If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
America's disappearing ski bum
The Real Bev wrote:
On 11/25/10 10:55, Bob F wrote: pigo wrote: Listen to the speeches that the government run media won't play. "Redistribution of wealth" is his main agenda. That's pure crap. He used those words once, yes. But not to mean what you right wong wackos say it means. How does it not mean "Take my money and give it to somebody else"? Or is he doing something different with it? Since 80% of the income gains in the previous 8 years went to the richest 1% of Americans, it could consist of changing tax laws to encourage businesses that actually hire employees and keep them working and remove the tax advantages of exporting jubs overseas. It could be support of laws to encourage manufacturing within our borders. It could be the removal of laws that give miniscule tax cuts to the middle class, but gigantic ones to the richest 2%. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
America's disappearing ski bum
On Dec 3, 3:16*pm, "Bob F" wrote:
Since 80% of the income gains in the previous 8 years went to the richest 1% of Americans, it could consist of changing tax laws to encourage businesses that actually hire employees and keep them working and remove the tax advantages of exporting jubs overseas. It could be support of laws to encourage manufacturing within our borders. It could be the removal of laws that give miniscule tax cuts to the middle class, but gigantic ones to the richest 2%. You just want to change one class warfare for another. Why not just confiscate _everything_ over $1M per year? But remember that would include basketball and football players and rappers. No exclusions. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
America's disappearing ski bum
pigo wrote:
On Dec 3, 3:16 pm, "Bob F" wrote: Since 80% of the income gains in the previous 8 years went to the richest 1% of Americans, it could consist of changing tax laws to encourage businesses that actually hire employees and keep them working and remove the tax advantages of exporting jubs overseas. It could be support of laws to encourage manufacturing within our borders. It could be the removal of laws that give miniscule tax cuts to the middle class, but gigantic ones to the richest 2%. You just want to change one class warfare for another. Why not just confiscate _everything_ over $1M per year? But remember that would include basketball and football players and rappers. No exclusions. As Warren Buffet said. We are having class warfare, and my class is winning. Of course, he has enough common sense to not approve. He, and Bill Gates Sr both thing the rich should pay more taxes. The idea that those that profit overwhelmingly from our government should be unwilling to pay a little to support it is just silly. Nobody is even suggesting anything as ludicrous as what you just did except for wackos. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
America's disappearing ski bum
On Dec 3, 3:43*pm, "Bob F" wrote:
pigo wrote: On Dec 3, 3:16 pm, "Bob F" wrote: Since 80% of the income gains in the previous 8 years went to the richest 1% of Americans, it could consist of changing tax laws to encourage businesses that actually hire employees and keep them working and remove the tax advantages of exporting jubs overseas. It could be support of laws to encourage manufacturing within our borders. It could be the removal of laws that give miniscule tax cuts to the middle class, but gigantic ones to the richest 2%. You just want to change one class warfare for another. Why not just confiscate _everything_ over $1M per year? But remember that would include basketball and football players and rappers. No exclusions. As Warren Buffet said. We are having class warfare, and my class is winning. Of course, he has enough common sense to not approve. He, and Bill Gates Sr both thing the rich should pay more taxes. The idea that those that profit overwhelmingly from our government should be unwilling to pay a little to support it is just silly. Nobody is even suggesting anything as ludicrous as what you just did except for wackos. There is no law that says they can't pay more. Why don't they do that? 99% of Hollywood could do the same. Drive used cars, live in 2 bdr. apartments and sent their millions to help those people they want me to? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
America's disappearing ski bum
On Dec 3, 5:09*pm, comadrejo wrote:
