If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
video make-over
I put some video clips of my own skating up on the web at
http://roberts-1.com/t/xc045/a/p1/index.htm I'd be glad if you'd take a look at it and tell me what I should work on next with my technique. Last time I posted some of my videos here more than a year ago, the critiques and suggestions I saw from many of you on this newsgroup were the best ski lesson I ever got. Thanks to all of you who took the trouble to analyze and write your comments and put them out in public on the newsgroup. Those older videos of me skating are still up on the web at http://roberts-1.com/t/xc034/a/p1 I think I see some changes in my technique since then -- already some sort of "make-over" (? but is it good or bad ?). Now I'd like to keep on developing, into another make-over. Playing with my own technique is fascinating and fun. My great thanks to JanneG for offering all those elite racer videos for me to learn from and compare to. Thanks to Zach Caldwell for posting the toughest and deepest critique of all. Above all to Sharon for enduring the hassle of all those times standing in the cold taking one more (and then one more) video shot of me trying to ski different. Ken P.S. Why so long since my last post of my videos? Because changing my technique style was really hard. I was surprised. Of course I knew that just using the right mental images and concepts would not work, but I thought that with frequent video analysis, change would be straightforward -- like substantial change in a month, or certainly after two months. Instead what happened with each video session is that I would quickly see what was wrong in the analysis afterward, and know why it was wrong in the physics -- and resolve to change it, and practice a new pattern -- but then in the video Sharon took three weeks later the same flaw would mostly still be there. Or I'd focus on fixing two subtle but critical problems for several months, and then notice three other visually-obvious flaws that "should" have been settled long ago. So my progress felt embarrassing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
KR,
It takes courage to post that stuff & invite criticism. Wow they are hugely different. On the positive side, you are skiing a lot less in the middle, making much better weight transfer which is key to all moves. This is great progress. I wonder about the head flopping you have added. Is this a tool to get you to stay on the gliding ski longer ? If you could quiet that down, I would think you've basically got it. You may not even realize it, although the view must be: Snow Treetops Bluesky Snow whereas I think it should probably be more like Snow a couple ski lengths ahead Top of hill Look just ahead Look to top of hill Or anything that gets your head quieted down. Your glide is about twice as long now, isn't it ? I bet you had to work on your basic balance skills, and maybe you have even honed the core strength. I bet you have better weight transfer in your V2 now also. That would be fun to see. Thanks. DT |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
delltodd wrote
I wonder about the head flopping you have added. I did not add that to my V1. The head-flopping just showed up on its own. I completely agree that it makes sense to stabilize my head for a stable view (like roughly toward the direction I'm going). But I'm not seeing a straightforward way to get that. So looks like it's going to be a year again until I post another video. I should be grateful to have something else to keep those long-slow-distance sessions from getting boring. Interesting that in observing the front-view video of my Legs Only skate, seems like my head is looking mostly straight forward -- even though my shoulders are tilting and turning all over the place. I think that's because I skate all summer with no poles, so I get lots of hours to work on stabilizing my head. So my interpretation is that it's the asymmetric V1 offset poling that's messing up my head-stability. I bet you have better weight transfer in your V2 now also. Probably yes. It's a little sad for me to look at my older videos -- I feel like saying "Cmon guy, put a little oomph into your skiing". But I almost never do V2 skate any more. For a while it was my favorite technique. Now on gentler terrain I find I just love the quiet power (and stable view) of Legs-only skating. Maybe it's time to revisit V2 and see what it can do for me. Ken ______________________________________________ delltodd wrote It takes courage to post that stuff & invite criticism. Wow they are hugely different. On the positive side, you are skiing a lot less in the middle, making much better weight transfer which is key to all moves. This is great progress. I wonder about the head flopping you have added. Is this a tool to get you to stay on the gliding ski longer ? If you could quiet that down, I would think you've basically got it. You may not even realize it, although the view must be: Snow Treetops Bluesky Snow whereas I think it should probably be more like Snow a couple ski lengths ahead Top of hill Look just ahead Look to top of hill Or anything that gets your head quieted down. Your glide is about twice as long now, isn't it ? I bet you had to work on your basic balance skills, and maybe you have even honed the core strength. I bet you have better weight transfer in your V2 now also. That would be fun to see. Thanks. DT ____________________________________________ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I agree with Dell about your willingness to post and ask for help, and
