If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Need advice on which GPS to buy
Hello backcountry skiiers,
I'm looking for advice on which GPS unit to buy. My husband and I are unemployed ski bums at the moment, so we're looking at the lower end models. From my research so far, I think that means a Magellan Explorist 100 or 200, or Garmin Etrex or Etrex Venture but I'm open to suggestions. We fully intend to rely on compass and map while travelling but would like a GPS unit as a backup to let us know "about" where we are. The thought is that, if we know where we are, we can then use the map/compass to figure out how to get where we want to go. I'm new to all this and hoping this is a reasonable use of the GPS--am I right? If so, can anyone suggest the best unit for the job? Here are some of the things we're wondering about: * The Magellans have 14 channels instead of 12--does this really make a significant difference, particularly in the woods? The Magellans seem to be lacking a number of features of the Garmins (computer hookup, longer batter life, more resolution), and we're not sure if we should give those features up for 14 channels. * I've read some not very complimentary comments on other boards about Magellan's customer service. I'd like to buy from a company that backs up its products. Any difference between Garmin and Magellan that you're aware of? We've been doing lots of research and feel more confused than we did before. Any info/advice would be very appreciated! Thanks a bunch! Hope |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On 23 Jan 2005 12:16:38 -0800, "hnilsson" wrote:
Hello backcountry skiiers, I'm looking for advice on which GPS unit to buy. My husband and I are unemployed ski bums at the moment, so we're looking at the lower end models. From my research so far, I think that means a Magellan Explorist 100 or 200, or Garmin Etrex or Etrex Venture but I'm open to suggestions. We fully intend to rely on compass and map while travelling but would like a GPS unit as a backup to let us know "about" where we are. The thought is that, if we know where we are, we can then use the map/compass to figure out how to get where we want to go. I'm new to all this and hoping this is a reasonable use of the GPS--am I right? If so, can anyone suggest the best unit for the job? Here are some of the things we're wondering about: * The Magellans have 14 channels instead of 12--does this really make a significant difference, particularly in the woods? The Magellans seem to be lacking a number of features of the Garmins (computer hookup, longer batter life, more resolution), and we're not sure if we should give those features up for 14 channels. * I've read some not very complimentary comments on other boards about Magellan's customer service. I'd like to buy from a company that backs up its products. Any difference between Garmin and Magellan that you're aware of? We've been doing lots of research and feel more confused than we did before. Any info/advice would be very appreciated! Thanks a bunch! Hope One site that will give a thorough amount of info is www.gpsinformation.net Most do not find the 14 channels effectively better than the 12. Antenna type is far more relevant. Both companies have a decent rep for customer service, although I have seen more complaints about Magellan, and more "I can't believe they did this for free" about Garmin. If you get a mapping unit, shop for maps first. With a basic unit, less of an issue. Many consider the computer interconnect important for backup, and working with electronic maps. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) ------------------------------------------------ at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
(Hopefully, I'm sticking this reply in the right place!)
Thanks a bunch, guys, this is all really helpful--now on to spend the REI gift certificates! Hope |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have the Garman Etrex Legend. I chose it because of the increased memory-
I wouldn't go any lower. I guess now they have it in a colored screen. The maps are small and if your in a treed area or covering, you may not have a clear view of the sky for transmission. definitely fun. check out Geocaching for a fun sport www.geocaching.com where you can combine hiking and the GPS. -- Diane "Bob Lee" wrote in message ... hnilsson wrote: Hello backcountry skiiers, I'm looking for advice on which GPS unit to buy. My husband and I are unemployed ski bums at the moment, so we're looking at the lower end models. From my research so far, I think that means a Magellan Explorist 100 or 200, or Garmin Etrex or Etrex Venture but I'm open to suggestions. We fully intend to rely on compass and map while travelling but would like a GPS unit as a backup to let us know "about" where we are. The thought is that, if we know where we are, we can then use the map/compass to figure out how to get where we want to go. I'm new to all this and hoping this is a reasonable use of the GPS--am I right? If so, can anyone suggest the best unit for the job? Here are some of the things we're wondering about: * The Magellans have 14 channels instead of 12--does this really make a significant difference, particularly in the woods? The Magellans seem to be lacking a number of features of the Garmins (computer hookup, longer batter life, more resolution), and we're not sure if we should give those features up for 14 channels. * I've read some not very complimentary comments on other boards about Magellan's customer service. I'd like to buy from a company that backs up its products. Any difference between Garmin and Magellan that you're aware of? We've been doing lots of research and feel more confused than we did before. Any info/advice would be very appreciated! Thanks a bunch! I don't know that the 14 channels would be a good reason to go with Magellan - I use a Garmin, and 12 seems to do fine. FWIW, I really like the small size, light weight, features, and price of the Garmin Geko 301: http://www.garmin.com/products/geko301/ I picked mine up on eBay for about $140 a couple of months ago. It tends to have a shorter battery life though - about 8-12 hours for a set of AAAs, depending on what features are turned on and how much monkeying around with different info I do. It's tiny and light (a lot smaller and way lighter than the eTrex series) and powerful, though the weight savings is *slightly* offset by having to carry spare batteries - but I'd do that anyway, so it's +/-. I like having the compass and altimeter, but you can turn those off to extend the battery life. If you're okay with fewer features, you get longer battery life and the same small size and light weight with the Garmin Geko 101 or 201. Punch up the features comparison function on the Garmin website. Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jacket Advice? | NIALLBRUCE | European Ski Resorts | 23 | January 6th 05 04:08 PM |
Advice needed re Italian resort suitable for first skiing hol | wallace | European Ski Resorts | 6 | January 4th 05 02:46 PM |
Good advice on the Internet :) | Lisa Horton | Alpine Skiing | 74 | May 29th 04 10:41 PM |
La Plagne advice | Mike Mather | European Ski Resorts | 0 | March 27th 04 08:43 AM |
equipment advice | Daviescs | Backcountry Skiing | 1 | February 1st 04 07:19 PM |