If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
On Nov 24, 6:10*pm, lal_truckee wrote:
On 11/24/10 4:59 PM, pigo wrote: On Nov 24, 5:18 pm, Ted *wrote: * Pigo, drop it. If the war to be over, stop continuing it. He still posts. Most likely the same old ****. Exactly. You're posting the same old **** about the same old ****. Pointless. Also suggest you drop it. Any criticism of Bob Thompson calling me a child molester, or threatening my life? Of course not. You've skied with this freak, drank with this freak, supported this freak in his stalking. Which says all any decent human being needs to know about you. What a scumbag!!!!! |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
On Nov 24, 7:06*pm, "Bob F" wrote:
I don't really understand. In one post, you claim you have campaigned for years to have him ignored and have done so yourself, yet here you are again playing with him. It was just a few months ago I plonked you because you kept baiting him. Why don't you make up your mind? I thought you were cleaning up your act when I un-plonked you recently. C'mon. It's been 11 years. A comical mix of insane rantings over that period of time is bound to pop up now and then. And it's true. If _no one_ quotes or responds, I won't have any material. You must admit that since the plan has been put into effect it's been much nicer around here. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
lal_truckee wrote:
On 11/24/10 4:59 PM, pigo wrote: On Nov 24, 5:18 pm, Ted wrote: Pigo, drop it. If the war to be over, stop continuing it. He still posts. Most likely the same old ****. Exactly. You're posting the same old **** about the same old ****. Pointless. Also suggest you drop it. good words to follow |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:23:48 -0800 (PST), pigo
wrote: On Nov 24, 1:20*pm, DaveM wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:30:23 -0800 (PST), pigo wrote: snip If you could? Please delete the quotes from trunky in your replies to him. We have virtually eliminated his tantrums that way. You'll understand after posting for awhile. TIA Uh, Yeah, thanks for the tip. I have been posting here occasionally for the past ten years or so and I actually have you klillfiled. Not, I suspect that you care but that's the facts. I manage to make it a pretty readable group where I see what I want and ignore what I see that I don't like. Haven't posted in response to any of the crap flying around in a few years now and don't care to be involved in it. Well, your right. I don't care. I suspect that I am no longer the one that skis the most on the group. Just in case you missed it, Scott and I were having a conversation that was NEARLY skiing related - snow, cold, wind related at least - that got hijacked by Horvath and you. Hijacked? That's a bit extreme for just asking you to eliminate his quotes in your posts. Go ahead and have your conversation with him if you think you can believe anything he says. We've come to a plan that has made this group more tolerable than it has been in years. And we are all quite happy knowing that the way to hurt him most is to ignore him and take away his podium. Something I've been doing and asking for on and off for years. Suddenly it sounded like a good idea to many and as near as I can tell is a huge success. Will it negatively effect you in anyway to just not quote him? Have anythign to say about the topic of the thread at all? Just another overblown forecast. Maybe that's why I only read you if someone replies to one of your rants, *like this one. That's fine. That's our plan for trunky. By all means keep talking to him. You'll see. Bob, I have no desire to get into this and in fact will not beyond this post: You are disingenuous in the extreme. You want to make it better you claim, but you all too frequently post crap that keeps it not better. Don't respond directly but keep taking shots from the oblique angles. Make statements that we all (who have been here a while) know the subtext of but claim that you are not talking to Scott directly and are therefore blameless for the results. You are Horvath but without the "gumption" to do it directly and nothing better (YOU wrote: Seems a bit extreme to me ** for a post or two... ** but you gotta do what you gotta do."