If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
my 4-5 year old K2 axis skis let me down this weekend , I've been tuning my
own skis but after the last tuning they feel like they lost a lot of their edge grip . I've kept them beveled same as factory specs at 1 at the base and 1 at the edge . I'm thinking of going a .5 on the base and start with 2 then possibly up to a 3 on the edge . I ski mostly on the Northeast . I want to get better grip on ice without making the ski hooky or edgy but still be able to slide around the moguls , any input appreciated . Ron |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
On Feb 13, 6:56 am, "Ron - NY" wrote:
my 4-5 year old K2 axis skis let me down this weekend , I've been tuning my own skis but after the last tuning they feel like they lost a lot of their edge grip . I've kept them beveled same as factory specs at 1 at the base and 1 at the edge . I'm thinking of going a .5 on the base and start with 2 then possibly up to a 3 on the edge . I ski mostly on the Northeast . I want to get better grip on ice without making the ski hooky or edgy but still be able to slide around the moguls , any input appreciated . Ron Base at 1 degree, side at 3 (2 at a min). Maybe you need a base grind too? Then, re-establish the base edge and take the side to 2 or 3. -- Marty |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
I figured I would deftly go from a 1 to a 2 on the sides and then I can go
to a 3 from there down the road if necessary . But you think better to leave the base at 1 than a .5 ? I do a stone grind once a season , but doesn't that flatten out the base edges to a 0 ? maybe after the stone grind i'll start with a .5 then try a 1 if they feel hooky . If I'm understanding things correctly , the more acute (3) the edge bevel is the better it will grip 'once' on edge . The flatter the bases are the quicker they will engage , the higher the angle the more delay before they engage . I will confess I skipped the de-tuning last time but didn't think that was enough to cause my problems . Can a ski just lose it's ability to keep an edge after a while ? Is it possible to keep an edge as sharp as the factory does it ? I'm not sure I like the way the machines do it and definitely like doing it myself , right now I am using the 'beast' tools ( base & edge ) with all the goodies,file,good diamond stones,gummy stone ,brushes ,hot waxing etc . "Marty" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 13, 6:56 am, "Ron - NY" wrote: my 4-5 year old K2 axis skis let me down this weekend , I've been tuning my own skis but after the last tuning they feel like they lost a lot of their edge grip . I've kept them beveled same as factory specs at 1 at the base and 1 at the edge . I'm thinking of going a .5 on the base and start with 2 then possibly up to a 3 on the edge . I ski mostly on the Northeast . I want to get better grip on ice without making the ski hooky or edgy but still be able to slide around the moguls , any input appreciated . Ron Base at 1 degree, side at 3 (2 at a min). Maybe you need a base grind too? Then, re-establish the base edge and take the side to 2 or 3. -- Marty |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
Ron - NY wrote:
Can a ski just lose it's ability to keep an edge after a while ? If the torsional stiffness breaks down, the ski will "wash out" even if the edges are sharp. So it's not just a matter of whether the edges are sharp, the ski has to remain torsionally stiff or the edges won't hold even if they are sharp. If sharp edges were all that were necessary to hold on Eastern Firm (TM) we could just buy our skis at Wal-Mart and sharpen the dickens out of them. I've experienced this degradation in edge hold that you describe, but I'm not sure if it's due to diminishing edge sharpness, diminishing torsional stiffness, or just some psychological phenomenon where my desire for new skis is manifesting itself as a perception that my skis aren't as good as they used to be. Probably a combination of all three. //Walt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
On Feb 13, 10:10 am, "Ron - NY" wrote:
I figured I would deftly go from a 1 to a 2 on the sides and then I can go to a 3 from there down the road if necessary . But you think better to leave the base at 1 than a .5 ? I do a stone grind once a season , but doesn't that flatten out the base edges to a 0 ? maybe after the stone grind i'll start with a .5 then try a 1 if they feel hooky . If I'm understanding things correctly , the more acute (3) the edge bevel is the better it will grip 'once' on edge . The flatter the bases are the quicker they will engage , the higher the angle the more delay before they engage . I will confess I skipped the de-tuning last time but didn't think that was enough to cause my problems . Can a ski just lose it's ability to keep an edge after a while ? Is it possible to keep an edge as sharp as the factory does it ? I'm not sure I like the way the machines do it and