If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Schattie makes fatal error in proving his innocence.
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:32:54 -0700, twobuddha
wrote: No way you gave them the right name, methinks. Because they would read your bull**** and see you for the lying freak you are, and they would judge you by the company you keep. Erm, maybe stating the obvious, but being "judged by the company you keep" isn't typically a large part of how the judicial process of finding someone guilty of a crime works. If this is what you believe, it's no wonder you think everyone else is guilty of a crime.... but that doesn't make you right, or very smart. But if that IS the criminal justice system works, since you keep the company of people you deem to be freaks, vile assassins, liars etc., it logically follows that you are as guilty as those you accuse. And if you are not as guilty as those you accuse, it logically follows that they cannot be guilty either, according to your value system. QED. It's simple: we're either all guilty by association with Schattie, or we're all as innocent and pure as he claims to be. You can't have it both ways with that philosophy. Suzie -- Suzieflame |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Schattie makes fatal error in proving his innocence.
Suzieflame wrote:
It's simple: we're either all guilty by association with Schattie, or we're all as innocent and pure as he claims to be. You can't have it both ways with that philosophy. A powerful and logical argument |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Schattie makes fatal error in proving his innocence.
On Aug 24, 1:44 am, Suzieflame wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:32:54 -0700, twobuddha wrote: No way you gave them the right name, methinks. Because they would read your bull**** and see you for the lying freak you are, and they would judge you by the company you keep. Erm, maybe stating the obvious, but being "judged by the company you keep" isn't typically a large part of how the judicial process of finding someone guilty of a crime works. If this is what you believe, it's no wonder you think everyone else is guilty of a crime.... but that doesn't make you right, or very smart. But if that IS the criminal justice system works, since you keep the company of people you deem to be freaks, vile assassins, liars etc., it logically follows that you are as guilty as those you accuse. And if you are not as guilty as those you accuse, it logically follows that they cannot be guilty either, according to your value system. QED. It's simple: we're either all guilty by association with Schattie, or we're all as innocent and pure as he claims to be. You can't have it both ways with that philosophy. Suzie -- Suzieflame Well Done Suzie. Well done indeed. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I wonder...
On Aug 19, 1:38 pm, Harry wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 07:39:38 -0700, twobuddha wrote this crap: I'm surprised all of Kerrison's buddies around here havn't chipped in to buy her plastic surgery. Especially some ass reduction. Are you speaking about yourself, again, dumbass? My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the ultimate power in the universe." Why would we? We didn't chip in for Stephan (a)'s adams apple reduction either !!!! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|