If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article . com, xcwhite wrote: I think you underestimate how light ski gear can be. An ice climber uses plastic boots so that there is no weight advantage with foot wear. There is randonee ski gear out there that rivals the weight of a set of snow shoes needed to carry a large amount of gear. _ The lightest binding that fits a mountaineering boot is just under 3lbs, "light" skis are at best 4lbs a pair. Other than old wooden snowshoes, I can't find a modern pair that weighs 7lbs. And breaking trail with those 4lbs skis is not going to be much fun.... Ultimately, it depends on how well you ski. So for a typical Randonee Race with 5,000 ft. of elevation gain and loss, you would choose snow shoes over randonee gear? Top level rando racers complete these races in under two hours on skis and you are saying they would be faster on snowshoes? _ I think it's probably a wash, but why are snowshoes illegal? However, I'm not talking about a rando race, but going up/down a mountain in the winter. At best a rando setup is going to be in the 5-7 lbs range and that's with bindings that don't work with mountain boots and doesn't include the weight of the skins. Wnen you're going uphill weight matters, glide does not. HEAVY snowshoes weigh 4 lbs. _ Here's another example Echo to Kirkwood. This is a race with a steep 2k vert climb in the beginning, a long groomed traverse and a not quite as steep descent at the end. Snowshoers regularly finish in the top 10 and that's with most of it groomed for skating. The problem with snowshoes is not on the ups but on the downs. A human cannot run downhill at 30 to 40 mph. _ You're not going to be doing 30 or 40 mph on Mountain boots either. Even the lightest rando boots offer much more control than mountain boots. Being faster on the down hills is far less advantageous than being faster on the uphills. Traveling in the mountains you spend roughly 90% of your time going uphill on skis. If the up is an ungroomed trail and very steep, skis can still be faster since the skier can z up the slope where as the snow shoes must post hole straight up (much slower on 30 to 40 degree slopes). _ Why? My experience in using VERT's snowshoes convinces me of the exact opposite conclusion. If your lungs are up to it, straight uphill is always the fastest. Also, I don't understand why a snowshoer can't traverse, I certainly see lot's of traversing snowshoe tracks in the mountains. The slim weight advantage gained from snow shoes does not make up for their speed going down even including the time it takes to remove skins from skis (if needed). _ It's not slim, it's generally more than 50%. Racing snowshoes are under 2lbs a pair, cost less than a pair of AT bindings and will probably work just fine for a ice climb approach. Having said all that I would still use skis because they are more fun, but the are 3-4x expensive, 2x heavier and at best only offer a marginal performance advantage. _ Booker C. Bense -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBRBtASWTWTAjn5N/lAQEYqQP/aCcg4pJS9e4QXQTx8NiFHkYKGVt2llJN ctZHc/xHhPg3LeRJ2BhBdWzq3/r2E6T6o+0nI3/1+o8RuI+gZXYaqUoyTRaMn33B E3ZgMiT/EogZF14ENHRNabW/2rm1HPWOk4rjdpMzENk89oZXG8efnY+zMvyaemAa D08rXgxoX0M= =BuJE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
You spend 90% of your time traveling uphill if you are on skis. On
snow shoes you spend 70% to 80% of your time traveling uphill thus the greater speed advantage of skis in any rando race or traveling across snow. I agree that weight makes a huge difference when traveling uphill, but the difference between a show shoe and ski is not enough to make up for the amount of time it takes to go downhill on snow shoes. It takes me about 20 minutes maybe a little more to descend 2000 to 2500 hundred feet on groomed ski trails using racing show shoes. I descend the same route on racing classic skis in about 5 minutes definitely no more than 10 minutes. I make it up the same route in well under an hour on full on rando gear (at race pace). I have never timed myself on snow shoes but I am sure I would be faster on my snow shoes than on my randonee gear and about the same amount of time if I was to skin up on light weight cross country gear. So using myself as a test subject ( I am a descent skier/athlete nothing great, I did bust the top 30 at the Birkie last year), there is no uestion that skiis are faster than snowshoes overall. I and any other competitor with a shot at winning would choose ski equipment over snow shoes for a winter race. The only decision to make would be how heavy a ski to choose depending on the snow conditions. .. Skis are illegal in snow shoe races the same snow shoes are illegal in ski races. Racing snow shoes are useless in ungroomed terrain. You would be post holing up to your hips if snow is anywhere near fresh. Take a pair of heavy duty snow shoes and try to traverse a steep route. Especially one that is set up. Not much fun, if even possible. For ice climbing approaches around here I would choose snow shoes only because they are short and steep, but I would not use racing snow shoes. I will give you that. xcwhite |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Oh, I forgot one thing. I talked to one my snow shoe racing buddies
