If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 05:24:17 -1000, comadrejo
wrote this crap: I am not interested in having a back and forth with you on this, or deal with your rhetorical questions. Stop trying to escalate this, or get third parties involved, especially houses of worship. I fail to see a problem. Except that you see yourself as some sort of net cop. If you have a problem with Scooter, do it through proper legal channels. How did that work out last time? Idiots and disturbed people like Scooter are sadly, a dime a dozen in big cities. Contacting random Synagogues in Seattle's city limit about Scooter's ravings isn't cool, and you or others are probably on the borderline of harassment. Once again I fail to see how posting a list of synagogues is somehow considered harassment. I believe that having Scottee seek some sort of professional counseling would be a good thing. Failing that, perhaps spiritual counseling would be good. Vote for Palin-Brown in 2012. Repeal the nightmares. This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
Richard Henry wrote:
Therefore, this is the sort of thing that is best dealt with mutual friends, or failing that, spiritual advisers. Do you disagree? No the best thing to do is drop it like a stone. There have been a number of changes in laws regarding the internet sooner or later scooter will get nailed you really do not need to be part of it. It is not worth the effort. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
On 1/3/11 7:46 AM, Richard Henry wrote:
Therefore, this is the sort of thing that is best dealt with mutual friends, or failing that, spiritual advisers. Do you disagree? Of course I disagree. Don't be obtuse. This is the sort of thing that is best dealt with by ostracism, not attention. The guy revels in attention; negative attention is a good as positive to him. You are bolstering his self esteem with your (and Horvath's) overload of attention. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
On Jan 3, 8:39*am, lal_truckee wrote:
On 1/3/11 7:46 AM, Richard Henry wrote: Therefore, this is the sort of thing that is best dealt with mutual friends, or failing that, spiritual advisers. *Do you disagree? Of course I disagree. Don't be obtuse. This is the sort of thing that is best dealt with by ostracism, not attention. Beat me, whip me. Ostracize me from a group of stalkers, pathological liars, and amoral psychopaths like Lloyd. Hey, freak? How about dealing with such real world stalking by ostracizing the stalkers, instead of their target? That's what a decent person would do. And we all know you are a pathetic, complete asshole. The guy revels in attention; negative attention is a good as positive to him. You are bolstering his self esteem with your (and Horvath's) overload of attention. No, dumb****. You are bolstering my self esteem by being such a disgusting, vile human being. I feel such esteem knowing I am such a better man than you are, idiot. You really don't understand how disgusting you look to decent people, do you? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
On Jan 3, 8:39 am, lal_truckee wrote:
On 1/3/11 7:46 AM, Richard Henry wrote: Therefore, this is the sort of thing that is best dealt with mutual friends, or failing that, spiritual advisers. Do you disagree? Of course I disagree. Don't be obtuse. This is the sort of thing that is best dealt with by ostracism, not attention. Beat me, whip me. Ostracize me from a group of stalkers, pathological liars, and amoral psychopaths like Lloyd. Hey, freak? How about dealing with such real world stalking by ostracizing the stalkers, instead of their target? That's what a decent person would do. And we all know you are a pathetic, complete asshole. The guy revels in attention; negative attention is a good as positive to him. You are bolstering his self esteem with your (and Horvath's) overload of attention. No, dumb****. You are bolstering my self esteem by being such a disgusting, vile human being. I feel such esteem knowing I am such a better man than you are, idiot. You really don't understand how disgusting you look to decent people, do you? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:31:00 -0800 (PST), twobuddha
wrote this crap: Therefore, this is the sort of thing that is best dealt with mutual friends, or failing that, spiritual advisers. *Do you disagree? I'm with you. Kewl. Two stalking pussies justifying being stalking pussies, and proving they are stalking pussies by doing so. Hilarious. I wonder if I should write the bartenders of Detroit area Hooters and VFW's and tell them to read Pussy Horvath on rsa. Please do. I can post a list if you want. Sending harassing letters to places of business is a federal crime. Vote for Palin-Brown in 2012. Repeal the nightmares. This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
On Jan 3, 7:54*am, "Bob F" wrote:
