If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
poor design since the liner came with the boot. Probably because the
shell was designed to take 26.0 and 26.5 liners. It's worse than that. I have some 28.5 raichle 123's, and if you check around on the various parts (back of heel, inside of boot cuff, inside of boot tounge) you'll actually see the size range printed/stamped on them. On mine they say 28.5-29-30. So it looks like they try to cover 1.5cm or more with each size. So if you order some more, try to talk to someone who knows the shell sizing, and make sure you actually get down to a smaller shell. I think the buckles just suck too. Really, I've not been at all impressed with these boots. Sure, I paid like $40 for the shells and they were a cheap way to try hardbooting, but now that I'm going to be giving hardbooting a longer run I'm trying to order just about anything other than another pair of Raichles. I want real ski boot buckles, not these silly ratchet things. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
It's worse than that. I have some 28.5 raichle 123's, and if you check
around on the various parts (back of heel, inside of boot cuff, inside of boot tounge) you'll actually see the size range printed/stamped on them. On mine they say 28.5-29-30. So it looks like they try to cover 1.5cm or more with each size. So if you order some more, try to talk to someone who knows the shell sizing, and make sure you actually get down to a smaller shell. I think there are three pieces... The bottom of the boot which covers a whole size plus the half size, e.g. 29-29.5 The upper, which covers a larger range, in your case 28.5 - 30 The tongue, which comes in three sizes - 22-24.5, 25-27.5, and 28+. I think the buckles just suck too. Really, I've not been at all impressed with these boots. Sure, I paid like $40 for the shells and they were a cheap way to try hardbooting, but now that I'm going to be giving hardbooting a longer run I'm trying to order just about anything other than another pair of Raichles. I want real ski boot buckles, not these silly ratchet things. Yes, the buckles suck!!!! And the plastic the Raichles are made of is cheap and heavy. And the Raichle/Deeluxe boots haven't improved much over the years - today's DeeLuxe LeMans and Spa models are pretty much the same as the Raichle 124 and 123 from like 1997. The LeMans at $379 USD is a friggin' ripoff. But, fit is everything in boots, and crappy buckles and cheap plastic are a joy to deal with compared to ill-fitting boots, so I keep using Raichle. I just keep my eyes peeled on eBay and Bomber classifieds, and if I see a model I like in my size, new or almost new, for cheap, I buy 'em. Mike T |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
I've got something even better - they're called "buckles".
Neil Irrelevant, but thanks anyway. Got any links of this thing oyu have? I went to the Lacebone but couldnt get a good look at the thing, or how it would be used.. tia I'm sorry, I don't. I couldn't find them online, and I just happened to find this ski shop I went to. You may have to call Lacebone directly. Eric |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
get a pair of soft laces. check out some of the hi-end burton boots. i
have the sl-6's and they have some very plush laces that won't tear up your skin. you should be able to buy similar laces at your local board shop. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
"Mike T" wrote in message ...
It's worse than that. I have some 28.5 raichle 123's, and if you check around on the various parts (back of heel, inside of boot cuff, inside of boot tounge) you'll actually see the size range printed/stamped on them. On mine they say 28.5-29-30. So it looks like they try to cover 1.5cm or more with each size. So if you order some more, try to talk to someone who knows the shell sizing, and make sure you actually get down to a smaller shell. I think there are three pieces... The bottom of the boot which covers a whole size plus the half size, e.g. 29-29.5 The upper, which covers a larger range, in your case 28.5 - 30 The tongue, which comes in three sizes - 22-24.5, 25-27.5, and 28+. I saw the same thing, but I ended up with Mike's interpretation. However, I'm not 100% sure, so who know... either way, the shells don't fit like they are suppose to in terms of sizing (liners fit though) I think the buckles just suck too. Really, I've not been at all impressed with these boots. Sure, I paid like $40 for the shells and they were a cheap way to try hardbooting, but now that I'm going to be giving hardbooting a longer run I'm trying to order just about anything other than another pair of Raichles. I want real ski boot buckles, not these silly ratchet things. Yes, the buckles suck!!!! And the plastic the Raichles are made of is cheap and heavy. And the Raichle/Deeluxe boots haven't improved much over the years - today's DeeLuxe LeMans and Spa models are pretty much the same as the Raichle 124 and 123 from like 1997. The LeMans at $379 USD is a friggin' ripoff. But, fit is everything in boots, and crappy buckles and cheap plastic are a joy to deal with compared to ill-fitting boots, so I keep using Raichle. I just keep my eyes peeled on eBay and Bomber classifieds, and if I see a model I like in my size, new or almost new, for cheap, I buy 'em. I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that hardboots fit better than softboots, or that since you've found a pair of Raichle hardboots that fit you (i.e. figured out the sizing "shift") that you are hesistant to go exploring other brands that might "naturally" fit your foot better? I think I'm going to side with Jason on this and probably check out some other brands to see if they are better. What other brands are there? I see Head, UPS and Raichle as the last remaining boot manufacturers. --Arvin |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
