If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
Two Buddha wrote:
Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake. A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing board while hiding his identity Your "licensing board", Schattie? BWAHAHAHA! What sort of licensing board is that? By the way, you haven't responded to this: Thanks for admitting that you broke the law. Here is a chart describing the various types of restraining order in WA state: http://www.wscadv.org/Resources/Comp...ders_11_06.pdf Your order must have been either a "No Contact Order" or a regular "Restraining Order". Violating either results in mandatory arrest, possible criminal contempt charges, and a charge of "Gross Misdemeanor". A Gross Misdemeanor in WA state is punishable by up to 1 year in jail and/or a $5,000 dollar fine. See below: http://www.wsba.org/media/publicatio...s/criminal.htm You've admitted to a Gross Misdemeanor under WA law. Punishable by a year in jail. Dave |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
On May 13, 11:32 pm, Dave Cartman wrote:
In article .com, pigo wrote: On May 13, 6:09 pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Your lies still go onward: you did it anonymously and you are well aware that such complaints are kept anonymous. Wow! DOUBLE anonymous!!! So what makes you so sure that Richard made a complaint against you? Besides your finally tuned conspiracy sensing apparatus, that is. And let us not forget that there is no "licensing" involved. It is merely a _registration_. Licensing infers that there are qualifications and oversight. Registration means just sign up. There is quite a large controversy in Washington over the unqualified and inept people _registered_ as counselors with no training at all. OMG you're right! They don't require ANY training but they do require this: Don't act so surprised. I'm certified to be right 99.995% of the time! :-) "To be certified as a Peer Counselor a person must meet these criteria: 1) self-identify as a consumer who is receiving or has received mental health services." Well then. At least we know he's "qualified". http://www1.dshs.wa.gov/word/hrsa/mh/peerfactsheet.doc And here is an excerpt from the application: (and I swear I didn't make this up) "Question 1 Describe your experiences as a mental health consumer? Was it with the public or private system?" http://www1.dshs.wa.gov/word/hrsa/mh...Questions_8_1_ 06_Bonnie.doc - Looks like you *do* have to be crazy to work there How perfectly does this fit in with the rest of his persona ! Do you think it's a paid position? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
On May 13, 1:31 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake. A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so, whines about being labeled a stalker. Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking. Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy from lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a defamatory lie. Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you conspire to harm the truthteller. Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he doesn't have the balls to do so in person..... Jeez.. if you are going to whine about something, at least whine about something that has some merit... Your "license" was worth less than the "registration fee" you paid for it..... http://tinyurl.com/2px8eb |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
On May 15, 2:38 pm, wrote:
On May 13, 1:31 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote: Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake. A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so, whines about being labeled a stalker. Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking. Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy from lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a defamatory lie. Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you conspire to harm the truthteller. Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he doesn't have the balls to do so in person..... Jeez.. if you are going to whine about something, at least whine about something that has some merit... Your "license" was worth less than the "registration fee" you paid for it..... http://tinyurl.com/2px8eb How odd? He seems to have disappeared again. Which spank do you think it was? This one? Or the pressure to PPOSTFU? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
On May 16, 5:42 am, pigo wrote:
On May 15, 2:38 pm, wrote: On May 13, 1:31 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote: Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake. A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so, whines about being labeled a stalker. Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking. Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy from lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a defamatory lie. Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you conspire to harm the truthteller. Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he doesn't have the balls to do so in person..... Jeez.. if you are going to whine about something, at least whine about something that has some merit... Your "license" was worth less than the "registration fee" you paid for it..... http://tinyurl.com/2px8eb How odd? He seems to have disappeared again. Which spank do you think it was? This one? Or the pressure to PPOSTFU?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The comparison to Ann Coulter. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
"pigo" wrote in message
oups.com... On May 13, 6:09 pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Your lies still go onward: you did it anonymously and you are well aware that such complaints are kept anonymous. Wow! DOUBLE anonymous!!! So what makes you so sure that Richard made a complaint against you? Besides your finally tuned conspiracy sensing apparatus, that is. And let us not forget that there is no "licensing" involved. It is merely a _registration_. Licensing infers that there are qualifications and oversight. Registration means just sign up. There is quite a large controversy in Washington over the unqualified and inept people _registered_ as counselors with no training at all. Really? Wouldn't know. I'm well educated, quite qualified, and well trained. Not just in psychology and addictionn. No controversy in Utah about Bob Thompson: EVERYONE thinks he's a dickless coward and pathological liar. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
