Scott Abraham Syndrome

On May 12, 1:41 am, Richard Henry wrote:
On May 11, 6:18 pm, Alan Baker wrote:



In article
,

twobuddha wrote:
On May 11, 2:29 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

twobuddha wrote:
Amazing. When busted in an outright lie, ignore being caught and keep
playing the pppppuuuussssssyyyyyyy game.

I haven't lied. You did claim to have contacted LE regarding Richard
Henry.

You stated I had contacted LE in, and I quote, "his neighborhood".
Absolute outright bull****. Unless you consider the entire US a
****ing neighborhood, you lying piece of **** freak.
You lied. Period. You lied. Period. You made up a ****ing whopper
and got caught. Period. Man up, you dickless bitch.

So you're going the semantics route.

Holy ****, you really are insane. Absolutely deranged. Completely
out of touch with reality.
I'm going the REALITY route, you ****ing nutjob. You lied. Period.
Nothing "semantic" about it. Plain English. You lied.

You contact LE, Scott. That is the essence of it.

The essence is that you just got busted lying and you're playing the
same sick game you always play when busted lying.

So you admit you contacted law enforcement and are hiding behind the
word "neighbourhood"...

And since they didn't contact Richard, they must be laughing at you...

...by your own standards.

Not by MY standards, you insane idiot. By your deranged logic. The
same logic that lets you blow off getting caught lying time and time
again.

Nope. Your standards. When Richard says that he contacted LE and you
claim that haven't heard from them, you claim that that means they are
laughing at him.

So when you claim you've contacted LE and Richard says he hasn't heard
from them, why doesn't that mean that they're laughing at you?

Actually, I think the SPD people who looked into my complaint about
Scott were laughing at _him_.

I think you are lying your ass off. I'd be delighted to find out.
Contact info?
Oh, yeah. Forgot. You made all kinds of ridiculous claims about me
going to jail, being hauled in for questioning, having to deal with
SPD, and I still have not heard from them.
Everybody laugh at Dickless Henry.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA

As for his warning that I was going to jail (what was that, 3 or 5
years ago?), that theme was started by Bert when he was still posting
here. Bert started posting accusations out of the blue about me that
made sense to me only after I realized that he was just trying to get
in some jabs and didn't care how foolish he looked. I think Scott
learned that from him.-

In article
,
Richard Henry wrote:

As for his warning that I was going to jail (what was that, 3 or 5
years ago?), that theme was started by Bert when he was still posting
here. Bert started posting accusations out of the blue about me that
made sense to me only after I realized that he was just trying to get
in some jabs and didn't care how foolish he looked. I think Scott
learned that from him.

I think that while Scott has probably had more than his share of "bad
luck," hooking up with Bert at a time when he really needed a friend
instead was very unfortunate.

On May 12, 10:32*am, Dave Cartman wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
Right after you tell me in straightforward language what you're claiming
I lied about...

Already have. *You ignore being caught, *As usual. *Here is some
straightforward language. *You are a pathological liar. *You are a
stalking, craven coward. *You are delusional, mentally ill asshole.
Man up, Baker. *Stop playing games. *Stop lying. *Get help, and you
will need a lot of it.

Alan,

I used to say that arguing with Scott was LIKE discussing theology with
a street preacher. *Now I think it IS discussing theology with a street
preacher.

Translation: Pervert Dave is encouraging the delusions of a mentally
ill stalker.
Dave, Dave. You couldn't discuss theology on the best day of your
life: psychopaths are notoriously clueless.
Once again, when confronted with the truth, you resort to the insanity
slur. How pathetic of you.

It's a free internet and I certainly waste my share of time, but I
believe Scott has a sick brain and talking to it isn't going to make a
big difference, any more than talking to a sick heart or sick kidneys
make a difference in their function.

Typical psychopath: when exposed as a pathological liar, call the guy
who catches him out time and time again mentally ill.
That's the problem with psychopaths: no creativitiy.

Anyone who reads more than two of his posts knows he's a netkook.

