If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
handsets suitable for skiing?
Apologies if this has been covered before here; I did some searches, but
couldn't find anything. I'm considering getting a pair of handsets for those times when, by choice or by accident, the group doesn't stick together. What I'd like is something that can be used without removing gloves and that transmits as clearly as possible. What are the good choices for this? What are the pitfalls? Is it the case that, no matter how good the set, if I go down the front side and he goes down the back, we're lost to each other? -- monique |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
Apologies if this has been covered before here; I did some searches, but couldn't find anything. I'm considering getting a pair of handsets for those times when, by choice or by accident, the group doesn't stick together. What I'd like is something that can be used without removing gloves and that transmits as clearly as possible. What are the good choices for this? What are the pitfalls? Is it the case that, no matter how good the set, if I go down the front side and he goes down the back, we're lost to each other? Mikey has been known to carry some sort of FRS radio on the mountain at Breck, and stay in contact with his wife in the condo in town. I think I heard her on mine as well, which was in my jacket. Mine is a Motorola, I think Mikey's is too. We use the kind that gives you the sub-channel's, because on a busy day the number of groups sharing channel's can get unwieldy. ---------------------- Chester, Give a man a fish, he owes you one fish. Teach a man to fish, you give up your monopoly on fisheries. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:44:59 CST, Chester Bullock
wrote: Monique Y. Herman wrote: Apologies if this has been covered before here; I did some searches, but couldn't find anything. I'm considering getting a pair of handsets for those times when, by choice or by accident, the group doesn't stick together. What I'd like is something that can be used without removing gloves and that transmits as clearly as possible. Mikey has been known to carry some sort of FRS radio on the mountain at Breck, and stay in contact with his wife in the condo in town. I think I heard her on mine as well, which was in my jacket. Mine is a Motorola, I think Mikey's is too. We use the kind that gives you the sub-channel's, because on a busy day the number of groups sharing channel's can get unwieldy. The FRS radios are the popular choice. I strongly agree about getting the subchannels for any area with many people. FRS radios are in the UHF range, which means more or less line-of-sight only. They advertise UP TO 2 miles, but you should think more like 1/2 to 1 mile unless blocked by terrain or architecture. Many of these have various headsets available for easy use without removing gloves. The VOX feature means voice activated so you needn't be holding any buttons. These are the least expensive, most available option. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) ------------------------------------------------ at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Gary S." Idontwantspam@net writes: FRS radios are in the UHF range, which means more or less line-of-sight only. They advertise UP TO 2 miles, but you should think more like 1/2 to 1 mile unless blocked by terrain or architecture. That's a good rule of thumb, but sometimes you get pleasant surprises. I have a Motorola talkabout (forgot which model, but it is your basic model with subchannels) On a good day I can reach my condo in the town of Winter Park from the summit of the ski area. That has to be more than 5 miles away... bruno. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Monique Y. Herman" wrote Is it the case that, no matter how good the set, if I go down the front side and he goes down the back, we're lost to each other? -- monique FRS handsets operate on a fairly high frequency/short wavelength which is very "line of sight". As a result, yes, you will be lost to each other if one of you goes down the back side and the other goes down the front. -- mark |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I'm pretty sure any GMRS radio is line-of-sight: if you are on one side of
the hill, and your friends are on the other, atmospheric conditions determine whether you can talk to one another. I've used Motorolas and Garmins (the GPS/GMRS combination), and some days the signal goes around corners (over ridges, for example), and some days it doesn't. The Motorolas are easy enough to use with gloves on, once you've set the channel and options. The on/off/volume knob is large, and the transmit button is easy to work with gloves. Please don't use it on the chairlift next to me... "Where are you?" "I'm here, where are you?" "I'm riding up the chairlift. How's the weather?" "It's fine. I had trouble buckling my boots." "Are you skiing down HotDog? I think I see you!" "I just stopped -- I'll wave to you..." "I see you! I see you!" Is it the case that, no matter how good the set, if I go down the front side and he goes down the back, we're lost to each other? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Chester Bullock wrote in news:bsqap1$79kf$2@ID-
174744.news.uni-berlin.de: Monique Y. Herman wrote: snip Is it the case that, no matter how good the set, if I go down the front side and he goes down the back, we're lost to each other? Mikey has been known to carry some sort of FRS radio on the mountain at Breck, and stay in contact with his wife in the condo in town. I think I heard her on mine as well, which was in my jacket. And they work over some pretty impressive distances. One day my buddy Jack & I summitted Torreys via Kelso ridge in mid-December and raised Mikey on the radio from the summit. Dunno how far as the crow flies, but it's gotta be 10 miles or more. -T.O.M.- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Monique Y. Herman" wrote in message .. .
