If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Avalanche "prevention" --- during ski hours?
We just had an avalanche at our local ski area ("Ski Lee" in Lee Canyon, Las
Vegas). The area is visible in the background he http://hwstock.org/nss/html/pan05NsisSnow_6128-9.htm As it stands right now, unless a miracle ensues, at least one person is lost. I was snowshoeing nearby (on a parallel ridge) scouting out possible backcountry runs, and I kept hearing explosions (at least 10), as the resort was attempting to release "dangerous" pre-avalanche loads. These explosions all took place several hours after the resort had opened, and the slopes were crowded with people. The weather changed to light rain at 8800', the snow got heavy, and we headed back to the car and left. The avalanche occurred about 2 hours after we left. Some people reported that a skier was swept off the chairlift. Two were rescued (dug out), one known victim is still missing, and there are several cars, yet unidentified, left in the parking lot after dark. So, my question: Do resorts often try to preen slopes of avalanche material, by explosions, during ski hours? This resort is small, and all skiable slopes have pretty much just one runout. The ski slopes end at natural avalanche chutes up on the cliffs. Sorry if this question seems naive; all the footage I've seen in the past, of man-made avalanches at ski resorts, showed explosions being set in areas that were closed to skiing for the time of the operation. I was quite surprised to hear so many explosions during such an active day at the ski area, since there aren't too many places for the loose snow to go, except down into the central start area by the lifts. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:39:03 GMT, "H.W. Stockman"
wrote: We just had an avalanche at our local ski area ("Ski Lee" in Lee Canyon, Las Vegas). The area is visible in the background he http://hwstock.org/nss/html/pan05NsisSnow_6128-9.htm As it stands right now, unless a miracle ensues, at least one person is lost. I was snowshoeing nearby (on a parallel ridge) scouting out possible backcountry runs, and I kept hearing explosions (at least 10), as the resort was attempting to release "dangerous" pre-avalanche loads. These explosions all took place several hours after the resort had opened, and the slopes were crowded with people. The weather changed to light rain at 8800', the snow got heavy, and we headed back to the car and left. In my experience, avalanche control is done on slopes that have no chance of taking out customers for obvious reasons. I've seen it routinely done during ski hours, but only in drainages that were empty except for patrol and a couple of lift operators. I found an article on this accident here; http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_ho.../25633446.html If the slope was open, then a/c would not have been going on there, since even without the danger of avalanches there's the danger of blowing up your customers. So if there were skiers/riders on the slope then it was probably set off by them. The article is not clear, but it sounds as if the slope was open. Of course it's also possible that someone completely ****ed up, but setting off an avalanche and taking out the lift with people on it would take an almost unimaginable lapse in judgement. From my experience watching it over the years, the patrol is typically cautious to the point of paranoia about customer safety. DCraig. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... [...] In my experience, avalanche control is done on slopes that have no chance of taking out customers for obvious reasons. I've seen it routinely done during ski hours, but only in drainages that were empty except for patrol and a couple of lift operators. I found an article on this accident here; http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_ho.../25633446.html If the slope was open, then a/c would not have been going on there, since even without the danger of avalanches there's the danger of blowing up your customers. So if there were skiers/riders on the slope then it was probably set off by them. The article is not clear, but it sounds as if the slope was open. I'm hoping it wasn't a screw-up, just a bad coincidence. But I am curious about the warning to motorists not to honk horns, etc., because the noise might set off another avalanche. The original explosions sure were loud -- even though we were two ridges away and not in line-of-sight. I guess this warning was of the "let's-cover-all-bases type", but I bet some lawyer siezes on it. The forest service has been warning BC skiers and snowshoers to stay out of the mountains for two weeks. We got a little bold yesterday, but stayed off of steep slopes, and kept to areas where there were no obvious historical avalanche tracks. The ski area is in a bowl right below many obvious avalanche tracks, but the most popular run seems to be "protected" by a promontory of unscarred forest. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Kurt Knisely" wrote in message ... In article , says... [...] http://www.avalanche.org/av-reports/...p3?OID=5406924 I get the feeling someone ****ed up. The first thing I thought about were lawsuits and that cute little ski area closing up. Wild, just wild--Snowboarder dies in avalanche riding on ski lift in Vegas. I wonder if anything like this has ever happend in this hemisphere before? I know this may sound like a "duh!", but I spoke with someone who was on the slopes right before the accident, and he said the avalanche control (the big booms) was being performed on closed, isolated runs. The ski area carries insurance; they may get to use it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I wonder if the kid who was swept off the lift had his bar down. I'm