But, fit is everything in boots, and crappy buckles and cheap
plastic are a joy to deal with compared to ill-fitting boots, so I keep using Raichle. I just keep my eyes peeled on eBay and Bomber classifieds, and if I see a model I like in my size, new or almost new, for cheap, I buy 'em. I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that hardboots fit better than softboots, or that since you've found a pair of Raichle hardboots that fit you (i.e. figured out the sizing "shift") that you are hesistant to go exploring other brands that might "naturally" fit your foot better? Raichle *is* a natural fit for me. My feet are quite narrow and so are the Raichle SB series. Footbeds and Thermo liners solve issues like flat feet and bony feet, both of which I have, but yeah, the narrow Raichle shells have been good to me. Everyone who's tried Burton, Head/Blax, and UPS say they are all wider than Raichle, so I haven't bothered. My only point was, I'm willing to put up with crappy ratchets etc. so I can have boots that fit me really well! I think I'm going to side with Jason on this and probably check out some other brands to see if they are better. What other brands are there? I see Head, UPS and Raichle as the last remaining boot manufacturers. You've got the whole list (without going to Europe or Japan at least) - Burton isn't making 'em anymore but remaining stock can be had at www.klugriding.com (see Bomber for horror stories) If you find something that fits right and has better features, awesome. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
"Mike T" wrote in message news:mz3Qb.4645 I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that
hardboots fit better than softboots, or that since you've found a pair of Raichle hardboots that fit you (i.e. figured out the sizing "shift") that you are hesistant to go exploring other brands that might "naturally" fit your foot better? Raichle *is* a natural fit for me. My feet are quite narrow and so are the Raichle SB series. Footbeds and Thermo liners solve issues like flat feet and bony feet, both of which I have, but yeah, the narrow Raichle shells have been good to me. Everyone who's tried Burton, Head/Blax, and UPS say they are all wider than Raichle, so I haven't bothered. My only point was, I'm willing to put up with crappy ratchets etc. so I can have boots that fit me really well! Width wise yes (hence why I'm trying them) but length wise... a mondo 26 boot should fit a person with mondo 26 feet since both are length measurements, no? I think I'm going to side with Jason on this and probably check out some other brands to see if they are better. What other brands are there? I see Head, UPS and Raichle as the last remaining boot manufacturers. You've got the whole list (without going to Europe or Japan at least) - Burton isn't making 'em anymore but remaining stock can be had at www.klugriding.com (see Bomber for horror stories) If you find something that fits right and has better features, awesome. Anyone trying UPS or Head boots? (I guess this is the wrong place to ask) --Arvin |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
Raichle *is* a natural fit for me. My feet are quite narrow and so
are the Raichle SB series. Footbeds and Thermo liners solve issues like flat feet and bony feet, both of which I have, but yeah, the narrow Raichle shells have been good to me. Everyone who's tried Burton, Head/Blax, and UPS say they are all wider than Raichle, so I haven't bothered. My only point was, I'm willing to put up with crappy ratchets etc. so I can have boots that fit me really well! Width wise yes (hence why I'm trying them) but length wise... a mondo 26 boot should fit a person with mondo 26 feet since both are length measurements, no? There's just too many variables for that to work all the time. My feet are flat, narrow, bony, and my toeline is quite angled. (Make all the girly feet jokes you want). Heel to big toe, I measure 26.5 and 26.7 respectively. With my angled toeline, my 2nd toe to heel is like 25 cm. If someone had more "boxy", wide feet, a big toe to heel of 26.7 might give a 2nd toe to heel that is more like 26 or 26.5. So if the boot shell is shaped such that the inside is longer than the outside, I'll be comfy in a smaller shell. Now, throw in the fact that I use a thermo liner. Fitted thermo liners can be less bulky that the standard Raichle liner, meaning that given the same inside volume, the outside surface is a little less. Thus, the need again for slightly less space inside the shell. My 26.5/7 feet are happy with a size 25 shell with fitted thermo liners. And at the end of the day that's what's important. Sure, I could try other brands, and I might like the features better. That would cost money that I'd rather spend on boards and bindings though - and since my current boots fit very well, I'm inclined to keep using them. Mike T |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble Tightening Snowboard Boots
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boots pinch front of ankle... Tall Rider | Brett | Snowboarding | 11 | October 7th 03 02:02 AM |
Salomon boots | Biff | Snowboarding | 10 | October 6th 03 09:17 AM |
FS: Arbor Woodie, Vans Fargo boots | My Name | Snowboarding | 0 | October 2nd 03 05:27 AM |
FA: Burton Snowboard boots - 12 hours to go | Richard | Snowboarding | 0 | September 3rd 03 10:41 PM |
FS: Burton snowboard boots | Richard | Snowboarding | 0 | August 4th 03 08:11 PM |