your improvement. There's a basic misunderstanding here. In three of the sequences you are trying to get weight shift, i.e., get from skate to skate from your upper body, esp. your shoulders. They are rocking, bobbing, weaving, etc. Instead, skating needs to come from your core/pelvic area and legs, with the upper body moving naturally along without tilting. The phrase often used is to have a quiet upper body. In the other sequence (side, legs), you are virtually running on skis rather than skating (perhaps the mental image is stepping, but you are actually moving too fast to step). For all of this... Exercise 1: Skate keeping your nongliding ski very close to the snow, literally lifting it just enough to clear and no higher. This exercise will force you to use your legs, as well as ankles, edges and such, while helping you get the feel of staying on the ski longer. Exercise 2: V1 Skate with a stiff (but not rigid) upper body, using mild terrain. This is an exaggerated position that will help make clear what a quiet upper body is. Do V2 this way also. Exercise 3 (no pole and pole): After you get comfortable with the first two exercises, i.e., you are actually using your legs and are skating ski to ski and you have quieted your torso, then try driving each skate with your upper thigh (some people use the knee, but I like to emphasize the top of the leg because it's easier to keep your hip over the ski from there). This will help you get up over the ski more and stay there longer. It's a different and great feeling. Poling: Isolating it from all the shoulder and head movement, your V1 poling actually looks pretty good. If you quiet the upper body, it will get a lot easier and more effective. I would suggest bringing the off-side hand across in front more, but no farther than halfway across your torso. Swimmers and big-shouldered folks tend to keep the off-side hand wider, while the rest of us are stronger closer, more like double pole hand distance apart. Poling Exercise: Do V1 with one pole, poling from both the strong side and then the off-side pole. This will also help you use your legs. Gene Ken Roberts wrote: I put some video clips of my own skating up on the web at http://roberts-1.com/t/xc045/a/p1/index.htm I'd be glad if you'd take a look at it and tell me what I should work on next with my technique. Last time I posted some of my videos here more than a year ago, the critiques and suggestions I saw from many of you on this newsgroup were the best ski lesson I ever got. Thanks to all of you who took the trouble to analyze and write your comments and put them out in public on the newsgroup. Those older videos of me skating are still up on the web at http://roberts-1.com/t/xc034/a/p1 I think I see some changes in my technique since then -- already some sort of "make-over" (? but is it good or bad ?). Now I'd like to keep on developing, into another make-over. Playing with my own technique is fascinating and fun. My great thanks to JanneG for offering all those elite racer videos for me to learn from and compare to. Thanks to Zach Caldwell for posting the toughest and deepest critique of all. Above all to Sharon for enduring the hassle of all those times standing in the cold taking one more (and then one more) video shot of me trying to ski different. Ken P.S. Why so long since my last post of my videos? Because changing my technique style was really hard. I was surprised. Of course I knew that just using the right mental images and concepts would not work, but I thought that with frequent video analysis, change would be straightforward -- like substantial change in a month, or certainly after two months. Instead what happened with each video session is that I would quickly see what was wrong in the analysis afterward, and know why it was wrong in the physics -- and resolve to change it, and practice a new pattern -- but then in the video Sharon took three weeks later the same flaw would mostly still be there. Or I'd focus on fixing two subtle but critical problems for several months, and then notice three other visually-obvious flaws that "should" have been settled long ago. So my progress felt embarrassing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Gene Goldenfeld wrote