certainly not trying to imply that if it had been down, he would have been fine, but I am curious. -simon- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
And it might not be renewed. No, it might get more expencive, but I can't see them loosing their policy, outright. No matter how this plays out, it certainly won't be the biggest **** up in the history of ski resort liability claims. Or the biggest pay-out. -simon- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article . net, H.W. Stockman wrote: So, my question: Do resorts often try to preen slopes of avalanche material, by explosions, during ski hours? _ Yes, that is very common practice, however the runout zones are supposed to be clear of people[1]. They have to do it on a fairly regular basis to avoid setting off a really big avalanche. _ They may have set off a much bigger avalanche than intended. This has been known to happen, but generally it's only the ski patrol that is affected. (i.e. the explosion causes an avalanche to break above them, rather than below ). More likely there was a repeat of the 1982 Alpine Meadows tragedy and a slope avalanched that nobody ever expected to be a threat. _ Given the size of this storm cycle, I expect we'll be seeing lot's of avalanches in unexpected places. I recently heard on the news that the Sierra hasn't had this much snow this early since 1916. Bombs can help with the normal predictable avalanche threat, but 100 year avalanches are pretty hard to get a handle on. And this seems like a 100 year storm cycle. When there's this much loading, avalanches can run a long ways. Even though you may be on normally "safe" ground you need to be aware of what is above you in the valley. Weak layer collapses can propagate from the flat ground in the valley to steeper terrain and a cornice breaking off can cause avalanches on relatively low angle terrain. Trees are no guarantee of safety. _ Booker C. Bense [1]_ From what I see at places like Alpine Meadows and Sugar Bowl, the "typical" runout zones are clear, but being truly 100% sure would mean closing the entire resort and the roads running into it. Google for "1982 Alpine Meadows Avalanche" to seem what I mean. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBQeLca2TWTAjn5N/lAQFoyQP8CJ06g9DdRm+jpbZG/7DRVv+q5fdNj6O2 hNuz1YmE7pn3XnhLqRdvGGioLoz1wfbf6RKuq613+BTvSU+reL mb0m7m6ITrvLhb lRGLcAq9+NC9sVeLJOK0OyNuzedbteALQSuHBGob5kytainvB6 WKihcFL+sotsVF wurzwzvHeqM= =2rIw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Simon Isbister" wrote in message news:PQAEd.78650$dv1.12570@edtnps89... I wonder if the kid who was swept off the lift had his bar down. I'm certainly not trying to imply that if it had been down, he would have been fine, but I am curious. Initial reports say his bar was down, and he actually tried to brace himself on the bar. The force of the avalanche was supposedly quite hard, and the speculation is that he was immediately knocked unconscious, if not immediately dealt a fatal blow (there was a lot of debri in the flow -- pieces of trees, rocks, etc.) The news just reported that he was found under 25 feet of hardened snow. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
H.W. Stockman wrote:
: Initial reports say his bar was down, and he actually tried to brace himself : on the bar. The force of the avalanche was supposedly quite hard, and the : speculation is that he was immediately knocked unconscious, if not : immediately dealt a fatal blow (there was a lot of debri in the flow -- : pieces of trees, rocks, etc.) The news just reported that he was found : under 25 feet of hardened snow. what i don't follow is how an avy can get to you when you're up on a lift. did he fall off the lift due to the shock of the avy hitting the lift tower? everything reads as if the avy swept him off the lift- which would mean it would have also snagged the chair, etc, which obviously didn't happen, since others on the lift survived. this doesn't appear to be spelled out very clearly in any of these reports. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt" wrote in message ... H.W. Stockman wrote: : Initial reports say his bar was down, and he actually tried to brace himself : on the bar. The force of the avalanche was supposedly quite hard, and the : speculation is that he was immediately knocked unconscious, if not : immediately dealt a fatal blow (there was a lot of debri in the flow -- : pieces of trees, rocks, etc.) The news just reported that he was found : under 25 feet of hardened snow. what i don't follow is how an avy can get to you when you're up on a lift. did he fall off the lift due to the shock of the avy hitting the lift tower? everything reads as if the avy swept him off the lift- which would mean it would have also snagged the chair, etc, which obviously didn't happen, since others on the lift survived. this doesn't appear to be spelled out very clearly in any of these reports. I think he was in the first chair, which was about to come to the top of the lift, so the chair was closer to the ground at that point (than the chairs behind). The avalanche was suppposedly quite high. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Avalanche Center Fall Update | Avalanche Center | Alpine Skiing | 5 | October 8th 03 11:42 PM |
Avalanche Center Fall Update | Avalanche Center | Snowboarding | 3 | October 8th 03 08:42 PM |
Avalanche Center Fall Update | Avalanche Center | North American Ski Resorts | 0 | October 8th 03 07:54 PM |
Avalanche Center Fall Update | Avalanche Center | Nordic Skiing | 0 | October 8th 03 07:53 PM |
Avalanche Center Fall Update | Avalanche Center | Backcountry Skiing | 0 | October 8th 03 07:53 PM |