A Snow and ski forum. SkiBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SkiBanter forum » Skiing Newsgroups » Nordic Skiing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Let The European and North American Olympics Winter Games Begin



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 6th 06, 01:40 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Let The European and North American Olympics Winter Games Begin

Where the Rich and Elite Meet to Compete
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...020302280.html

Where the Rich and Elite Meet to Compete

By Paul Farhi
Sunday, February 5, 2006; B01

Never mind the usual puffery about what this month's Winter Olympics
are all about. Sure, there's the beauty of sports, the spirit of
friendly competition, the dedication of great athletes and all that.
But the Winter Games are about a few other things as well: elitism,
exclusion and the triumph of the world's sporting haves over its have
nots.

What the Winter Games are not is a truly international sporting
competition that brings the best of the world together to compete, as
the promotional blather would have you believe. Unlike the widely
attended Summer Olympics, the winter version is almost exclusively the
preserve of a narrow, generally wealthy, predominantly Caucasian
collection of athletes and nations. In fact, I'd suggest that the name
of the Winter Games, which start Friday, be changed. They could be more
accurately branded "The European and North American Expensive Sports
Festival."

Throughout most of the Winter Olympics' history, the parade of
participating nations has been a short one. Until as recently as 1994,
fewer than a third of the planet's countries took part. This year, in
Turin, Italy, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) expects
delegations from about 85 countries, an all-time high, but still barely
43 percent of the world's total. Even that exaggerates the extent of
participation. Many of the nations in the Opening Ceremonies will be
represented by tokens, some consisting entirely of sports bureaucrats,
not athletes. Ethiopia, a nation of 73 million, will send its first
"team" to a Winter Olympics this year -- a single skier.

As always, the biggest delegations, and the big winners, will come from
a familiar pool. In the history of the winter competition, dating from
its inception in 1924, competitors from only six countries -- the
Soviet Union/Russia, Germany (East, West and combined), Norway, the
United States, Austria and Finland, in that order -- have won almost
two-thirds of all the medals awarded. Only 17 countries have ever
amassed more than 10 medals during the past 19 winter Olympiads. Only
38 countries have won even one medal.

This had turned the Winter Olympics into a remarkably insular
competition. The Czech Republic (and Czechoslovakia before it) has won
more medals than China, home to about one-fifth of humanity. Norway, a
nation with a population smaller than metropolitan Washington, has won
three times as many winter medals as the nations of Asia, Latin and
South America, Australia and Polynesia, the Middle East and the
Caribbean Basin combined.

By contrast, the all-time list of summer winners is long and deep,
extending to athletes from 143 countries, including such places as
Tonga, Paraguay and Burundi. The Summer Games have medal hogs, too, but
nothing like winter ones. The top six in the summer -- the United
States, the Soviet Union/Russia, Germany, France, Britain and Italy --
have swept up slightly more than half the medals since the modern games
started in 1896.

Obviously, the climate and terrain in, say, Indonesia or Aruba aren't
highly conducive to molding superstar aerial skiers and biathlon
champions. But it's not just the presence or absence of snow and ice
that determines Winter Olympics success, or even participation. If it
were, some of America's best ice skaters and speedskaters wouldn't live
and train in Southern California or Florida. If it were, athletes from
countries like Peru, Chile, Nepal, Morocco, Afghanistan and Ethiopia --
all blessed with soaring, snow-covered mountains -- would be marching
en masse in the Opening Ceremonies and fighting for the medal stand.

Instead, the more telling factors are economic. Would-be Winter
Olympians need years of training, coaching and competition if they're
going to make it to the Games. All of these things require massive sums
of money. A bobsled (or bobsleigh, in official IOC-speak) costs about
$35,000, to say nothing of what it costs to build an Olympic-caliber
bobsled run. A pair of speedskates might be relatively cheap, but how
many countries have speedskating rinks? Most nations, even those with
plenty of snow and cold, simply can't afford such extravagances.

Remember the Jamaican bobsled team? Those lovable underdogs endeared
themselves to many with their participation in the 1988 games in
Calgary (the four-man team was the subject of the 1993 Disney movie
"Cool Runnings" and finished a surprisingly high 14th in 1994). Less
well-known is what happened -- or didn't happen -- to the Jamaicans in
the 2002 games in Salt Lake City: They didn't show up. The team ran out
of funding and had to stay home.