There's a basic misunderstanding here Yes I think Gene and I do have a "basic" -- not misunderstanding -- We just plain disagree. . . . have a quiet upper body. Gene thinks I should have a quiet upper body. I think "quiet" is an option for skating on the flats, but when I gotta climb up a steep hill, I need to get wild with my upper body. I think that's what physics says, and that's what the elite racers in the videos do. Put me on hard snow on the flats and I'll skate as pretty as you want, but if I'm going to make it up a hill with soft snow on it, I gotta do what works. And I think physics says that what works includes: * smooth effective leg-push out toward the side, while the ski is gliding way out to the side. * stable hips * wild side-to-side motion of torso * stable head The way I analyze those videos of my V1, I'm getting close on 3 out of 4 of those points, but I'm still way off on 1 out of 4 ("stable head"). So "stable head in V1" is now on my list to work on for next year. But I would need to hear some good reason for why I should also be adding "quiet upper body for climbing up hills". In the other sequence (side, legs), you are virtually running on skis rather than skating To me that side view of Legs-only looks very different from running up a hill: * each ski keeps gliding forward the whole time it's on the snow. * as the leg pushes, the heel drives down and back into the snow. I don't think hill-runners drive their heels down like that. True, the glide is nowhere near as long as you'd expect to see of someone skating on the flats -- but that video was taken on the steepest hill at the Mohonk ski center -- How much glide can you expect there from some guy with distinctly non-elite leg muscles? And viewing the Legs-only front-view video using pause and single-frame, on most of the leg-pushes (especially the skier's left leg): * the pushing leg ends up nearly fully straightened, * with the toe pointed out way to the side. I do not think running up a hill looks like that. I guess I need more help in identifying the "running" aspects of the motion. I'm sorta thinking that the side-view Legs video looks a bit like "hot feet" or "dynamic legs". I even see some of that "knee drive" move that Vordenberg has been focusing on lately. And in the front-view Legs video when the toe ends pointed out to the side -- could that be a bit of that "kicking forward" move that Rob Bradlee was describing on this newsgroup 3 weeks ago to help with "Struggles going upshill"? (Let's see what I can learn from basic disagreement.) Ken _______________________________________ Gene Goldenfeld wrote I agree with Dell about your willingness to post and ask for help, and your improvement. There's a basic misunderstanding here. In three of the sequences you are trying to get weight shift, i.e., get from skate to skate from your upper body, esp. your shoulders. They are rocking, bobbing, weaving, etc. Instead, skating needs to come from your core/pelvic area and legs, with the upper body moving naturally along without tilting. The phrase often used is to have a quiet upper body. In the other sequence (side, legs), you are virtually running on skis rather than skating (perhaps the mental image is stepping, but you are actually moving too fast to step). For all of this... Exercise 1: Skate keeping your nongliding ski very close to the snow, literally lifting it just enough to clear and no higher. This exercise will force you to use your legs, as well as ankles, edges and such, while helping you get the feel of staying on the ski longer. Exercise 2: V1 Skate with a stiff (but not rigid) upper body, using mild terrain. This is an exaggerated position that will help make clear what a quiet upper body is. Do V2 this way also. Exercise 3 (no pole and pole): After you get comfortable with the first two exercises, i.e., you are actually using your legs and are skating ski to ski and you have quieted your torso, then try driving each skate with your upper thigh (some people use the knee, but I like to emphasize the top of the leg because it's easier to keep your hip over the ski from there). This will help you get up over the ski more and stay there longer. It's a different and great feeling. Poling: Isolating it from all the shoulder and head movement, your V1 poling actually looks pretty good. If you quiet the upper body, it will get a lot easier and more effective. I would suggest bringing the off-side hand across in front more, but no farther than halfway across your torso. Swimmers and big-shouldered folks tend to keep the off-side hand wider, while the rest of us are stronger closer, more like double pole hand distance apart. Poling Exercise: Do V1 with one pole, poling from both the strong side and then the off-side pole. This will also help you use your legs. Gene __________________________________________________ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I'm not going to argue with you, all the more so since you didn't
address me. If you can find someone else in the world to agree with you, then you will have a party of two. Good luck. GG Ken Roberts wrote: Gene Goldenfeld wrote There's a basic misunderstanding here Yes I think Gene and I do have a "basic" -- not misunderstanding -- We just plain disagree. . . . have a quiet upper body. Gene thinks I should have a quiet upper body. I think "quiet" is an option for skating on the flats, but when I gotta climb up a steep hill, I need to get wild with my upper body. I think that's what physics says, and that's what the elite racers in the videos do. Put me on hard snow on the flats and I'll skate as pretty as you want, but if I'm going to make it up a hill with soft snow on it, I gotta do what works. And I think physics says that what works includes: * smooth effective leg-push out toward the side, while the ski is gliding way out to the side. * stable hips * wild side-to-side motion of torso * stable head The way I analyze those videos of my V1, I'm getting close on 3 out of 4 of those points, but I'm still way off on 1 out of 4 ("stable head"). So "stable head in V1" is now on my list to work on