Why is Scatty so bitter and angry ?

"Harry Weiner" wrote in message
. com...
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:49:49 -0700, "Two Buddha"
wrote this crap:




You have less ethics and morals than a drunken Paris Hilton at a
college frat party.

And you've probably had more dick, too.

Ever talk to anyone like this in person, freak?

All the time.

Yeah. Women and children. You don't do it to men. You're still breathing.

One thing for su you
wouldn't have the balls to do so to me.


You forget who I am. I've seen worse than you.

I know exactly who you are. You wouldn't have the balls to do so to me.
And we both know it. Because you'd have to back up your bull****, and you
ain't man enough to do so, George.
Odd thing happened when I googled George Horvath.
Nothing.
Not a word about your yachting, about being retired military, nothing.
Caught lying again, freak.

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, Alan. You've been here long enough to know I tell the truth.
Rigorously. Drives you ****ing nuts....not that you needed any help.
You are insane. Get help.

Even if that were true. New people don't automatically know this.


--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Richard Henry" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jun 25, 5:34 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
"Alan Baker" wrote in message

What was the name of my boss, Scotty? You're not going to claim
that
you
can't tell me that name, are you?

I could tell you the name of your boss. But I won't. Just to ****
you
off,
freak. Now go **** yourself again.

Since not telling misses the chance to prove you were not lying, why
would he be ****ed off?

I'm not lying. Why prove it to Baker? He just ignores reality. So
do
you.
The difference between you is that he does not know it.

Hmmmm...

Because other people on here might wonder whether you're telling the
truth or not.

They don't wonder at all, Alan. They KNOW I'm telling the truth. Which
is
why they have to lie so much and attack so much. Simple, really. They
wish
they could catch me lying. Since they can't, they lie.
You don't know you are lying. Because you are insane.

Really?

No newbie comes in here and wonders whether the outrageous tales you
tell are true or not?

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Try again...More like THE TIME. Thus my attempt to
SCHEDULE a
meeting.

Yeah. You're so busy on a Sunday evening.
What you don't have is the balls. Jeff told you our
schedule.
You
didn't
show. You lose. Again.

it wasn't a meet unless both parties agreed. People DO have
lives...even on Sunday evenings. You are delusional.

Never said it was an agreed to meet, freak. You are delusional.
Sunday
evening never stopped you from making up delusional lies about
me.
You
could have showed. You know it, I know it.
One thing you're not delusional about: you ain't got the balls
and
we
both
know it.
You lose. Again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let's see... He said he wasn't going to be there. You say you
knew
he
wasn't going to be there. Everybody's in agreement he wasn't
going
to
be there. And he wasn't there.

Everybody is in agreement that he is an insane nutless asshole who
had
the
opportunity to show up and didn't have the balls.

How does he lose again?

He could have shown. He didn't. Proven freak again.

So any time you could show, but don't...

You could have shown at Whistler. You didn't. I win. Apply your
logic
to
yourself. Or admit you are a cowardly hypocrite.

Actually, at Whistler I applied *your* logic.

You refused to meet my condition.


The only logic you applied is that if you showed up, you'd have to back
it
up. So you ran. You just admitted you are a cowardly hypocrite.
Thanks.
I win.

And what's the logic for you not meeting my condition? When if you had,
you'd have had an ironclad case. When doing so would have taken but a
single sentence.

I have an ironclad case. I showed, you didn't. I win. End of discussion.
All you had to do was show up. You didn't. Now go see a shrink, freak.

You'd have had an ironclad case if you'd turned on the video camera you
claimed you'd have with you and had given me the clarification I asked
for.

Instead you don't have any video and you didn't provide the
clarification and thus knew I wouldn't be coming.

I can only assume you wanted it that way.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

"Richard Henry" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 28, 2:00 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
"Richard Henry" wrote in message

ups.com...





On Jun 27, 3:36 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Richard Henry" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Jun 25, 5:34 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
"Alan Baker" wrote in message

What was the name of my boss, Scotty? You're not going to
claim
that
you
can't tell me that name, are you?

I could tell you the name of your boss. But I won't. Just to
****
you
off,
freak. Now go **** yourself again.

Since not telling misses the chance to prove you were not
lying,
why
would he be ****ed off?

I'm not lying. Why prove it to Baker? He just ignores reality.
So
do
you.
The difference between you is that he does not know it.

Hmmmm...

Because other people on here might wonder whether you're telling
the
truth or not.

They don't wonder at all, Alan. They KNOW I'm telling the truth.
Which is
why they have to lie so much and attack so much. Simple, really.
They
wish
they could catch me lying. Since they can't, they lie.
You don't know you are lying. Because you are insane.

Really?

No newbie comes in here and wonders whether the outrageous tales you
tell are true or not?

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if
you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If Mr. Newbie has any doubts, they will last only until the first time
Scott tells a lie about him.

