If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
TR: Mt Lemmon, Arizona
I skied at Mt Lemmon Ski Valley this past Sunday. Here's the deal: Mt Lemmon Ski Valley is the southernmost resort in the US. At approximately 32.5 degrees North, it's at about the same latitude as Tijuana Mexico, Shreveport Louisiana, and Savannah Georgia. Plus it's in the Sonoran Desert (or borders on it if you want to be persnickety). So, warm tempatures, hot sun, and dry conditions. Sounds perfect for a ski resort, no? Well, the most impressive thing about Mt Lemmon is the fact that it's there at all. Yet, there it is. Like the plants in the desert below who cling to life in a hostile environment, Mt Lemmon has adapted to survive in a place where no ski hill should be. One adaptation is that the trails are narrow. I mean really narrow. As in 10 feet wide narrow. If it had wide open slopes like many western resorts the Sonoran sun would melt the snow too fast, so the trails are narrow affairs shaded by the pines. Yeah, there are a couple of 100' wide trails and an open area for the runout at the base, but for the most part think gladed runs and summer hiking trails that they let you ski. There's not much in the way of crowds, so the resort has just one old fixed grip double. At that, three out of four chairs went up empty on a weekend day - definitely no waiting. (Actually, there was a little bit of a crowd outside the fence watching - it seems that skiing is somewhat of a curiosity in the desert southwest, so people stop by to watch, and take pictures and videos of the skiers. At one point there were more people watching than skiing.) Water is at a premium, so no indoor plumbing. There's four porta-johns in the parking lot. Bottled water available at the snack-bar. Grooming? Well, I saw a couple of groomers parked alongside the hill, but no evidence of any usage within recent memory. I figure that with the thin coverage (~ 10" by my estimate) all a groomer would do is mix up a lot of dirt into what little snow they have. So, maybe they groom sometimes, but don't count on it. Rocks, sticks, pinecones, logs, grass, etc. etc. etc. on the slopes? You betcha - bring your rock skis, or rent a pair of their beaters like I did. Snowmaking? Don't think so. I didn't see any snowguns. Anyway, where would they get the water? The skiing is pleasant enough, once you get off the nasty catwalk that feeds the drop-ins. My preference is for wide open groomers where I can make carved turns at speed, but there's nothing like that at Mt. Lemmon. Ungroomed, with too many blind corners and too many hazards to let the skis run. And there were few places where the trails were actually wide enough to make a full carved turn. But while not to my tastes, it's still fun - more "real" skiing or "skiing like it used to be" than the artificial stuff I'm used to. There's nothing particularly steep, but it's steep enough for some grins. Beginners should stay away (or just ski the runout at the bottom) but anyone with basic intermediate chops should be able to handle most everything there. In some ways, the black runs were easier to ski than the green catwalk. Interesting observation: all the ski patrollers (I saw about a dozen that day) were skiing on ten-to-fifteen year old "straight" skis. I'm not sure if this is because of the rocks, or because you can't really make carved turns there (making shaped skis have less utility), or just because everything else about the place is old school. Bottom line: It's not worth travelling to just for the skiing, but if you live in Tuscon or are visiting the area for some other reason, it's worth a trip up to Mt Lemmon for a day. Adjust your expectations accordingly and you'll have fun. Beginners will have tough going, and experts will be bored, but an open-minded intermediate can have fun. Bring your rock skis. One thing that's not on the website: they're closed Tuesdays and Wednesdays. //Walt P.S. I couldn't find a trailmap on line (yeah, the place is that marginal) but here's a link to Google's Satelite view: http://preview.tinyurl.com/327bl7 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
TR: Mt Lemmon, Arizona
Walt wrote:
Interesting observation: all the ski patrollers (I saw about a dozen that day) were skiing on ten-to-fifteen year old "straight" skis. I'm not sure if this is because of the rocks, or because you can't really make carved turns there (making shaped skis have less utility), or just because everything else about the place is old school. Maybe they're just extremely intelligent and talented skiers? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
TR: Mt Lemmon, Arizona
lal_truckee wrote:
Walt wrote: Interesting observation: all the ski patrollers (I saw about a dozen that day) were skiing on ten-to-fifteen year old "straight" skis. I'm not sure if this is because of the rocks, or because you can't really make carved turns there (making shaped skis have less utility), or just because everything else about the place is old school. Maybe they're just extremely intelligent and talented skiers? That could be. But I think I'm going with "cheap". Why wreck the bases of $900 skis when there's an unlimited supply of $50 beaters? //Walt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
TR: Mt Lemmon, Arizona
Bob Lee wrote:
Walt wrote: I skied at Mt Lemmon Ski Valley this past Sunday. Here's the deal: snip That was a *great* TR. Oh, I bet you say that to all the boys. Incidentally, Mt. Lemmon doesn't exactly open every year. I'm not surprised. I wasn't aware that it opened this year - Well, it's not like you can just go to their website for a snow report - they don't really have one. And it's certainly not listed at sites like www.onthesnow.com. The best way to find out whether they're open is to call their snow report hotline. Or it would be if it actually worked, but since it's broken that won't do you much good. There's another phone number for the resort which is somewhat harder to find, but they don't answer that most of the time either. I probably called 30 times before getting through, and when I did the girl on the phone (she sounded like she was about 12) didn't know anything about the snow conditions. Eventually I dragged a description out of her, which was at least honest ("I think it's ice with a little bit of loose snow on top, but I'm not really sure") I haven't been up there since it almost burned up a couple of times. People put a lot of effort into keeping it from burning up a couple of years running. How does it look now? There was a big fire a couple of years ago (2003?) that burned the nearby town of Summerhaven almost completely. Mt Lemmon Ski Valley seems to have survived the fire just fine, but it was apparent that the fire came all the way up the south side of the mountain - all the trees on the south side of the ridge were burnt; the fire was probably within a dozen yards of the lift unloading area, but it didn't work it's way down the north side where the ski runs are. A close one for sure - I'm sure your eyes would have read more from the remains than my untrained ones. The town of Mt Lemmon, which is 5 or 10 miles away was not so lucky. See http://www.climbaz.com/features/mtle...emmonfire.html for pix. So you've actually skied there? I thought I might be the first RSA bear to do so. Anyway, one interesting observation is that it was the first ski day this year where I didn't see any telemarkers. Maybe that's due to the abundance of equally good free hike-to terrain in the vicinity? //Walt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
TR: Mt Lemmon, Arizona
Bob Lee wrote:
Walt wrote: Anyway, one interesting observation is that it was the first ski day this year where I didn't see any telemarkers. Maybe that's due to the abundance of equally good free hike-to terrain in the vicinity? Heh. No, that's not the reason. Ok. So what is the reason? You guys outa duct tape or something? //Walt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
TR: Mt Lemmon, Arizona
Bob Lee wrote:
Walt wrote: It's along the lines of that if someone takes the trouble to learn to telemark, they're going to go somewhere that it snows more than twice a decade. Huh. I just figured that if people are willing to telemark at Mt Trashmore* they'd be willing to telemark just about anywhere. //Walt *If they have the BALLS, of course. Some don't, yannow. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Arizona is the suck | Chad | Snowboarding | 3 | January 20th 06 04:20 PM |
Arizona or New Mexico Skiing | xenman | Alpine Skiing | 30 | February 16th 05 11:01 PM |