If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
legal: 2/5/06 Snowboard death at Alpine Meadows
Almost missed the trial results: Appeals court finding December 7, 2010
http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020101207122.xml&d ocbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR Common sense wins. How weird. After all the legal shooting, you still have to feel for Jessica Gregorie - all she wanted was to enjoy a day on the slopes. What she did was take her board off to hike in soft snowboard boots on the traverse. Usually no negative results. Two rules: 1) Never take your board/skis off on a steep slope - those steel edges are all that's keeping you from sliding into those rocks down there. 2) Be careful. Dying is no way to enjoy yourself. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
legal: 2/5/06 Snowboard death at Alpine Meadows
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:23:52 -0800, lal_truckee
wrote this crap: Two rules: 1) Never take your board/skis off on a steep slope - those steel edges are all that's keeping you from sliding into those rocks down there. 2) Be careful. Dying is no way to enjoy yourself. 3.) Never drop your rum flask. Vote for Palin-Brown in 2012. Repeal the nightmares. This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
legal: 2/5/06 Snowboard death at Alpine Meadows
On 12/31/10 1:01 PM, Ted Waldron wrote:
In , wrote: Two rules: 1) Never take your board/skis off on a steep slope - those steel edges are all that's keeping you from sliding into those rocks down there. I don't agree with this. It really depends on a variety of things. If the snow isn't boilerplate, and the boarder/skier can kick steps to climb out, then there is nothing wrong in removing one's skiis or board. If you can easily stand and/or kick steps that's not the "steep" I'm talking about. I've had to rescue boarders stuck on icy snow on High Traverse back side here - they see a skier take off and mindlessly follow. To get one board-less boarder to safety I had to sacrifice much of my safety by giving the guy one of my poles while blocking his fall with my body below and jamming my other pole into the ice between us giving him a secure step on each stride. Scared the hell out of me, but the guy was a goner otherwise. Most of the other cases were much easier on the nerves. I'm convinced boarders believe their gear is the equivalent of skis. It's not. Boards are a significant capability downgrade, not just in climbing and traversing, but also in control and security in icy or otherwise treacherous conditions (tree wells come to mind.) We won't know whether this girl hit the tree or fell into the tree well until the autopsy. Avalanche danger is high in the Sierra; be careful. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
legal: 2/5/06 Snowboard death at Alpine Meadows
On 12/31/2010 05:16 PM, lal_truckee wrote:
On 12/31/10 1:01 PM, Ted Waldron wrote: In , wrote: Two rules: 1) Never take your board/skis off on a steep slope - those steel edges are all that's keeping you from sliding into those rocks down there. I don't agree with this. It really depends on a variety of things. If the snow isn't boilerplate, and the boarder/skier can kick steps to climb out, then there is nothing wrong in removing one's skiis or board. If you can easily stand and/or kick steps that's not the "steep" I'm talking about. I've had to rescue boarders stuck on icy snow on High Traverse back side here - they see a skier take off and mindlessly follow. To get one board-less boarder to safety I had to sacrifice much of my safety by giving the guy one of my poles while blocking his fall with my body below and jamming my other pole into the ice between us giving him a secure step on each stride. Scared the hell out of me, but the guy was a goner otherwise. Most of the other cases were much easier on the nerves. I'm convinced boarders believe their gear is the equivalent of skis. It's not. Boards are a significant capability downgrade, not just in climbing and traversing, but also in control and security in icy or otherwise treacherous conditions (tree wells come to mind.) We won't know whether this girl hit the tree or fell into the tree well until the autopsy. Avalanche danger is high in the Sierra; be careful. So I helped a local patroller rescue an injured skier on a steep icy trail. It was my job to hold the sled in place from below at 90 degrees to the fall line while the patroller maneuvered the injured party into the sled. While he was instructing me on what to do, the first thing he said was, "Don't take your skis off." It all worked out OK and we got the guy down, but it was dicey. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
legal: 2/5/06 Snowboard death at Alpine Meadows
On Dec 31, 2:16*pm, lal_truckee wrote:
On 12/31/10 1:01 PM, Ted Waldron wrote: In , * *wrote: Two rules: 1) Never take your board/skis off on a steep slope - those steel edges are all that's keeping you from sliding into those rocks down there. * * *I don't agree with this. It really depends on a variety of things. If the snow isn't boilerplate, and the boarder/skier can kick steps to climb out, then there is nothing wrong in removing one's skiis or board.. If you can easily stand and/or kick steps that's not the "steep" I'm talking about. I've had to rescue boarders stuck on icy snow on High Traverse back side here - they see a skier take off and mindlessly follow.. To get one board-less boarder to safety I had to sacrifice much of my safety by giving the guy one of my poles while blocking his fall with my body below and jamming my other pole into the ice between us giving him a secure step on each stride. Scared the hell out of me, but the guy was a goner otherwise. Most of the other cases were much easier on the nerves.. I'm convinced boarders believe their gear is the equivalent of skis. It's not. Boards are a significant capability downgrade, not just in climbing and traversing, but also in control and security in icy or otherwise treacherous conditions (tree wells come to mind.) We won't know whether this girl hit the tree or fell into the tree well until the autopsy. Avalanche danger is high in the Sierra; be careful. Awwww. Another hero story from a pathetic, stalking coward. Hey, freak? If you're such a good guy on the hill, why do you not only tolerate but encourage people who threaten MY life? I'm convinced you're a transparent fraud and an all around asshole. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
