If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
"Champ" wrote in message ... | On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:42:32 +0100, "PG" | wrote: | | | "Champ" wrote in message | .. . | | On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:45:48 +0100, "PG" | | wrote: | | | | mega snip | | | | So, can you explain again why a racer without a helmet (who seems to | | be in a minority) is setting a bad example? | | You've got to be kidding... | | No, really. | | You've stated that almost all racers are wearing helmets, so why are | the few that don't going to have any sort of influence? Depends on several factors. In France a racer that doesn't wear a helmet is unlikely to have significant influence unless he/she receives proportionately greater media attention for some reason (local skier, major event winner, etc). Whereas the UK is a different story, as there are only two British male racers with any kind of public profile (just one until quite recently), so that influence is potentially greater. In both cases a disproportionate degree of influence is possible, depending on the circumstances. Pete www.skiclublesarcs.com |
Ads |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Nick Hounsome wrote:
"David Mahon" wrote in message ... Champ wrote: This is where it all falls down. The only resposibility a senior racer has is to themselves. Whoever he is, I imagine the racer in question had a reason for not wearing a helmet. Given that it only affects him (i.e. it's only his brain at risk), then why isn't that reason good enough for you and your daughter? Not true - there are incidents now where skiers/boarders with helmets have collided with other skiers/boarders and caused significant injury (I'm not sure about death) that may be attributable to their helmets. No it's attributable to them being out of control. Punish the dangerous not the careful. Why do you consider wearing a helmet a punishment? -- Chris *:-) Downhill Good, Uphill BAD! www.suffolkvikings.org.uk |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
As the OP, can I just chip in here.....
On the subject of skiing my experience is that low speeds the nature of the skiis and the slopes seems to make hitting your head very unlikely - mostly it is more of a semi-controlled sitting down. I don't ski fast unless the piste is flat and clear - if I did I would probably wear a helmet. This is my point exactly....Its horses for courses. Most of the responses to my post seem to be about racing. I'm not talking about racing. I'm talking about the family tootling down greens and blues admiring the scenery. In this instance, helmets are obtrusive, and detach you somewhat from the surroundings. I also think they can restrict the senses (vison/hearing) to the extent that you are less aware of other traffic! The decision ought to lie with the parent, who is hopefully intelligent enough to make a fair risk assessment. As a parent, I would not want my children to go racing without proper protection, and would not consider it myself. Enforcing skiing tourists to wear them is just not on and should never happen. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
"John Ricketts" wrote in message ... | As the OP, can I just chip in here..... | | On the subject of skiing my experience is that low speeds the nature of | the skiis and the slopes seems to make hitting your head very unlikely - | mostly it is more of a semi-controlled sitting down. I don't ski fast | unless the piste is flat and clear - if I did I would probably wear a | helmet. | | This is my point exactly....Its horses for courses. Most of the responses to | my post seem to be about racing. I'm not talking about racing. I'm talking | about the family tootling down greens and blues admiring the scenery. In | this instance, helmets are obtrusive, and detach you somewhat from the | surroundings. I also think they can restrict the senses (vison/hearing) to | the extent that you are less aware of other traffic! The decision ought to | lie with the parent, who is hopefully intelligent enough to make a fair risk | assessment. | | As a parent, I would not want my children to go racing without proper | protection, and would not consider it myself. Enforcing skiing tourists to | wear them is just not on and should never happen. Trusting parents to make an informed decision about whether their children should wear helmets is a mistake IMO. Intelligence isn't enough - the great majority of ski tourists have little or no knowledge of the FIS piste etiquette rules, and are simply too inexperienced and ill-informed themselves to judge what's best. Their limited experience of the dangers of the mountain environment is demonstrated time and again on the piste, as holiday rush/sheer stupidity/ignorance etc affect a not insignificant number - and not just the gung-ho teenagers, I've seen many a 'respectable' father mistake himself for the Herminator in conditions of heavy traffic. Children ambling down a piste on holiday take a tumble far more frequently than the 'pro' ski racers. They are far less aware of their surroundings and change direction randomly - both by accident and design. Skiers/boarders coming up behind a slower person are often unaware of the priority rules. They regularly don't allow for unexpected movements downhill of them. Many are unaware how changing snow conditions can affect their level of control. Collisions are a frequent occurence, the occasional one very violent indeed. It is not just a case of protecting people from themselves. Helmets 'detaching you from the environment' ... well, that is not my experience. You can hear and see just fine, and racers don't seem to have a problem. As a parent with several children who don't race as well as the one who does, I can think of a number of incidents where a helmet has protected them - and particularly the youngest - from what could have been quite serious injury. They include being taken out at speed from behind by both boarders and skiers, as well as some nasty falls from overenthusiastic skiing of bumps. Pete www.skiclublesarcs.com I spend several months a year on the pistes. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
John Ricketts wrote:
As the OP, can I just chip in here..... On the subject of skiing my experience is that low speeds the nature of the skiis and the slopes seems to make hitting your head very unlikely - mostly it is more of a semi-controlled sitting down. I don't ski fast unless the piste is flat and clear - if I did I would probably wear a helmet. This is my point exactly....Its horses for courses. Most of the responses to my post seem to be about racing. I'm not talking about racing. I'm talking about the family tootling down greens and blues admiring the scenery. In this instance, helmets are obtrusive, and detach you somewhat from the surroundings. I also think they can restrict the senses (vison/hearing) to the extent that you are less aware of other traffic! The decision ought to lie with the parent, who is hopefully intelligent enough to make a fair risk assessment. As a parent, I would not want my children to go racing without proper protection, and would not consider it myself. Enforcing skiing tourists to wear them is just not on and should never happen. The problem is that you and your children may well be tootling down greens and blues, but you are not the only people on the piste, and even worse the blue or green you are tootling down may be crossed by a red or even a black run. and the other users may well be out of control, or have just fallen and they and their equipment is sliding down the hill. I am also intrigued by the idea that Helmets "restrict the senses", Most helmets worn by non racers do not impinge on your area of vision, and many do not even cover your ears. Even Helmets designed for racing tend to have holes to allow you to hear normally. I bought my Helmet for racing, Helmets are required for all racers on dry slopes so I didn't really have much choice. In the beginning I used only to wear it on snow when I was training, Racing or the weather was vile (Helmets are much better protection from a blizzard than a woolly hat!), but over time I have been wearing my helmet more and more of the time, Mainly I think because of the apparently deteriorating level of control of many skiers/boarders and also because of the deteriorating snow conditions which seem to be leaving more and more obstructions uncovered by snow. I don't believe that Adults should be forced to wear helmets, but I do believe you are being negligent if you allow small children to ski without one! -- Chris *:-) Downhill Good, Uphill BAD! www.suffolkvikings.org.uk |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Almost all laws are about protecting person A from person B. However, things like the seatbelt law and helmet laws are about protecting person A from person A, and I really don't think that's the business of the state. -- Champ That's fine as long as person A does a proper job and terminates him/herself. If person A ends up as chronic wreck then the state (i.e. the rest of us) has to pay that cost..... so why should I pay for person A's stupidity / how much should the state restrict person A's freedom of choice. It's a question of balance and hence there will be no right/wrong answer. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
"MoonMan" wrote in message ... I don't believe that Adults should be forced to wear helmets, but I do believe you are being negligent if you allow small children to ski without one! Does 12 class as small? |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
"PG" wrote in message ... "Nick Hounsome" wrote in message . uk... | | "PG" wrote in message | ... | | "Nick Hounsome" wrote in message | . uk... | | | | On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:36:12 +0100, "PG" | | wrote: | | | | | | I don't think that feeling disgusted can reasonably be called a | discussion | | of the issues. | | Straw man. This is the logical fallacy of refuting a caricatured or | extreme version of someone's argument, rather than the argument they've | actually made. | | You have lost the thread - there is no post that says that the child | discussed anything at all she was only reported as being disgusted. Her views were mentioned in passing and were never held up to be a discussion of the issues. Therefore your reply is a straw man, as I said. On the contrary - the fact that a young child can be "disgusted" by the sight of a pro racer not wearing a helmet is extremely relevant to the issue of the social pressures restricting freedom of choice regarding wearing a helmet. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
"MoonMan" wrote in message ... Nick Hounsome wrote: "David Mahon" wrote in message ... Champ wrote: This is where it all falls down. The only resposibility a senior racer has is to themselves. Whoever he is, I imagine the racer in question had a reason for not wearing a helmet. Given that it only affects him (i.e. it's only his brain at risk), then why isn't that reason good enough for you and your daughter? Not true - there are incidents now where skiers/boarders with helmets have collided with other skiers/boarders and caused significant injury (I'm not sure about death) that may be attributable to their helmets. No it's attributable to them being out of control. Punish the dangerous not the careful. Why do you consider wearing a helmet a punishment? An invouluntary payment is usualy regarded as a tax or a fine. A fine is a punishment. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
"PG" wrote in message ... "Champ" wrote in message ... | On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:42:32 +0100, "PG" | wrote: | | | "Champ" wrote in message | .. . | | On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:45:48 +0100, "PG" | | wrote: | | | | mega snip | | | | So, can you explain again why a racer without a helmet (who seems to | | be in a minority) is setting a bad example? | | You've got to be kidding... | | No, really. | | You've stated that almost all racers are wearing helmets, so why are | the few that don't going to have any sort of influence? Depends on several factors. In France a racer that doesn't wear a helmet is unlikely to have significant influence unless he/she receives proportionately greater media attention for some reason (local skier, major event winner, etc). Whereas the UK is a different story, as there are only two British male racers with any kind of public profile (just one until quite recently), so that influence is potentially greater. In both cases a disproportionate degree of influence is possible, depending on the circumstances. You seem to be taking the notion of the responsibility of pros rather a long way he now it seems that their responsibility rises and falls not just according to their own behaviour but according to the rankings of their fellow countrymen and whether the BBC decides to increase coverage of skiing! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Helmets | Scott Elliot | Nordic Skiing | 2 | September 21st 04 11:08 PM |
Helmets - any available with soft padding? | Henry | Snowboarding | 8 | February 26th 04 12:54 PM |
Helmets | Steve Haigh | European Ski Resorts | 50 | February 5th 04 04:46 PM |
Giro Nine helmets in stock at $79.95 | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | December 17th 03 11:41 AM |
Helmets - thermal protection | Ian Turek | Snowboarding | 4 | November 13th 03 06:35 PM |