Let it go

In article
,
snowbender wrote:

On Sep 15, 12:35 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:58 am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:26 am, Alan Baker wrote:

Are you proud of yourself because you have the last word?

Are you, since you posted following me?

:-)

No, just playing a dinker,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evJzO-jLUCE

who cannot resist a sore mouth.

So you posted a lie...

No, a matter of fact is not a lie.

Yes, it was a lie.

"Are you proud of yourself because you have the last word?"

A question is never a lie, little knowledge.

The question included a "fact" upon which it was based:

"you have the last word".

That was a lie.


But I didn't have the last word, because you posted that question. You
knew that I wasn't getting the last word, so it was a lie.

Yup, you have tried, but failed.

So you admit it was a lie.


I didn't get the last word because you posted a reply.

:-)

Yup, you've got that right, as you're still dangling on the line.

And now you're using the "I meant to do that defense"...

That only makes you a loser, not lie.

It's your defense, Chai-tea.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Sep 15, 1:17 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:35 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:58 am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:26 am, Alan Baker wrote:

Are you proud of yourself because you have the last word?

Are you, since you posted following me?

:-)

No, just playing a dinker,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evJzO-jLUCE

who cannot resist a sore mouth.

So you posted a lie...

No, a matter of fact is not a lie.

Yes, it was a lie.

"Are you proud of yourself because you have the last word?"

A question is never a lie, little knowledge.

The question included a "fact" upon which it was based:

"you have the last word".

That was a lie.

Little knowledge English? You forgot to read "because."

But I didn't have the last word, because you posted that question. You
knew that I wasn't getting the last word, so it was a lie.

Yup, you have tried, but failed.

So you admit it was a lie.

No, as the wheel was still spinning...

I didn't get the last word because you posted a reply.

:-)

Yup, you've got that right, as you're still dangling on the line.

And now you're using the "I meant to do that defense"...

That only makes you a loser, not lie.

It's your defense, Chai-tea.

That's what makes you a loser.

snowbender

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia

In article
,
snowbender wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:17 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:35 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:58 am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:26 am, Alan Baker wrote:

Are you proud of yourself because you have the last word?

Are you, since you posted following me?

:-)

No, just playing a dinker,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evJzO-jLUCE

who cannot resist a sore mouth.

So you posted a lie...

No, a matter of fact is not a lie.

Yes, it was a lie.

"Are you proud of yourself because you have the last word?"

A question is never a lie, little knowledge.

The question included a "fact" upon which it was based:

"you have the last word".

That was a lie.

Little knowledge English? You forgot to read "because."

No.

If I ask you if you now have a stable "because you have a pony" then I'm
stating as a fact within my question that you have a pony.

The word "because" is what makes that clear.


But I didn't have the last word, because you posted that question. You
knew that I wasn't getting the last word, so it was a lie.

Yup, you have tried, but failed.

So you admit it was a lie.

No, as the wheel was still spinning...

"So it was a lie". "Yup".


I didn't get the last word because you posted a reply.

:-)

Yup, you've got that right, as you're still dangling on the line.

And now you're using the "I meant to do that defense"...

That only makes you a loser, not lie.

It's your defense, Chai-tea.

That's what makes you a loser.

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Sep 15, 1:35 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:

Little knowledge English? You forgot to read "because."

No.

If I ask you if you now have a stable "because you have a pony" then I'm
stating as a fact within my question that you have a pony.

The word "because" is what makes that clear.

Guess that what makes a little knowledge; maybe it is "clear" to you,
but I don't see it; every question has two answers, do you know what
they are?

No, as the wheel was still spinning...

"So it was a lie". "Yup".

Your little knowledge cannot tell.

That's what makes you a loser.

LOL

I was wonder how long before you turn into your "last word" defense.
Yes, you have been played by your little mind.

snowbender

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia

In article
,
snowbender wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:35 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:

Little knowledge English? You forgot to read "because."

No.

If I ask you if you now have a stable "because you have a pony" then I'm
stating as a fact within my question that you have a pony.

The word "because" is what makes that clear.

Guess that what makes a little knowledge; maybe it is "clear" to you,
but I don't see it; every question has two answers, do you know what
they are?