legal: 2/5/06 Snowboard death at Alpine Meadows
On Dec 31, 5:02*pm, VtSkier wrote:
On 12/31/2010 05:16 PM, lal_truckee wrote: On 12/31/10 1:01 PM, Ted Waldron wrote: In , wrote: Two rules: 1) Never take your board/skis off on a steep slope - those steel edges are all that's keeping you from sliding into those rocks down there. I don't agree with this. It really depends on a variety of things. If the snow isn't boilerplate, and the boarder/skier can kick steps to climb out, then there is nothing wrong in removing one's skiis or board. If you can easily stand and/or kick steps that's not the "steep" I'm talking about. I've had to rescue boarders stuck on icy snow on High Traverse back side here - they see a skier take off and mindlessly follow. To get one board-less boarder to safety I had to sacrifice much of my safety by giving the guy one of my poles while blocking his fall with my body below and jamming my other pole into the ice between us giving him a secure step on each stride. Scared the hell out of me, but the guy was a goner otherwise. Most of the other cases were much easier on the nerves. I'm convinced boarders believe their gear is the equivalent of skis. It's not. Boards are a significant capability downgrade, not just in climbing and traversing, but also in control and security in icy or otherwise treacherous conditions (tree wells come to mind.) We won't know whether this girl hit the tree or fell into the tree well until the autopsy. Avalanche danger is high in the Sierra; be careful. So I helped a local patroller rescue an injured skier on a steep icy trail. It was my job to hold the sled in place from below at 90 degrees to the fall line while the patroller maneuvered the injured party into the sled. While he was instructing me on what to do, the first thing he said was, "Don't take your skis off." Another laughable hero story from a rsa stalking coward. They could have used a ****ing post. It all worked out OK and we got the guy down, but it was dicey.- Hey, freak? What if it was ME needing a sled down an icy run? You'd let go, right? After all, you have repeatedly threatened my life, but when the time came to sneak through Seattle, you came up with a truly ridiculous excuse. Afraid I would show up at Sun Peaks, eh? Not to worry. As much as I would like to meet you in person and give you what you deserve, I don't ski over Christmas. Anywhere. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
legal: 2/5/06 Snowboard death at Alpine Meadows
On 12/31/2010 09:37 PM, comadrejo wrote:
In , wrote: On 12/31/2010 05:16 PM, lal_truckee wrote: On 12/31/10 1:01 PM, Ted Waldron wrote: In , wrote: Two rules: 1) Never take your board/skis off on a steep slope - those steel edges are all that's keeping you from sliding into those rocks down there. I don't agree with this. It really depends on a variety of things. If the snow isn't boilerplate, and the boarder/skier can kick steps to climb out, then there is nothing wrong in removing one's skiis or board. If you can easily stand and/or kick steps that's not the "steep" I'm talking about. I've had to rescue boarders stuck on icy snow on High Traverse back side here - they see a skier take off and mindlessly follow. To get one board-less boarder to safety I had to sacrifice much of my safety by giving the guy one of my poles while blocking his fall with my body below and jamming my other pole into the ice between us giving him a secure step on each stride. Scared the hell out of me, but the guy was a goner otherwise. Most of the other cases were much easier on the nerves. I'm convinced boarders believe their gear is the equivalent of skis. It's not. Boards are a significant capability downgrade, not just in climbing and traversing, but also in control and security in icy or otherwise treacherous conditions (tree wells come to mind.) We won't know whether this girl hit the tree or fell into the tree well until the autopsy. Avalanche danger is high in the Sierra; be careful. So I helped a local patroller rescue an injured skier on a steep icy trail. It was my job to hold the sled in place from below at 90 degrees to the fall line while the patroller maneuvered the injured party into the sled. While he was instructing me on what to do, the first thing he said was, "Don't take your skis off." As I wrote, it depends on the snow conditions. I wouldn't recommend rescuing anyone if the scene appears very unsafe and the rescuer is likely to become a casualty. If it is a very icy slope and the rescuer has to approach with extreme caution, yes, edges are your safety equipment. However there should be other safety equipment like a snow anchor/snow post, besides rope, harness and a silent partner or figure eight device. My point is that "Never take off your skis on a steep slope", isn't a failsafe adage, there many other circumstances. The key is to get the person out of an unsafe situation, and not make the rescuer a victim as well. Besides you weren't on a steep slope, you were above it :-) (or that is what I decipher from your post) Nope, if you know Killington, Lower Double Dipper about 1/3 of the way down, not