If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 25, 1:10*pm, twobuddha wrote:
On May 25, 11:54*am, Scottum wrote: On May 25, 10:32*am, twobuddha wrote: On May 25, 9:15*am, Scottum wrote: On May 24, 2:18*pm, twobuddha wrote: On May 24, 12:19*pm, Scottum wrote: On May 24, 12:38*pm, twobuddha wrote: On May 24, 4:04*am, Dave Cartman wrote: A psychopathic pathological liar playing pathologically psychopathic games? You know what is really hilarious? The number of things wrong with the preceding sentence? The number of things right, you mean? *Hilarious to me, for damn sure. I'm sure that fantasy world is pretty hilarious. I could not ask for a more powerful validation that for you to write that. What does that even mean? *Maybe it makes sense in your fantasy world but here in the real world it just makes you look even more crazy. Clue for you. *You do not know you are lying. *You are not a psychopath. *You are mentally ill. *Get help. Back to the 'I don't have any response because Scottum is right' cop out, I see.- Clue for you. *You do not know you are lying. *You are not a psychopath. *You are mentally ill. *Get help.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What lies? *Would you care to point out some? Holy ****, you really are insane. Do you mean the ones that you made up about me? Holy ****, you really are insane. *You do not know you are lying. Do you mean your lie that you showed up at Copper? Holy ****, you really are insane. *I showed. *You didn't. *Reality. Get help. Where's the clock, Porkchop?- Happy to show you. *In person, next time you are in MY neighborhood.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What lies? You can't even answer a simple question like that. Everything you said in that post is a lie, as usual. The clock isn't in your neighborhood, Porkchop. I guess we'll just chalk it up to more weasling. |
Ads |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 25, 12:44 pm, Dave Cartman wrote:
In article , taichiskiing wrote: Chinese sage Lao-Zi had resolved the fallacy of "begging the question" more than 2500 years ago. (snip) Again, please. "begging the question" is simply one of many classic logical fallacies. It can no more be "resolved" than a "non sequitur" or a "straw man" can be resolved. They are well known and well understood errors of reasoning. Not really, that was to say you are only operated in undergrad math; for post PhD program's view (more serious discussion on the fallacy of logic), read "The Problems of Philosophy" by Bertrand Russell; then again, what am I talking about, if you can read that book and understand what is said in there, we would not have this argument. Nevertheless, for your reference. Lao-Zi no more resolved the fallacy of "begging the question" than a dictionary resolves typographical errors. That is, for all things, definition comes first. You might want to tell that to all the things that humans haven't seen or discovered yet. Where your words don't touch the ground, you are living in an illusion. You are wiggling. There are two "shameless" in that sentence, but each reflects a different meaning, as the first one gives "shameless" a label, and the second one gives the label a meaning, which is "derived from all previous expositions, i.e. an external source," it may be double defined (a Zen Buddhism Koan's technique) but not a circular reasoning. Here's one that I learned it in junior high, "I saw a saw saw a saw," does that make sense? Your English! You've done this before. When caught being mistaken about physics or, in this case, logical fallacies to retreat into Chinese philosophy. No, this argument only proves that you're operating in your small English domain, if not racism; from Chinese philosophy I can see your/ Western world, but you have no ideas what my (Chinese Unism) world is. So, you ARE living in a "smaller" world. And no, I haven't made any physics mistake here, those ideas of "I being mistaken" only reflects that you are either not know enough, or you're in denial, i.e. lying to yourself, to give your mutated ego a lick. It doesn't matter that you use the same word or a different word in your circular reasoning. It's still circular. It's no different than both you and Scott claiming that I'm a liar, but "proving" by saying I lie. "Proving" was done before "you're a liar" was coined, so your argument is only reflecting your shameless denial continued. Those no rule that says you can't make nutty claims, but for it to be valid or believable, you need to back it up with more than circular reasoning. You might want to appear silly and nonsensical. That is certainly your prerogative. Quote (cut&paste from another your post): You're being silly. Ancient Egyptians and Chinese didn't think in "pictographs" anymore than I think in letters. Written word is simply a physical expression of spoken language. Not really, where in your written words that say "bass" and "trout" are both fish? In other words, how can you tell the "physical expression" of the words in their written appearance? Silly you? Your "history" is at least 1200 years behind. Now it appears that you don't know what the word "history" means. What do you think it means, and I'll try to help you sort it out. Dave Sounds like you know I know what does it mean but deny it, so, what do you mean by "history"? End quote. The "circling reasoning" is only in your shameless denial. Thanks for coming to the "head banging session." |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
