New Information

On Friday, 15 August 2014 16:43:11 UTC-7, twobuddha wrote:

I got a lot of compliments about that pic.

From who? Your gay ButtBudddy Burt? Oh, that's right... even he's not your friend anymore. I guess that just leaves all your imaginary friends.

On 08/15/2014 01:22 PM, pigo wrote:
On Friday, August 15, 2014 2:08:13 PM UTC-6, Richard Henry wrote:

More from Ferguson police chief - "This robbery does not relate to
the initial contact between the officer and Michael Brown. He
contacted them because they were walking down the middle of the
street blocking traffic."

It was within minutes of the robbery. The robber didn't know that the
cop didn't know. I suppose that's why he attacked the cop.

Why do you suppose that so far we've only gotten old pictures of an
innocent looking young teen? And not the menacing 300 pounder?

I guess you missed the tape from the convenience store showing the guy
shoving the storeowner out of the way as he -- presumably -- made off
with stolen snacks.

--
Cheers, Bev
=============================================
If you are going to try cross-country skiing,
start with a small country.

On Friday, 15 August 2014 17:05:15 UTC-7, twobuddha wrote:
You're foaming at the mouth in impotent rage, maggot.

There you go again projecting your own behaviour. Here's a clue for you, ****tard, I'm laughing at you as I poke you with a sharp stick and watch you dance on demand.

You're flailing your skinny little arms and stomping your skinny little legs.

Oh, BTW, on Facebook you say you're self-employed. Is that what you call it when you stay in your fetid little basement and wank you little weiner all day.

On 2014-08-15 17:22:49 +0000, pigo said:

On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:57:46 AM UTC-6, Richard Henry wrote:

The video is out. And the robber is much different looking than the
picture that have been released of "the innocent young teen" purported
to be shot by the racist police.



"Purported"? The police have admitted the officer shot him. Even
giving his story the greatest latitude, the officer is likely guilty of
manslaughter.

Purported to be an innocent young teen. 6'4" and 300# alone is enough
to give the officer legitimate fear for his life. The attack and recent
robbery by the suspect only add to that justification.

But you know that.

So you're all cool if police officers start shooting anyone who is 6'4"
and 300#... ...or just the black ones?

On Friday, August 15, 2014 6:01:37 PM UTC-6, The Real Bev wrote:

I guess you missed the tape from the convenience store showing the guy
shoving the storeowner out of the way as he -- presumably -- made off
with stolen snacks.

No. But up until then and still so far in the stills he's portrayed as about a 15 year old. Much like they did with Treyvon Martin, showing 5 year old pictures. Why not show recent ones?

On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:27:45 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

So you're all cool if police officers start shooting anyone who is 6'4"
and 300#... ...or just the black ones?

I'm giving the cop (that needed medical attention after the incident) the benefit of the doubt over a robber. His size is relevant to the officers legitimate fear for his life. So are his actions just prior to the shooting.

You've got a cop with a clean record and no complaints.

You've got a thug that just robbed a store and without doubt had a juvenile record.

Who's side would you come down on with what we have so far? I'm not saying it's the final story. But at this point it looks worse for the thug.

On Friday, 15 August 2014 20:39:23 UTC-7, twobuddha wrote:
Having fun stalking?


What part of "Public Profile" are you having trouble comprehending, ****tard?

Maybe you need to adjust your Facebook settings... but that's probably more than your alcohol-addled brain can manage.

On Saturday, August 16, 2014 6:17:53 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote:
On Friday, August 15, 2014 6:01:37 PM UTC-6, The Real Bev wrote:



I guess you missed the tape from the convenience store showing the guy

shoving the storeowner out of the way as he -- presumably -- made off

with stolen snacks.



No. But up until then and still so far in the stills he's portrayed as about a 15 year old. Much like they did with Treyvon Martin, showing 5 year old pictures. Why not show recent ones?

They have shown his high school graduation picture, which was taken a couple of months ago

On Saturday, August 16, 2014 6:23:21 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote:
On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:27:45 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:



So you're all cool if police officers start shooting anyone who is 6'4"

and 300#... ...or just the black ones?



I'm giving the cop (that needed medical attention after the incident) the benefit of the doubt over a robber. His size is relevant to the officers legitimate fear for his life. So are his actions just prior to the shooting.



You've got a cop with a clean record and no complaints.



You've got a thug that just robbed a store and without doubt had a juvenile record.



Who's side would you come down on with what we have so far? I'm not saying it's the final story. But at this point it looks worse for the thug.

Without doubt? Do you know what they call that?

On Saturday, August 16, 2014 9:35:45 AM UTC-7, Richard Henry wrote:
On Saturday, August 16, 2014 6:23:21 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote:

On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:27:45 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:







So you're all cool if police officers start shooting anyone who is 6'4"



and 300#... ...or just the black ones?







I'm giving the cop (that needed medical attention after the incident) the benefit of the doubt over a robber. His size is relevant to the officers legitimate fear for his life. So are his actions just prior to the shooting.







You've got a cop with a clean record and no complaints.







You've got a thug that just robbed a store and without doubt had a juvenile record.







Who's side would you come down on with what we have so far? I'm not saying it's the final story. But at this point it looks worse for the thug.



Without doubt? Do you know what they call that?

http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/n...al-record.html