* Much of wage earning in the past 10 years was eaten up by one cost that is out of control: US Healthcare, which is why there needs to be uniform standards to keep put some brakes on healthcare costs... As much as the Federal Deficit, Entitlement spending and Defense Spending are difficult to curtail, Healtcare cost are still expecting to double in another ten years, with or without HCR. There were many alternatives to the current socialist takeover of 1/6 of the US economy that wouldn't have cost a dime. Sale across state lines for example. Creation of sales pools so that individuals could take advantage of bulk rates that large employers get. Hundreds of large employers have now received exemptions from obamacare requirements. Because it would have forced them to curtail or drop employee benefits. Great plan. Although that is the true goal of obamacare to eliminate insurance companies. Does anyone here expect to buy car insurance after you crash? Fire insurance after your house burns down? If you do it's welfare, not insurance. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
America's disappearing ski bum
pigo wrote:
On Dec 3, 3:43 pm, "Bob F" wrote: pigo wrote: On Dec 3, 3:16 pm, "Bob F" wrote: Since 80% of the income gains in the previous 8 years went to the richest 1% of Americans, it could consist of changing tax laws to encourage businesses that actually hire employees and keep them working and remove the tax advantages of exporting jubs overseas. It could be support of laws to encourage manufacturing within our borders. It could be the removal of laws that give miniscule tax cuts to the middle class, but gigantic ones to the richest 2%. You just want to change one class warfare for another. Why not just confiscate _everything_ over $1M per year? But remember that would include basketball and football players and rappers. No exclusions. As Warren Buffet said. We are having class warfare, and my class is winning. Of course, he has enough common sense to not approve. He, and Bill Gates Sr both thing the rich should pay more taxes. The idea that those that profit overwhelmingly from our government should be unwilling to pay a little to support it is just silly. Nobody is even suggesting anything as ludicrous as what you just did except for wackos. There is no law that says they can't pay more. Why don't they do that? 99% of Hollywood could do the same. Drive used cars, live in 2 bdr. apartments and sent their millions to help those people they want me to? And it wasn't that long ago that the top margina; tax rate was 91%. The rich suffer so. Why should they pay their share. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
America's disappearing ski bum
On Dec 3, 2:22*pm, pigo wrote:
On Dec 3, 3:16*pm, "Bob F" wrote: Since 80% of the income gains in the previous 8 years went to the richest 1% of Americans, it could consist of changing tax laws to encourage businesses that actually hire employees and keep them working and remove the tax advantages of exporting jubs overseas. It could be support of laws to encourage manufacturing within our borders. It could be the removal of laws that give miniscule tax cuts to the middle class, but gigantic ones to the richest 2%. You just want to change one class warfare for another. Why not just confiscate _everything_ over $1M per year? But remember that would include basketball and football players and rappers. No exclusions. Another coded racist crack from Racist Bob, who is bragging about stalking me to my HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI COMMITTEE!!!! When are you freaks going to get this nutjob committed? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
America's disappearing ski bum
On Dec 3, 4:40*pm, pigo wrote:
On Dec 3, 3:43*pm, "Bob F" wrote: pigo wrote: On Dec 3, 3:16 pm, "Bob F" wrote: Since 80% of the income gains in the previous 8 years went to the richest 1% of Americans, it could consist of changing tax laws to encourage businesses that actually hire employees and keep them working and remove the tax advantages of exporting jubs overseas. It could be support of laws to encourage manufacturing within our borders. It could be the removal of laws that give miniscule tax cuts to the middle class, but gigantic ones to the richest 2%. You just want to change one class warfare for another. Why not just confiscate _everything_ over $1M per year? But remember that would include basketball and football players and rappers. No exclusions. As Warren Buffet said. We are having class warfare, and my class is winning. Of course, he has enough common sense to not approve. He, and Bill Gates Sr both thing the rich should pay more taxes. The idea that those that profit overwhelmingly from our government should be unwilling to pay a little to support it is just silly. Nobody is even suggesting anything as ludicrous as what you just did except for wackos. There is no law that says they can't pay more. Why don't they do that? 99% of Hollywood could do the same. Drive used cars, live in 2 bdr. apartments and sent their millions to help those people they want me to?- Mental illness. Insanity. Wet brain. Bob Thompson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
America's disappearing ski bum | pigo[_2_] | Alpine Skiing | 3 | November 28th 10 03:58 PM |
The incredible disappearing bumps | frankenskier | Alpine Skiing | 25 | January 30th 06 03:05 PM |