Anyone who reads more than two of your posts knows you are a laughable
coward, a psychopathic pathological liar, and an all around asshole.
Not to mention a pervert.

*I've
exchanged plenty of posts with him, so I'm probably not the best person
to make this point, but arguing with him really is a waste of time. *I
doubt it worsens his condition though.

Translation: he keeps getting bitch slapped with reality, exposed as a
blowhard coward and pervert, and that frustrates the psychopath,
because they think they can con anyone with their lies.

Anyway... I hope your Spring is going well and you are getting lots of
golf in. *If you find yourself in Hawaii, look me up, we have some very
nice golf course here.

Once again, a psychopath manipulates a delusional, mentally ill wack
job stalker. How typical of Pervert Dave.

On May 12, 10:35*am, Dave Cartman wrote:
In article
,
*Richard Henry wrote:

As for his warning that I was going to jail (what was that, 3 or 5
years ago?), that theme was started by Bert when he was still posting
here. *Bert started posting accusations out of the blue about me that
made sense to me only after I realized that he was just trying to get
in some jabs and didn't care how foolish he looked. *I think Scott
learned that from him.

I think that while Scott has probably had more than his share of "bad
luck," hooking up with Bert at a time when he really needed a friend
instead was very unfortunate.

Hell, maybe I could have hooked up with an amoral cowardly perverted
psychopathic pathological liar like Pervert Dave. Ooooops, forgot. I
did. Plenty of them in this ********.

On May 10, 12:51*pm, Richard Henry wrote:
In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster as
suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". *His particular
characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or
willing to provide any concrete examples.

That got me to thinking - other than empty accusations or insinuations
of lying, what other behaviors belong in the SAS definition?

Don't forget this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_memory_syndrome

On May 12, 12:05*pm, Scottum wrote:
On May 10, 12:51*pm, Richard Henry wrote:

In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster as
suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". *His particular
characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or
willing to provide any concrete examples.

That got me to thinking - other than empty accusations or insinuations
of lying, what other behaviors belong in the SAS definition?

Don't forget this one:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_memory_syndrome

Included, perhaps, but he goes way beyond that.

On May 12, 2:44*pm, twobuddha wrote:
On May 12, 1:34*pm, SkiGuy wrote:

twobuddha wrote:
Typical psychopath: when exposed as a pathological liar, call the guy
who catches him out time and time again mentally ill.
That's the problem with psychopaths: no creativitiy.

and a couple of post later follows it up with his usual reply:

You are insane.

Oh, the irony! Project much, Scott?

Bull****. *He IS insane. *Delusional. *As you well know. *How pathetic
of you. *No irony at all: just me busting a lying piece of ****.



Keep dancing, Monkey Boy. You're making this way to easy.

Actually, you make it too easy, you pathetic loser.

Thanks for dancing on command... AGAIN, Monkey Boy.

On May 12, 12:11*pm, Scottum wrote:

Project much?

Of course headslap. I should have included "projects his problems
onto others".

I would bet that if one were to catalog all the accusations SA has
made against others in this newsgroup, it would be a fairly good
description of his overall condition.

On May 12, 3:52*pm, Richard Henry wrote:
On May 12, 12:11*pm, Scottum wrote:



Project much?

Of course headslap. *I should have included "projects his problems
onto others".

I would bet that if one were to catalog all the accusations SA has
made against others in this newsgroup, it would be a fairly good
description of his overall condition.

Since writing that, I have started reading all of Scott's accusations
as confessions. Makes more sense that way.

On May 12, 3:52*pm, Richard Henry wrote:
On May 12, 12:11*pm, Scottum wrote:



Project much?

Of course headslap. *I should have included "projects his problems
onto others".

Of course, a psychopath would tell that lie. Everybody laugh at
Richard Henry.

I would bet that if one were to catalog all the accusations SA has
made against others in this newsgroup, it would be a fairly good
description of his overall condition.

No, it would be a fairly good description of what pathetic,
ridiculous, desperate, despicable assholes you and your fellow freaks
are.