the steepest part but definitely steep. However if the skier has a choice between sidestepping and kicking steps to get out of a hairy situation, than I would recommend sidestepping with the skis or board given the weight distribution. Sidestepping with a board? It all worked out OK and we got the guy down, but it was dicey. As in many rescue situation,which is why I am stressing that mountain rescue has to have more important tools than ski and snowboard edges. Snow conditions were boilerplate, not RealIce(tm) that you can see a fish through so there was a little edgeability. It would appear that the alternative to what we did would have been to set an anchor above and then rope the sled either up or down. In this location up probably would have been better. But the patroller thought he could work it in the 'normal' manner and we did. I never felt afraid, but I recognized the dicey-ness of the situation. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
legal: 2/5/06 Snowboard death at Alpine Meadows
On Jan 1, 7:10*am, VtSkier wrote:
On 12/31/2010 09:37 PM, comadrejo wrote: In , * *wrote: On 12/31/2010 05:16 PM, lal_truckee wrote: On 12/31/10 1:01 PM, Ted Waldron wrote: In , *wrote: Two rules: 1) Never take your board/skis off on a steep slope - those steel edges are all that's keeping you from sliding into those rocks down there.. I don't agree with this. It really depends on a variety of things. If the snow isn't boilerplate, and the boarder/skier can kick steps to climb out, then there is nothing wrong in removing one's skiis or board. If you can easily stand and/or kick steps that's not the "steep" I'm talking about. I've had to rescue boarders stuck on icy snow on High Traverse back side here - they see a skier take off and mindlessly follow. To get one board-less boarder to safety I had to sacrifice much of my safety by giving the guy one of my poles while blocking his fall with my body below and jamming my other pole into the ice between us giving him a secure step on each stride. Scared the hell out of me, but the guy was a goner otherwise. Most of the other cases were much easier on the nerves. I'm convinced boarders believe their gear is the equivalent of skis. It's not. Boards are a significant capability downgrade, not just in climbing and traversing, but also in control and security in icy or otherwise treacherous conditions (tree wells come to mind.) We won't know whether this girl hit the tree or fell into the tree well until the autopsy. Avalanche danger is high in the Sierra; be careful. So I helped a local patroller rescue an injured skier on a steep icy trail. It was my job to hold the sled in place from below at 90 degrees to the fall line while the patroller maneuvered the injured party into the sled. While he was instructing me on what to do, the first thing he said was, "Don't take your skis off." As I wrote, it depends on the snow conditions. I wouldn't recommend rescuing anyone if the scene appears very unsafe and the rescuer is likely to become a casualty. *If it is a very icy slope and the rescuer has to approach with extreme caution, yes, edges are your safety equipment. *However there should be other safety equipment like a snow anchor/snow post, besides rope, harness and a silent partner or figure eight device. My point is that "Never take off your skis on a steep slope", isn't a failsafe adage, there many other circumstances. The key is to get the person out of an unsafe situation, and not make the rescuer a victim as well. Besides you weren't on a steep slope, you were above it :-) (or that is what I decipher from your post) Nope, if you know Killington, Lower Double Dipper about 1/3 of the way down, not the steepest part but definitely steep. * *However if the skier has a choice between sidestepping and kicking steps to get out of a hairy situation, than I would recommend sidestepping with the skis or board given the weight distribution. Sidestepping with a board? It all worked out OK and we got the guy down, but it was dicey. As in many rescue situation,which is why I am stressing that mountain rescue has to have more important tools than ski and snowboard edges. Snow conditions were boilerplate, not RealIce(tm) that you can see a fish through so there was a little edgeability. It would appear that the alternative to what we did would have been to set an anchor above and then rope the sled either up or down. In this location up probably would have been better. But the patroller thought he could work it in the 'normal' manner and we did. I never felt afraid, but I recognized the dicey-ness of the situation.- More cowardly posing pretending to be a hero. Standard issue sled work, not even worth mentioning. But this freak wants to look like he is a decent human being......when we all know the REAL Richard Walsh, a psychopathic pathological liar and terrorist. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
legal: 2/5/06 Snowboard death at Alpine Meadows
In article ,
Ted Waldron wrote: In article , twobuddha wrote: What if it was ME needing a sled down an icy run? You'd let go, right? For any Wilderness/Mountain SAR situation, the Hippocratic Oath applies of "Do No Harm". "Primum non nocere" or "First do no harm" We used to add, "because there'll be plenty of time for that later." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ski lift, Five Lakes area, Alpine Meadows CA? | AES | Backcountry Skiing | 3 | July 14th 10 09:23 PM |
Legal Update : Biggers v. Abraham. | Yabahoobs | Alpine Skiing | 34 | January 2nd 09 02:14 AM |
legal action by Inge Bråten? | John Forrest Tomlinson | Nordic Skiing | 4 | January 26th 07 04:05 PM |
Alpine Meadows | Jiyang Chen | Alpine Skiing | 7 | September 10th 04 08:04 PM |
Bert and Scott can make it legal | Terd Fartingmor | Alpine Skiing | 0 | March 10th 04 03:37 AM |