Lasts a long time, eh? If Mr. Newbie has any doubts, it sure won't take
long until YOU tell a lie about ME.
I win. Hardly any newbies here, and the ones that show generally run
their
ass off as soon as they figure your ass off.
RSA is dead. As I desire. **** yourself, psychopath.

Speaking of your lies, you are a little behind in your responses.
Please try to catch up.
What statements did I make about the "San Diego Archdiocese"?

Lies? What lies, Richard? Quote them, please, because you just lied when I
caught you lying.
Please try to catch up. Hard to do when everything you say is a lie.......

On Jun 28, 4:55 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
On Jun 28, 4:55 pm, "Felonius ****" dribbled:
snip

Well Mr. "Balls",

It looks like the legal system said it was a felony and the ACLU
wouldn't bother with it so they didn't think it was a First Admendment
issue. However, if the First Admendment was so important how come you
didn't have the guts, balls, cajones, courage etc. etc. to post under
your own name? How come you fat ****? You lying sack of ****, you
tried to hide because you were scared - you cocksucker. No other
explanation is possible. As far as that stupidity about multiple bobs
- that's so ****ing goofy a two year old wouldn't even try it. In your
spare time which is quite plentiful since you have no job why don't go
through and separate the various bobs postings (It's also intriguing
that they all posted from the same ISP - according to the court order
if they were posting on your behalf - that's still a felony. Who's ISP
was it? Yours?

You're such a ****ing loser.

I have an ironclad case. I was there. You weren't. Fact. You are a
dickless coward. Fact. You are insane. Fact.

--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Try again...More like THE TIME. Thus my attempt to
SCHEDULE a
meeting.

Yeah. You're so busy on a Sunday evening.
What you don't have is the balls. Jeff told you our
schedule.
You
didn't
show. You lose. Again.

it wasn't a meet unless both parties agreed. People DO
have
lives...even on Sunday evenings. You are delusional.

Never said it was an agreed to meet, freak. You are
delusional.
Sunday
evening never stopped you from making up delusional lies
about
me.
You
could have showed. You know it, I know it.
One thing you're not delusional about: you ain't got the
balls
and
we
both
know it.
You lose. Again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let's see... He said he wasn't going to be there. You say you
knew
he
wasn't going to be there. Everybody's in agreement he wasn't
going
to
be there. And he wasn't there.

Everybody is in agreement that he is an insane nutless asshole
who
had
the
opportunity to show up and didn't have the balls.

How does he lose again?

He could have shown. He didn't. Proven freak again.

So any time you could show, but don't...

You could have shown at Whistler. You didn't. I win. Apply your
logic
to
yourself. Or admit you are a cowardly hypocrite.

Actually, at Whistler I applied *your* logic.

You refused to meet my condition.


The only logic you applied is that if you showed up, you'd have to
back
it
up. So you ran. You just admitted you are a cowardly hypocrite.
Thanks.
I win.

And what's the logic for you not meeting my condition? When if you had,
you'd have had an ironclad case. When doing so would have taken but a
single sentence.

I have an ironclad case. I showed, you didn't. I win. End of
discussion.
All you had to do was show up. You didn't. Now go see a shrink, freak.

You'd have had an ironclad case if you'd turned on the video camera you
claimed you'd have with you and had given me the clarification I asked
for.

Instead you don't have any video and you didn't provide the
clarification and thus knew I wouldn't be coming.

I can only assume you wanted it that way.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

It's true, Alan, as you well know. But since you are insane, you continue
to deny reality. Get help.

--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, Alan. You've been here long enough to know I tell the truth.
Rigorously. Drives you ****ing nuts....not that you needed any help.
You are insane. Get help.

Even if that were true. New people don't automatically know this.


--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

"Richard Henry" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jun 25, 5:34 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
"Alan Baker" wrote in message

What was the name of my boss, Scotty? You're not going to
claim
that
you
can't tell me that name, are you?

I could tell you the name of your boss. But I won't. Just to
****
you
off,
freak. Now go **** yourself again.

Since not telling misses the chance to prove you were not lying,
why
would he be ****ed off?

I'm not lying. Why prove it to Baker? He just ignores reality.
So
do
you.
The difference between you is that he does not know it.

Hmmmm...

Because other people on here might wonder whether you're telling the
truth or not.

They don't wonder at all, Alan. They KNOW I'm telling the truth.
Which
is
why they have to lie so much and attack so much. Simple, really.
They
wish
they could catch me lying. Since they can't, they lie.
You don't know you are lying. Because you are insane.

Really?

No newbie comes in here and wonders whether the outrageous tales you
tell are true or not?

