If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Waxing makes skis slower!
Has anyone seen the article in The Economist (Dec 17th, p79)? Some
researcher in Sweden did a study that says glide wax only traps dirt and makes your skis go slower for "runs more than a couple of hundred metres". That will certainly require a rebuttal from the wax manufacturers. Scott |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dec 17th is Sweden's April 1st.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... Dec 17th is Sweden's April 1st. You serious?? (About the April 1st line) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I doubt that a mag like The Economist would publish a prank report,
although I will admit that editors or reputable magazines have been fooled before. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Mike, ask Nordic people in this newsgroup
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The author of the article has come up missing. Went out for a ski and never
returned. The Norwegian police have raided Swix headquarters looking for evidence. Incriminating E Mails have been impounded. How do you say "Senator I have no recollection of those events" in Norwegian. The FrontRunner Also known as the one armed bandit due to a shoulder problem. How long until the Birkie? "Scott" wrote in message ups.com... I doubt that a mag like The Economist would publish a prank report, although I will admit that editors or reputable magazines have been fooled before. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
here is the search results on the economist. to go further, one must
subscribe, http://www.economist.com/index.html Ski wax is redundant Dec 14th 2005 From Ski wax print edition THIS season, like every previous one, recreational and racing skiers alike will apply wax to their skis in the hope of schussing that little bit faster. They will do so after assessing the air's temperature, its humidity and the prevailing snow conditions, so as to determine exactly which wax they should use. Not any old wax will do.... Scott wrote: Has anyone seen the article in The Economist (Dec 17th, p79)? Some researcher in Sweden did a study that says glide wax only traps dirt and makes your skis go slower for "runs more than a couple of hundred metres". That will certainly require a rebuttal from the wax manufacturers. Scott |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Scott wrote: I doubt that a mag like The Economist would publish a prank report, although I will admit that editors or reputable magazines have been fooled before. Correct. It's no prank and april fool's day is April 1st in Sweden. I haven't seen the article in the Economist, but different Swedish media has reported about it. It's the result of two years' of research at a Swedish university, published in a Licentate thesis by Leonid Kuzmin In Sweden, a Licentiate thesis is something that you write half-way between Master of Science and Ph.D. degree. Compared to a Ph.D. thesis, there is not the same high requirements for having it reviewed vy and defended "against" experts in the field. Interesting results, anyway. You find more about his results and ski-preparation-tips (in English) he http://www.expertsvar.nu/publicIndex...ID=5785&lang=2 I don't know if the thesis is written in English, but you have his e-mail address on the above web page so if you're interested you can ask him if he has more detailed material (or the entre thesis in English). / Niklas |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On 30 Dec 2005 03:14:34 -0800, "Scott"
wrote: Has anyone seen the article in The Economist (Dec 17th, p79)? Some researcher in Sweden did a study that says glide wax only traps dirt and makes your skis go slower for "runs more than a couple of hundred metres". That will certainly require a rebuttal from the wax manufacturers. Scott The interesting thing to me is the possibility that the current running surfaces are designed for (or at least contain the properties for) absorbing glide wax. I wonder if there aren't other running surface materials that have been rejected in the past as being impervious to glide wax absorption that may now be reconsidered for ski bases. g.c. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Wasn't this already discussed on this forum? I'll check the archives
when I have the chance, but tidbits that come to my mind are - what temps/conditions were involved, what methodology, repeatable? etc. etc. -zeke Scott wrote: Has anyone seen the article in The Economist (Dec 17th, p79)? Some researcher in Sweden did a study that says glide wax only traps dirt and makes your skis go slower for "runs more than a couple of hundred metres". That will certainly require a rebuttal from the wax manufacturers. Scott |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Warm and cold skis | [email protected] | Nordic Skiing | 10 | June 8th 05 05:20 PM |
Probability of Getting Good Race Skis at Small Ski Shops ?? | Tim Kelley | Nordic Skiing | 26 | October 27th 04 06:41 PM |
Near fatal ski incident | Me | Nordic Skiing | 22 | February 27th 04 01:47 PM |
Waxing "waxless" skis? | J999w | Nordic Skiing | 4 | February 23rd 04 10:16 PM |
Ski Mountaineering | Clyde | Backcountry Skiing | 2 | September 23rd 03 09:18 PM |