If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Don't show this to your skier buddies...
Just saw this while "snurfin" the web...will have to see if it comes
true. I doubt it. The Mobile Guide: Skiers Beware Riders of the Apocalypse By Alex Kozinski. 15 March 1995, The Wall Street Journal, A12 (PDF scan) Mark my words: 25 years or so from now your grandchild will climb on your knee and ask, "Hey, Grandpa (or Grandma), I heard that when you were a kid they used to saw snowboards in half and put one piece on each foot. Why'd they do that?" Stumped for an answer, you'll mumble something like, "It was a plot hatched by orthopedists." Sound ridiculous? Don't be so sure. Children, unburdened by the prejudices and vanities of their elders, are voting with their feet and deserting skiing for snowboarding in droves. My sons skied for years, but now they're out snowboarding while their skis gather dust. Curious, I decided to give snowboarding a try, and that's the last my own skis saw the slopes. Snowboards are here to stay and, like compact disks and touch-tone phones, they'll push out the outdated technology everyone thought was irreplaceable. Here are just a few reasons why: Skiing is hard; snowboarding's easy. You can spend many years and the GNP of New Guinea on lessons and still be a mediocre skier, but you can become a darn good snowboarder in no time at all. Yes, that includes klutzniks; I should know. Skiing mangles knees; snowboarding doesn't. Skiing is inherently dangerous because it requires you to strap each foot to a separate object. During a fall these objects often move in different directions, putting torque on the nearest joint -- usually the knee. Quick-release bindings reduce the hazard, but highly debilitating, often permanent, knee injuries continue to be a major risk of skiing. Snowboarders (or, as they prefer to be called, "riders") seldom suffer such injuries because they keep both feet firmly attached to the same object. Riders do get injured from falls and collisions, but so do skiers. You can reduce such injuries by wearing a helmet and wrist guards, a wise move no matter how you propel yourself down the mountain. But no one has yet devised foolproof protection from the debilitating joint injuries caused by skiing. Skiing is work; snowboarding's fun. Just watch any good skier and you'll see his legs move as if they were disconnected from the rest of his body. This requires an immense amount of coordination and physical exertion; most skiers never get it right. Maneuvering a snowboard involves small shifts of body weight. This is not only more natural and graceful than skiing, it uses skills that can be practiced year-round in surfing, skateboarding, even bicycling. Skiers hate bad terrain; snowboarders don't care. Listen to skiers after a day on the slopes and you'll hear them complain about ice, moguls, granular snow, wet snow, etc. You seldom hear such complaints from riders because snowboards are nearly as easy to use in bad conditions as in good. The only real complaint snowboarders have is about apres-ski whiners. Ski boots hurt; snowboard boots are comfy. Need I say more? Skiers look dweeby; snowboarders look cool. Most skiers look like overstuffed neon sausages or hearty Tyrolean yodelers who just rolled off the set of "Dumb and Dumber." The only ones on the slope who look like they're having a good time are the riders. Skiing is scary; snowboarding is exhilarating. Watch skiers as they approach a steep ledge. They hesitate, they survey the terrain, they pretend to be enjoying the view. What they're really doing is praying this isn't going to be the day they discover firsthand the miracle of arthroscopic surgery. Riders show no such hesitation because snowboards are designed to keep you in control no matter how steep, icy or mogully the descent. After less than a season on a snowboard, for example, I had no trouble handling any run on the back bowls at Vail. Ski equipment is a pain: snowboarding gear is a breeze. To go snowboarding all you need is a snowboard, which you can sling over your shoulders as you head for the slopes. To go skiing, you have to walk from your car or condo in forward-leaning, rigid shell boots while juggling skis and poles. When you take a spill on the slope, all that equipment gets scattered about (a condition known derisively as a "yard sale"), and you then have to go chasing it, usually uphill. Your snowboard never leaves your feet, thank you. Skis clutter; snowboards are neat. An adult snowboard fits within the trunk of a Ford Taurus, and has a slim profile in a ski locker. Storing and transporting skis, poles and hard boots for a family of four is a job for Bekins. Skiers carry poles; snowboarders have free hands. One of the best things about snowboarding is that you don't always have your hands full. You can throw snowballs, take pictures, or just let your arms swing free. You don't carry poles in your daily life; why should you put up with them when you're having a good time? Skiers have learned to endure a lot of risks and inconveniences, but it all seems so pointless once you've streaked down the mountain on your Burton, without fear or pain, suspended almost weightless between snow and sky. It makes you laugh out loud and wonder, why do all these people split snowboards in half? Skiing is history; snowboarding rules! Mr. Kozinski is a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Jrobb wrote:
Just saw this while "snurfin" the web...will have to see if it comes true. I doubt it. Well a good chunk of it is already false. One wonders if the good judge ever actually rode down any mogul-y, icy slopes after his one year on a board. Neil |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
This could be a reason for the downfall of the us court system as
well...false perceptions by ill advised judges.\ J |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:35:35 GMT, "Jrobb"
allegedly wrote: The Mobile Guide: Skiers Beware Riders of the Apocalypse By Alex Kozinski. 15 March 1995, The Wall Street Journal, A12 (PDF scan) Given that it was written 11 years ago, it sounds about right for the attitude of that time. Snowboarding was taking off quickly and seeing more and more people go to it. At the time it seemed an easy call to say that skiing would be dead once the new generation had made themselves the majority. What we didn't see was the impact that snowboard design and technology would have on skiing itself. Twin tips and carving skis completely revolutionised a stagnant industry. Suddenly skiing became fun again for those that had got stuck in a rut. Some of those that moved to boards, moved back again. Others went to blades. Still others who were new to any form of slope sliding, saw skiing as the first option again. The time to become comfortable on skis has reduced a lot, so it's no longer a question of those that get 1-2 weeks a year going to boarding because it's easier. And it's all the better for it. Whilst the North American resorts were coming around to snowboarding, it was still a minority sport on most hills. Now with a new breed of freestyle skiing, there are a lot more people to please by building epic terrain parks and pristine pipes. So we all benefit. Apart from those on fat skis stealing our powder fields :-) - Dave. -- The only powder to get high on, falls from the sky. http://www.vpas.org/ - Snowboarding the worlds pow pow - Securing your e-mail The Snowboard FAQ lives here - http://rssFAQ.org/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Nevertheless, big fun to read. But I have to agree to my previous speaker:
Icy runs with nice mini-hills produced by anxious skiers are no fun at all. But Powder surely is. "Jrobb" schrieb im Newsbeitrag oups.com... This could be a reason for the downfall of the us court system as well...false perceptions by ill advised judges.\ J |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On 13 Apr 2006 11:23:38 GMT, Switters wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:35:35 GMT, "Jrobb" allegedly wrote: The Mobile Guide: Skiers Beware Riders of the Apocalypse By Alex Kozinski. 15 March 1995, The Wall Street Journal, A12 (PDF scan) Given that it was written 11 years ago, it sounds about right for the attitude of that time. Snowboarding was taking off quickly and seeing more and more people go to it. At the time it seemed an easy call to say that skiing would be dead once the new generation had made themselves the majority. What we didn't see was the impact that snowboard design and technology would have on skiing itself. Twin tips and carving skis completely revolutionised a stagnant industry. Suddenly skiing became fun again for those that had got stuck in a rut. Some of those that moved to boards, moved back again. Others went to blades. Still others who were new to any form of slope sliding, saw skiing as the first option again. All true, and the arguments betweem skiers amd boarders have mostly gone too. I've spent a fair few days this season with skiers, and we tackled the same terrain and had the same fun. Apart from those on fat skis stealing our powder fields :-) This is the bit I find difficult to forgive! -- Champ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Champ wrote:
On 13 Apr 2006 11:23:38 GMT, Switters wrote: On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:35:35 GMT, "Jrobb" allegedly wrote: The Mobile Guide: Skiers Beware Riders of the Apocalypse By Alex Kozinski. 15 March 1995, The Wall Street Journal, A12 (PDF scan) Given that it was written 11 years ago, it sounds about right for the attitude of that time. Snowboarding was taking off quickly and seeing more and more people go to it. At the time it seemed an easy call to say that skiing would be dead once the new generation had made themselves the majority. What we didn't see was the impact that snowboard design and technology would have on skiing itself. Twin tips and carving skis completely revolutionised a stagnant industry. Suddenly skiing became fun again for those that had got stuck in a rut. Some of those that moved to boards, moved back again. Others went to blades. Still others who were new to any form of slope sliding, saw skiing as the first option again. All true, and the arguments betweem skiers amd boarders have mostly gone too. I've spent a fair few days this season with skiers, and we tackled the same terrain and had the same fun. Same here - I'm not fussed who I ride with as long as I have fun. Trouble is we still seem to get a lot of 'gays on trays' jibes from fellow Brits whereas I've never experienced this from continental Europeans or North Americans... Apart from those on fat skis stealing our powder fields :-) This is the bit I find difficult to forgive! lol - at least there's the refuge of *some* space off piste when all the skiers hit the mountains at the weekend! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:05:59 +0100, " cupra"