"pigo" wrote in message
ups.com... On May 13, 11:32 pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article .com, pigo wrote: On May 13, 6:09 pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Your lies still go onward: you did it anonymously and you are well aware that such complaints are kept anonymous. Wow! DOUBLE anonymous!!! So what makes you so sure that Richard made a complaint against you? Besides your finally tuned conspiracy sensing apparatus, that is. And let us not forget that there is no "licensing" involved. It is merely a _registration_. Licensing infers that there are qualifications and oversight. Registration means just sign up. There is quite a large controversy in Washington over the unqualified and inept people _registered_ as counselors with no training at all. OMG you're right! They don't require ANY training but they do require this: Don't act so surprised. I'm certified to be right 99.995% of the time! :-) "To be certified as a Peer Counselor a person must meet these criteria: 1) self-identify as a consumer who is receiving or has received mental health services." Well then. At least we know he's "qualified". http://www1.dshs.wa.gov/word/hrsa/mh/peerfactsheet.doc And here is an excerpt from the application: (and I swear I didn't make this up) "Question 1 Describe your experiences as a mental health consumer? Was it with the public or private system?" http://www1.dshs.wa.gov/word/hrsa/mh...Questions_8_1_ 06_Bonnie.doc - Looks like you *do* have to be crazy to work there How perfectly does this fit in with the rest of his persona ! Do you think it's a paid position? Amazing. Two sick freaks joining in a defamatory lie fest. No surprise two dickless cowards like each other, they have so much in common. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
Geez, Dave, no problem.
Now discuss the FELONIES your buddies committed to get that order, the lies they told, etc. Seeing as the order was based completely on lies, false allegations, and gross defamation, with not a shred of evidence, I think that someone like you would be concerned about your friends so grossly and deliberately breaking the law. Discuss. -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Dave Stallard" wrote in message . .. Two Buddha wrote: Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake. A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing board while hiding his identity Your "licensing board", Schattie? BWAHAHAHA! What sort of licensing board is that? By the way, you haven't responded to this: Thanks for admitting that you broke the law. Here is a chart describing the various types of restraining order in WA state: http://www.wscadv.org/Resources/Comp...ders_11_06.pdf Your order must have been either a "No Contact Order" or a regular "Restraining Order". Violating either results in mandatory arrest, possible criminal contempt charges, and a charge of "Gross Misdemeanor". A Gross Misdemeanor in WA state is punishable by up to 1 year in jail and/or a $5,000 dollar fine. See below: http://www.wsba.org/media/publicatio...s/criminal.htm You've admitted to a Gross Misdemeanor under WA law. Punishable by a year in jail. Dave |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
No surprise. A stalking lying freak minimizes the real world stalking of a
fellow stalking lying freak. Of course, none of them have ever had the balls to stalk me in person....because the stalking would end. Permanently. -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com wrote in message oups.com... On May 13, 1:31 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote: Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake. A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so, whines about being labeled a stalker. Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking. Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy from lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a defamatory lie. Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you conspire to harm the truthteller. Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he doesn't have the balls to do so in person..... Jeez.. if you are going to whine about something, at least whine about something that has some merit... Your "license" was worth less than the "registration fee" you paid for it..... http://tinyurl.com/2px8eb |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Henry, Stalking Freak.
You truly are a psychopathic freak, Henry. A laughable, despicable,
dickless usenet wimp. You belong here. -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Richard Henry" wrote in message oups.com... On May 16, 5:42 am, pigo wrote: On May 15, 2:38 pm, wrote: On May 13, 1:31 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote: Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake. A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so, whines about being labeled a stalker. Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking. Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy from lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a defamatory lie. Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you conspire to harm the truthteller. Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he doesn't have the balls to do so in person..... Jeez.. if you are going to whine about something, at least whine about something that has some merit... Your "license" was worth less than the "registration fee" you paid for it..... http://tinyurl.com/2px8eb How odd? He seems to have disappeared again. Which spank do you think it was? This one? Or the pressure to PPOSTFU?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The comparison to Ann Coulter. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|