New skis on Kickstarter

On Thursday, September 26, 2013 5:42:13 PM UTC-6, Richard Henry wrote:

From the time Hitler joined the NSDAP, their platform included rejection of the Versailles treaty, a racist national government, and expulsion or extermination of many non-"Aryan" ethnic groups. It was the most right-wing of any viable party in German politics of the time. The real Social Democrats (a party has had that name since then except when they were banned by the Nazis) had nothing to do with them.

Ok. Rejection of the U.S. Constitution.....definitely a racist.......the expulsion and extermination will be of "Aryan" groups this time. Though I doubt he thinks that will be accomplished soon.

You can go far off either end of the scale and meet back at fascist. That's where they meet up again.

On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:25:45 -0700 (PDT), Richard Henry
wrote this crap:


At this point we are 20's and 30's Germany. When Hitler was a

member of the Social Democrats. The largest of his social

engineering projects was the final solution.



From the time Hitler joined the NSDAP, their platform included

rejection of the Versailles treaty, a racist national government,

and expulsion or extermination of many non-"Aryan" ethnic

groups. It was the most right-wing of any viable party in German

politics of the time.



That doesn't make it right-wing. Hitler was a Socialist. I read his

book.



The real Social Democrats (a party has had that name

since then except when they were banned by the Nazis)

had nothing to do with them.



There were several different Socialist parties. What part of,

"National Socialist German Workers Party," do you think is right-wing?


The party used that name to attract voters. There was nothing
remotely socialist about them.

Did you read Hitler's book? I did. It's mostly rambling garbage but
Hitler does give his opinions on socialism and the Unions. Hitler
introduced shorter working weeks and a two-week paid vacation which
included a trip paid for by the Nazi Party.

How would you like a two-week paid ski vacation all paid for by the
party? That is socialism at it's finest.

Do you think the Tea Party serves tea?

Some people think it's run by the Mad Hatter.


There's no need to fear if Trunky is near.

On Friday, September 27, 2013 9:29:15 AM UTC-6, twobuddha wrote:
On Friday, September 27, 2013 6:43:37 AM UTC-7, wrote:

Bob Thompson is not a Nazi. Though I certainly could see him running the ovens. He's that kind of nutcase.







The sad part is that you really do see that happening in your fantasy world.



So are you, freak. The sad part is that you don't see your fantasy world regarding me.

What???

On Saturday, September 28, 2013 11:57:38 AM UTC-5, comadrejo wrote:

snippage

Pigo, if you want to believe paranoid bozos like Glenn Beck or Michael
Savage, you should realized that they don't even know the history
correctly. Glenn Beck has many conditions of paranoia, and he takes
bits and pieces of history, without understanding how they fit into
context.

Two words to always remember about Glenn Beck:

"Benito Mussolini."

On Saturday, September 28, 2013 1:22:35 PM UTC-6, wrote:


Glenn Beck? Where's he been off to lately?

Just remember, when you don't protest when they come after your neighbor there will be no one left to protest when they come after you.

comadrejo wrote:
On 2013-09-26 23:14:41 +0000, pigo said:

On Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:29:31 AM UTC-6, comadrejo wrote:

At this point we are 20's and 30's Germany. When Hitler was a member
of the Social Democrats. The largest of his social engineering
projects was the final solution.

And the result of those socialistic nazis. They are socialists?? You've got to
be a moron to think that.


First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me

On Sunday, September 29, 2013 7:02:32 PM UTC-4, twobuddha wrote:

One thing for su if they ever come for you, they will be wearing white coats and using soft restraints, and no one will protest you being confined to a looney bin.

Indeed. No one will ever protest your confinement in a psychiatric hospital, so long as internet access is proscribed for you.

Here's a top-shelf one; lots of famous writers have stayed there. I'm sure they'll recognize your genius.

http://www.mclean.harvard.edu/

Dave

Hey. How would you libs feel about denying the congress the 75% subsidy they will get for their med. insurance and make them subject to the same penalty the rest of us will be subject to? As it was originally passed? And how about rescinding all the exemptions and putting the law into force as originally passed? I would go for that.

No special interests. bho and family go onto the same policy.

On 9/30/2013 1:29 PM, pigo wrote:
Hey. How would you libs feel about denying the congress the
75% subsidy they will get for their med. insurance and make them subject
to the same penalty the rest
of us will be subject to? As it was
originally passed? And how about rescinding all the exemptions
and putting the law into force as
originally passed? I would go for that.

No special interests. bho and family go onto the same policy.

Goodness P, you sound a lot like a very famous Vermonter, Bernie
Sanders. You bet, I'd go for that. And I'd make them accept Social
Security plus any 401K that they would like to fund themselves as their
retirement too.

Then let's see how much of an "entitlement" they think Social Security
really is. It's INSURANCE, I've paid for it and will collect benefits to
the full letter of the law.

On Monday, September 30, 2013 1:21:54 PM UTC-6, VtSkier wrote:


Goodness P, you sound a lot like a very famous Vermonter, Bernie
Sanders. You bet, I'd go for that. And I'd make them accept Social
Security plus any 401K that they would like to fund themselves as their
retirement too.

Well every once and awhile I'm sure that barbara boxer says that the sky is blue too.

Then let's see how much of an "entitlement" they think Social Security
really is. It's INSURANCE, I've paid for it and will collect benefits to
the full letter of the law.

Social Security is a supplement. I can imagine that several people that didn't plan ahead could shape a space, utilities and food and it could go quite far. They might not be able to afford the expensive cable tv, nice cars. But oh well, that's what you get for not planning. You could certainly afford a bus pass or a bike.

I think (on the surface) it would be smart for the house to pass that bill though. Fund the government AND bhocare. But only as originally passed with the exception that bho and family also abide. NO exemptions, NO delays, NO special interest favors. The unions pay for it too.