definitely like doing it myself , right now I am using the 'beast' tools ( base & edge ) with all the goodies,file,good diamond stones,gummy stone ,brushes ,hot waxing etc . I use the beast tool too. Nice tools and not too expensive compared to (for example) SVST. It seems that you have a perfect understanding of edge beveling. You could start with a base edge of .5 and see how that works. You can always remove more. I have been told to sharpen modern shaped skis from tip to tail and NOT to de-tune. If your edges are tuned well and they feel hooky, it may be an issue with boot alignment. Walt has a good point too in that maybe the ski is just starting to lose it's "snap". Time for new skis? -- Marty |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
Walt wrote:
Ron - NY wrote: Can a ski just lose it's ability to keep an edge after a while ? If the torsional stiffness breaks down, the ski will "wash out" even if the edges are sharp. So it's not just a matter of whether the edges are sharp, the ski has to remain torsionally stiff or the edges won't hold even if they are sharp. If sharp edges were all that were necessary to hold on Eastern Firm (TM) we could just buy our skis at Wal-Mart and sharpen the dickens out of them. I've experienced this degradation in edge hold that you describe, but I'm not sure if it's due to diminishing edge sharpness, diminishing torsional stiffness, or just some psychological phenomenon where my desire for new skis is manifesting itself as a perception that my skis aren't as good as they used to be. Probably a combination of all three. //Walt A Nordica rep told me that skis degrade in torsional stiffness after a couple of years of use. (Use means 70-90 ski days a year.) Good luck, jimbo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
well , I brought them in to my local shop and spoke to the guy who does
tuning . I also spoke to the guy at the "Race Place" where I bought all my tuning equipment . After speaking to the guy at my local shop , he agreed the edges seemed rounded out . I have to admit I think I got carried away with the file last time I tuned . When they say less is more they are right .. I'm also going to start using the magic marker trick . I'm getting them stone ground and starting again . Both places seemed to think I should leave the base at a 1 degree angle and not go to a .5 . I'm going from a 1 to a 2 on the sides though and see if I notice a difference , if I still need more edge after this I'll go to a 3 . As far as detuning , I think 1 light stroke across the edge with a gummy stone is probably a good idea , but I'm going very light . I'm not quite sure I still understand the principle behind de-tuning the tips and tails so I'm not doing any of that . But one question I forgot to ask was , does it make any sense to keep a dedicated left & right ski all the time ? I usually do , but wanted to see what other thought .. Ron "Marty" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 13, 10:10 am, "Ron - NY" wrote: I figured I would deftly go from a 1 to a 2 on the sides and then I can go to a 3 from there down the road if necessary . But you think better to leave the base at 1 than a .5 ? I do a stone grind once a season , but doesn't that flatten out the base edges to a 0 ? maybe after the stone grind i'll start with a .5 then try a 1 if they feel hooky . If I'm understanding things correctly , the more acute (3) the edge bevel is the better it will grip 'once' on edge . The flatter the bases are the quicker they will engage , the higher the angle the more delay before they engage . I will confess I skipped the de-tuning last time but didn't think that was enough to cause my problems . Can a ski just lose it's ability to keep an edge after a while ? Is it possible to keep an edge as sharp as the factory does it ? I'm not sure I like the way the machines do it and definitely like doing it myself , right now I am using the 'beast' tools ( base & edge ) with all the goodies,file,good diamond stones,gummy stone ,brushes ,hot waxing etc . I use the beast tool too. Nice tools and not too expensive compared to (for example) SVST. It seems that you have a perfect understanding of edge beveling. You could start with a base edge of .5 and see how that works. You can always remove more. I have been told to sharpen modern shaped skis from tip to tail and NOT to de-tune. If your edges are tuned well and they feel hooky, it may be an issue with boot alignment. Walt has a good point too in that maybe the ski is just starting to lose it's "snap". Time for new skis? -- Marty |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
Ron - NY wrote:
I'm not quite sure I still understand the principle behind de-tuning the tips and tails so I'm not doing any of that . Sharp tips & tails can make the ski "grabby" and you can catch an edge. Well, that's the idea anyway. If you're sloppy with your technique, this can be a problem. While I'm hardly a paragon of precision, it's not a problem for me, so I leave 'em sharp. But one question I forgot to ask was , does it make any sense to keep a dedicated left & right ski all the time ? I usually do , but wanted to see what other thought The inside edges get more use/abuse than the outside edges, so they become duller faster. I generally ski two days with the left ski on the left foot, then switch them out for the next two days to take advantage of the sharper edges. Then it's time for another tune. If you ski on soft stuff, this regimen is unnecessary. //Walt . Ron "Marty" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 13, 10:10 am, "Ron - NY" wrote: I figured I would deftly go from a 1 to a 2 on the sides and then I can go to a 3 from there down the road if necessary . But you think better to leave the base at 1 than a .5 ? I do a stone grind once a season , but doesn't that flatten out the base edges to a 0 ? maybe after the stone grind i'll start with a .5 then try a 1 if they feel hooky . If I'm understanding things correctly , the more acute (3) the edge bevel is the better it will grip 'once' on edge . The flatter the bases are the quicker they will engage , the higher the angle the more delay before they engage . I will confess I skipped the de-tuning last time but didn't think that was enough to cause my problems . Can a ski just lose it's ability to keep an edge after a while ? Is it possible to keep an edge as sharp as the factory does it ? I'm not sure I like the way the machines do it and definitely like doing it myself , right now I am using the 'beast' tools ( base & edge ) with all the goodies,file,good diamond stones,gummy stone ,brushes ,hot waxing etc . I use the beast tool too. Nice tools and not too expensive compared to (for example) SVST. It seems that you have a perfect understanding of edge beveling. You could start with a base edge of .5 and see how that works. You can always remove more. I have been told to sharpen modern shaped skis from tip to tail and NOT to de-tune. If your edges are tuned well and they feel hooky, it may be an issue with boot alignment. Walt has a good point too in that maybe the ski is just starting to lose it's "snap". Time for new skis? -- Marty |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
Hmmm , interesting , I would have thought for sure the outside edges would
wear quicker than the inside . I'm going to try your alternating idea . Never really seemed to have the problem of the skis feeling hooky , BUT I have always had the problem of the skis feeling wobbly side to side on straightaways but always thought that was inherent in parabolic skis . Ron "Walt" wrote in message ... Ron - NY wrote: I'm not quite sure I still understand the principle behind de-tuning the tips and tails so I'm not doing any of that . Sharp tips & tails can make the ski "grabby" and you can catch an edge. Well, that's the idea anyway. If you're sloppy with your technique, this can be a problem. While I'm hardly a paragon of precision, it's not a problem for me, so I leave 'em sharp. But one question I forgot to ask was , does it make any sense to keep a dedicated left & right ski all the time ? I usually do , but wanted to see what other thought The inside edges get more use/abuse than the outside edges, so they become duller faster. I generally ski two days with the left ski on the left foot, then switch them out for the next two days to take advantage of the sharper edges. Then it's time for another tune. If you ski on soft stuff, this regimen is unnecessary. //Walt . Ron "Marty" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 13, 10:10 am, "Ron - NY" wrote: I figured I would deftly go from a 1 to a 2 on the sides and then I can go to a 3 from there down the road if necessary . But you think better to leave the base at 1 than a .5 ? I do a stone grind once a season , but doesn't that flatten out the base edges to a 0 ? maybe after the stone grind i'll start with a .5 then try a 1 if they feel hooky . If I'm understanding things correctly , the more acute (3) the edge bevel is the better it will grip 'once' on edge . The flatter the bases are the quicker they will engage , the higher the angle the more delay before they engage . I will confess I skipped the de-tuning last time but didn't think that was enough to cause my problems . Can a ski just lose it's ability to keep an edge after a while ? Is it possible to keep an edge as sharp as the factory does it ? I'm not sure I like the way the machines do it and definitely like doing it myself , right now I am using the 'beast' tools ( base & edge ) with all the goodies,file,good diamond stones,gummy stone ,brushes ,hot waxing etc . I use the beast tool too. Nice tools and not too expensive compared to (for example) SVST. It seems that you have a perfect understanding of edge beveling. You could start with a base edge of .5 and see how that works. You can always remove more. I have been told to sharpen modern shaped skis from tip to tail and NOT to de-tune. If your edges are tuned well and they feel hooky, it may be an issue with boot alignment. Walt has a good point too in that maybe the ski is just starting to lose it's "snap". Time for new skis? -- Marty |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Tuning question
