If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
On our local 47k groomed public trail it is "No Dogs Allowed" and
"Snowshoes not allowed on the groomed trail". It works because adjacent areas are provided for both (the dog area is called "the poop loop"). Here the skaters are given priority with the track set often too close to the trail edge. But the way I see it is (I ski classic) I can ski anywhere, leaving the track set if it gets too thin, as well as using all of the ungroomed back country trails that are nearby. The skaters need a wide, well groomed trail and they are the vast majority on the groomed trail. I should add that dogs and snowshoes are always a problem on the ungroomed trail areas but usually only near the trail head (even though signs are posted asking them to stay out of the tracks). But all you need to do is go back far enough and then you can usually find unspoiled tracks. Rich M |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Here where I am we have different problems - walkers, dogs, smokers, and snowshoers. I'd gladly contend with an occasional skating mark over the classic tracks rather than some idiot walking their 100 pound labrador retriever right in a groomed track while smoking and pulling a sled full of kids. Nearly got a fist fight over it last weekend. Anyone have any suggestions for solving the "walker" problems ?? Full metal edges. Run over their feet/ankles. :-) Chris |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
xcwhite wrote:
I agree, use the opportunity to work on your technique by not skiing in the tracks. Indeed. Thought they called it "cross country" skiing for a reason? =) I tend to use the set "train" tracks only for scooting down slight downhill slopes where they provide nice straight glide with minimum effort - either on skates or classic skis. There's a whole wide groomed trail there to kick and glide on. Why not use it? Better yet hop off the groomed stuff and ski on real snow. =) Chris |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Cole wrote:
xcwhite wrote: I agree, use the opportunity to work on your technique by not skiing in the tracks. Indeed. Thought they called it "cross country" skiing for a reason? =) I tend to use the set "train" tracks only for scooting down slight downhill slopes where they provide nice straight glide with minimum effort - either on skates or classic skis. There's a whole wide groomed trail there to kick and glide on. Why not use it? Better yet hop off the groomed stuff and ski on real snow. =) Chris For sure! I got to go to Galena Lodge (out by Sun Valley in Idaho) 2 years ago, (previously only having skied on eastern US snow (ie; mostly wet, mostly thin)), and even though it was the end of the season, the base was 50 inches or so, they got an inch of so of new powderish stuff each night. Anyway, when I went off the groomed surfaces and jabbed a pole good, I found that it went down 3 or 4 feet. Also the trees were pretty widely spaced so I could climb around up hills and easily ski back down to the trail. Trails are fun and the glide is better, but woods are lots of fun (as is untracked snow!). (btw , this was easy skiing on std xc skis, I am afraid I am not good enough to claim any Telemark status!) gr gr |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
I think that a good portion of the ruined tracks results from inadequate signage
at the trails themselves. It is not enough to list them on a trail map, or at a bulletin board at the main trail head. Although there are exceptions to this, most people obey signs, or at least feel more guilty if one is staring them in the face. Get your favorite areas to post clear signs at the trail heads indicating which kinds of skiing are permitted, and big clear signs at the main trail heads indicating no foot traffic, dogs, etc. If there are enough trails available, I think the skaters and the stridders should be segregated to their own trails to avoid these kinds of conflicts, and all main access trails should be wide enough to handle both types. I have skied several resorts in the Midwest where this is put to practice. Sherwin D. 32 degrees wrote: hey chris - thanks for the final recap on this thread. I didnt try to stir things up or say anything bad with my analogy. Was just really trying to explain the situation ! I am an accomplished skater and love it, but also love great classic tracks ( just in from two great hours of it ). As for your comment ... Dealing with "walkers, dogs, smokers, and snowshoers" is indeed worse. Thankfully, Eldora Mountain Resort is too steep for most walkers, the altitude would cause most smokers to keel over and die, and dogs are totally banned (although I once was startled by a complete sled dog team that emerged from the woods onto my trail one day!). The snowshoe crowd sometimes strays onto a groomed trail, but not often enough to be a problem; the resort does a good job with signs for that." I think I've discovered the problem -- We need to move our little town trails from their current 1300' elevation to about 9,300 ! That would drive out the smokers. hahaha later JK |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Nobodys mentioned actual injuries.
At a minor classic club race in Scotland we had a single cut track on a forest road on a slight downhill. Part way down our track went off left and then up an incline. The slope and the turn were so gentle that all the family members made it without a problem. On race day the Biathlon Juniors (all military) appeared and were invited to race too, a race within a race. One soldier boy was so keen to catchup his pal in front he took his eyes off the track just on the bend. His weighted right ski came out of the groove into the track left by a skater going straight on. He did the splits, fell on his right arm and it fractured. Just another incident, but it cost him a potential podium place at the upcoming Army Championships. He went back to his regiment and he never skied again after that day. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
legs-only skating for itself | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 7 | January 12th 06 06:01 PM |
converting from classical to skating | S. S. | Nordic Skiing | 9 | February 17th 04 02:36 AM |
TR- New York City park skating | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 2 | January 24th 04 01:19 AM |
skating on classic ski | Sebastian | Nordic Skiing | 4 | January 14th 04 06:03 PM |
glide: skating vs. traditional??? | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 4 | August 22nd 03 11:57 PM |