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

"Clarencedarrow" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 28, 4:55 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
On Jun 28, 4:55 pm, "Felonius ****" dribbled:
snip

Well Mr. "Balls",

It looks like the legal system said it was a felony and the ACLU
wouldn't bother with it so they didn't think it was a First Admendment
issue.

It looks like you just got caught lying again, and now you avoid discussing
the lie and make up more lies.

However, if the First Admendment was so important how come you
didn't have the guts, balls, cajones, courage etc. etc. to post under
your own name?

My irony meter just exploded. This from a stalking defaming freak who
continues to hide his identity. KABOOOM.
Holy ****, you relaly are insane.

How come you fat ****? You lying sack of ****, you
tried to hide because you were scared - you cocksucker.

Anytime you want to see if I'm scared, freak, show up. Who is scared? Who
hides like the little bitch he is?
You.

No other
explanation is possible. As far as that stupidity about multiple bobs
- that's so ****ing goofy a two year old wouldn't even try it. In your
spare time which is quite plentiful since you have no job why don't go
through and separate the various bobs postings (It's also intriguing
that they all posted from the same ISP - according to the court order
if they were posting on your behalf - that's still a felony. Who's ISP
was it? Yours?

As I said, what felony? You really believe your own deranged delusions and
insane lies, eh, you dickless freak?

You're such a ****ing loser.

KABOOM.
I want to point out that Bob Lee has always supported and encouraged
deranged stalkers like this insane wacko, and has never criticized them or
contradicted their lies.
That's what THAT dickless freak does.

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

I have an ironclad case. I was there.

So you say, but you never did turn on the video camera you claimed you
were going to have there.

You weren't. Fact.

You knew I wouldn't be. Fact.

You are a
dickless coward. Fact.

I'm not afraid of yes or no questions.

You are insane. Fact.

yawn

Try again...More like THE TIME. Thus my attempt to
SCHEDULE a
meeting.

Yeah. You're so busy on a Sunday evening.
What you don't have is the balls. Jeff told you our
schedule.
You
didn't
show. You lose. Again.

it wasn't a meet unless both parties agreed. People DO
have
lives...even on Sunday evenings. You are delusional.

Never said it was an agreed to meet, freak. You are
delusional.
Sunday
evening never stopped you from making up delusional lies
about
me.
You
could have showed. You know it, I know it.
One thing you're not delusional about: you ain't got the
balls
and
we
both
know it.
You lose. Again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Let's see... He said he wasn't going to be there. You say you
knew
he
wasn't going to be there. Everybody's in agreement he wasn't
going
to
be there. And he wasn't there.

Everybody is in agreement that he is an insane nutless asshole
who
had
the
opportunity to show up and didn't have the balls.

How does he lose again?

He could have shown. He didn't. Proven freak again.

So any time you could show, but don't...

You could have shown at Whistler. You didn't. I win. Apply your
logic
to
yourself. Or admit you are a cowardly hypocrite.

Actually, at Whistler I applied *your* logic.

You refused to meet my condition.


The only logic you applied is that if you showed up, you'd have to
back
it
up. So you ran. You just admitted you are a cowardly hypocrite.
Thanks.
I win.

And what's the logic for you not meeting my condition? When if you had,
you'd have had an ironclad case. When doing so would have taken but a
single sentence.

I have an ironclad case. I showed, you didn't. I win. End of
discussion.
All you had to do was show up. You didn't. Now go see a shrink, freak.

You'd have had an ironclad case if you'd turned on the video camera you
claimed you'd have with you and had given me the clarification I asked
for.

Instead you don't have any video and you didn't provide the
clarification and thus knew I wouldn't be coming.

I can only assume you wanted it that way.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

It's true, Alan, as you well know. But since you are insane, you continue
to deny reality. Get help.

I know you to be lying, actually. But even assuming I did know it, it
doesn't explain how you expect newcomers to know.

Now I wonder why you won't address that...

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Alan, Alan. You've been here long enough to know I tell the truth.
Rigorously. Drives you ****ing nuts....not that you needed any help.
You are insane. Get help.

Even if that were true. New people don't automatically know this.
What was the name of my boss, Scotty? You're not going to
claim
that
you
can't tell me that name, are you?

I could tell you the name of your boss. But I won't. Just to
****
you
off,
freak. Now go **** yourself again.

Since not telling misses the chance to prove you were not lying,
why
would he be ****ed off?

I'm not lying. Why prove it to Baker? He just ignores reality.
So
do
you.
The difference between you is that he does not know it.

Hmmmm...

Because other people on here might wonder whether you're telling the
truth or not.

They don't wonder at all, Alan. They KNOW I'm telling the truth.
Which
is
why they have to lie so much and attack so much. Simple, really.
They
wish
they could catch me lying. Since they can't, they lie.
You don't know you are lying. Because you are insane.

Really?

No newbie comes in here and wonders whether the outrageous tales you
tell are true or not?

Well, Scotty?

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."