If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
Espressopithecus (Java Man) Espressopithecus wrote:
In article , says... Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Don't "invite". Arrange a "meet". You know his record. ;-) Java Just to be on the "safe" side, arrange a meet a thousand mile away from the "invasion", there's a word that was used in the past. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
"Mike Y" wrote in message ... "Suzieflame" wrote in message ... Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Suzie -- Suzieflame I've never met the individual. I have no desire to. About 5 or 6 years ago I came into this forum without any warning. (I know, that was a problem right there!) There was a question, I seem to recall about footbeds and boots, and I don't even remember what I posted. I think it was just that I had a footbed. Now, I had NEVER posted to this group before. Unfortunately, I can only guess, it appeared that because my response was to someone this certain individual had an issue with, I was made the object of a venomous attack by the individual you are trying to keep the trip from. I ignored his attack, and rarely post here, but I do occasionally. As a result, I've been slammed a few more times as well, but the slamming has NEVER been about WHAT I post, it appears to be just the fact that I posted in a thread this individual has targeted. I have no desire to EVER interact with the individual under discussion, and I'm sure there's a lot of others that feel the same way. My opinion? If I were running the show, I'd avoid trouble. If possible I would have made the invites privately via email... Hmm, it's a shame I can take up the offer, but that's the breaks. Personally, I just block messages from him and some of his worst enablers. That only eliminates about 2 out of 3 of the postings to the group, and it gets a lot more peaceful. I never see his venemous responses to my posts, unless someone respondes to them and quotes him. Bob |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 16, 7:19 am, Armin wrote:
On Oct 16, 7:17 am, Suzieflame wrote: Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Suzie -- Suzieflame Let's see, five,eh?... 1. Scott 2. Bert 3. Jeff OK, I bite... who are the other rwo? ;-) BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!! This from a dickless freak who has repeatedly been challenged to identify himself: I've been in Canada several times and offered to look him up. Holy ****, you freaks never cease to amaze. But just for discussion: Bert and I are planning on Jackson in late Febuary, early March. Jeff and his buddies would love to show up and meet you freaks, too. Bluff called, you cowardly nutcases. Holy ****, you freaks never cease to amaze. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
In article .com,
pigo wrote: b.) planning should include our recognition of his unstable mental condition Scott doesn't have an unstable mental condition. You're lying again. -- According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker." |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 17, 10:14 pm, (Jeff Davis) wrote:
In article .com, pigo wrote: b.) planning should include our recognition of his unstable mental condition Scott doesn't have an unstable mental condition. You're lying again. So his mental condition has stabilized then ? Good for him. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:30:21 -0700, twobuddha
wrote this crap: BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!! This from a dickless freak who has repeatedly been challenged to identify himself: I've been in Canada several times and offered to look him up. Holy ****, you freaks never cease to amaze. But just for discussion: Bert and I are planning on Jackson in late Febuary, early March. Jeff and his buddies would love to show up and meet you freaks, too. Bluff called, you cowardly nutcases. Holy ****, you freaks never cease to amaze. We're just amazing people. How was the food in the joint? I'm sorry to see that you're out. My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the ultimate power in the universe." |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:35:14 -0000, HPLCisNeat-O
wrote this crap: condition Scott doesn't have an unstable mental condition. You're lying again. So his mental condition has stabilized then ? Good for him. Stable as a Minnesota bridge. Go Buckeyes. My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the ultimate power in the universe." |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 18, 12:14 am, (Jeff Davis) wrote:
In article .com, pigo wrote: b.) planning should include our recognition of his unstable mental condition Scott doesn't have an unstable mental condition. You're lying again. Ah yes! Jeffy has found a new subject about which he knows nothing. Was there a mental health chapter in your Winnebago manual? Has Mama finished balancing the the check book, yet? Get a real paying job? Make the Jackson hole ski patrol? Inquiring minds want to know. You can go back to masturbating in front of your Shane McConkey poster now. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 17, 9:30 pm, twobuddha wrote:
On Oct 16, 7:19 am, Armin wrote: You are such a predictable turd. They throw out their little 10 lbs test lines for trolling and they wind up with a 300 lbs. warthog. You stupid ****head, you're giving them just what they want - a temper tantrum from a big fat arrested development sociopath. By the way, I see you're up to your old tricks over on the crap shack - just happened to forget about mentioning that a HSM suit has knee patches. There's a "gently worn" item. Schmuck. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 17, 6:30 pm, twobuddha wrote:
On Oct 16, 7:19 am, Armin wrote: On Oct 16, 7:17 am, Suzieflame wrote: Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Suzie -- Suzieflame Let's see, five,eh?... 1. Scott 2. Bert 3. Jeff OK, I bite... who are the other rwo? ;-) BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!! This from a dickless freak who has repeatedly been challenged to identify himself: I've been in Canada several times and offered to look him up. Holy ****, you freaks never cease to amaze. But just for discussion: Bert and I are planning on Jackson in late Febuary, early March. Jeff and his buddies would love to show up and meet you freaks, too. Bluff called, you cowardly nutcases. Holy ****, you freaks never cease to amaze. Bluff called? Actually, the plan is to be somewhere else thaqn where you are. But thanks for the itinerary. It will make planning that much easier. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
skiottawa.net, web discussion board | [email protected] | Alpine Skiing (moderated) | 0 | January 6th 06 10:29 PM |
New 05/06 ski discussion | steve | Nordic Skiing | 1 | September 19th 05 10:31 AM |