I'm considering getting a pair of handsets.... What are the good choices for this? What are the pitfalls? There's a Usenet group for this, alt.radio.family, which, inevitably, is full of bickering. Several different radio services will work, such as CB, MURS, and amateur radio, but FRS is a good place to start. You can find them at Circuit City, Best Buy, Fry's, Wal*Mart, and all the other usual big box stores. Try to get one with AA cells instead of AAA cells as, all other things being equal, AA cells will last longer than AAA cells. Full power with FRS is 500 milliwatts, or a half watt. As someone else has already said, don't believe the claims made for range. Any reception past a mile is wishful thinking. Yes, I know the world record is much more than that. FRS requires no license. GMRS does require a license. In Europe, they use something called PM446. Like FRS, it does not require a license. PM446 radios are not to be used in the US, as PM446 uses different frequencies than FRS. Here's an example of a PM446 radio: http://www.castellsatcomradio.com/mo...ola_t6222.html You have no expectation of privacy on any radio service I have mentioned. Here's a good site for FRS: http://familyradioservice.fateback.com/ Here's a GMRS site: http://www.gmrsweb.com/gmrs.html A lot of kids around here got FRSes for Christmas. They're fun to listen to on the scanner. Best wishes. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary S." Idontwantspam@net wrote in message . ..
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:44:59 CST, Chester Bullock wrote: Monique Y. Herman wrote: Apologies if this has been covered before here; I did some searches, but couldn't find anything. I'm considering getting a pair of handsets for those times when, by choice or by accident, the group doesn't stick together. What I'd like is something that can be used without removing gloves and that transmits as clearly as possible. Mikey has been known to carry some sort of FRS radio on the mountain at Breck, and stay in contact with his wife in the condo in town. I think I heard her on mine as well, which was in my jacket. Mine is a Motorola, I think Mikey's is too. We use the kind that gives you the sub-channel's, because on a busy day the number of groups sharing channel's can get unwieldy. The FRS radios are the popular choice. I strongly agree about getting the subchannels for any area with many people. FRS radios are in the UHF range, which means more or less line-of-sight only. They advertise UP TO 2 miles, but you should think more like 1/2 to 1 mile unless blocked by terrain or architecture. Many of these have various headsets available for easy use without removing gloves. The VOX feature means voice activated so you needn't be holding any buttons. These are the least expensive, most available option. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) ------------------------------------------------ at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom Definitely a good idea to spend the extra money and get the more powerful units with subchannels. (We use Motorolas.) Your range will be much better. Even then you can still get out of range by getting on the opposite side of the mountain. Also note that some frequencies are incompatible for use in Canada. I was told by Whistler/Blackcomb ski patrol that I was interferring with their assigned frequencies. I guess if I needed help that would be a good thing though. Fred |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wax ski with Grip Tape suitable for beginner? | Amadeo | Nordic Skiing | 12 | January 13th 05 07:18 PM |
Advice needed re Italian resort suitable for first skiing hol | wallace | European Ski Resorts | 6 | January 4th 05 02:46 PM |
Resorts suitable for family of mixed abilities | Puerto Pollensa Travel Guide | European Ski Resorts | 11 | February 6th 04 09:23 AM |