[emphasis added]). Funny how there were at least three such responses in this thread alone, go look at the cxrap you are spewing. You complain about the word "hijack" in my response to you, but go back and read what you posted; it is a hijack of a thread about at least snowish things. You can claim that it is a plea to not quote Scott but that is silly, and it is an infantile argument and anyone who understands the history of this "place" can see that from your invocation of names best left in the past. Besides, the post you are responding to was about snow in the NW and in Seattle! The horror that I or we should talk about that. You want to ignore, him, you claim, but you demonstrably can't. Ignore him or don't but you get no moral high ground for doing neither and claiming the former. You rail against my "overblown forecast" (and maybeit was, it was only -13F when I parked at work today) but you post obsessively almost about California's educational system and its pricing structure and myriad off-topic issues. The last you do in the most self-serving ways that indicate a lack of clear and critical thinking beyond what is best for you and yours, ignoring any notion of the commons or larger questions of logical argument. That is why you get no readership from me; you are not a true person here. Your politics and need to self-aggrandize aside (Why do I care if you are the person posting here who skis the most days?), this is not the place for what you post or how you post it. If you want to make it a better place to talk about skiing and almost skiing related things then stop interfering with those who are trying to make it that and tend to the plank in your own eye. I am not persuaded by your bloviating. Make it better or don't but stop pretending. I am out and done. AND, in grand RSA style (re)PLONK! Fire away, I will not read it, and if I do because someone else replies to it I will not respond. DaveM |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
On Nov 24, 9:22*pm, DaveM wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:23:48 -0800 (PST), pigo wrote: On Nov 24, 1:20*pm, DaveM wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:30:23 -0800 (PST), pigo wrote: snip If you could? Please delete the quotes from trunky in your replies to him. We have virtually eliminated his tantrums that way. You'll understand after posting for awhile. TIA Uh, Yeah, thanks for the tip. I have been posting here occasionally for the past ten years or so and I actually have you klillfiled. Not, I suspect that you care but that's the facts. I manage to make it a pretty readable group where I see what I want and ignore what I see that I don't like. Haven't posted in response to any of the crap flying around in a few years now and don't care to be involved in it. Well, your right. I don't care. I suspect that I am no longer the one that skis the most on the group. Just in case you missed it, Scott and I were having a conversation that was NEARLY skiing related - snow, cold, wind related at least - that got hijacked by Horvath and you. Hijacked? That's a bit extreme for just asking you to eliminate his quotes in your posts. Go ahead and have your conversation with him if you think you can believe anything he says. We've come to a plan that has made this group more tolerable than it has been in years. And we are all quite happy knowing that the way to hurt him most is to ignore him and take away his podium. Something I've been doing and asking for on and off for years. Suddenly it sounded like a good idea to many and as near as I can tell is a huge success. Will it negatively effect you in anyway to just not quote him? Have anythign to say about the topic of the thread at all? Just another overblown forecast. Maybe that's why I only read you if someone replies to one of your rants, *like this one. That's fine. That's our plan for trunky. By all means keep talking to him. You'll see. Bob, I have no desire to get into this and in fact will not beyond this post: You are disingenuous in the extreme. *You want to make it better you claim, but you all too frequently post crap that keeps it not better. Don't respond directly but keep taking shots from the oblique angles. Make statements that we all (who have been here a while) know the subtext of but claim that you are not talking to Scott directly and are therefore blameless for the results. *You are Horvath but without the "gumption" to do it directly and nothing better (YOU wrote: Seems a bit extreme to me ** for a post or two... ** but you gotta do what you gotta do."[emphasis added]). Funny how there were at least three such responses in this thread alone, go look at the cxrap you are spewing. You complain about the word "hijack" in my response to you, but go back and read what you posted; it is a hijack of a thread about at least snowish things. You can claim that it is a plea to not quote Scott but that is silly, and it is an infantile argument and anyone who understands the history of this "place" can see that from your invocation of names best left in the past. Besides, the post you are responding to was about snow in the NW and in Seattle! *The horror that I or we should talk about that. You want to ignore, him, you claim, but you demonstrably can't. Ignore him or don't but you get no moral high ground for doing neither and claiming the former. You rail against my "overblown forecast" (and maybeit was, it was only -13F when I parked at work today) but you post obsessively almost about California's educational system and its pricing structure and myriad off-topic issues. The last you do in the most self-serving ways that indicate a lack of clear and critical thinking beyond what is best for you and yours, ignoring any notion of the commons