(one of the best in the country, I think at the US championships a year or so ago he won or was top three), that it has been proven skis are faster than snow shoes. Some of the elite snow shoe racers in the country were about 9 minutes slower up and down imperial bowl in Breckenridge compared to well above average regional athletes on skis on the same course. If you are not familiar with Imperial Bowl, it is a pretty steep up and a technical off piste down even on alpine gear. xcwhite |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article .com, xcwhite wrote: Oh, I forgot one thing. I talked to one my snow shoe racing buddies (one of the best in the country, I think at the US championships a year or so ago he won or was top three), that it has been proven skis are faster than snow shoes. Some of the elite snow shoe racers in the country were about 9 minutes slower up and down imperial bowl in Breckenridge compared to well above average regional athletes on skis on the same course. If you are not familiar with Imperial Bowl, it is a pretty steep up and a technical off piste down even on alpine gear. _ 9 minutes is meaningless in a full days travel in the mountains. Even 9 minutes per hour of travel is not that significant. However, you seem convinced of your point, so I'll concede it. If you want to spend 3-4x the money and carry 2x the weight, skis will gain you 9 minutes per hour... If you want to argue this further, please show me any AT setup that works with mountaineering boots, has a release, lockable heel and weighs less than 2x reasonable snowshoes. ( 7lbs) I would really love to be wrong about this. _ Also, the slower you climb, the more the % advantage matters. What may be an advantage to elite athletes, might be a significant handicap to your average weekend warrior. Personally, I love skiing and for me winter ascents without skis would be a kind of slow torture, but I think snowshoes will bag more peaks in the long run if you're only interested in bagging peaks. _ Booker C. Bense -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBRBuaM2TWTAjn5N/lAQGuwAQAtOVmaAli7Awd5F8obStSriF0uy1tuvoK ayHVowKJTHuvgyaZu8oFXadeEUxDAzwWPfR0HBcQ04dTyiMhS1 T9U64CrX4FDu+/ 3GrXjXEmwJlaqwP/ousedjOcSu9PQy6CJt96mOexWkjoZb8tZ77ydUtZdDeXGuVG jhJyKUL7Jzk= =oREV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Booker C. Bense" . stanford.edu wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- If you want to argue this further, please show me any AT setup that works with mountaineering boots, has a release, lockable heel and weighs less than 2x reasonable snowshoes. ( 7lbs) I would really love to be wrong about this. If I might just get back to my original subject for a moment. I have reasonably light AT setup using my existing Dynafit TLT bindings, BUT, I really would like to be able to wear "proper" climbing boots AND keep the weight down. Hence my query about mountaineering boots on NORDIC skis (i.e. free heel and with no particular interest in high speed descents). I'm sure in the good old days before everything got so specialised there used to be cable bindings that would do the job. Roy. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Roy,
if yu want to use your mountaineering boots have you thought about ski-boards? A friend of mine bought some few years back which fitted his mountaineering boots had an AT style releasable heel and came with skins. I'm sorry but I can't remember the brand or model, freelandia? (I think that might be a car). I don't think mountaineering boots would fit into the front part of any modern cable binding ( except possiblely the ones used in the arctic) they all seem to be designed to fit snugly around a telemark boot with a 3 pin lug at the toe. Perhaps you could make one fit and add straps etc but I expect it would come off at all the wrong moments and I don't think your heel would lift enough for easy climbing. Booker and "xchwhite" I was interested in your debate could one or both of you tell me more about up and down races? andyb buxton derbyshire |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... Roy, if yu want to use your mountaineering boots have you thought about ski-boards? A friend of mine bought some few years back which fitted his mountaineering boots had an AT style releasable heel and came with skins. I'm sorry but I can't remember the brand or model, freelandia? (I think that might be a car). If you're talking about short skis ("figles"), I have looked at them and they are a possibility, though I still fancy the Nordic route if I can figure out a way of doing it. Roy. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: NNN tour boots size 10 men, NNN bindings, 205 tour skis | [email protected] | Nordic Skiing | 0 | January 20th 05 02:20 AM |
Boots Between AT and Mountaineering | Chris Clarke | Backcountry Skiing | 10 | November 12th 04 12:38 AM |
Near fatal ski incident | Me | Nordic Skiing | 22 | February 27th 04 01:47 PM |
Custom Made Nordic Ski Boots??? | Chase66 | Nordic Skiing | 1 | December 29th 03 11:27 PM |
Ski Mountaineering | Clyde | Backcountry Skiing | 2 | September 23rd 03 09:18 PM |