for next year. But I would need to hear some good reason for why I should also be adding "quiet upper body for climbing up hills". In the other sequence (side, legs), you are virtually running on skis rather than skating To me that side view of Legs-only looks very different from running up a hill: * each ski keeps gliding forward the whole time it's on the snow. * as the leg pushes, the heel drives down and back into the snow. I don't think hill-runners drive their heels down like that. True, the glide is nowhere near as long as you'd expect to see of someone skating on the flats -- but that video was taken on the steepest hill at the Mohonk ski center -- How much glide can you expect there from some guy with distinctly non-elite leg muscles? And viewing the Legs-only front-view video using pause and single-frame, on most of the leg-pushes (especially the skier's left leg): * the pushing leg ends up nearly fully straightened, * with the toe pointed out way to the side. I do not think running up a hill looks like that. I guess I need more help in identifying the "running" aspects of the motion. I'm sorta thinking that the side-view Legs video looks a bit like "hot feet" or "dynamic legs". I even see some of that "knee drive" move that Vordenberg has been focusing on lately. And in the front-view Legs video when the toe ends pointed out to the side -- could that be a bit of that "kicking forward" move that Rob Bradlee was describing on this newsgroup 3 weeks ago to help with "Struggles going upshill"? (Let's see what I can learn from basic disagreement.) Ken _______________________________________ Gene Goldenfeld wrote I agree with Dell about your willingness to post and ask for help, and your improvement. There's a basic misunderstanding here. In three of the sequences you are trying to get weight shift, i.e., get from skate to skate from your upper body, esp. your shoulders. They are rocking, bobbing, weaving, etc. Instead, skating needs to come from your core/pelvic area and legs, with the upper body moving naturally along without tilting. The phrase often used is to have a quiet upper body. In the other sequence (side, legs), you are virtually running on skis rather than skating (perhaps the mental image is stepping, but you are actually moving too fast to step). For all of this... Exercise 1: Skate keeping your nongliding ski very close to the snow, literally lifting it just enough to clear and no higher. This exercise will force you to use your legs, as well as ankles, edges and such, while helping you get the feel of staying on the ski longer. Exercise 2: V1 Skate with a stiff (but not rigid) upper body, using mild terrain. This is an exaggerated position that will help make clear what a quiet upper body is. Do V2 this way also. Exercise 3 (no pole and pole): After you get comfortable with the first two exercises, i.e., you are actually using your legs and are skating ski to ski and you have quieted your torso, then try driving each skate with your upper thigh (some people use the knee, but I like to emphasize the top of the leg because it's easier to keep your hip over the ski from there). This will help you get up over the ski more and stay there longer. It's a different and great feeling. Poling: Isolating it from all the shoulder and head movement, your V1 poling actually looks pretty good. If you quiet the upper body, it will get a lot easier and more effective. I would suggest bringing the off-side hand across in front more, but no farther than halfway across your torso. Swimmers and big-shouldered folks tend to keep the off-side hand wider, while the rest of us are stronger closer, more like double pole hand distance apart. Poling Exercise: Do V1 with one pole, poling from both the strong side and then the off-side pole. This will also help you use your legs. Gene __________________________________________________ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Ken, at times I almost think that you are trolling ;^)
I also taught myself and I shudder to think how I looked skating my first two years, but I think that my learning process made me very aware of what mental technique pointers worked for me. I also have skating imprinted into my brain from watching and rewatching the 1998 Olympic tapes continuously one winter (and later 2002 Olympics and Janne's technique videos) during the time I finally picked up how to skate correctly. Here are the things that I noticed on your new videos: Your weight is on your heels. You are skating like a speed skater pre-clap skate. It was very noticeable to me that your boots never come off your skis you could probably ski the same way if your heel was fixed! You should be aware of your center of gravity. When your weight is back, your COG is over your heels and that's where you feel the pressure in your feet. You need to shift your weight forward so that your COG is over the front part of your foot... the ball of your foot or just behind the ball of your foot. If you feel the most pressure at that point when you skate off, you know you have it right. References from memory: Galanes (RSN poster "Jim") wrote that the push should be with whole foot, with greatest pressure on the forefoot. Abby Larson had an article a while back somewhere where she says that she can tell she is in the right fore-aft position