If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Suzie -- Suzieflame |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 16, 7:17 am, Suzieflame wrote:
Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. I take it those five aren't planning to attend. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 16, 8:17 am, Suzieflame wrote:
Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Suzie -- Suzieflame Personally, I'd like to actually ski. Not argue about court proceedings. (That's for here) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 16, 7:17 am, Suzieflame wrote:
Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Suzie -- Suzieflame Let's see, five,eh?... 1. Scott 2. Bert 3. Jeff OK, I bite... who are the other rwo? ;-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 16, 8:19 am, Armin wrote:
On Oct 16, 7:17 am, Suzieflame wrote: Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Suzie -- Suzieflame Let's see, five,eh?... 1. Scott 2. Bert 3. Jeff OK, I bite... who are the other rwo? ;-) 4. Bobaloobob 5. Xlmeister |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:17:07 +0200, Suzieflame
wrote this crap: Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. I've invited him to put a shotgun to his head. My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the ultimate power in the universe." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
On Oct 16, 8:17 am, Suzieflame wrote:
Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Suzie -- Suzieflame I wouldn't "invite" him. But I wouldn't worry about keeping it a super secret location. a.) his record of showing up is dismal b.) planning should include our recognition of his unstable mental condition c.) it should also include our hope that he inflict it on someone else and stay away. d.) lastly it should include notice that we intend to excersize our right to free association without disruption from person with previously mentioned "unstable mental condition" and will take appropriate actions and legal measures should he decide to disrupt our little party. Beyond that? **** him. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
I wouldn't "invite" him. But I wouldn't worry about keeping it a super secret location. a.) his record of showing up is dismal b.) planning should include our recognition of his unstable mental condition c.) it should also include our hope that he inflict it on someone else and stay away. d.) lastly it should include notice that we intend to excersize our right to free association without disruption from person with previously mentioned "unstable mental condition" and will take appropriate actions and legal measures should he decide to disrupt our little party. Beyond that? **** him. Amen. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
"Suzieflame" wrote in message ... Five people have suggested that I should invite Scott Abraham. I'm willing to open the debate. His record of showing up is non-existent anyway. Suzie -- Suzieflame I've never met the individual. I have no desire to. About 5 or 6 years ago I came into this forum without any warning. (I know, that was a problem right there!) There was a question, I seem to recall about footbeds and boots, and I don't even remember what I posted. I think it was just that I had a footbed. Now, I had NEVER posted to this group before. Unfortunately, I can only guess, it appeared that because my response was to someone this certain individual had an issue with, I was made the object of a venomous attack by the individual you are trying to keep the trip from. I ignored his attack, and rarely post here, but I do occasionally. As a result, I've been slammed a few more times as well, but the slamming has NEVER been about WHAT I post, it appears to be just the fact that I posted in a thread this individual has targeted. I have no desire to EVER interact with the individual under discussion, and I'm sure there's a lot of others that feel the same way. My opinion? If I were running the show, I'd avoid trouble. If possible I would have made the invites privately via email... Hmm, it's a shame I can take up the offer, but that's the breaks. Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
OK, this needs discussion
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
skiottawa.net, web discussion board | [email protected] | Alpine Skiing (moderated) | 0 | January 6th 06 10:29 PM |
New 05/06 ski discussion | steve | Nordic Skiing | 1 | September 19th 05 10:31 AM |