|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 20th 11, 02:28 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
Alpine
119 inches at mid-mountain from this storm. 10 feet!
I think I shoveled most of it. 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
February 20th 11, 09:09 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alpine
On 2/20/11 7:28 AM, lal_truckee wrote:
119 inches at mid-mountain from this storm. 10 feet! I think I shoveled most of it. Also, in case you're one of the three people in California who didn't ski today, the skiing is good. Thanks to Ullr for singles lines.
|
|
#3
February 20th 11, 10:48 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alpine
On Feb 20, 8:28*am, lal_truckee wrote:
119 inches at mid-mountain from this storm. 10 feet! I think I shoveled most of it. How much on the 2nd day?
|
|
#4
February 21st 11, 03:55 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alpine
On Feb 20, 11:09*pm, lal_truckee wrote:
On 2/20/11 7:28 AM, lal_truckee wrote: 119 inches at mid-mountain from this storm. 10 feet! I think I shoveled most of it. Also, in case you're one of the three people in California who didn't ski today, the skiing is good. Thanks to Ullr for singles lines. 3 meters of powder and it's safe to ski alone??
|
|
#5
February 21st 11, 04:18 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alpine
On 2/21/2011 11:55 AM, Evojeesus wrote:
On Feb 20, 11:09 pm, lal_truckee wrote: On 2/20/11 7:28 AM, lal_truckee wrote: 119 inches at mid-mountain from this storm. 10 feet! I think I shoveled most of it. Also, in case you're one of the three people in California who didn't ski today, the skiing is good. Thanks to Ullr for singles lines. 3 meters of powder and it's safe to ski alone?? Who said anything about skiing alone? The singles line is for getting on a lift with three of your newest friends. //Walt
|
|
#6
February 21st 11, 06:39 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alpine
Walt wrote:
On 2/21/2011 11:55 AM, Evojeesus wrote: On Feb 20, 11:09 pm, lal_truckee wrote: On 2/20/11 7:28 AM, lal_truckee wrote: 119 inches at mid-mountain from this storm. 10 feet! I think I shoveled most of it. Also, in case you're one of the three people in California who didn't ski today, the skiing is good. Thanks to Ullr for singles lines. 3 meters of powder and it's safe to ski alone?? Who said anything about skiing alone? The singles line is for getting on a lift with three of your newest friends. Well said!
|
|
#7
February 21st 11, 08:26 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alpine
On 2/20/11 2:09 PM, lal_truckee wrote:
On 2/20/11 7:28 AM, lal_truckee wrote: 119 inches at mid-mountain from this storm. 10 feet! I think I shoveled most of it. Also, in case you're one of the three people in California who didn't ski today, the skiing is good. Thanks to Ullr for singles lines. And another sunrise. Went out to the mid-mountain snow stake, which hides between Wolverine and Beaver bowls*. There's a genuine 195 inches of snow about 10am. The stake only goes to 260 inches - might have to break out the extension, if anybody remembers where it got stored - it's been years since it was needed. *bowls: these are genuine bowls AKA glacial cirques, not simple stream drainages like Vail and it's marketing ilk flaunt.
|
|
#8
February 21st 11, 08:39 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alpine
On Feb 21, 1:26*pm, lal_truckee wrote:
On 2/20/11 2:09 PM, lal_truckee wrote: On 2/20/11 7:28 AM, lal_truckee wrote: 119 inches at mid-mountain from this storm. 10 feet! I think I shoveled most of it. Also, in case you're one of the three people in California who didn't ski today, the skiing is good. Thanks to Ullr for singles lines. And another sunrise. Went out to the mid-mountain snow stake, which hides between Wolverine and Beaver bowls*. There's a genuine 195 inches of snow about 10am. The stake only goes to 260 inches - might have to break out the extension, if anybody remembers where it got stored - it's been years since it was needed. *bowls: these are genuine bowls AKA glacial cirques, not simple stream drainages like Vail and it's marketing ilk flaunt. Holy ****. Are you such a pathetic Luddite that you deny the glory of the Back Bowls? Genuine bowls. Huge bowls. Fortunately, only decent and blessed people ski there. Two Buddha, Prophet of Vail Vail: Where pathological liars and stalking freaks find enlightenment.
|
|
#9
February 21st 11, 09:11 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alpine
On Feb 21, 2:26*pm, lal_truckee wrote:
*bowls: these are genuine bowls AKA glacial cirques, not simple stream drainages like Vail and it's marketing ilk flaunt. And they have some pitch too. Vain bowls are so flat that any more than about 12" you have to go straight down.
|
|
#10
February 22nd 11, 12:57 PM
posted to rec.skiing.alpine
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alpine
On Feb 21, 6:18*pm, Walt wrote:
Who said anything about skiing alone? *The singles line is for getting on a lift with three of your newest friends. Yeah right, you people forms queues and all. It does not really work that way in France 
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I WANT AN ALPINE BOARD | paul lee | Snowboarding | 1 | October 22nd 07 05:38 PM |
| XC is more popular than alpine? | [email protected] | Nordic Skiing | 2 | January 27th 06 01:40 AM |
| Welcome to rec.skiing.alpine | The Real Bev | Alpine Skiing | 0 | December 29th 04 04:27 PM |
| Welcome to rec.skiing.alpine | The Real Bev | Alpine Skiing | 8 | December 16th 04 11:27 PM |
| rec.skiing.alpine FAQ (1/1) | Dave Stallard | Alpine Skiing | 19 | June 5th 04 07:47 AM |
Linear Mode
