If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
redlodge wrote: hey lr, When I say normal shops I mean the massive super stores that carry tons of schlock that people snap up, if you live in a mountain town or have a good board shop you can find the stuff I have. However, we do get access to off the radar brands like Ghost, Compatriot, Illuminati, and a bunch of others. The next time I see a Ghost will be the first. http://www.ghostriderx.com http://www.compatriotsnowboards.com http://www.ill23.com http://www.smokinsnowboards.com Thinking about buying one of those Ghost boards, the Swiss. Got an Atomic last season and it is time for a new ride, just not sure what to get. Not sure what to make of your observation about skinny ankles. My feet are big and my boots fit like a champ, I do have skinny ankles and I like the BOA because I can really tighten it up to make it snug. Kind of works for me but everyone is different so get what makes you happy. I just like the fact that I can walk to the lift with loose boots, ride up, and make a couple of twists and have nice tight boots for riding. No fussing around with laces but that is just me. Thanks for the links! I've only heard about Illuminati. Heck, Smoking Snowboards is in my backyard although I guess they are in North Lake and I'm way way South lake. Their tech page looks like they know what they are doing, I'm definitely going to check them out as SFO snowboards carries them (shop where I go my Nideckers from). Compatriot boards seems interesting, but they only make two models for people with regular size feet (a 155 freestyle and a 162 freeride). What do you like about the Ghost boards? Aside from the hybrid-cap construction, they seem to be really into their glow in the dark base material... what's the ride like? |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
redlodge wrote:
Not sure what to make of your observation about skinny ankles. My feet are big and my boots fit like a champ, I do have skinny ankles and I like the BOA because I can really tighten it up to make it snug. I meant to say that I wanted to really crank down on the ankles... but if I do that, the forefoot area is also tightened (which creates a pressure point on my instep) so I either have to chooes between loose ankle or crushed foot. Heat-moldable liners like the ones in Salomon (and Thirtytwo) help a lot, but I still like to tight each area individually. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks 4 all the information guys. I definately won't buy a burton
binding... Not that I don't like them, they're simply not availible 4 me. I'm just a student and in my country snowboard stuff ain't cheap. My budget is strictly limited. As 4 the boots, I already have ones. I bought the Salomon boots 4 women(the Ivy model?). They make them a bit tighter than those 4 men and my ankles and feet are skinny, this makes them perfect 4 me. And what's also important 4 me, they've got this quick lacing system with kevlar laces... I just can't wait to check their performance. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"redlodge" ) writes: Just some more info for ego the newbie, whatever boots you have take them to the dumpster and pitch them. Then go out and buy a pair of boots with the wire lacing system (BOA). I cannot describe how easy they are to get tight which is essential for boarding. Normal laces are a bitch sometimes (especially when frigid cold) and the BOA system is just turning a knob. Check out this link, it has all the boot companies that carry the system. http://www.boatechnology.com/boa.php...owboard&drill= Simple system that I went for but didn't work well for me. I got rid of my Flow TXP's with BOA becuase it was killing the front part of my ankle; the shape of my foot didn't fit with the shape of the boot when I tightened them up. Its too bad they didn't set them up with two zones to allow you to customize tightness on the top and bottom. Crank it tight and its too much in some areas, and not enough in others. I waffled between Salomon Malamutes and Burton Driver X's and went with the Driver X's because of the narrow fit of the Malamutes didn't fit well. BTW, Driver X is more comfortable and pretty fast to do up as well, just pull on the handle for the lower foot, then again for the upper foot. Steve. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Steven Slaby wrote: Simple system that I went for but didn't work well for me. I got rid of my Flow TXP's with BOA becuase it was killing the front part of my ankle; the shape of my foot didn't fit with the shape of the boot when I tightened them up. Its too bad they didn't set them up with two zones to allow you to customize tightness on the top and bottom. Crank it tight and its too much in some areas, and not enough in others. I waffled between Salomon Malamutes and Burton Driver X's and went with the Driver X's because of the narrow fit of the Malamutes didn't fit well. BTW, Driver X is more comfortable and pretty fast to do up as well, just pull on the handle for the lower foot, then again for the upper foot. Yea, this exactly what I was saying. I have narrow feet and so I went the other way with the Malamutes. I've never seen Burton's Speed Zone Lacing system, but looks a lot like the Salomon system, but from what you say it has a lower and upper foot boot tighteners, which would let you customize the tightness for the two zones which is pretty cool. Including the L-pads with the boot is great as normally you have to take your boot to a bootfitter to do that (and most people don't know they can do that to help heelhold). Also I notice that Burton is putting better-quality footbeds into their boots, which is nice as most companies just stick in a thin foam insole that gets you no arch or heel support. I like it when companies innovate behind your back (although usually tend to hype up the less important but more "cool" stuff they do). |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"lonerider" wrote in message ups.com... Steven Slaby wrote: Simple system that I went for but didn't work well for me. I got rid of my snip - get rid of BOA boots I waffled between Salomon Malamutes and Burton Driver X's and went with the Driver X's because of the narrow fit of the Malamutes didn't fit well. BTW, Driver X is more comfortable and pretty fast to do up as well, just pull on the handle for the lower foot, then again for the upper foot. Snip - Malamutes/Burton take your boot to a bootfitter to do that (and most people don't know they can do that to help heelhold). Also I notice that Burton is putting better-quality footbeds into their boots, which is nice as most companies just stick in a thin foam insole that gets you no arch or heel support. I like it when companies innovate behind your back (although usually tend to hype up the less important but more "cool" stuff they do). I had two pairs of the Malamutes and liked them with my Flows. Switched to the Burton P1 Carbon bindings and switched boots as well to the Burton Ions. BTW- narrow feet 10.5 size. With the J Bar inserts I get I nice tight heel fit. The Dual zone lacing has allowed me to "dial in" how tight I want them. I find that with the cap strap and moving the back straps up higher I don't have to tighten the boots as much as I thought I would so I have warmer feet with less discomfort at the end of the day. With the Carbon highback being so stiff, I went with the "softer" boots. Really like the mix. Didn't have the Driver-Xs in my size so I can't comment on them. Would like to try the SL-8's next year. I think many that don't like Burton think they have sold out to marketing, but I think they have done quite a bit in the technology side in both boards and bindings. Don't have much of their clothing. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
tg wrote: "lonerider" wrote in message ups.com... I find that with the cap strap and moving the back straps up higher I don't have to tighten the boots as much as I thought I would so I have warmer feet with less discomfort at the end of the day. With the Carbon highback being so stiff, I went with the "softer" boots. I too have noticed moving my top strap back and higher I get better responsiveness on toesides. My Nideckers kind of have a "half cap strap" that goes over the toe of the boot... and I've been considering buying Capstraps from my P1MDs... but already fit weally well not. I think many that don't like Burton think they have sold out to marketing, but I think they have done quite a bit in the technology side in both boards and bindings. Don't have much of their clothing. Part of Burton has definitely sold out to marketing... they definitely make a lot of items that are more marketing hype than anything else (like a board with "recessed" edges specifically for jibbing). However, I agree they do still surprising me occasionally with some good down-to-earth product innovation and improvement. I see it as I can recommend certain products from Burton... but I can't recommend *any* product from the company like I can with Ride, Salomon, Nitro, Nidecker where even the entry-level stuff is pretty solid. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bindings from straight skiis suitable for for shaped? | [email protected] | Alpine Skiing | 7 | October 14th 05 05:48 PM |
salomon bindings / burton boards | Joe | Snowboarding | 6 | December 18th 03 09:48 PM |
Mounting alpine bindings | Terry Hill | Alpine Skiing | 26 | December 6th 03 05:51 AM |
Mount Bindings | Schmoe | Alpine Skiing | 12 | November 15th 03 03:02 PM |
Atomic Ski Bindings - 4.12 or 6.14 which is better for me? | Christopher Luke | Alpine Skiing | 7 | August 10th 03 03:40 PM |