If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
zero/multi waxless skis
After being in several races in the past two years where racers on
zero or multi type waxless skis have done very well, I'm considering adding a pair to my bag. Any words of wisdom out there? What I've read and heard indicates they should be fitted softer than I would have guessed, and that the way in which they are "haired up" can make a big difference in how well they work. Randy |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
zero/multi waxless skis
Hi Randy,
'Softer' closing flex? 'Softer' half-weight? Softer than what? It is almost a meaningless term. The Zeros I've come across have had low camber heights, so in that regard, they are already 'soft'. I'm guessing the ski designers feel the thickness of the hairs are less than the thickness of multiple layers of wax and design in the lower camber for Zeros. My Fischer Zeros were fitted on a ski flex bench at a shop. The rubber inlay hairy area is completely off the surface, when my weight is evenly distributed, as it would be when gliding. But the closing flex number is about as high as my Carbonlite Plus skis. The closing flex number of my Carbonlites is much higher than I would have guessed I could use, but they too were fitted on a bench and work great. So in that regard, my Zeros are 'stiff'. The first pair of Zeros were picked 'by the numbers' from a warehouse. They were very draggy and unusable. So, if I could offer any words of wisdom, it would be the same as any pair of ski you'd purchase. Know what you are looking for in a ski, then go to a shop with knowledge staff that stands behind their sales. Since you are looking for a ski that is for temps around freezing, they should be able to find you a good one and flex it out for you on a bench. Zach Caldwell has researched Zeros for use at the Olympics next year up in Callaghan and probably knows more about Zeros than anyone in North America. He'd be a good one to set you up and he stands behind his work. -- Paul Haltvick Bay Design and Build - LLC Engineering, Construction FSx Midwest - Fischer / Swix Racing wrote in message ... After being in several races in the past two years where racers on zero or multi type waxless skis have done very well, I'm considering adding a pair to my bag. Any words of wisdom out there? What I've read and heard indicates they should be fitted softer than I would have guessed, and that the way in which they are "haired up" can make a big difference in how well they work. Randy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
zero/multi waxless skis
On Mar 31, 10:12*pm, "Norski" wrote:
Hi Randy, * * 'Softer' closing flex? *'Softer' half-weight? *Softer than what? It is almost a meaningless term. * * The Zeros I've come across have had low camber heights, so in that regard, they are already 'soft'. I'm guessing the ski designers feel the thickness of the hairs are less than the thickness of multiple layers of wax and design in the lower camber for Zeros. * * My Fischer Zeros were fitted on a ski flex bench at a shop. The rubber inlay hairy area is completely off the surface, when my weight is evenly distributed, as it would be when gliding. But the closing flex number is about as high as my Carbonlite Plus skis. The closing flex number of my Carbonlites is much higher than I would have guessed I could use, but they too were fitted on a bench and work great. So in that regard, my Zeros are 'stiff'. * * The first pair of Zeros were picked 'by the numbers' from a warehouse. They were very draggy and unusable. * * So, if I could offer any words of wisdom, it would be the same as any pair of ski you'd purchase. *Know what you are looking for in a ski, then go to a shop with knowledge staff that stands behind their sales. Since you are looking for a ski that is for temps around freezing, they should be able to find you a good one and flex it out for you on a bench. * * Zach Caldwell has researched Zeros for use at the Olympics next year up in Callaghan and probably knows more about Zeros than anyone in North America. He'd be a good one to set you up and he stands behind his work. -- Paul Haltvick Bay Design and Build - LLC Engineering, Construction FSx Midwest - Fischer / Swix Racing wrote in message ... After being in several races in the past two years where racers on zero or multi type waxless skis have done very well, I'm considering adding a pair to my bag. *Any words of wisdom out there? *What I've read and heard indicates they should be fitted softer than I would have guessed, and that the way in which they are "haired up" can make a big difference in how well they work. Randy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Be very careful. I ordered a pair of Atomic Multi's from a Mid West online xc ski shop with state of the art flex testing equipment "Fit Is Everything". Well the skis were horrible. Like the other writer states mine were beyond grabby and were useless. I received store credit form the shop. I would order Zero's through BNS Sports in Boulder. Nathan can help you from his own experience and Zach's. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