In article
, taichiskiing wrote: Not really, that was to say you are only operated in undergrad math; for post PhD program's view (more serious discussion on the fallacy of logic), read "The Problems of Philosophy" by Bertrand Russell; then again, what am I talking about, if you can read that book and understand what is said in there, we would not have this argument. Nevertheless, for your reference. Bertrand Russell's "The Problems of Philosophy" is not a book written for a "post PhD program." It's in its 17th printing and is available for free online. Ironically, one of Russell's goals in writing the book was to make philosophy more accessible to anyone. It's taught as a core text in many undergraduate philosphy courses. Regardless, I am only willing to discuss facts with you. Your unique punctuation and word redefinitions would make any discussion of philosophy with you hopeless. Lao-Zi no more resolved the fallacy of "begging the question" than a dictionary resolves typographical errors. That is, for all things, definition comes first. You might want to tell that to all the things that humans haven't seen or discovered yet. Where your words don't touch the ground, you are living in an illusion. Dude, that is so deep, I'm in awe!... So things *do* or *don't* need to have a definition to exist? I say they don't. You are wiggling. There are two "shameless" in that sentence, but each reflects a different meaning, as the first one gives "shameless" a label, and the second one gives the label a meaning, which is "derived from all previous expositions, i.e. an external source," it may be double defined (a Zen Buddhism Koan's technique) but not a circular reasoning. Here's one that I learned it in junior high, "I saw a saw saw a saw," does that make sense? Your English! You've done this before. When caught being mistaken about physics or, in this case, logical fallacies to retreat into Chinese philosophy. No, this argument only proves that you're operating in your small English domain, if not racism; from Chinese philosophy I can see your/ Western world, but you have no ideas what my (Chinese Unism) world is. So, you ARE living in a "smaller" world. And no, I haven't made any physics mistake here, those ideas of "I being mistaken" only reflects that you are either not know enough, or you're in denial, i.e. lying to yourself, to give your mutated ego a lick. Look, I don't know what you mean by "give your mutated ego a lick." Are you using "mutated" in the "to change" sense or in the "x-men" sense? Your race (whatever it might be) is of no issue here. And actually your philosophical views aren't either. This discuss began because you made the claim "begging the question" is a sound logical reasoning that you learn in college math." I pointed out it's actually a logical FALLACY of circular reasoning. You were wrong, but instead of admitting your mistake you insult me and make wild claims about your own intellectual ability. It doesn't matter that you use the same word or a different word in your circular reasoning. It's still circular. It's no different than both you and Scott claiming that I'm a liar, but "proving" by saying I lie. "Proving" was done before "you're a liar" was coined, so your argument is only reflecting your shameless denial continued. If you proved that I'm not only a liar but a "recycled" liar you should show that proof to the world. Otherwise, you are just calling me names. Those no rule that says you can't make nutty claims, but for it to be valid or believable, you need to back it up with more than circular reasoning. You might want to appear silly and nonsensical. That is certainly your prerogative. Quote (cut&paste from another your post): You're being silly. Ancient Egyptians and Chinese didn't think in "pictographs" anymore than I think in letters. Written word is simply a physical expression of spoken language. Not really, where in your written words that say "bass" and "trout" are both fish? In the definition of the word "fish." A trout is a fish. A opossum is not. They are both fish by virtue of their shared characteristics. Here is one (casual) description, from Webster's, "any of numerous cold-blooded strictly aquatic craniate vertebrates that include the bony fishes and usually the cartilaginous and jawless fishes and that have typically an elongated somewhat spindle-shaped body terminating in a broad caudal fin, limbs in the form of fins when present at all, and a 2-chambered heart by which blood is sent through thoracic gills to be oxygenated" A trout is a fish. A kangaroo is not. Not really, where in your written words that say "bass" and "trout" are both fish? In other words, how can you tell the "physical expression" of the words in their written appearance? Silly you? Unless your pictogram of a fish is drawn with magic ink, the pictogram of a fish won't reveal it's species UNLESS it has modifers, like stylistic changes, or context, or other modifying pictograms. (I may not know hieroglyphics, but I am unstoppable at Pictionary.) Similarly, in English we use context and adjectives. Same idea. Different shape. Your "history" is at least 1200 years behind. Now it appears that you don't know what the word "history" means. What do you think it means, and I'll try to help you