when her weight is on the front part of he feet. You are not using your abdominals, at least not to the extent that you should or the way that you should. One part of it is the running thing that Gene mentioned in your forward step. Getting this right was THE key for me (I picked up the tip from the archives of RSN a couple of years ago). Don't step forward with your leg. Swing (not lift) your leg forward with your abs... You can figure out how to do that now in the house. Visualize your legs going all the way to the bottom of your ribs and move from there. During my first two years of skiing, I never used my abs. One time, as I was skiing behind my friend up a long hill, I asked her if she was using her abs and she told me OF COURSE! and that it was almost cramping up. She's a high level skier, so that was a wakeup for me. Anyway, that visualization for bring the leg forward turned my skiing around within minutes of trying it. Immediately my upper body was more stable. In the legs only views, you can tell that you are not using your abs and that it is resulting in you having fore-aft balance problems (where you seem to get your upper body too far forward and need to correct...). I agree with Gene on your upper body. You should shift your weight around and compress to some extent, but your upper body should move as a whole. Dang, Ken, you are even arching your back backwards the V1 front view video (the side view doesn't look as bad). If you keep your torso connected with your pelvis with body tension, ALL of your upper body will be involved with weight shift (not just your torso) and the overall movement will be quieter. It's an easier and more effective way of loading your weight on your kicking (skating) foot than what you are doing with the extra torso movement. Keep your head steady too. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nice analysis, Andrew. Several years ago Mary Kay (MK) linked in an
article by Max Jones about using the psoas muscles in skating, which are behind the abs. I can't find it now, but will look later. Gene Andrew Lee wrote: Swing (not lift) your leg forward with your abs... You can figure out how to do that now in the house. Visualize your legs going all the way to the bottom of your ribs and move from there. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew Lee wrote
Swing (not lift) your leg forward with your abs... You can figure out how to do that now in the house. Visualize your legs going all the way to the bottom of your ribs and move from there. OK I'll try that. Andrew is right that I can feel the difference in my living room. Actually I'm not sure why thinking about moving my leg should help much. But that's OK -- I'm happy to try new moves and figure out the physics/biomechanics later. (Is this move at all related to what Jim Grau said about "forward hip rotation"?) Your weight is on your heels. You are skating like a speed skater pre-clap skate. It was very noticeable to me that your boots never come off your skis. I agree with this observation that my heel stays down thru virtually my whole leg-push, though I think my heel usually does come up just as I'm finishing my leg-push. But I'm not seeing where to go with this, because it looks to me like the same observation about "heels down thru almost the whole leg-push" can be made about Bjorndalen and all the other elite racers in Janne G's video -- and to me it looks even more clear in that footwork close-up video on Janne G's Technic page: skateFeetSlomo.mpg ... you having fore-aft balance problems (where you seem to get your upper body too far forward . . . I agree with the observation that my upper body is leaning way forward. But it looks to me like most of the elite racers in JanneG's videos are leaning way forward also -- and it seems roughly as far as me, but sometimes more. I know skating is complicated -- so I'm glad to say I'm missing some key aspect -- what is it? If you keep your torso connected with your pelvis with body tension, ALL of your upper body will be involved with weight shift (not just your torso) I think I'm hearing that maybe my pelvis and hips are not properly shifting sideways. To me that sounds undesirable, since I really believe in side-weight-shift, and I really believe that it's more important for my hips, than it is for my torso and shoulders. I really believe that the shift of my shoulders is only a supplement to be added after strong hip+pelvis side-weight-transfer is achieved. I'll give up some shoulder-torso-swing if I really understand how that's going to increase my hip+pelvis action, but not if I haven't heard how at least a good hint at how proper hip weight-transfer should be defined and observed -- so I could know when I'd finally "got" it. So like in my Legs-only Front-view video, or my V1 Front-view, what is the observation that shows that my hips or pelvis (or something) is not getting enough weight-transfer? In what phase of my leg-push: set-down? final extension? you are even arching your back backwards the V1 front view video ... your upper body should move as a whole. I agree with that observation about arching back, and that I don't like it and want to get rid of it. And I agree with the observation about the elite racers (this time) in their torso-side-moves do not curve their torso sideways like