America's disappearing ski bum

On Dec 6, 8:32*am, pigo wrote:
On Dec 5, 9:09*pm, "Bob F" wrote:

Such people are people without insurance. period. *They don't get free care the
same as insured people. They get stabilized and released, sometimes without any
support for sick weakened patients. The lie that anyone gets free care is just
that - a lie.

You get what you pay for. Why should those that choose an addicted,
worthless, life like trunky's get their **** for free?

Holy ****. A drinking, wet brained alcoholic takes another cheap
shot. Clue time, Bob. I had my last drink almost 22 years ago. You
had your last drink at breakfast.

Actions/
consequenses.

Exactly. Show up in person (action), face the consequences.

And beyond that, why don't you and your ilk lower your own standard of
living and pay. No one is stopping you. You can afford an insurance
premium or two can't you?

I'd rather take your money. I deserve something for ****ing free.

I heard a report yesterday that Gates and Buffet say "tax me more".
Why don't they just take $100K and send the rest in? The government
will take it. Or how about they open a store and just hand $10,000 to
everyone that comes in for their health insurance? I'm sure no one
would spend it on booze or cigarettes.

You are one disgusting racist wack job.

Why do you need me? Take the money that Dems spend on elections.
Anyone know how much that is? How many insurance policies would that
buy?

How about we take the money that you R's spent buying this election?
You are insane. Get help.

On Dec 6, 9:28*am, pigo wrote:
On Dec 6, 9:36*am, Richard Henry wrote:

Not as much as what the Republicans spend.

Seemed to me that Edwards spent record amounts. He's a real beaut.

I'm not so sure about that. But whatever it is, it's a lot of money on
both sides, agreed? But its the Dems that want to take peoples money
and *give it to others. Why don't they volunteer 90%? That would
probably leave most of them with sizeable amounts to live on.

I would take care of people that needed it. But in a manner that
taking care of yourself was preferable. Warehouse accomodations, same
meal everyday, every meal, no cash. Rather than food stamps people
should get a coupon for a box of kraft mac and cheese per person over
15 per day. Under 15 gets 1 box for two days.

The two biggest problems with America today are the Democrat Party
and the Republican Party.

Richard Henry wrote:
On Dec 6, 9:28 am, pigo wrote:
On Dec 6, 9:36 am, Richard Henry wrote:

Not as much as what the Republicans spend.

Seemed to me that Edwards spent record amounts. He's a real beaut.

I'm not so sure about that. But whatever it is, it's a lot of money
on both sides, agreed? But its the Dems that want to take peoples
money and give it to others. Why don't they volunteer 90%? That would
probably leave most of them with sizeable amounts to live on.

I would take care of people that needed it. But in a manner that
taking care of yourself was preferable. Warehouse accomodations, same
meal everyday, every meal, no cash. Rather than food stamps people
should get a coupon for a box of kraft mac and cheese per person over
15 per day. Under 15 gets 1 box for two days.

The two biggest problems with America today are the Democrat Party
and the Republican Party.

Except there is no "Democrat" party.

On 12/06/10 09:55, snoig wrote:

I'm not so sure about that. But whatever it is, it's a lot of money on
both sides, agreed? But its the Dems that want to take peoples money
and give it to others.

As opposed to the Republicians who want to take other peoples money
and give it to themselves? Like the 'temporary' taxes to fund Coors
field and Invesco field here in Colorado.

It's the 'taking people's money' that causes the problem. What they
waste it on is kind of irrelevant. Eliminating the earmarks themselves
probably won't make a big difference, but it might remove some
bargaining chips for expenditures that DO make a big difference.

They're all ****heads and thieves, except the ones who haven't figured
out the system yet.

--
Cheers, Bev
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I'm pretty sure omnipotent entities don't need
middlemen to get their message to the people.

On Dec 6, 4:35*pm, The Real Bev wrote:
On 12/06/10 09:55, snoig wrote:

*I'm not so sure about that. But whatever it is, it's a lot of money on
*both sides, agreed? But its the Dems that want to take peoples money
*and *give it to others.

As opposed to the Republicians who want to take other peoples money
and give it to themselves? *Like the 'temporary' taxes to fund Coors
field and Invesco field here in Colorado.

It's the 'taking people's money' that causes the problem. *What they
waste it on is kind of irrelevant. *Eliminating the earmarks themselves
probably won't make a big difference, but it might remove some
bargaining chips for expenditures that DO make a big difference.

They're all ****heads and thieves, except the ones who haven't figured
out the system yet.

Bev Ashley should know. She ripped off the taxpayer her entire life
and is retired on federal money. A ****head thief who hates the fact
that anyone else can exploit the government the way she did.