had a stroke which left me withot use of my left
arm and hand, thankfully,legs are fine.With rehab and time the hope is to regain the use of both,but just in case,I might be doing alot of no pole skating, to start out.But doing the little bit of no-pole skating before this happened required me to use my arms in a rythmic action as if I had poles ,sort of like in speedskating.Is that what you do,or do use 100% legs and don't involve the arms? Thanks, Marty |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
MartyC wrote
I had a stroke which left me withot use of my left arm and hand . . . I might be doing alot of no pole skating That's showing strong spirit. (what about single-pole skating?) before ... use my arms in a rythmic action as if I had poles, Is that what you do? Yes I definitely use my arms, but not simulating poling. When it gets steep, I just swing my arms from side to side like I would accelerating or climbing a hill on inline-skates (with some shoulder-swing too). Helps me glide a little longer out to the side on each stroke. I can see how keeping the upper body quieter could be good for technique improvement, to focus completely on the the sub-motions and feelings of just the legs. But when I'm trying to survive to the top of a steep hill and still have capacity to enjoy some more skiing afterward, I give my legs need all the help I can get from my arms and torso. Ken P.S. Reflecting more about turnover frequency: I don't think about turnover when climbing a hill slowly. Instead I have a sense of how much I can push on each stroke without getting too much muscle fatigue, and that's how hard I push. My "slowness" comes first from aiming the push partly out to the side (rather than "attacking" the hill vertically). Second from getting good at controlling how close to the edge of "stalling" I can take it in the current snow conditions. As I sense my side-glide is getting close to stalling on the current stroke, then it's time to start the next stroke out toward the opposite side. So for me instead of "light and quick", it's "side-push-glide and slow-to-almost-stall". |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I tried another non-racing challenge: skating with no poles at Garnet Hill,
in northern New York -- a ski center which I like for several reasons also with my poles: interesting trails, nice lake skiing, serious hills, helpful detailed snow reports. My big challenge was to skate from Rogers Rd up to the ski shop with some tougher hills along the way -- with no stops, no rest pauses -- and no poles. Two years ago this was well beyond my skating capabilities even with poles, and one year ago I was rather satisfied make it for the first time with poles. My route was Rogers Rd up to the Sugarhouse, then up the Solitude trail to Bobcat, down a little on Trappers and straight into Skullbuster Hill, up to the scenic viewpoint. Skullbuster might be more sustained steep than any single hill at Mt Van Ho -- I was at my limit on technique and strength. I was real happy to make it up to the ski shop. (though now it occurs to me that I could have kept climbing up to the Log House lodge -- something for next time). After a snack I found a second challenge at Garnet Hill. I went down to Thirteenth Lake, and it was pretty and pleasant skating on it flat. My challenge was to skate with no poles from the Lake up to the Log House lodge. On this one I did stop twice, for road crossings: Beach Trail to Hooper Loop, finish on Andy's Run. This turned out to be tougher than I expected because some of the trails are not as wide, which made it hard for me to take the steep sections slower by gliding out to the side. My legs felt more tired afterward than I remembered from the Olympic Men's 15km course at Mt Van Hoevenberg. I didn't record my time for either climb -- I'm sure it was slow. But after the first climb and the flat skating on the lake, my skating technique up the second climb came together like never before. Ken |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ken Roberts wrote:
Some skiers skate without poles as a means to improve their skate-with-poling technique for freestyle races. I like skating with only my legs as a skiing thing on its own. Several days in the past year that's all the skiing I've done for the day: two or three or more hours with no poling. No races to prepare for -- just to do it. I totally agree - skiing with out poles (skate skiing or striding) is an excellent exercise and can give you a tremendous sense of accomplishment. Excellent training, exercise and fun as a change of pace. * Public recognition: Skating up hills with no poles puts me in a "can't lose" situation -- since if somebody using poles passes me, I've got an obviously visible excuse. And if I pass somebody else (which happens), there's no need to wait for two hours until the race results get posted. I couldn't understand if you're talking about a race situation here or just out skiing. If you're just out skiing for fun or training, I think this is not a good attitude to have. You should be going at a rate that makes sense for you, whether that just the pace that is fun or for a specific training goal for that day - interval, recovery, LSD, etc. How you are skiing compared to others is the wrong way to look at it. Pushing just to look good compared to some other skier on the trail is vanity, not smart skiing. If you're talking about a race situation, never mind! I would agree with you totally on the "can't lose" aspect. Although I don't know why someone would purposefully handicap themselves in a race situation. But again, I agree no poles skiing is an excellent exercise no matter how you look at it. I must say that it is not "skiing" though, at least not the reason I love skiing. The real beauty of skiing for fitness and locomotive function is that it is an all around technique - using the arms, legs and abdomen in a beautifully coordinated way. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry, I just don't think that it's worthwhile to "race" (compare) when
training or skiing for fun. What are you "comparing" to? - for all you know the guy you puff up to pass for that feel-good momemt is doing an LSD or technique work out and your comparison shows you nothing. You push hard, he skis slow and smart and you win. So what? Is it the purpose of your ski to beat some stranger up a hill? that's a race, not a controlled, mature training plan. Just my opinion mind you, but I don't think it's worthwhile or productive to be thinking of those things unless you're racing or doing some sort of pace work out. Now, when I'm doing an interval or such work out I will try to join with a similar skier and get some competitition going to push the pace. Or when skiing with friends for fun, like on a tour or such, we often race downhill (rarely uphill because that's not "fun"). Again, just mho. Of course your race rankings have nothing to do with your fitness relative to the general population, because the general population is watching TV, not ski racing, but you knew that. I guess it might be fun to beat some duffer out on the trail on a Sunday afternoon, but what's the point? -zeke |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
converting from classical to skating | S. S. | Nordic Skiing | 9 | February 17th 04 02:36 AM |
TR- New York City park skating | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 2 | January 24th 04 01:19 AM |
Skate technique USST two cents | Pete Vordenberg | Nordic Skiing | 52 | January 22nd 04 02:31 PM |
skating on classic ski | Sebastian | Nordic Skiing | 4 | January 14th 04 06:03 PM |
WC Skating Influence - Herve Balland, Mogren, Gunde, DeZolt, and Alsgard. | Douglas Diehl | Nordic Skiing | 8 | January 13th 04 05:02 AM |