My answers to your question do not change that your question included a
false statement in the form of its "because" clause.


No, as the wheel was still spinning...

"So it was a lie". "Yup".

Your little knowledge cannot tell.

That's what makes you a loser.

LOL

I was wonder how long before you turn into your "last word" defense.
Yes, you have been played by your little mind.

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Sep 15, 2:28 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:35 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:

Little knowledge English? You forgot to read "because."

No.

If I ask you if you now have a stable "because you have a pony" then I'm
stating as a fact within my question that you have a pony.

The word "because" is what makes that clear.

Guess that what makes a little knowledge; maybe it is "clear" to you,
but I don't see it; every question has two answers, do you know what
they are?

My answers to your question do not change that your question included a
false statement in the form of its "because" clause.

No, that's only your little knowledge English; as if you wish to hit
the lottery, will this question be valid? "Will you be happy because
you win the lottery?"

No, as the wheel was still spinning...

"So it was a lie". "Yup".

Your little knowledge cannot tell.

That's what makes you a loser.

LOL

I was wonder how long before you turn into your "last word" defense.
Yes, you have been played by your little mind.

LOL

You like to beat the dead horse, eh? Are you happy because you can
beat a dead horse?

snowbender

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia

In article
,
snowbender wrote:

On Sep 15, 2:28 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:35 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:

Little knowledge English? You forgot to read "because."

No.

If I ask you if you now have a stable "because you have a pony" then I'm
stating as a fact within my question that you have a pony.

The word "because" is what makes that clear.

Guess that what makes a little knowledge; maybe it is "clear" to you,
but I don't see it; every question has two answers, do you know what
they are?

My answers to your question do not change that your question included a
false statement in the form of its "because" clause.

No, that's only your little knowledge English; as if you wish to hit
the lottery, will this question be valid? "Will you be happy because
you win the lottery?"

1. That question is in the future tense.

2. The correct word would be "if", not "because".


No, as the wheel was still spinning...

"So it was a lie". "Yup".

Your little knowledge cannot tell.

That's what makes you a loser.

LOL

I was wonder how long before you turn into your "last word" defense.
Yes, you have been played by your little mind.

LOL

You like to beat the dead horse, eh? Are you happy because you can
beat a dead horse?

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Sep 15, 9:30 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
No, that's only your little knowledge English; as if you wish to hit
the lottery, will this question be valid? "Will you be happy because
you win the lottery?"

1. That question is in the future tense.

2. The correct word would be "if", not "because".

That IS your little knowledge English, "because" has much stronger
force/meaning than "if" in this case.

You like to beat the dead horse, eh? Are you happy because you can
beat a dead horse?

LOL

Your point?

Welcome to the morning head banging session.

snowbender

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia

In article
,
snowbender wrote:

On Sep 15, 9:30 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
No, that's only your little knowledge English; as if you wish to hit
the lottery, will this question be valid? "Will you be happy because
you win the lottery?"

1. That question is in the future tense.

2. The correct word would be "if", not "because".

That IS your little knowledge English, "because" has much stronger
force/meaning than "if" in this case.

Yes. Its meaning is that what follows it is supposed to be a fact.

And that's your lie.


You like to beat the dead horse, eh? Are you happy because you can
beat a dead horse?

LOL

Your point?

Welcome to the morning head banging session.

snowbender

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Sep 16, 9:54 am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

snowbender wrote:
On Sep 15, 9:30 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
No, that's only your little knowledge English; as if you wish to hit
the lottery, will this question be valid? "Will you be happy because
you win the lottery?"

1. That question is in the future tense.

2. The correct word would be "if", not "because".

That IS your little knowledge English, "because" has much stronger
force/meaning than "if" in this case.

Yes. Its meaning is that what follows it is supposed to be a fact.

And that's your lie.

Your little knowledge alright, "because" also implies "what if," which
is not a fact, so your accusation is shameless.

Welcome to the morning head banging session.

You like to beat the dead horse, eh? Are you happy because you can
beat a dead horse?

LOL

Your point?

Welcome to the morning head banging session.

snowbender

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia