If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Booker,
_ You're right, they aren't "light", just lighter than everything else available. Well, sorry to disagree here, but they are far from being light. Over the years I have owned quite a number of AT boots as they evolved and the TLT4 is right in there with the heavier ones. For the same size (E44), my clunky San Marcos that I bought in the mid 70s weighed nearly the same as the TLT4s, that is 66oz. In contrast, my old leather Munari lace up AT boots from the 60s weighed 44oz and they skied well too! The Dynafit range acquired its reputation for lightness with the TLT3 in an era when AT boots were like concrete buckets;, Unfortunately the TLT4 reversed that trend when it gained weight after Dynafit started to experiment with new trends rtrying to beat finacial collapse. That they are marketed as super light is just a stint of advertising. The MLT4 is genuinely light, but as you say, it leaves something to be desired with the lacing. I use the Loden liners in mine, There is no doubt that Loden inners ski better, but they are heavy and if they get wet can freeze up something awful. Also, as far as lacing goes, there is nothing worse than having to tighten up a Loden inner so that the shell can tighten sufficiently around the ankles, especially in bad weather. A buckle up boot with a loose Loden inner is very much less effective than a one fitted with a foam inner. because I think they ski better than thermoflex ones. Thermoflex liners are great for getting lighter boots, but I do think they give up some support compared to more traditional liners. You are quite right. The Loden inners are tightened with laces and add an additional and significant degree to the support, always provided that they are tightened adequately before the buckles are (tightened). Maybe I just don't expect much of mine, but I'm always pretty impressed with how well they ski. They are very comfortable. If one can ski competently, then almost any boot will do for AT, lateral supposrt, comfort and weight being the principal determinants. I have skied with Swiss guides who used nothing but Koflach mountaineering boots and their style was flawless, equally in junk snow as on ice as on powder. But one thing is for su The less boot one has, the harder the legs have to work and the better the technique has to be. _ Power straps suck, Buckles rule... No question about that - That is why I think that their latest racing boot is worth a second look. But as far as lacing goes, there is nothing worse than having to tighten up a Loden inner so that the shell can tighten sufficiently around the ankles. A buckle up boot with a loose inner is very much less than satisfactory and this is why I went over to foam inners. From what I can see I think they compromise the skiing side too much for my taste. No cuff lock and a velcro strap. Unless carrying heavy packs, and skiing with heavy long skis, those features can be dispensed with. Rando racers use skis so short that only 5yrs ago they would have been considered inadequate, on their boots they often remove the tongues for weight saving! I think that for real AT,as opposed to off-piste skiing, the most important attribute of a boot is to provide lateral support for controlled edging. Everything else is secondary. Nice to have, but dispensable, otherwise we be all touring in our heavy DH recreational boots. _ My primary use of these boots is for peak bagging in the spring which generally involves climbing lot's of relatively low angle hard snow with crampons before the sun rises, waiting on top for the snow to soften and skiing back down. Same here. There is some powder skiing also, but active glaciers are treacherous places with powder and decent mid-winter weather is scarce. I've never tried much dirt/rocks walking with them, but even plastic ice climbing boots aren't much fun for that. Glacier rubble walking is no fun in anything! In the days of leather boots, they used to wear through the toe welt/stiching after a few tours. The standard remedy in those days was to epoxy and fibre-glass over the toe caps and try to get a little extra life out of them.... In general I think that if the conditions will let you get away with it[1], you're better of carrying your boots than walking in them. Yes, many do that. Cheers Craig |
Ads |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Fischer Skate Boots Report | Jay Tegeder | Nordic Skiing | 9 | October 16th 04 06:34 PM |
Northwest Mountaineering Journal, Issue 1, Summer 2004 | Lowell Skoog | Backcountry Skiing | 0 | July 19th 04 03:42 AM |
NW Mountaineering Journal - Announcement and Call For Submissions | Lowell Skoog | Backcountry Skiing | 0 | February 10th 04 05:04 AM |
AT combinations/Backcountry Skiing in Newfoundland | Bob Inkpen | Backcountry Skiing | 16 | September 25th 03 06:39 PM |
Ski Mountaineering | Clyde | Backcountry Skiing | 2 | September 23rd 03 09:18 PM |