If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
On a boring groomer day last year, I turned on my GPS, reset my track,
and did a speed run, just to see how fast I was going. My GPS (an old Magellan Sport track) has a "maximum speed" indicator (I'm sure most others do too), and when I got on the lift I saw that I maxed out at 72mph! I'm pretty sure the GPS speed indicator is accurate, as I often compare it to my car speedometer, and it is always the same. I was indeed hauling a$$, but was still totally in control, and felt I could have pushed it a bit more (not too much though). Not one to encourage dangerous behavour, but is something worth trying. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
Humsquirto wrote:
72mph! I'm pretty sure the GPS speed indicator is accurate, ... I profess a slight doubt... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
On Tue 06 Oct '09 at 21:03 lal_truckee wrote:
Humsquirto wrote: 72mph! I'm pretty sure the GPS speed indicator is accurate, ... I profess a slight doubt... This generated a lot of discussion amongst people I know too, here's some facts: http://www8.garmin.com/products/etrexVistacx/spec.html GPS accuracy: Position: 15 meters, 95% typical* Velocity: 0.05 meter/sec steady state i.e. 0.05 (meters per second) = 0.111846815 mph Remember that the position error is constant between the velocity measurements, thus cancels out. Though this assumes a good signal the entire time, and you should check the individual track log points. I've seen 600mph+ readings sometimes with bad GPS signal and massive non constant positional errors. A. -- Alun Evans |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
lal_truckee wrote:
Humsquirto wrote: 72mph! I'm pretty sure the GPS speed indicator is accurate, ... I profess a slight doubt... I would drink to that doubt. There is a GPS option available for many data acquisition systems most drivers find that you get more repeatable results from a lateral accelerometer and a wheel speed indicator non driven wheel. There is a fair amount of error in the gps system, my thoughts also when you get height changes z axis the calculations are not that accurate vs on a road where you just measuring x y axis changes I can show you some funny errors such as going off track on to grass and show a speed of 203 from the gps calulation, he was doing 95 before leaving track. yesterday I was chasing a 158 mph high on one lap the calculated max speed of car at 9000 rpm is about 144--- 145 13 mph over is one big draft or a gps error |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
On Oct 6, 9:03 pm, lal_truckee wrote:
Humsquirto wrote: 72mph! I'm pretty sure the GPS speed indicator is accurate, ... I profess a slight doubt... Please explain why you think I am lying. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
Humsquirto wrote:
On Oct 6, 9:03 pm, lal_truckee wrote: Humsquirto wrote: 72mph! I'm pretty sure the GPS speed indicator is accurate, ... I profess a slight doubt... Please explain why you think I am lying. I saw nothing to indicate he thought you were lying. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
There is a GPS option available for many data acquisition systems most
drivers find that you get more repeatable results from a lateral accelerometer and a wheel speed indicator non driven wheel. There is a fair amount of error in the gps system, my thoughts also when you get height changes z axis the calculations are not that accurate vs on a road where you just measuring x y axis changes Downhill and alun, thanks for the info, that is more of what I was hoping for with this discussion. I like the mention of the z-axis change - makes sense. I still however profess that 70 mph is absolutely attainible. Downhill racers typically max at upper 80's to 90 mph, I don't think reaching 75% of this speed in ideal conditions (long wide straight run with a consistent yet steep slope, iced over groomed run, no bumps, tuck the whole way, not worrying about ruts, turns, gates, etc.) is that hard to believe. Even with a 10% error, that is still mid 60's, which is splitting hairs. I posed the question to the folks at the USA speed skiing association, who said that under the right conditions that was certainly doable (difficult, yes, but impossible, no). What if the GPS was actually close to accurate? Errors are not automatic. So maybe it was closer to 60 mph, but even that means that 70 mph is still possible. Next time I will take my Trimble unit. Ask yourself, how fast do you think you could go? 60+ mph is not that unreasonable. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
Humsquirto wrote:
There is a GPS option available for many data acquisition systems most drivers find that you get more repeatable results from a lateral accelerometer and a wheel speed indicator non driven wheel. There is a fair amount of error in the gps system, my thoughts also when you get height changes z axis the calculations are not that accurate vs on a road where you just measuring x y axis changes Downhill and alun, thanks for the info, that is more of what I was hoping for with this discussion. I like the mention of the z-axis change - makes sense. I still however profess that 70 mph is absolutely attainible. Downhill racers typically max at upper 80's to 90 mph, I don't think reaching 75% of this speed in ideal conditions (long wide straight run with a consistent yet steep slope, iced over groomed run, no bumps, tuck the whole way, not worrying about ruts, turns, gates, etc.) is that hard to believe. Even with a 10% error, that is still mid 60's, which is splitting hairs. I posed the question to the folks at the USA speed skiing association, who said that under the right conditions that was certainly doable (difficult, yes, but impossible, no). What if the GPS was actually close to accurate? Errors are not automatic. So maybe it was closer to 60 mph, but even that means that 70 mph is still possible. Next time I will take my Trimble unit. Ask yourself, how fast do you think you could go? 60+ mph is not that unreasonable. Not necessarily about your particular questions, but: A friend of mine has the GPS app for his I-Phone. He also has a dedicated GPS (he's a toy freak). He finds that both the I-phone and the dedicated GPS show speed quite accurately when compared to his speedometer. Having