sort it out. Dave Sounds like you know I know what does it mean but deny it, so, what do you mean by "history"? Typically, "history" refers to "a chronological record of significant events." (Webster) In that context, your statement "Your 'history' is at least 1200 years behind" is gibberish. So, what do mean by "history?" The "circling reasoning" is only in your shameless denial. Thanks for coming to the "head banging session." It's an intellectual exercise to refresh my memory of logical fallacies, or consider "what is a fish?" or whether pictographic writing is really any different than our Roman alphabet (it's not) In the past, your stubborn ignorance has been a motivation to review flight mechanics and basic physics, and I get to make a pompous blowhard look silly in the process. Now, 1) What is it you say I'm lying about? Be specific. 2) What do you mean when you by disagreeing with you when you are clearly and easily demonstrably wrong that there is "no redemption for (my) soul." 3) I am really curious to see what you think the word "history" means in English. Dave |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
Dave Cartman wrote:
Now, 1) What is it you say I'm lying about? Be specific. Any thing that disagrees with my pronouncements is a lie! 2) What do you mean when you by disagreeing with you when you are clearly and easily demonstrably wrong that there is "no redemption for (my) soul." Like a muslim thing kill the infidel 3) I am really curious to see what you think the word "history" means in English. HIS STORY subject to no known truths as accepted by the rest of the US population and other logical thinkers Dave good luck with getting a straight answer |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 25, 1:13*pm, Richard Henry wrote:
Happy to show you. *In person, next time you are in MY neighborhood. The clock tower is in your neighborhood? You have to take into consideration the source Richard. Of course the clock is not in his neighborhood. It's not even at Copper where he thought it was. And consider that lately he's come up with, just where it concerns me, just in the limited amount of his drivel that I see, that I am a draft dodger, that I lied to authorities, and that I claimed to have had him banned from Canada. All easily proveable if true. But all outright lies without any basis whatsoever. Just more of the same. But a little more intense, don't you think? Hopefully he's about to bust a vein. |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 25, 1:44*pm, Dave Cartman wrote:
Those no rule that says you can't make nutty claims, but for it to be valid or believable, you need to back it up with more than circular reasoning. *You might want to appear silly and nonsensical. *That is certainly your prerogative. And the one thing he appears successful at so far. |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 26, 7:31*am, pigo wrote:
On May 25, 1:44*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: Those no rule that says you can't make nutty claims, but for it to be valid or believable, you need to back it up with more than circular reasoning. *You might want to appear silly and nonsensical. *That is certainly your prerogative. And the one thing he appears successful at so far. This from Brain Fried Bob Thompson, who just whined that I am an extremely violent man likely to go postal and harm innocents? The mind boggles. Especially considering Thompson brags about making such nutty claims to LE. Irony meter makes a truly nutty claim, saying Brain Fried Bob is sane. |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 26, 7:29*am, pigo wrote:
On May 25, 1:13*pm, Richard Henry wrote: Happy to show you. *In person, next time you are in MY neighborhood.. The clock tower is in your neighborhood? You have to take into consideration the source Richard. Sure, Bob. Let us discuss the Cabin on Bald Mountain at Deer Valley. You know, when I gave you THREE months notice of a meet, and you didn't have the nads to show up? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA Of course the clock is not in his neighborhood. Yes, but I am in my neighborhood. You know, the neighborhood you claim to have stalked me in WHEN YOU KNEW I WAS IN SUN VALLEY? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA It's not even at Copper where he thought it was. Really? You ever been to Copper? How about mentioning your pussy buddy who said he'd show up at Copper and then didn't have the balls? You forgot that? Of course you did. You two have so much in common. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA And consider that lately he's come up with, just where it concerns me, just in the limited amount of his drivel that I see, that I am a draft dodger, that I lied to authorities, and that I claimed to have had him banned from Canada. You are a draft dodger. You bragged about getting me banned from Canada by lying to Canadian LE (because there is no way you told the truth). The only drivel is this sentence. Busted lying again and again and again. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA All easily proveable if true. But all outright lies without any basis whatsoever. Exactly. Your statements are outright lies. Ridiculous, transparent, laughable lies. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA Just more of the same. But a little more intense, don't you think? Hopefully he's about to bust a vein. Looks to me like you just busted a vein in your brain, writing such absurd crap, you blithering dumb****. Hey, Brain Fried Bitch? You never have offered an excuse for not showing up at DV, or Temple Square, or Sun Valley, or..... BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAH AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAH AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHA HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA HAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHA HAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAB WHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHA HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAA HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHA HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH AHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH AAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAH AHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABW HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAH AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAH AHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHA HAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWH AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHA HAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH AAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAA HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAH AAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHA HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAH AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH AHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAH AHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAH AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAH AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHA HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA HAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHA HAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAB WHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHA HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAA HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHA HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH AHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH AAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAH AHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABW HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAH AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAH AHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 25, 2:59*pm, Scottum wrote:
What lies? *You can't even answer a simple question like that. Everything you said in that post is a lie, as usual. The clock isn't in your neighborhood, Porkchop. *I guess we'll just chalk it up to more weasling. Exactly as predicted. I don't suppose he's shown the post where I claimed to have him banned from Canada yet? That would be too easy, if it were true. If I were a draft dodger I wouldn't have a draft card, status 1H would I? I think showing that would make trunky a liar. OH WAIT! We already know that. |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 26, 8:14*am, pigo wrote:
On May 25, 2:59*pm, Scottum wrote: What lies? *You can't even answer a simple question like that. Everything you said in that post is a lie, as usual. The clock isn't in your neighborhood, Porkchop. *I guess we'll just chalk it up to more weasling. Yeah, but I am in my neighborhood, and I can show you proof I was at Copper. In person. If you ever grow a set. What am I supposed to do, show up at Copper again? So you can pussy out again and wastemy time? Exactly as predicted. I don't suppose he's shown the post where I claimed to have him banned from Canada yet? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA Holy ****, Brain Fried Bob. Are you really trying to lie your way out of being busted? Bad enough that you claim to have lied to Canadian LE, but you also claimed to have been successful, bragging about how I couldn't come up during the Olympics. You know it, I know it, everybody knows it. No need to prove you a liar when everybody knows you lied, ppppppuuuuuuussssssyyyyyyyy That would be too easy, Sure would be. But since I know for a fact that you did exactly that, I'll just keep repeating the facts, and laugh my ass off when you try to sell this bull****. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA if it were true. If I were a draft dodger I wouldn't have a draft card, status 1H would I? I think showing that would make trunky a liar. OH WAIT! We already know that. Thompson, you are a dickless coward who avoided serving in the military. You could have volunteered. Hey, you still have your draft card? Do you keep your used diapers, too? You used your lottery number to duck serving, and then you have the gall, the profound dishonesty, the ridiculous hypocrisy to trash Senator John Kerry, who VOLUNTEERED!!!!!!! I am amazed. Brain Fried Thompson is trying to cover up his blatant lying about a decorated war hero by whining he didn't dodge the draft. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA Who's a liar, Swift Boat Bob? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Taichiskiing | Stuart[_2_] | Alpine Skiing | 39 | May 15th 10 01:41 PM |
Dear taichiskiing guy | Marty | Alpine Skiing | 1 | June 1st 07 12:25 AM |