If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Suzieflame wrote:
More than 15cm in the city overnight, do sure there have been big dumps on the hills in the Tirol in last 24 hours. Is 15cm considered a big dump for Austria? Thats about 6" which here in the western USA would be an average snowfall for a night. To me a dump is over 12" (30cm) in a day. Lately its been dry with nothing in the forcast so any snow is a good thing! Good thing November brought us ample snow for now. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dumping snow in Austria and Germany
Suzieflame wrote:
More than 15cm in the city overnight, do sure there have been big dumps on the hills in the Tirol in last 24 hours. "do sure"??? What kind of English is that? Get thee to a grammar school pronto! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
miles wrote:
Suzieflame wrote: More than 15cm in the city overnight, do sure there have been big dumps on the hills in the Tirol in last 24 hours. Is 15cm considered a big dump for Austria? Thats about 6" which here in the western USA would be an average snowfall for a night. To me a dump is over 12" (30cm) in a day. Lately its been dry with nothing in the forcast so any snow is a good thing! Good thing November brought us ample snow for now. In northern Canada, I mean way north, 15 cm isn't considered much unless there is a strong wind with the snow. We take it all in stride. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Suzieflame wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:52:29 -0700, miles wrote: Suzieflame wrote: More than 15cm in the city overnight, do sure there have been big dumps on the hills in the Tirol in last 24 hours. Is 15cm considered a big dump for Austria? No, but that's in the city. On the hills you could for sure double that, given that it was also raining at the lower, warmer altitudes yesterday. Comma not required between "lower" and "warmer". "for sure" is bad English. Get thee to a grammer school Suzie LaFlame! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Suzieflame wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:54:02 -0500, Joe Canuck wrote: Suzieflame wrote: More than 15cm in the city overnight, do sure there have been big dumps on the hills in the Tirol in last 24 hours. "do sure"??? What kind of English is that? Get thee to a grammar school pronto! Hey look everybody, I got me a new stalker! And it spell lames! When you make dumb comments suggesting the English language does not evolve you can expect to take some heat over it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Joe Canuck" wrote in message
... Suzieflame wrote: No, but that's in the city. On the hills you could for sure double that, given that it was also raining at the lower, warmer altitudes yesterday. Comma not required between "lower" and "warmer". "for sure" is bad English. Get thee to a grammer school Suzie LaFlame! How about "eh", Mr. Canuck? : ) Martha as a California, knows "fer sure, dood" is part of her vocabulary..... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Suzieflame wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 10:08:48 -0500, Joe Canuck wrote: Get thee to a grammer school Suzie LaFlame! ^ People who spell "grammar" with an "e" look pretty ****ing stupid making spelling lames, stalker boi. But please, keep it up. Firstly, it's quite entertaining watching you reach for the lowest, most inane commentary known to Man and STILL **** it up in the most embarrassing way possible like a complete and utter imbecile. And secondly, I know I'm not going to be the one regretting getting involved in a flame war with me.... more it will be likely you, Paul. Most entertaining, as expected you consumed the bait as only a first-class flame troll can. That being a dubious distinction; however, please do try to not mangle the English language too much with your attempts to master it. You have perhaps four skills to your credit: 1) The ability to pop keywords into a search engine. 2) The ability to fart in public. 2) The ability to count up to two. 4) The ability to misquote. Bye bye Suzie. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Olaf Timandahaff" wrote in message news , Black Metal Martha dropped this bomb: "Joe Canuck" wrote in message ... Suzieflame wrote: No, but that's in the city. On the hills you could for sure double that, given that it was also raining at the lower, warmer altitudes yesterday. Comma not required between "lower" and "warmer". "for sure" is bad English. Get thee to a grammer school Suzie LaFlame! How about "eh", Mr. Canuck? : ) Martha as a California, knows "fer sure, dood" is part of her vocabulary..... I always saw "ok fine, fer sure, fer sure, eh?" [not a valley girl though] Woah dood, with a name like Olaf, you're sure yer not from the valleeee?? Martha not from the valley either |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Suzieflame wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:28:20 -0500, Joe Canuck wrote: Suzieflame wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:06:24 -0500, Joe Canuck wrote: Suzieflame wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 10:08:48 -0500, Joe Canuck wrote: Get thee to a grammer school Suzie LaFlame! ^ People who spell "grammar" with an "e" look pretty ****ing stupid making spelling lames, stalker boi. But please, keep it up. Firstly, it's quite entertaining watching you reach for the lowest, most inane commentary known to Man and STILL **** it up in the most embarrassing way possible like a complete and utter imbecile. And secondly, I know I'm not going to be the one regretting getting involved in a flame war with me.... more it will be likely you, Paul. Most entertaining, as expected you consumed the bait as only a first-class flame troll can. rolls eyes "I was trolling you" is about the second most unlikely-to-be-believed back pedal ever. If you want to know how you can really claim to be trolling look the thread "PING: Astro", and check the posting times. chuckle Regret SLAP Let's just see that in slow motion, shall we? Regrettably for you, you are an ineffectual flamer. Your whole Usenet persona is based on trolling for flames so you can somehow effectively compete in the "awards" voting: http://tinyurl.com/5edux So do not try to tell us you don't troll for flames, you could not compete if you did not. Couldn't care less? The reality is quite the opposite. You care a whole lot... about a pile of steaming crap. Bye bye Suzie. P.S. Your ascii art needs work. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Suzieflame wrote:
And secondly, I know I'm not going to be the one regretting getting involved in a flame war with me.... more it will be likely you, Paul. If you guys absolutely have to get into a cheap flamewar here, could you at least attempt to make it funny or clever? Is that asking too much? Suzie, you did NOT create RSAM, you just cut+pasted somebody else's docs and threw it out like bait. If we snapped it up it was because the subject had already been discussed in detail and you just flipped the switch. Good enough thing to do, and we are grateful. But does that mean we have to listen to this crap for the rest of our lives? Is it so difficult to recognize when enough is ****ING ENOUGH? -- Cheers, Bev ************************************************** ******* Warning: Objects in mirror appear smarter than they are. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|