RSAM moderation failure???

None of my posts to rec.skiing.alpine.moderated are going through. I
have not received any rejection messages, the posts just disappear.

Anybody know what's going on?

--
//-Walt
//
//

in article lid, Walt at
lid wrote on 10/14/03 6:16 AM:


None of my posts to rec.skiing.alpine.moderated are going through. I
have not received any rejection messages, the posts just disappear.

Anybody know what's going on?

Yeah. RSA. Terrorist is a pathetic failure. No decent people post there.

Walt wrote:
None of my posts to rec.skiing.alpine.moderated are going through. I
have not received any rejection messages, the posts just disappear.

Anybody know what's going on?



Not sure - I had a reject a couple of days ago from the german server
claiming the forwarding address wasn't found, but a re-post on the same
path went right through. What server are you using?

lal truckee wrote:

Walt wrote:
None of my posts to rec.skiing.alpine.moderated are going through. I
have not received any rejection messages, the posts just disappear.

Anybody know what's going on?

Not sure - I had a reject a couple of days ago from the german server
claiming the forwarding address wasn't found, but a re-post on the same
path went right through. What server are you using?

If you bothered to look in the headers of any of my posts, it's right
there. With very few exceptions [road trips, etc.] it's been the same
for as long as I've been hanging around here.

Of course, if *I* bothered to look in the headers of an RSAM message,
I'd see

X-RSAM-Policy:
http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/usenet/rsam/index.html
X-RSAM-Info-1:
Send submissions to
X-RSAM-Info-2:
Send technical complaints to
X-RSAM-Info-3:
Send complaints about policy to

I'll take it up with the official channels and see if I get anywhere.
mMeanwhile, keep an eye out for posts from me in the moderators'
inbox...

--
//-Walt
//
//

Walt wrote:

If you bothered to look in the headers of any of my posts, it's right
there.

I don't want to fall into the trap of studiously reading headers trying
to discern ... well, never mind, you get the picture.

I hope we can track down and fix any problems posting to rsam - it looks
like we might need the option ...

lal truckee wrote:

Walt wrote:

If you bothered to look in the headers of any of my posts, it's right
there.

I don't want to fall into the trap of studiously reading headers trying
to discern ... well, never mind, you get the picture.

I hope we can track down and fix any problems posting to rsam - it looks
like we might need the option ...

Well, let's hope "we" can get it resolved before the first dump of the
season. I'd hate to waste people's time fiddling with computers when
there's turns to be had...

(BTW, I just tried another post to rsam - looks like it's still broken)

--
//-Walt
//
//

Walt wrote:

(BTW, I just tried another post to rsam - looks like it's still broken)

Me too - one went through, one bounced - both went to the german server,
which is who bounced the bouncee, and who forwarded the success. Makes
no dam sense to me. The mail portal itself may be flaky, but we don't
yet know; I just tried a direct mail post of the bounced msg, just to
see if it is rejected by the mail portal. I suspect it won't link
properly, tho.

ObSki The weather is slightly cooler, always a good sign.

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:14:00 -0700, lal truckee
wrote:

Walt wrote:

(BTW, I just tried another post to rsam - looks like it's still broken)

Me too - one went through, one bounced - both went to the german server,
which is who bounced the bouncee, and who forwarded the success. Makes
no dam sense to me. The mail portal itself may be flaky, but we don't
yet know; I just tried a direct mail post of the bounced msg, just to
see if it is rejected by the mail portal. I suspect it won't link
properly, tho.

ObSki The weather is slightly cooler, always a good sign.

I successfully posted two articles to RSAM today, however, one of them
took a few minutes longer than normal.

Seems to be working fine, for me.

-Astro

---
maximum exposure f/2.8
http://www.xmission.com/~hound/astro/03-04/index.htm
---

Walt wrote:

lal truckee wrote:

Walt wrote:

If you bothered to look in the headers of any of my posts, it's right
there.

I don't want to fall into the trap of studiously reading headers trying
to discern ... well, never mind, you get the picture.

I hope we can track down and fix any problems posting to rsam - it looks
like we might need the option ...

Well, let's hope "we" can get it resolved before the first dump of the
season. I'd hate to waste people's time fiddling with computers when
there's turns to be had...

(BTW, I just tried another post to rsam - looks like it's still broken)

Not rsam's problem, I posted to it and lal replied.

--
Cheers,
Bev
_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_
Too many freaks, not enough circuses.

The Real Bev wrote:

Walt wrote:

lal truckee wrote:

Walt wrote:

If you bothered to look in the headers of any of my posts, it's right
there.

I don't want to fall into the trap of studiously reading headers trying
to discern ... well, never mind, you get the picture.

I hope we can track down and fix any problems posting to rsam - it looks
like we might need the option ...

Well, let's hope "we" can get it resolved before the first dump of the
season. I'd hate to waste people's time fiddling with computers when
there's turns to be had...

(BTW, I just tried another post to rsam - looks like it's still broken)

Not rsam's problem, I posted to it and lal replied.

Update: I tried to reply to lal twice, and the German server bounced
both attempts. Error message:

mail failed, returning to sender
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 03:22:57 +0200 (MEST)
From:
To:
|------------------------- Failed addresses follow:
---------------------|
... transport
inet_zone_bind_smtp: 550 5.1.1
... User unknown
....

--
Cheers,
Bev
_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_|-_
Too many freaks, not enough circuses.