Unlike the Winter Games, the Summer Olympics level many of the
advantages of national wealth, as well as favorable geography and
climate. It takes all the usual things to become a Summer Olympian --
heart, outsized talent and the ability to devote most of your waking
hours to your sport -- but the barriers to entry are much lower.
Athletes from the poorest African and Caribbean nations have developed
into some of the world's greatest athletes with shockingly minimal, or
even nonexistent, facilities and equipment.

In winter sports, by contrast, the rich keep getting richer. Nations
wealthy enough to host a Winter Olympics tend to be those that win most
of the medals (17 of the 20 Winter Olympics have been held in Western
Europe, Canada or the United States). And hosting the Games tends to
ensure future success; the expensive facilities left behind -- the ski
jumps, skeleton runs, half-pipes, etc. -- become training grounds for
the next generation of Olympians.

Baron Pierre de Coubertin, the founder of the modern Olympics,
recognized some of these global sporting inequities more than a century
ago. De Coubertin objected to the creation of a separate Winter
Olympics for many years, dismissing winter sports in 1921 as "the
snobbish play of the rich." It wasn't until 1924 -- some 28 years after
the first modern Olympics -- that the IOC retroactively recognized
something called the "International Week of Winter Sports" in Chamonix,
France, as the first Winter Olympics.

So why perpetuate an event that could just as easily be contested as a
series of disaggregated annual championships? The reason, of course, is
money and TV. And here again, it's a small world. The Winter Olympics
might collapse were it not for the financial support of American
broadcasters and their (mostly) American advertisers. Like the teams
themselves, the audience for the Winter Olympics is predominantly North
American and European, accounting for about two-thirds of all worldwide
viewing during the Salt Lake City Games of 2002, according to the IOC.
This is just fine by the Olympics' "worldwide" sponsors -- companies
like Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Panasonic and Visa -- whose biggest markets
are in these places, too. Indeed, with NBC paying about half of all the
fees for TV rights the IOC collects, American sponsors and broadcasters
call the tune. In 1994, facing sponsor "fatigue" from same-year Summer
and Winter Olympics, the IOC decided to stagger the two seasons' Games,
so that the Winter Olympics now take place two years after the summer
ones.

This is not to suggest that Winter Olympians aren't dedicated and
superb athletes. They are, of course. But the pool of actual and
potential competitors in, say, luge or curling (or skeleton or biathlon
or bobsledding or freestyle moguls skiing) is ludicrously small and
will probably remain so for years to come. The Winter Olympics simply
aren't, and probably can't be, a truly global sporting contest.

So please, in the next few weeks, spare us the hokum about the nations
of the world joining together in a symbolic celebration of the human
spirit. Some nations and some human spirit maybe, but unfortunately,
all too precious little.

Ads
  #2  
Old February 6th 06, 01:44 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

dude - lighten up.
its rec.skiing.nordic not politcal.social.commentary.blah


  #3  
Old February 6th 06, 02:17 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 5 Feb 2006 17:40:49 -0800, "Mike" wrote:

Where the Rich and Elite Meet to Compete
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...020302280.html

Where the Rich and Elite Meet to Compete


It's not good to post someone else's copyrighted material in it's
entirety like this -- the link and an excerpt are enough.

JFT


****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
  #4  
Old February 6th 06, 03:40 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


32 degrees wrote:
dude - lighten up.
its rec.skiing.nordic not politcal.social.commentary.blah


And besides which, it's alot of codswallop. Don't see too many
Ethiopians competing in modern pentathlon or dressage, do you? And I
suppose it's the fault of us Western imperialists that there isn't
enough snow in Kenya for them to field a ski team. The premise seems to
be that we should reduce the world to the lowest common denominator so
that every country can compete... welcome to Olympic tiddly-winks...

  #5  
Old February 6th 06, 06:42 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike wrote:
Where the Rich and Elite Meet to Compete
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...020302280.html


Certain points in the above article (which needn't, and probably
shouldn't, have been quoted in its entirety) are valid, but a lot of the
economic arguments are equally applicable, despite the author's opinion,
to the summer games.