Richard Henry wrote: On Jan 3, 7:09 am, Ted Waldron wrote: In article , wrote: On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:09:36 -1000, Ted Waldron wrote this crap: I'm afraid I don't understand your sensitivity here. Is there some untold story? Posting a list of synagogues in City of Seattle isn't cool, no matter if the information is publicly available. I don't understand your problem. Suppose I posted a list of Catholic Churches in Houston? Would that be wrong? It's not like they are hiding anything. It is your intent. If you wrote to St. Marks Cathedral in Seattle because I went there, and tried to humiliate me because of my antics here, it is harassment and escalating a problem. Whether it is St. Marks or City of Seattle Synagogues or all religious institutions in King County, they are houses of worship, they are a gathering of the community. They are not tools in a flame war. Among LE responses to me and others was that Scott's behavior, while technically illegal, was difficult for them to prioritize because no there had been no physical actions nor direct confrontations in their jurisdiction. Therefore, this is the sort of thing that is best dealt with mutual friends, or failing that, spiritual advisers. *Do you disagree? Yes. He seeks attention. Give him none. You are just feeding his habit. You may see it as an obnoxious habit. I see it as a possible threat. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
On Jan 3, 8:14*am, Ted Waldron wrote:
In article , *Richard Henry wrote: On Jan 3, 7:09*am, Ted Waldron wrote: In article , wrote: On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:09:36 -1000, Ted Waldron wrote this crap: I'm afraid I don't understand your sensitivity here. *Is there some untold story? *Posting a list of synagogues in City of Seattle isn't cool, no matter if the information is publicly available. I don't understand your problem. *Suppose I posted a list of Catholic Churches in Houston? *Would that be wrong? *It's not like they are hiding anything. * It is your intent. *If you wrote to St. Marks Cathedral in Seattle because I went there, and tried to humiliate me because of my antics here, it is harassment and escalating a problem. * *Whether it is St. Marks or City of Seattle Synagogues or all religious institutions in King County, *they are houses of worship, they are a gathering of the community. *They are not tools in a flame war. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
On Jan 3, 8:17*am, wrote:
BTW Scottee has already stated that he no longer attends a synagogue so the whole point is moot. Your first error there is assuming that he was telling the truth. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Just for fun
On Jan 3, 9:03*am, Richard Henry wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:54*am, "Bob F" wrote: Richard Henry wrote: On Jan 3, 7:09 am, Ted Waldron wrote: In article , wrote: On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:09:36 -1000, Ted Waldron wrote this crap: I'm afraid I don't understand your sensitivity here. Is there some untold story? Posting a list of synagogues in City of Seattle isn't cool, no matter if the information is publicly available. I don't understand your problem. Suppose I posted a list of Catholic Churches in Houston? Would that be wrong? It's not like they are hiding anything. It is your intent. If you wrote to St. Marks Cathedral in Seattle because I went there, and tried to humiliate me because of my antics here, it is harassment and escalating a problem. Whether it is St. Marks or City of Seattle Synagogues or all religious institutions in King County, they are houses of worship, they are a gathering of the community. They are not tools in a flame war. Among LE responses to me and others was that Scott's behavior, while technically illegal, was difficult for them to prioritize because no there had been no physical actions nor direct confrontations in their jurisdiction. Therefore, this is the sort of thing that is best dealt with mutual friends, or failing that, spiritual advisers. *Do you disagree? Yes. He seeks attention. Give him none. You are just feeding his habit. You may see it as an obnoxious habit. *I see it as a possible threat.- Hey, asshole? If you think I am such a threat, then why are you threatening me, stalking me, and harassing me? Reason suggests that you would stop doing so if you thought I would hunt your ass down, as you deserve. Just another pathetic rationalization for YOUR obnoxious habit of stalking in the real world. Ain't me posting YOUR home address and bragging about it. But you're not a potential threat. You'll never be man enough to try to make good on your threats. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA Hey, pussy? How is lying about me to a bunch of rabbis I don't know supposed to minimize a "possible threat"? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA Let's discuss this with law enforcement. Contact info? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|