wrote: All true, and the arguments betweem skiers amd boarders have mostly gone too. I've spent a fair few days this season with skiers, and we tackled the same terrain and had the same fun. Same here - I'm not fussed who I ride with as long as I have fun. Trouble is we still seem to get a lot of 'gays on trays' jibes from fellow Brits whereas I've never experienced this from continental Europeans or North Americans... Yeah, well the British are very class conscious, and a lot of the original antagonism was because skiing was a *very* middle class activity, and boarders tended to be younger and more working class. Not surprised some English are still clinging on to some outdated ideas. (I'm English myself, for ref). -- Champ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Champ wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:05:59 +0100, " cupra" wrote: All true, and the arguments betweem skiers amd boarders have mostly gone too. I've spent a fair few days this season with skiers, and we tackled the same terrain and had the same fun. Same here - I'm not fussed who I ride with as long as I have fun. Trouble is we still seem to get a lot of 'gays on trays' jibes from fellow Brits whereas I've never experienced this from continental Europeans or North Americans... Yeah, well the British are very class conscious, and a lot of the original antagonism was because skiing was a *very* middle class activity, and boarders tended to be younger and more working class. Not surprised some English are still clinging on to some outdated ideas. (I'm English myself, for ref). I'd be interested what young skiers and boarders say to each other these days to see if there's any change in attitude (since I'm turning into an old git these days!) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Just saw this while "snurfin" the web...will have to see if it comes
true. I doubt it. LMAO! As Switters says, its outdated. I have a 3 year old daughter - old enough to ski but a few years before she'll be on a board. It just so happens that hitting the slopes with my grom is *much* easier when I'm also on skis. So, for the first time in 13 years give or take, I've spent some time on two planks this season. Most of it is spent chasing my grom around, but I've spent a little time skiing just to get some practice in so I can set a good example for her. I have a pair of Atomic Metron M11 172's. They retail for more than any snowboard I own, even my beloved Donek Olympic and Coiler Custom, but I scored them "lightly demoed" from a local Atomic rep for a fraction of their cost. There have a 12m sidecut which is tighter than half my snowboards, and *ridiculously* tight for a pair of skis. Have you ever seen those bumper stickers that say "If it were easy it would be called snowboarding"? Fuggetaboutit. Skiing on these M11's is SOOOOOO easy. I skied for about 8 years before switching to snowboarding. I skied parallel but never carved. I was carving on my *second run* on these skis. All you do is tip 'em on edge, point your knees into the turn, bend the inside knee, straighten the outside one, and Presto! You look and feel like a racer. Granted, I spent most of my snoboarding time digging trenches, so I have the feel down from that, but leaving twin trenches on my second run? It's that easy. The boots are still less comfy that snowboard boots - and I ride hardshell snowboard boots most of the time. Hard snowboard boots flex more at the ankle, this is what IMHO makes them more comfy than ski boots. But my $89 Heads from eBay (great deal - probably a little soft, but still very stiff compared to my snowboard hardshells) are not bad. I can ski all day with my grom (no kidding - she went from 10 - 4 last weekend, with two breaks) and my feet don't hurt. I don't use poles. Why would I? These skis are so easy to rail turns on without them. I don't even *own* a pair of poles. Now having said all this, skiiing is still a distant 3rd behind hardboot snowboarding and softboot snowboarding for me. It just feels better. Leaving twin trenches on skis is fun, don't get me wrong. But carving hard on a snowboard is downright exhilterating. Skiinig the downhill edge still feels grouned in some way. Riding the downhill edge on a snowboard feels like you're in suspended animation, especially on a steep slope where you're switching edges while pointed across the hill. Surfing powder on a snowboard is pure nirvana. I probably won't find out what skiing in deep powder is like because I will be on my board instead, but when I picture it in my mind it's not the same. Mike T ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Wisconsin Skier is Upset! | The Wisconsin Skier | Alpine Skiing | 0 | February 14th 06 01:28 PM |
Wasatch Citizens' Series (Utah) Slide Show | Chris Cline | Nordic Skiing | 2 | March 8th 05 03:40 AM |
OT joke: stopped for speeding | Sue White | Alpine Skiing | 0 | March 4th 05 08:01 PM |