It's a fact of life that to be competitive at an international level in
any sport, an athlete has to spend their life training at that sport,
essentially full-time. In poorer countries, the ability of the state, or
rich relatives, or whoever, to financially support that athlete and his
or her family while they spend their time pursuing their sporting goals
is obviously more limited. This applies equally to summer and winter sports.

The point regarding infrastructure is reasonably valid, though. Poor
countries are capable of producing exceptionally talented runners
partially because all they really need, apart from good coaching and
training regimes, is some flat ground. A combination of wealth and
geography imposes limitations on many winter sports, however. Australia
is not a poor nation, but if I see a bobsleigh track built in this
country before I die I promise to ski down it naked on national TV...
it's just _not_ going to happen, despite the fact that we could build
one if we decided to. Climate, and lack of experience or interest in
bobsledding, mean that it's immensely unlikely ever to become an event
we would be able to compete in. Australians who do compete in such
winter events (check out the Aussies in the luge/skeleton this year!!)
are required to train overseas. So the barriers are not merely financial.

It is probably true, however, that if 50 of the world's poorest
countries were suddenly endowed with enough snow and ice to be
"geographically competitive" at winter sports, many events would still
fail to produce top-quality athletes because yes it _is_ ridiculously
expensive to support the infrastructure and sometimes even individual
equipment involved in many winter sports. But, again, the summer games
has the same problem... how many poor countries compete in the sailing
events?

But bugger the bobsled, the ski jump, and everything else... success at
cross-country skiing (and biathlon) one would hope is only limited by
geography. It's one of the "purest" athletic pursuits at the winter
games... basically medium to long distance running, with some skis
strapped on so you can take advantage of gliding over the snow instead
of plodding through it. Skis can be expensive, and the quiver of gear
taken to a top-level event by a modern skiier would certainly obliterate
my bank balance, but providing a few pairs of top quality skis to a
handful of superb athletes is probably not beyond even some of the
poorest countries in the world. The problem lies almost entirely in that
they don't have anywhere to train, and while the capital cost of good
gear to ski on may not be totally prohibitive, the cost of sending
someone overseas to a nordically inclined country where the cost of
living is _enormous_, to train for extended periods of time, is
unfortunately an impenetrable wall.

So I suspect that while cross-country ski racing has the potential to be
the most "economically" inclusive of the sports contested at the winter
olympics, the limitations imposed by climate will mean that the only
people who will ever be any good at it, are those who live in, on or
near good consistent snow... _and_ those that come from a rich enough
country that they can travel extensively (and expensively) to find that
snow on a regular and ongoing basis if they have none, or little (like
us!), at home.

Chris


  #6  
Old February 6th 06, 08:04 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

32 degrees wrote:
dude - lighten up.
its rec.skiing.nordic not politcal.social.commentary.blah


The article author does have some points, particularly the expensive
infrastructure needed for some winter sports.

OTOH, breeding jumper horses isn't exactly cheap either. :-)

xc skiing is definitely on the cheap end of the spectrum, except at the
very top elite level.

Terje

--
-
"almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
  #7  
Old February 6th 06, 10:45 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chris Cole wrote:

Thanks Chris your comments are right on the button.
I notice the original poster didnt add his comments on the article.

We've been made aware of two Brazilian skiers both scheduled to race at Pragellato.
I spotted the girl at a World Cup race earlier this year and didnt know then that she'd raced at Salt Lake City. I still dont know her name.
The guy is Helio Freitas a home nation marathon runner who gave up sun and samba to train and race on snow.
WE all understand the hardship, deprivations and expense it would take to become a leading marathon runner but he's gone through that a second time in an alien snow and ice environment.

In Britain we lost our national interest in nordic events in the late 80's with the coming of warmer winters and the reduction in military winter training. This year at our National Champs in a neighbouring snowy country we are seeing the results of completely reorganising our admin, coaching and club targets and we now have several promising youngsters coming forward for junior development.




  #8  
Old February 8th 06, 04:16 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What a surprise!! Countries with winter dominate the winter games and
countries without winter don't send any (or very few) athletes.

How many words does it take to state the obvious?

Scott


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Let The European and North American Olympics Winter Games Begin Mike Alpine Skiing 20 February 8th 06 05:00 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SkiBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.