If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Still More Information for your perusal
Here's a well thought out proposal from an academic:
http://tinyurl.com/25yxw5 This appears to be a really practical and enforceable plan that can be adopted by the developing third world countries where the vast majority of population growth is occurring. A more practical solution would be to drop nuclear devices on the largest 100 metropolitan areas - snuff out all those SUV's, kill billions and create a nuclear winter. By the way, here's that link to the petition I was talking about. http://www.oism.org/pproject/ More food for thought: http://tinyurl.com/7y37e http://tinyurl.com/237yde I also saw an article about a tremendous amount of infighting at Bali among nations. That is what prompted the "oblivion" statement by the Secretary General. Everyone wants the other guy to make the "sacrifices". Sounds like a real consensus to me. When politics and money become involved, the real truth gets trampled. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Still More Information for your perusal
On Dec 12, 10:28 am, Doofus Fighter
wrote: Here's a well thought out proposal from an academic: http://tinyurl.com/25yxw5 This appears to be a really practical and enforceable plan that can be adopted by the developing third world countries where the vast majority of population growth is occurring. A more practical solution would be to drop nuclear devices on the largest 100 metropolitan areas - snuff out all those SUV's, kill billions and create a nuclear winter. By the way, here's that link to the petition I was talking about. http://www.oism.org/pproject/ On further research, Dr. Seitz and his petition project smells like a fraud. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Still More Information for your perusal
In article
, Doofus Fighter wrote: By the way, here's that link to the petition I was talking about. http://www.oism.org/pproject/ You are truly an idiot, if you think that petition is valid, or carries any weight, Vinnie. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Still More Information for your perusal
On Dec 13, 10:15 am, Ted Waldron wrote:
In article , Doofus Fighter wrote: By the way, here's that link to the petition I was talking about. http://www.oism.org/pproject/ You are truly an idiot, if you think that petition is valid, or carries any weight, Vinnie. Only to mindless drones like you, Ted. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Still More Information for your perusal
On Dec 13, 12:56 pm, comadrejo wrote:
In article , Doofus Fighter wrote: On Dec 13, 10:15 am, Ted Waldron wrote: In article , Doofus Fighter wrote: By the way, here's that link to the petition I was talking about. http://www.oism.org/pproject/ You are truly an idiot, if you think that petition is valid, or carries any weight, Vinnie. Only to mindless drones like you, Ted. Sorry, Vinnie, but if you actually know what "OISM" is about, and how it is looney outfit relying on selling nuclear survival and home schooling kits, only an idiot believes that the petition and Dr.Seitz has any validity on the AGW. You have shown you have no idea what you are talking about, nor thinking that you have some special insight about AGW. The only non dubious source you have quoted in your rants, has been Bugs Bunny. Al Gore isn't the issue, nor is he the subject matter of this story.. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1211233433.htm Your site is biased and deliberately manipulating information. Wait a minute, isn't that what you people have been saying about me. What makes your site any more valid than any of the ones I presented. I know - because it supports your position, right? Dumbass lemming. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Still More Information for your perusal
On Dec 13, 11:15 am, Doofus Fighter
wrote: On Dec 13, 12:56 pm, comadrejo wrote: In article , Doofus Fighter wrote: On Dec 13, 10:15 am, Ted Waldron wrote: In article , Doofus Fighter wrote: By the way, here's that link to the petition I was talking about. http://www.oism.org/pproject/ You are truly an idiot, if you think that petition is valid, or carries any weight, Vinnie. Only to mindless drones like you, Ted. Sorry, Vinnie, but if you actually know what "OISM" is about, and how it is looney outfit relying on selling nuclear survival and home schooling kits, only an idiot believes that the petition and Dr.Seitz has any validity on the AGW. You have shown you have no idea what you are talking about, nor thinking that you have some special insight about AGW. The only non dubious source you have quoted in your rants, has been Bugs Bunny. Al Gore isn't the issue, nor is he the subject matter of this story.. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1211233433.htm Your site is biased and deliberately manipulating information. Wait a minute, isn't that what you people have been saying about me. What makes your site any more valid than any of the ones I presented. I know - because it supports your position, right? Dumbass lemming. Why do you say sciencedaily.com is biased? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Still More Information for your perusal
In article
, Doofus Fighter wrote: On Dec 13, 12:56 pm, comadrejo wrote: In article , Doofus Fighter wrote: On Dec 13, 10:15 am, Ted Waldron wrote: In article , Doofus Fighter wrote: By the way, here's that link to the petition I was talking about. http://www.oism.org/pproject/ You are truly an idiot, if you think that petition is valid, or carries any weight, Vinnie. Only to mindless drones like you, Ted. Sorry, Vinnie, but if you actually know what "OISM" is about, and how it is looney outfit relying on selling nuclear survival and home schooling kits, only an idiot believes that the petition and Dr.Seitz has any validity on the AGW. You have shown you have no idea what you are talking about, nor thinking that you have some special insight about AGW. The only non dubious source you have quoted in your rants, has been Bugs Bunny. Al Gore isn't the issue, nor is he the subject matter of this story.. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1211233433.htm Your site is biased and deliberately manipulating information. Wait a minute, isn't that what you people have been saying about me. What makes your site any more valid than any of the ones I presented. I know - because it supports your position, right? Dumbass lemming. Supports my position?!?! If you actually read the article, it explains how Dr.Steffen and his group acquired their data and explain their conclusions. The CIRES findings are opened for peer reviewed inquiry. http://cires.colorado.edu/science/groups/steffen/ There findings are more valid than the garbage you are spewing here, because they aren't using paid shills from the petroleum and energy companies like Christopher Walter, aka Lord Monckton.. that you posted here.. http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/925 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More Information for your perusal | Doofus Fighter | Alpine Skiing | 2 | December 12th 07 03:19 PM |
No "Information Tower" at Whistler | Ron - N.Y | Alpine Skiing | 35 | June 25th 06 01:19 AM |
Les Gets - information | steve a | European Ski Resorts | 4 | January 26th 04 11:12 AM |
Courses and more information | Justin Bischoff | Backcountry Skiing | 7 | September 17th 03 07:30 PM |