Walt wrote:
Ron - NY wrote: I'm not quite sure I still understand the principle behind de-tuning the tips and tails so I'm not doing any of that . Sharp tips & tails can make the ski "grabby" and you can catch an edge. Well, that's the idea anyway. If you're sloppy with your technique, this can be a problem. While I'm hardly a paragon of precision, it's not a problem for me, so I leave 'em sharp. Something I'm a little more familiar with. Skiing I have never skied a "grabby" ski since they got wider, shorter and have more side cut. I always used to dull 3" from the curve of the tip and 2" from the tail. This on OldStraightSkis(tm). I tried on several occasions on several OSS's to not do this and' always had trouble. Found a rock beside the trail to dull the skis with. On several occasions as an ambassador at K-mart, I had someone talk to me about having seemingly no control at all over their new skis. They had bought them at a city ski shop where the help may or may not have known anything about skis and skiing. The SOP in those days was to "properly" tune a customer's skis before they went out the door. With these particular people, this wasn't done. I also used to carry a Swiss Army Knife with a file blade. This was just enough to make the skis dull in the right places and I was hailed as a hero. Today, your best ride will be with the factory tune that comes on your skis. Try to make that last as long as possible and note that the tips and tails have not been dulled. Check with your local shop as to whether or not they follow manufacturer's guidelines for tuning, and if you do it yourself, familiarize yourself with these guidelines. Almost never, dull the tips and tails. A friend was having trouble with his skis right after a tune. Checked and found the tips (but not tails) dulled. Took 'em back and had the tune redone at no additional cost. Back to factory tune specs and good response of the skis. But one question I forgot to ask was , does it make any sense to keep a dedicated left & right ski all the time ? I usually do , but wanted to see what other thought The inside edges get more use/abuse than the outside edges, so they become duller faster. I generally ski two days with the left ski on the left foot, then switch them out for the next two days to take advantage of the sharper edges. Then it's time for another tune. If you ski on soft stuff, this regimen is unnecessary. I just don't pay any attention as to which ski is left or right. I believe this give me equal wear on both sets of edges. Probably does what your method does in a little less compulsive way. //Walt . Ron "Marty" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 13, 10:10 am, "Ron - NY" wrote: I figured I would deftly go from a 1 to a 2 on the sides and then I can go to a 3 from there down the road if necessary . But you think better to leave the base at 1 than a .5 ? I do a stone grind once a season , but doesn't that flatten out the base edges to a 0 ? maybe after the stone grind i'll start with a .5 then try a 1 if they feel hooky . If I'm understanding things correctly , the more acute (3) the edge bevel is the better it will grip 'once' on edge . The flatter the bases are the quicker they will engage , the higher the angle the more delay before they engage . I will confess I skipped the de-tuning last time but didn't think that was enough to cause my problems . Can a ski just lose it's ability to keep an edge after a while ? Is it possible to keep an edge as sharp as the factory does it ? I'm not sure I like the way the machines do it and definitely like doing it myself , right now I am using the 'beast' tools ( base & edge ) with all the goodies,file,good diamond stones,gummy stone ,brushes ,hot waxing etc . I use the beast tool too. Nice tools and not too expensive compared to (for example) SVST. It seems that you have a perfect understanding of edge beveling. You could start with a base edge of .5 and see how that works. You can always remove more. I have been told to sharpen modern shaped skis from tip to tail and NOT to de-tune. If your edges are tuned well and they feel hooky, it may be an issue with boot alignment. Walt has a good point too in that maybe the ski is just starting to lose it's "snap". Time for new skis? -- Marty |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dumb seasonal question - any advice? | Tom | Snowboarding | 3 | March 23rd 04 07:49 PM |
Intro and question | Ken Campbell | Snowboarding | 6 | January 30th 04 06:53 PM |
Boot Info and Basic Tuning Needed | Nick | General | 0 | December 10th 03 02:32 AM |
ski tuning video | Seth Masia | Alpine Skiing | 7 | October 3rd 03 05:14 PM |
GS Ski Length Question | ENORD | Alpine Skiing | 4 | August 16th 03 06:14 PM |