or larger questions of logical argument. That is why you get no readership from me; you are not a true person here. Your politics and need to self-aggrandize aside (Why do I care if you are the person posting here who skis the most days?), this is not the place for what you post or how you post it. If you want to make it a better place to talk about *skiing and almost skiing related things then stop interfering with those who are trying to make it that and tend to the plank in your own eye. I am not persuaded by your bloviating. Make it better or don't but stop pretending. I am out and done. AND, in grand RSA style (re)PLONK! Fire away, I will not read it, and if I do because someone else replies to it I will not respond. I am speechless. Morals, ethics, and decency from someone other than me. Seattle just froze over. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
On Nov 24, 9:22*pm, DaveM wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:23:48 -0800 (PST), pigo wrote: On Nov 24, 1:20*pm, DaveM wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:30:23 -0800 (PST), pigo wrote: snip If you could? Please delete the quotes from trunky in your replies to him. We have virtually eliminated his tantrums that way. You'll understand after posting for awhile. TIA Uh, Yeah, thanks for the tip. I have been posting here occasionally for the past ten years or so and I actually have you klillfiled. Not, I suspect that you care but that's the facts. I manage to make it a pretty readable group where I see what I want and ignore what I see that I don't like. Haven't posted in response to any of the crap flying around in a few years now and don't care to be involved in it. Well, your right. I don't care. I suspect that I am no longer the one that skis the most on the group. Just in case you missed it, Scott and I were having a conversation that was NEARLY skiing related - snow, cold, wind related at least - that got hijacked by Horvath and you. Hijacked? That's a bit extreme for just asking you to eliminate his quotes in your posts. Go ahead and have your conversation with him if you think you can believe anything he says. We've come to a plan that has made this group more tolerable than it has been in years. And we are all quite happy knowing that the way to hurt him most is to ignore him and take away his podium. Something I've been doing and asking for on and off for years. Suddenly it sounded like a good idea to many and as near as I can tell is a huge success. Will it negatively effect you in anyway to just not quote him? Have anythign to say about the topic of the thread at all? Just another overblown forecast. Maybe that's why I only read you if someone replies to one of your rants, *like this one. That's fine. That's our plan for trunky. By all means keep talking to him. You'll see. Bob, I have no desire to get into this and in fact will not beyond this post: You are disingenuous in the extreme. *You want to make it better you claim, but you all too frequently post crap that keeps it not better. Don't respond directly but keep taking shots from the oblique angles. Make statements that we all (who have been here a while) know the subtext of but claim that you are not talking to Scott directly and are therefore blameless for the results. *You are Horvath but without the "gumption" to do it directly and nothing better (YOU wrote: Seems a bit extreme to me ** for a post or two... ** but you gotta do what you gotta do."[emphasis added]). Funny how there were at least three such responses in this thread alone, go look at the cxrap you are spewing. You complain about the word "hijack" in my response to you, but go back and read what you posted; it is a hijack of a thread about at least snowish things. You can claim that it is a plea to not quote Scott but that is silly, and it is an infantile argument and anyone who understands the history of this "place" can see that from your invocation of names best left in the past. Besides, the post you are responding to was about snow in the NW and in Seattle! *The horror that I or we should talk about that. You want to ignore, him, you claim, but you demonstrably can't. Ignore him or don't but you get no moral high ground for doing neither and claiming the former. You rail against my "overblown forecast" (and maybeit was, it was only -13F when I parked at work today) but you post obsessively almost about California's educational system and its pricing structure and myriad off-topic issues. The last you do in the most self-serving ways that indicate a lack of clear and critical thinking beyond what is best for you and yours, ignoring any notion of the commons or larger questions of logical argument. That is why you get no readership from me; you are not a true person here. Your politics and need to self-aggrandize aside (Why do I care if you are the person posting here who skis the most days?), this is not the place for what you post or how you post it. If you want to make it a better place to talk about *skiing and almost skiing related things then stop interfering with those who are trying to make it that and tend to the plank in your own eye. I am not persuaded by your bloviating. Make it better or don't but stop pretending. I am out and done. AND, in grand RSA style (re)PLONK! Fire away, I will not read it, and if I do because someone else replies to it I will not respond. DaveM- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Love ya, bro. Going to try to make it to Schweitzer this year, ain't seen my friends in too long a time, will drop you a line if I go. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
