A Snow and ski forum. SkiBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SkiBanter forum » Skiing Newsgroups » Nordic Skiing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Marwe 610C versus 610



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 25th 09, 06:04 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
Dell Todd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Marwe 610C versus 610

Hi RSN'ers

Last night a buddy of mine & I rollerskied (I know! So early in the
season!) and he had some shiny new very fancy looking Marwes which
could be mistaken for Fischers. Slick graphics.

They turn out to be the 610 "C" Model for $399 and the 610 standard
model is still available for the old $349.

They seemed to me to be much faster than the standard 610s.

Do you have any experience with these new Marwe's? What is the word on
the street about the two? What is the intent?

The website doesnt help - they are both medium speed so, what gives?

Thanks.

DT
Ads
  #2  
Old August 25th 09, 07:32 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
Bob Schwartz[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default Marwe 610C versus 610

Dell Todd wrote:
Hi RSN'ers

Last night a buddy of mine & I rollerskied (I know! So early in the
season!) and he had some shiny new very fancy looking Marwes which
could be mistaken for Fischers. Slick graphics.

They turn out to be the 610 "C" Model for $399 and the 610 standard
model is still available for the old $349.

They seemed to me to be much faster than the standard 610s.

Do you have any experience with these new Marwe's? What is the word on
the street about the two? What is the intent?

The website doesnt help - they are both medium speed so, what gives?

Thanks.

DT


The standard 610s are wooden. The website lists 610Cs as having
a unique Nanoepoxy Aircell Core Cap. Which doesn't sound like
wood.

Don't know anything more than that. I like my 610s, maybe they
needed a reason for people to pay $50 more. Standard 610s
aren't terribly fast.

Bob Schwartz
  #3  
Old August 25th 09, 07:54 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 572
Default Marwe 610C versus 610

It'd be a good question for Greg Weir or Tom Novack at Finn Sisu (888-finn-sisu). If you find out what the Nanoepoxy Aircell Core Cap is, please let us know.

Gene

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Dell Todd wrote:

Hi RSN'ers

Last night a buddy of mine & I rollerskied (I know! So early in the
season!) and he had some shiny new very fancy looking Marwes which
could be mistaken for Fischers. Slick graphics.

They turn out to be the 610 "C" Model for $399 and the 610 standard
model is still available for the old $349.

They seemed to me to be much faster than the standard 610s.

Do you have any experience with these new Marwe's? What is the word on
the street about the two? What is the intent?

The website doesnt help - they are both medium speed so, what gives?

Thanks.

DT

  #4  
Old August 26th 09, 02:12 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
DAT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Marwe 610C versus 610

Greg says the C model has a cap ski shaft. Same wheel speed as ol'
woody 610 standard. Perhaps one of my buddies ended up with dirt in
the bearings (slower) and the guy with new ones has the speed the
Marwe's should all have. The speed parts are all the same in either
model.

They are slick looking though, very flash.

I guess ya gotta have nano nanos these days
  #5  
Old August 26th 09, 07:11 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 572
Default Marwe 610C versus 610

If you ever get a chance to compare with the woodies, pass along your impressions.

Gene

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
DAT wrote:

Greg says the C model has a cap ski shaft. Same wheel speed as ol'
woody 610 standard. Perhaps one of my buddies ended up with dirt in
the bearings (slower) and the guy with new ones has the speed the
Marwe's should all have. The speed parts are all the same in either
model.

They are slick looking though, very flash.

I guess ya gotta have nano nanos these days

  #6  
Old September 22nd 09, 08:30 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
Iain Ballentine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Marwe 610C versus 610

On Aug 26, 8:11 pm, wrote:
If you ever get a chance to compare with the woodies, pass along your impressions.

Hello folks, the main difference with the new 610C ski is that it is
more torsionally stiff. In other words, like with the newer racing
skis on snow, they do not twist as much. But there is still much the
same spring when you push downwards on them. The wheels are exactly
the same as with the standard 610, so there should not be much
difference speed-wise. The ski component is made in collaboration
with Peltonen, the Finnish maker of racing skis. Hope this helps - I
had much the same questions, and had a good chat with Marwe about it,

Iain Ballentine
www.rollerski.co.uk (UK Marwe dealer)



Gene

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:12:48 -0700 (PDT)

DAT wrote:
Greg says the C model has a cap ski shaft. Same wheel speed as ol'
woody 610 standard. Perhaps one of my buddies ended up with dirt in
the bearings (slower) and the guy with new ones has the speed the
Marwe's should all have. The speed parts are all the same in either
model.


They are slick looking though, very flash.


I guess ya gotta have nano nanos these days


  #7  
Old September 22nd 09, 10:22 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 572
Default Marwe 610C versus 610

I wonder if those of us short of elite would be able to tell the
difference in torsional stiffness. Now if it's rolling and
vertical (push-off) stiffness, we certainly would.

Gene

On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Iain Ballentine wrote:

On Aug 26, 8:11 pm, wrote:
If you ever get a chance to compare with the woodies, pass along
your impressions.

Hello folks, the main difference with the new 610C ski is that it is
more torsionally stiff. In other words, like with the newer racing
skis on snow, they do not twist as much. But there is still much the
same spring when you push downwards on them. The wheels are exactly
the same as with the standard 610, so there should not be much
difference speed-wise. The ski component is made in collaboration
with Peltonen, the Finnish maker of racing skis. Hope this helps - I
had much the same questions, and had a good chat with Marwe about it,

Iain Ballentine
www.rollerski.co.uk (UK Marwe dealer)



Gene

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:12:48 -0700 (PDT)

DAT wrote:
Greg says the C model has a cap ski shaft. Same wheel speed as ol'
woody 610 standard. Perhaps one of my buddies ended up with dirt
in the bearings (slower) and the guy with new ones has the speed
the Marwe's should all have. The speed parts are all the same in
either model.


They are slick looking though, very flash.


I guess ya gotta have nano nanos these days


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Feel of Marwe 610s versus Jenex V2 105s mountainwalker Nordic Skiing 14 December 15th 06 10:34 PM
Marwe 610; First 150kms Jim Howe Nordic Skiing 16 July 8th 05 06:33 PM
shoulder twist in skating? Swenson versus Alsgard versus [email protected] Nordic Skiing 1 December 10th 03 04:37 PM
shoulder twist in skating? Swenson versus Alsgard versus Ken Roberts Nordic Skiing 0 December 10th 03 11:23 AM
Marwe Wheels Jay Tegeder Nordic Skiing 0 September 30th 03 10:35 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SkiBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.