zero/multi waxless skis
On Apr 1, 4:47*am, ADK Skier wrote:
On Mar 31, 10:12*pm, "Norski" wrote: Hi Randy, * * 'Softer' closing flex? *'Softer' half-weight? *Softer than what? It is almost a meaningless term. * * The Zeros I've come across have had low camber heights, so in that regard, they are already 'soft'. I'm guessing the ski designers feel the thickness of the hairs are less than the thickness of multiple layers of wax and design in the lower camber for Zeros. * * My Fischer Zeros were fitted on a ski flex bench at a shop. The rubber inlay hairy area is completely off the surface, when my weight is evenly distributed, as it would be when gliding. But the closing flex number is about as high as my Carbonlite Plus skis. The closing flex number of my Carbonlites is much higher than I would have guessed I could use, but they too were fitted on a bench and work great. So in that regard, my Zeros are 'stiff'. * * The first pair of Zeros were picked 'by the numbers' from a warehouse. They were very draggy and unusable. * * So, if I could offer any words of wisdom, it would be the same as any pair of ski you'd purchase. *Know what you are looking for in a ski, then go to a shop with knowledge staff that stands behind their sales. Since you are looking for a ski that is for temps around freezing, they should be able to find you a good one and flex it out for you on a bench. * * Zach Caldwell has researched Zeros for use at the Olympics next year up in Callaghan and probably knows more about Zeros than anyone in North America. He'd be a good one to set you up and he stands behind his work.. -- Paul Haltvick Bay Design and Build - LLC Engineering, Construction FSx Midwest - Fischer / Swix Racing wrote in message .... After being in several races in the past two years where racers on zero or multi type waxless skis have done very well, I'm considering adding a pair to my bag. *Any words of wisdom out there? *What I've read and heard indicates they should be fitted softer than I would have guessed, and that the way in which they are "haired up" can make a big difference in how well they work. Randy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Be very careful. I ordered a pair of Atomic Multi's from a Mid West online xc ski shop with state of the art flex testing equipment "Fit Is Everything". Well the skis were horrible. Like the other writer states mine were beyond grabby and were useless. I received store credit form the shop. I would order Zero's through BNS Sports in Boulder. Nathan can help you from his own experience and Zach's.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Atomic seems to have dropped the Multi. I got my Atomic Multis from Zack/Nathan during the fall 2007 to fit between my Atomic "cold" and "warm" pairs. The Multis worked well for me during the 2008 McCall MWC mid distance classic (15 km for my age group) although my time would say otherwise. Others were either going hairies or "fishscales" The Multis stayed ice free with decent grip until the tracks started glazing. They seemed to be gliding as well as anyone elses skis on the test slope. Nathan/BNS's McCall report: "Rain began sprinkling down at midnight Friday just as we finished all of the race pairs for the next day. Around 4:30AM, wet snow began falling - hard - and by 5:30 when we were busy changing the final layers we had just put on a few hours ago, there was already 3 inches on the ground.... "Getting good kick wax when the temps are around freezing is a challenge becuase very slight changes in temperature result in dramatic physical changes to the snow due to the phase change from ice to water. Waxes in this range tend to have very small windows where they work well and often a wax that is great one minute will be terrible five minutes later.... http://www.bouldernordicsport.com/Ho...7/Default.aspx |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should All Skis be Waxless? | George Cleveland | Nordic Skiing | 27 | January 3rd 06 07:49 AM |
Waxing waxless skis | Micheal Artindale | Nordic Skiing | 11 | September 20th 05 10:07 PM |
getting better grip with waxless skis | Micheal Artindale | Nordic Skiing | 13 | March 21st 05 08:26 PM |
Technique with waxless skis | Micheal Artindale | Nordic Skiing | 13 | February 12th 05 08:59 PM |
Icing on waxless skis | MB | Nordic Skiing | 10 | March 26th 04 03:46 PM |