I do -- so thanks for exposing me to that. But this is one case where I'm not yet ready to copy the elite racers -- in the side-curve-bend of my torso. I don't buy the "upper body should move as a whole" because to me it's like what the US National team coaches have been pointing out for years about the benefit of forward-curvature of the torso -- that in the pole-push it's important to curve the shoulders-chest-abdomen (the C position), and have warned against the mistake of hinge at the waist and keep the torso straight in poling. I agree with those National coaches, and in the last six months on the newsgroup gave a difficult-to-understand justification of the physics and biomechanics of why the curved C position is better. I'd be glad to hear some arguments for why side-curvature is bad even though front-curvature is good, or for why its side-effects are inevitably bad. But for me it's got to be something more than just "quieter is better". Because climbing up a hill is an act against nature. Ken __________________________________ Andrew Lee wrote Ken, at times I almost think that you are trolling ;^) I also taught myself and I shudder to think how I looked skating my first two years, but I think that my learning process made me very aware of what mental technique pointers worked for me. I also have skating imprinted into my brain from watching and rewatching the 1998 Olympic tapes continuously one winter (and later 2002 Olympics and Janne's technique videos) during the time I finally picked up how to skate correctly. Here are the things that I noticed on your new videos: Your weight is on your heels. You are skating like a speed skater pre-clap skate. It was very noticeable to me that your boots never come off your skis you could probably ski the same way if your heel was fixed! You should be aware of your center of gravity. When your weight is back, your COG is over your heels and that's where you feel the pressure in your feet. You need to shift your weight forward so that your COG is over the front part of your foot... the ball of your foot or just behind the ball of your foot. If you feel the most pressure at that point when you skate off, you know you have it right. References from memory: Galanes (RSN poster "Jim") wrote that the push should be with whole foot, with greatest pressure on the forefoot. Abby Larson had an article a while back somewhere where she says that she can tell she is in the right fore-aft position when her weight is on the front part of he feet. You are not using your abdominals, at least not to the extent that you should or the way that you should. One part of it is the running thing that Gene mentioned in your forward step. Getting this right was THE key for me (I picked up the tip from the archives of RSN a couple of years ago). Don't step forward with your leg. Swing (not lift) your leg forward with your abs... You can figure out how to do that now in the house. Visualize your legs going all the way to the bottom of your ribs and move from there. During my first two years of skiing, I never used my abs. One time, as I was skiing behind my friend up a long hill, I asked her if she was using her abs and she told me OF COURSE! and that it was almost cramping up. She's a high level skier, so that was a wakeup for me. Anyway, that visualization for bring the leg forward turned my skiing around within minutes of trying it. Immediately my upper body was more stable. In the legs only views, you can tell that you are not using your abs and that it is resulting in you having fore-aft balance problems (where you seem to get your upper body too far forward and need to correct...). I agree with Gene on your upper body. You should shift your weight around and compress to some extent, but your upper body should move as a whole. Dang, Ken, you are even arching your back backwards the V1 front view video (the side view doesn't look as bad). If you keep your torso connected with your pelvis with body tension, ALL of your upper body will be involved with weight shift (not just your torso) and the overall movement will be quieter. It's an easier and more effective way of loading your weight on your kicking (skating) foot than what you are doing with the extra torso movement. Keep your head steady too. _____________________________________ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Ken Roberts wrote: Andrew Lee wrote Swing (not lift) your leg forward with your abs... You can figure out how to do that now in the house. Visualize your legs going all the way to the bottom of your ribs and move from there. OK I'll try that. Andrew is right that I can feel the difference in my living room. Actually I'm not sure why thinking about moving my leg should help much. But that's OK -- I'm happy to try new moves and figure out the physics/biomechanics later. (Is this move at all related to what Jim Grau said about "forward hip rotation"?) Yes, it is related to what Jim said. It will stabilize you more than you can believe if you haven't tried it yet on snow. You might be able to see it in the videos if you know what to look for - it's a elastic springiness to their hip/ab movement that shows that they are using those muscles. I notice it even in the leg skating videos. The stability will help you reduce extraneous upper body movement. Your