said that, he finds this is so over a distance and when he accelerates or decelerates there is a lag before the GPS receivers w adjust to the new speed, so what I would suggest is that your GPS may give you a accurate max speed reading but that at any given instant, the reading could be wildly off. For example, it is several seconds before my friends GPS will register the fact that the car has stopped, still recording 25 or 30 mph while the car is stopped. So... I would tend to believe you that in the conditions that you indicate that you really are going 70 mph (or so with a fairly small error) As for me, I believe that I top out at somewhere around 50. I have another friend who likes to "speed ski". He does so early in the morning (before crowds and bumps form) and only when he is alone or almost so on the hill. I suspect he hits downhill racer speeds. Big guy, big skis, lots of skill. Has been stopped by patrol, who listened to his story and said that under the conditions he described, going fast is OK. Neither one of us has had our speed measured. .. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
Humsquirto wrote:
There is a GPS option available for many data acquisition systems most drivers find that you get more repeatable results from a lateral accelerometer and a wheel speed indicator non driven wheel. There is a fair amount of error in the gps system, my thoughts also when you get height changes z axis the calculations are not that accurate vs on a road where you just measuring x y axis changes Downhill and alun, thanks for the info, that is more of what I was hoping for with this discussion. I like the mention of the z-axis change - makes sense. I still however profess that 70 mph is absolutely attainible. Downhill racers typically max at upper 80's to 90 mph, I don't think reaching 75% of this speed in ideal conditions (long wide straight run with a consistent yet steep slope, iced over groomed run, no bumps, tuck the whole way, not worrying about ruts, turns, gates, etc.) is that hard to believe. Even with a 10% error, that is still mid 60's, which is splitting hairs. I posed the question to the folks at the USA speed skiing association, who said that under the right conditions that was certainly doable (difficult, yes, but impossible, no). What if the GPS was actually close to accurate? Errors are not automatic. So maybe it was closer to 60 mph, but even that means that 70 mph is still possible. Next time I will take my Trimble unit. Ask yourself, how fast do you think you could go? 60+ mph is not that unreasonable. I have been clocked at 55 on a radar gun in a speed suit & 212cm skis and it was work. The fastest guy went 65 and he had pro experience. My experience with people and speed they have a tendency to lean towards big numbers even if there is error The fastest master skiers hit 70 max, you can not use world cup people as a real world example for regular skiers. If you work out like Bode you might see 60 but I think you going to be in for a surprise. Plus your talking about using downhill or super-g skis to do this, using 170cm to do this is asking for trouble The real way of testing your speed is trip lights or a radar gun. Or a pitot tube that would be the cheapest way. Even simpler measure the distance and run a watch time the fastest segment. I use gps in my line of work and you need to view it in context of other data, but it is not repeatable over a period of hours. In one of the testing magazines I get there is a new product for increasing the accuracy of your gps signal input. Does not fit in formula cars so did not look in detail. My thought to best experience the speed is to stand up from the tuck when you want to slow down Bring this up in the spring I will share some data from ski runs this year I am going to some trade shows and putting on a tech seminar in feb and one of the subjects we will be exploring is gps data. As for comments from speed groups Lime Rock a 1.6 mile course can be driven in 49 seconds in a formula atlantic car but only by a small group of people and many have tried. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
fun things to try with your GPS
downhill,
...........very convincing. so, maybe not quite 72. still, I felt like I was going faster than the old AMC Eagle coming down hwy 50 after a sunday family ski day. Great info, by the way, I hope you are able to post some good data after the season. from downhill: I have been clocked at 55 on a radar gun in a speed suit & 212cm skis and it was work. The fastest guy went 65 and he had pro experience. My experience with people and speed they have a tendency to lean towards big numbers even if there is error The fastest master skiers hit 70 max, you can not use world cup people as a real world example for regular skiers. If you work out like Bode you might see 60 but I think you going to be in for a surprise. Plus your talking about using downhill or super-g skis to do this, using 170cm to do this is asking for trouble The real way of testing your speed is trip lights or a radar gun. Or a pitot tube that would be the cheapest way. Even simpler measure the distance and run a watch time the fastest segment. I use gps in my line of work and you need to view it in context of other data, but it is not repeatable over a period of hours. In one of the testing magazines I get there is a new product for increasing the accuracy of your gps signal input. Does not fit in formula cars so did not look in detail. My thought to best experience the speed is to stand up from the tuck when you want to slow down Bring this up in the spring I will share some data from ski runs this year I am going to some trade shows and putting on a tech seminar in feb and one of the subjects we will be exploring is gps data. As for comments from speed groups Lime Rock a 1.6 mile course can be driven in 49 seconds in a formula atlantic car but only by a small group of people and many have tried.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two smart things I did.... | Walt | Alpine Skiing | 1 | March 4th 08 09:43 PM |
Things have calmed down | Chuck | Alpine Skiing | 31 | July 26th 06 04:45 PM |
Things Have changed WHY? | Seals4Deals | Marketplace | 0 | February 10th 06 09:05 PM |
Annoying Things #101 | Simon Brown | European Ski Resorts | 3 | March 6th 04 06:41 PM |