If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On Friday, 15 August 2014 16:43:11 UTC-7, twobuddha wrote:
I got a lot of compliments about that pic. From who? Your gay ButtBudddy Burt? Oh, that's right... even he's not your friend anymore. I guess that just leaves all your imaginary friends. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On 08/15/2014 01:22 PM, pigo wrote:
On Friday, August 15, 2014 2:08:13 PM UTC-6, Richard Henry wrote: More from Ferguson police chief - "This robbery does not relate to the initial contact between the officer and Michael Brown. He contacted them because they were walking down the middle of the street blocking traffic." It was within minutes of the robbery. The robber didn't know that the cop didn't know. I suppose that's why he attacked the cop. Why do you suppose that so far we've only gotten old pictures of an innocent looking young teen? And not the menacing 300 pounder? I guess you missed the tape from the convenience store showing the guy shoving the storeowner out of the way as he -- presumably -- made off with stolen snacks. -- Cheers, Bev ============================================= If you are going to try cross-country skiing, start with a small country. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On Friday, 15 August 2014 17:05:15 UTC-7, twobuddha wrote:
You're foaming at the mouth in impotent rage, maggot. There you go again projecting your own behaviour. Here's a clue for you, ****tard, I'm laughing at you as I poke you with a sharp stick and watch you dance on demand. You're flailing your skinny little arms and stomping your skinny little legs. Oh, BTW, on Facebook you say you're self-employed. Is that what you call it when you stay in your fetid little basement and wank you little weiner all day. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On 2014-08-15 17:22:49 +0000, pigo said:
On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:57:46 AM UTC-6, Richard Henry wrote: The video is out. And the robber is much different looking than the picture that have been released of "the innocent young teen" purported to be shot by the racist police. "Purported"? The police have admitted the officer shot him. Even giving his story the greatest latitude, the officer is likely guilty of manslaughter. Purported to be an innocent young teen. 6'4" and 300# alone is enough to give the officer legitimate fear for his life. The attack and recent robbery by the suspect only add to that justification. But you know that. So you're all cool if police officers start shooting anyone who is 6'4" and 300#... ...or just the black ones? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On Friday, August 15, 2014 6:01:37 PM UTC-6, The Real Bev wrote:
I guess you missed the tape from the convenience store showing the guy shoving the storeowner out of the way as he -- presumably -- made off with stolen snacks. No. But up until then and still so far in the stills he's portrayed as about a 15 year old. Much like they did with Treyvon Martin, showing 5 year old pictures. Why not show recent ones? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:27:45 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:
So you're all cool if police officers start shooting anyone who is 6'4" and 300#... ...or just the black ones? I'm giving the cop (that needed medical attention after the incident) the benefit of the doubt over a robber. His size is relevant to the officers legitimate fear for his life. So are his actions just prior to the shooting. You've got a cop with a clean record and no complaints. You've got a thug that just robbed a store and without doubt had a juvenile record. Who's side would you come down on with what we have so far? I'm not saying it's the final story. But at this point it looks worse for the thug. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On Friday, 15 August 2014 20:39:23 UTC-7, twobuddha wrote:
Having fun stalking? What part of "Public Profile" are you having trouble comprehending, ****tard? Maybe you need to adjust your Facebook settings... but that's probably more than your alcohol-addled brain can manage. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On Saturday, August 16, 2014 6:17:53 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote:
On Friday, August 15, 2014 6:01:37 PM UTC-6, The Real Bev wrote: I guess you missed the tape from the convenience store showing the guy shoving the storeowner out of the way as he -- presumably -- made off with stolen snacks. No. But up until then and still so far in the stills he's portrayed as about a 15 year old. Much like they did with Treyvon Martin, showing 5 year old pictures. Why not show recent ones? They have shown his high school graduation picture, which was taken a couple of months ago |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On Saturday, August 16, 2014 6:23:21 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote:
On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:27:45 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote: So you're all cool if police officers start shooting anyone who is 6'4" and 300#... ...or just the black ones? I'm giving the cop (that needed medical attention after the incident) the benefit of the doubt over a robber. His size is relevant to the officers legitimate fear for his life. So are his actions just prior to the shooting. You've got a cop with a clean record and no complaints. You've got a thug that just robbed a store and without doubt had a juvenile record. Who's side would you come down on with what we have so far? I'm not saying it's the final story. But at this point it looks worse for the thug. Without doubt? Do you know what they call that? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
New Information
On Saturday, August 16, 2014 9:35:45 AM UTC-7, Richard Henry wrote:
On Saturday, August 16, 2014 6:23:21 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote: On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:27:45 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote: So you're all cool if police officers start shooting anyone who is 6'4" and 300#... ...or just the black ones? I'm giving the cop (that needed medical attention after the incident) the benefit of the doubt over a robber. His size is relevant to the officers legitimate fear for his life. So are his actions just prior to the shooting. You've got a cop with a clean record and no complaints. You've got a thug that just robbed a store and without doubt had a juvenile record. Who's side would you come down on with what we have so far? I'm not saying it's the final story. But at this point it looks worse for the thug. Without doubt? Do you know what they call that? http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/n...al-record.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Information From the Web | pigo[_2_] | Alpine Skiing | 1 | May 16th 14 02:49 PM |
Request for Information | klaus[_2_] | Alpine Skiing | 135 | October 8th 08 10:48 AM |
More Information for your perusal | Doofus Fighter | Alpine Skiing | 2 | December 12th 07 03:19 PM |
Les Gets - information | steve a | European Ski Resorts | 4 | January 26th 04 11:12 AM |