weight center will no longer be all over the place, so you will be able to smoothly shift it much easier. I use this for all the skating techniques and classic as well. Your weight is on your heels. You are skating like a speed skater pre-clap skate. It was very noticeable to me that your boots never come off your skis. I agree with this observation that my heel stays down thru virtually my whole leg-push, though I think my heel usually does come up just as I'm finishing my leg-push. But I'm not seeing where to go with this, because it looks to me like the same observation about "heels down thru almost the whole leg-push" can be made about Bjorndalen and all the other elite racers in Janne G's video -- and to me it looks even more clear in that footwork close-up video on Janne G's Technic page: skateFeetSlomo.mpg I could tell without detailed observation that you were skating off your heels - it just looked like that in my first impression on the side views. It might be a factor in limiting your leg extension. If you try it both ways dryland, you might notice the difference. This is pretty much an easy fix I think. Just keep your weight centered over the front of your feet and feel the pressure just behind the ball of your feet when you push off and rest will probably take care of itself. ... you having fore-aft balance problems (where you seem to get your upper body too far forward . . . I agree with the observation that my upper body is leaning way forward. But it looks to me like most of the elite racers in JanneG's videos are leaning way forward also -- and it seems roughly as far as me, but sometimes more. I know skating is complicated -- so I'm glad to say I'm missing some key aspect -- what is it? I was noticing the bobble and instability, not the angle so much. See my first point. If you keep your torso connected with your pelvis with body tension, ALL of your upper body will be involved with weight shift (not just your torso) I think I'm hearing that maybe my pelvis and hips are not properly shifting sideways. To me that sounds undesirable, since I really believe in side-weight-shift, and I really believe that it's more important for my hips, than it is for my torso and shoulders. I really believe that the shift of my shoulders is only a supplement to be added after strong hip+pelvis side-weight-transfer is achieved. I'll give up some shoulder-torso-swing if I really understand how that's going to increase my hip+pelvis action, but not if I haven't heard how at least a good hint at how proper hip weight-transfer should be defined and observed -- so I could know when I'd finally "got" it. You can keep the swing, but more pendulum like without the flailing. So like in my Legs-only Front-view video, or my V1 Front-view, what is the observation that shows that my hips or pelvis (or something) is not getting enough weight-transfer? In what phase of my leg-push: set-down? final extension? It looks like you are getting good weight transfer - you are moving up the hill pretty well. you are even arching your back backwards the V1 front view video ... your upper body should move as a whole. I agree with that observation about arching back, and that I don't like it and want to get rid of it. And I agree with the observation about the elite racers (this time) in their torso-side-moves do not curve their torso sideways like I do -- so thanks for exposing me to that. But this is one case where I'm not yet ready to copy the elite racers -- in the side-curve-bend of my torso. I don't buy the "upper body should move as a whole" because to me it's like what the US National team coaches have been pointing out for years about the benefit of forward-curvature of the torso -- that in the pole-push it's important to curve the shoulders-chest-abdomen (the C position), and have warned against the mistake of hinge at the waist and keep the torso straight in poling. I agree with those National coaches, and in the last six months on the newsgroup gave a difficult-to-understand justification of the physics and biomechanics of why the curved C position is better. I guess my point wasn't clear. I'm not saying anything about whether there should be a curve or not, and I'm not saying to bend at the waist. The curve is a good thing. The lower part of the C is maintained by the muscles that I was referring to in my first point (psoas?). I was thinking of two things: the back arching and instability. I'd be glad to hear some arguments for why side-curvature is bad even though front-curvature is good, or for why its side-effects are inevitably bad. But for me it's got to be something more than just "quieter is better". Because climbing up a hill is an act against nature. No one else does it, right? Maybe it isn't inevitably bad. Some top marathoners do some weird form things (Paula Radcliffe's head bobble, some top Chinese runner's straight arms, etc.). But it looks like flailing to me. If you can get on some snow (in Europe?), try the ab driven leg recovery and the weight over the front of the foot things. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This can make you some extra cash, check it out. | Nick Burns | Snowboarding | 0 | July 14th 03 04:32 PM |
This can make you some extra cash, check it out. | Nick Burns | North American Ski Resorts | 0 | July 14th 03 04:32 PM |