![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nigel wrote in
: Lech is still on the same pass as St Anton,St Christoph,Rendl,Zurs. You can get some great skiing in early December & Lech is one of the few places that is pretty snow sure . Lech & Zurs is fantastic for Off-Piste however it will be a little to early for that unless they get a copuple of huge October/November dumps. As for Food , you can eat pretty well in Lech, dont expect any McDonalds kind of places but you can get a cheap Pizza etc. However, it your going to Lech you may as well lap it all up .The Hotel restaurants are the best places to eat, the food is top quality , some of the Hotels have award winning chefs . You can eat very well on the slopes as well. This place is worth a visit . "Alter Goldener Berg" http://www.hospiz.com/start.asp Absolutely - the Hospiz is a fantastic restaurant, and not nearly as expensive as it looks (for lunch, at any rate). Note that it's not in Lech, though - it's in St Christoph. In Lech, it's nice to eat on the terasses of the hotels in Oberlech (Uberlech? can't remember). Right on the slopes a couple of hundred metres above the bottom lifts, and facing the sun. Jeremy |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All this talk about Lech has convinced me it's a good place to go.
So what are the chances of finding reasonable-priced self catering accommodation there over new year week (27/12 - 3/1)? I don't fancy St. Anton - from what I hear it's far too noisy for the likes of us. I've heard Stuben (I think it was) might be good though... And coming by car, is there any chance we might not be able to get there? If they could sort out their web site, maybe I could check some of these things for myself, but it keeps crashing my browser. Adrian -- http://www.nspcc.org.uk/donate-4-free ais@ Adrian Shaw, Adran Cyfrifiadureg, Prifysgol Cymru, aber. Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Cymru ac. http://users.aber.ac.uk/ais uk |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:41:35 +0200, "Ivan Rafn"
wrote: "Ian Spare" skrev i en meddelelse news ![]() On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:58:29 +0100, "Jonathan Gogan" wrote: "Ian Spare" was updset enough to wrote Of course it's !"£$ing ski station, are you on drugs or what? Before posting drivel again try and get your brain engaged and sort out your posting style, ie attibution and don't top post. More Drivel: I would call 'Station Oz' a ski station. As it is, a, well ... 'ski station' I would call St Anotn a village/town as it is a well... town? The is Europe, it's rec.skiing.resorts.europe, we call a ski station somewhere that has access to a ski area, like a train station lets you ride the train. Hi, I am puzzled too. Please don't be offended, but in Scandinavia and all cross Europe we would surely call a town like St. Anton a town. This apparently is different in UK. I am curious, how do one differentiate between a town and a mere station? Why on earth would you want to? They are not mutually exclusive terms. To me a ski station would be any location with ski lifts which can be accessed without requiring other lifts. If that happens to be a town, then it is also a town. A town is not a definition which has anything to do with skiing. -- Alex Heney, Global Villager Which way to Castle Anthrax? To reply by email, my address is aDOTjDOTheneyATbtinternetDOTcom |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:13:37 +0100, "MoonMan"
wrote: snip Bottom posting is a pain! it is a remnant of using teletypes. Why can't we move with the technology? Because it is NOTHING to do with teletypes. Bottom posting is the norm because that is the way we read. I only bottom post, because if you don't you get shouted at. If people snipped irrelevant text it would not be such a problem, but they don't and I get ****ed off by having to scroll down through reams of stuff I have read before to find a 1 line silly comment at the bottom. if it was top posted life would be much simpler! Only if you are not interested in the context. I quite agree that there are too many people who don't snip properly, but that is actually seen more in top posters than bottom. If you are actually interested in the context, then top posting is *much* harder to read, because you have to skip backwards and forwards. -- Alex Heney, Global Villager Which way to Castle Anthrax? To reply by email, my address is aDOTjDOTheneyATbtinternetDOTcom |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Accomodation in that week is the most expensive & of the season & the
most difficult to get . Most of the self catering units get blocked booked up by the big scandinavian tour company's. ALot of people especially from Germany just come down for the New Year celebrations. Persistance is the name of game in getting accomodation in this period. I would say that 75% of visitors to the Arlberg are regular repeat visitors like myself, so we are booked in by default until we cancel. All the hotels & Landlords are looking for customers who will fill there houses for a complete week or two. Goodluck Nigel Adrian D. Shaw wrote: All this talk about Lech has convinced me it's a good place to go. So what are the chances of finding reasonable-priced self catering accommodation there over new year week (27/12 - 3/1)? I don't fancy St. Anton - from what I hear it's far too noisy for the likes of us. I've heard Stuben (I think it was) might be good though... And coming by car, is there any chance we might not be able to get there? If they could sort out their web site, maybe I could check some of these things for myself, but it keeps crashing my browser. Adrian |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ivan Rafn" Wrote:
Hi, I am puzzled too. Please don't be offended, but in Scandinavia and all cross Europe we would surely call a town like St. Anton a town. This apparently is different in UK. I am curious, how do one differentiate between a town and a mere station? Thank's for clarification everyone. I will remember to call a Ski Area a Ski Station from now on. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In k, Ivan Rafn typed:
"Ivan Rafn" Wrote: Hi, I am puzzled too. Please don't be offended, but in Scandinavia and all cross Europe we would surely call a town like St. Anton a town. This apparently is different in UK. I am curious, how do one differentiate between a town and a mere station? Thank's for clarification everyone. I will remember to call a Ski Area a Ski Station from now on. But only when in France :-) -- Chris *:-) Downhill Good, Uphill BAD! www.suffolkvikings.org.uk |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , Alex Heney typed:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:13:37 +0100, "MoonMan" wrote: snip Bottom posting is a pain! it is a remnant of using teletypes. Why can't we move with the technology? Because it is NOTHING to do with teletypes. Bottom posting is the norm because that is the way we read. the norm with email is to add your comment at the top, this is why OE defaults to it. it makes life simpler because the text which you have responded to is always immediatly below what you are typing. this is still linear text with the most relevant information at the top and older less relevant information after it, much more logical and much more usable. Do you not like HTML because it isn't "the way we read"? obski the snow comes first, then we ski on top of it! -- Chris *:-) Downhill Good, Uphill BAD! www.suffolkvikings.org.uk I only bottom post, because if you don't you get shouted at. If people snipped irrelevant text it would not be such a problem, but they don't and I get ****ed off by having to scroll down through reams of stuff I have read before to find a 1 line silly comment at the bottom. if it was top posted life would be much simpler! Only if you are not interested in the context. I quite agree that there are too many people who don't snip properly, but that is actually seen more in top posters than bottom. If you are actually interested in the context, then top posting is *much* harder to read, because you have to skip backwards and forwards. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:36:04 +0100, "MoonMan"
wrote: In , Alex Heney typed: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:13:37 +0100, "MoonMan" wrote: snip Bottom posting is a pain! it is a remnant of using teletypes. Why can't we move with the technology? Bottom posting is the norm because that is the way we read. the norm with email is to add your comment at the top, this is why OE defaults to it. a) it's not a universal norm b) usenet |=email it makes life simpler because the text which you have responded to is always immediatly below what you are typing. this is still linear text with the most relevant information at the top and older less relevant information after it, much more logical and much more usable. This may be fine and dandy in a two-way conversation, but usenet just isn't like that. Somebody might be replying to a thread that's already ten-deep, and will need to see exactly who said what to whom, in response to what. This isn't easily done in a top-post stylee. In internal emails one typically quotes the entirety of each post so far, so one _could_ read them all, by going to the bottom and working upwards, but on usenet it's accepted that quoted material is trimmed to the relevant only. And there are many occasions, even working in a company where top-posting email is the rule, that I, and others, have resorted to putting comments in-line with the previous posting, very much like is normal on usenet. Do you not like HTML because it isn't "the way we read"? Many people use newsreaders that are not HTML-enabled so would be unable to read it. Usenet is a text-only concept, so it's no good saying all these peeps should upgrade to the latest Windoze kit, particularly as many of them will have been around, using textonly software, since before 'the internet' was born. -- Ace (bruce dot rogers at roche dot com) Ski Club of Great Britain - http://www.skiclub.co.uk All opinions expressed are personal and in no way represent those of the Ski Club. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yn erthygl , sgrifennodd
Ivan Rafn : Thank's for clarification everyone. I will remember to call a Ski Area a Ski Station from now on. I'm from the UK, but that's not a term I'd use. It sounds american to me, not english. Heh, it's certainly not Welsh! Hmm, gorsaf sgio... I like that! Adrian -- http://www.nspcc.org.uk/donate-4-free ais@ Adrian Shaw, Adran Cyfrifiadureg, Prifysgol Cymru, aber. Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Cymru ac. http://users.aber.ac.uk/ais uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Skiing in Austria | FredB | European Ski Resorts | 10 | August 2nd 03 09:48 PM |