pigo wrote:
On Nov 24, 7:06 pm, "Bob F" wrote: I don't really understand. In one post, you claim you have campaigned for years to have him ignored and have done so yourself, yet here you are again playing with him. It was just a few months ago I plonked you because you kept baiting him. Why don't you make up your mind? I thought you were cleaning up your act when I un-plonked you recently. C'mon. It's been 11 years. A comical mix of insane rantings over that period of time is bound to pop up now and then. And it's true. If _no one_ quotes or responds, I won't have any material. You must admit that since the plan has been put into effect it's been much nicer around here. But no thanks to you. You are still among the worst offenders. Try harder. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
On Nov 24, 6:26*pm, pigo wrote:
On Nov 24, 7:06*pm, "Bob F" wrote: I don't really understand. In one post, you claim you have campaigned for years to have him ignored and have done so yourself, yet here you are again playing with him. It was just a few months ago I plonked you because you kept baiting him. Why don't you make up your mind? I thought you were cleaning up your act when I un-plonked you recently. C'mon. It's been 11 years. A comical mix of insane rantings over that period of time is bound to pop up now and then. Bob, I could not describe your insane behavior more clearly. A comical mix of insane rantings is right. And it's true. If _no one_ quotes or responds, I won't have any material. Bob, you never run out of material because you are delusional and make **** up no matter how crazy it sounds. You must admit that since the plan has been put into effect it's been much nicer around here. Sure has. The volume of threats, lies, defamations, false allegations, and disgusting jokes about raping children sure is down. You freaks should be proud of yourselves. I didn't think you could do it. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
On Nov 24, 10:22*pm, "Bob F" wrote:
pigo wrote: On Nov 24, 7:06 pm, "Bob F" wrote: I don't really understand. In one post, you claim you have campaigned for years to have him ignored and have done so yourself, yet here you are again playing with him. It was just a few months ago I plonked you because you kept baiting him. Why don't you make up your mind? I thought you were cleaning up your act when I un-plonked you recently. C'mon. It's been 11 years. A comical mix of insane rantings over that period of time is bound to pop up now and then. And it's true. If _no one_ quotes or responds, I won't have any material. You must admit that since the plan has been put into effect it's been much nicer around here. But no thanks to you. You are still among the worst offenders. Try harder.- Same for you, asshole. You have not stopped taking cheap shots at me, and of course, even though you live in the neighborhood, you have not been man enough to do so to my face. Try harder, you dickless coward. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Winter is here!
On 25/11/2010 07:22, Bob F wrote:
pigo wrote: On Nov 24, 7:06 pm, "Bob wrote: I don't really understand. In one post, you claim you have campaigned for years to have him ignored and have done so yourself, yet here you are again playing with him. It was just a few months ago I plonked you because you kept baiting him. Why don't you make up your mind? I thought you were cleaning up your act when I un-plonked you recently. C'mon. It's been 11 years. A comical mix of insane rantings over that period of time is bound to pop up now and then. And it's true. If _no one_ quotes or responds, I won't have any material. You must admit that since the plan has been put into effect it's been much nicer around here. But no thanks to you. You are still among the worst offenders. Agreed. He's in my (very small) kill-file and looks like staying there forever. What a hypocrite. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
La Nina this winter! | Bob F | Alpine Skiing | 1 | August 11th 10 10:55 PM |
The winter that wouldn't start, the winter that wouldn't end. | VtSkier | Alpine Skiing | 4 | April 12th 07 10:29 PM |
Winter Triathlon - Take 1 | NewMexSki | Nordic Skiing | 2 | January 17th 07 09:26 PM |
It's winter again | VtSkier | Alpine Skiing (moderated) | 0 | December 2nd 04 02:38 PM |
Winter is Over | Simon Brown | European Ski Resorts | 29 | February 24th 04 08:35 AM |