If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
As if....
.......anyone needed a glimpse into that overflowing thimble that is al
frankens character. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95162,00.html OH CRAP! It's from Foxnews, probably made up...... |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
As if....
pigo wrote:
......anyone needed a glimpse into that overflowing thimble that is al frankens character. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95162,00.html The fact that Al Franken is a sophmoric a-hole doesn't give the Fox suit any more merit. Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
As if....
"Dave Stallard" wrote in message ... The fact that Al Franken is a sophmoric a-hole doesn't give the Fox suit any more merit. Dave Someone thought that is was beyond comprehension that al would use the term "Fair and Balanced" as a means to give a false impression of endorsement. Turns out that besides everything else that is wrong about him, he did exactly that with Harvard and their letterhead. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
As if....
"Dave Stallard" wrote in message ... pigo wrote: ......anyone needed a glimpse into that overflowing thimble that is al frankens character. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95162,00.html The fact that Al Franken is a sophmoric a-hole doesn't give the Fox suit any more merit. I'll agree. AF is not very funny, even though he tries, except in an esoteric, pseudo-intellectual way. FNC, on the other hand, is funny every day without even trying. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
As if....
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 07:39:40 -0600, "pigo"
wrote: ......anyone needed a glimpse into that overflowing thimble that is al frankens character. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95162,00.html OH CRAP! It's from Foxnews, probably made up...... Naw, that's an easy one. Al did a bad thing, apologized for it, and Fox covered the apology. I'm still trying to find their coverage of Bill O'Reilly's apology to Denmark. Being fair and balanced, I'm sure they ran an article on it, especially since he shot his mouth off on their airtime in the first place. If anybody's got a link to it, or to Bill's public retraction please let me know; he's a fair and balanced commentator, so I'm sure it's out there, but the liberal media seem to have buried it. bw |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
As if....
"Dave Stallard" wrote in message ... No, we thought it was beyond comprehension that someone would actually BELIEVE Franken meant to do give a false impression of Fox's endorsement, when his book cover was so obviously a PARODY of Fox. That's the crux of the matter, which you seem to have difficulty understanding. So, knowing what you know now, that franken used Harvard Letterhead to give the false impression of Harvard endorsment of his disrespectful behavior with regards to the Attorney General of the United States, you still find it hard to believe that he used the same tactic with a news organization that exposes him for the lackey that he is? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
As if....
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:43:14 GMT, Dave Stallard
wrote: bdubya wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 07:39:40 -0600, "pigo" wrote: ......anyone needed a glimpse into that overflowing thimble that is al frankens character. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95162,00.html OH CRAP! It's from Foxnews, probably made up...... Naw, that's an easy one. Al did a bad thing, apologized for it, and Fox covered the apology. I'm still trying to find their coverage of Bill O'Reilly's apology to Denmark. Being fair and balanced, I'm sure they ran an article on it, especially since he shot his mouth off on their airtime in the first place. If anybody's got a link to it, or to Bill's public retraction please let me know; he's a fair and balanced commentator, so I'm sure it's out there, but the liberal media seem to have buried it. What did to O'Reilly say, and to whom? Who's Denmark, or do you mean the country? The country. http://www.denmarkemb.org/oreilly.html and then, a very fair 3 weeks later, http://www.denmarkemb.org/oreilly2.html I'm sure Fox ran something fair and balanced on this, I'm just trying to find it. bw |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
As if....
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:46:27 -0400, Walt
wrote: bdubya wrote: What did to O'Reilly say, and to whom? Who's Denmark, or do you mean the country? The country. http://www.denmarkemb.org/oreilly.html and then, a very fair 3 weeks later, http://www.denmarkemb.org/oreilly2.html I'm sure Fox ran something fair and balanced on this, I'm just trying to find it. Who cares about appologizing to the Danes? When's he gonna appologize to us? "And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush administration again." -- Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly on "Good Morning America," March 18, 2003 It depends on what your definition of "nothing" is chuckle. But seriously, like I've said, it's too early to declare there really were no WMD at all; they just might still turn up. Even if they don't, the buried twelve-year-old nuke docs amount to "something" marginally greater than "nothing". And I'd rather see O'Reilly win a Peabody than hear Saddam called "clean", not that there's much likelihood of either. bw |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
As if....
"Walt" wrote in message ... "And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush administration again." -- Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly on "Good Morning America," March 18, 2003 Last I looked they found jetliners there at the airport. Recent history tells us that those are weapons of mass destruction. Unless you don't consider ground zero in NYC a site of mass destruction. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|