If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
pole length question
I've seen lots of discussion of pole length for both skating and
striding. For example classic pole length used to be "armpit height", but recent discussions state "top of the shoulder height". For skate I've seen "cleft of the chin" or "tip of the nose". Last night I saw a reference to ideal pole length that went as follows: skate pole length=users height in CM x .90 classic pole length=users height in CM x .85 The formula SEEMS much less subjective than the "cleft of the chin" method.....but which is really the true measure? What other factors should be taken into account? TIA e. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
pole length question
"Nevalainen, Eric" wrote in message
news:43299D65FC3D8847ACB9E8C44A49256E013282B6@BPEX U1VM1.andersencorp.com... I've seen lots of discussion of pole length for both skating and striding. For example classic pole length used to be "armpit height", but recent discussions state "top of the shoulder height". For skate I've seen "cleft of the chin" or "tip of the nose". Last night I saw a reference to ideal pole length that went as follows: skate pole length=users height in CM x .90 classic pole length=users height in CM x .85 The formula SEEMS much less subjective than the "cleft of the chin" method.....but which is really the true measure? What other factors should be taken into account? Eric: I think you'll find that all of these pole fitting methods generally work fine and come out pretty close to each other. However, I've decided that for my purposes (and those of my own and ski club kids, and most adults), the methods using body landmarks are easiest and best. In my personal opinion, fitting the poles - for an advanced skier anyway, and maybe even a beginner as well - has to be subjective or at least personalized and no formula fits all. The reason for this is that body proportions are different (e.g. leg length vs. torso length vs. arm length vs. neck length, etc) and everyone's skiing abilities, technique and needs are at least a little different. In addition, nowadays the design of the grip and basket can make several cm difference in what the effective length of the pole is. Therefore, if you're a serious skier and like to tweak, you will probably ending up adjusting within a "normal" range to suit yourself. My advice is to buy a pole at the top of the "body landmark" range and gradually cut it down (say 1-2 cm / 3/4 inch) until it seems to work best - or based on the advice of your coach or instructor. Even for a beginner, I personally wouldn't trust the formula (e.g. ht X factor) and would rather fit to a certain spot in the body (arm pit, lips, whatever). If you're going mail order, you can still do that by simply measuring with a tape measure. That said, I've found the following to be very good guidelines (which is probably exactly what you're referring to above!). All are based on standing on the floor in your ski boots (or similar shoes). If you're outside on skis, the measurement should be taken with the pole resting on top of the ski so it's not sticking into the snow. Classic/striding: pole should be somewhere between armpit and top of shoulder. I've settled on pretty much lower mid point - definitely shorter than the shoulder, but very, very snug when forced up under the armpit. Skating: Pole should be somewere between bottom of chin to tip of nose. I've setteled on just a little above chin level - below the lower lip. As recently as two years ago, I was using "mustache" lenght poles. On me, both of the above represent a range of about 7-8 cm (3 inches). In my experience and from talking to others, most everyone has a pole length within this range that just seems to feel right and promote good body position. In my experience, I have tended toward the low end of the range for skating and it really feels better since I cut down my poles. I think this is because I really mostly ski in hilly country with relatively (not absolutely!) little flat land techniques such as v-2 alternate or double poling. I think that if you tend to ski on flatter ground, you might tend to like longer poles, skating or striding. I recently cut my 12 year old daughter's new skate poles to this shorter length and she complained "bitterly" because her old poles were about nose height. I'll managed to talk her into giving them a whirl, promising to convert them to classic poles and buying her new skate poles if she really didn't like them. I really do believe the shorter poles have helped her improve her body position and efficiency, and she doesn't complain at all anymore. Way too much coffee to write that much on pole length. Griss |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
pole length question
--0-1555813654-1075314405=:95292
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Eric- Think "referential", not "subjective". Cold hard numbers sound great until you consider that people's proportions vary. Also, when you're picking out a pole, it's a lot easier to measure a pole against your chin or armpit. As to WHERE on your chin or armpit the pole should reach-- the answer varies a bit. The conventional wisdom seems to change back and forth a bit over time-- currently, the thinking is that poles should be a little shorter. But the answer also varies by your skiing skill, your style, and the type of terrain you will be skiing on. for example, too-long poles tend to put beginning skaters in the "back seat", but longer poles might be an advantage for a skilled skiier on flat terrain. That same skilled skiier might want to use a shorter pair of poles on a course with steep uphills. clear as mud? Chris Cline SLC, UT "Nevalainen, Eric" wrote: I've seen lots of discussion of pole length for both skating and striding. For example classic pole length used to be "armpit height", but recent discussions state "top of the shoulder height". For skate I've seen "cleft of the chin" or "tip of the nose". Last night I saw a reference to ideal pole length that went as follows: skate pole length=users height in CM x .90 classic pole length=users height in CM x .85 The formula SEEMS much less subjective than the "cleft of the chin" method.....but which is really the true measure? What other factors should be taken into account? TIA e. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! --0-1555813654-1075314405=:95292 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii DIVHi Eric-/DIV DIVThink "referential", not "subjective". Cold hard numbers sound great until you consider that people's proportions vary. Also, when you're picking out a pole, it's a lot easier to measure a pole against your chin or armpit. As to WHERE on your chin or armpit the pole should reach-- the answer varies a bit. The conventional wisdom seems to change back and forth a bit over time-- currently, the thinking is that poles should be a little shorter. But the answer also varies by your skiing skill, your style, and the type of terrain you will be skiing on. for example, too-long poles tend to put beginning skaters in the "back seat", but longer poles might be an advantage for a skilled skiier on flat terrain. That same skilled skiier might want to use a shorter pair of poles on a course with steep uphills./DIV DIV /DIV DIVclear as mud?/DIV DIV /DIV DIVChris Cline/DIV DIVSLC, UT/DIV DIVBRBRBI"Nevalainen, Eric" >/I/B wrote:/DIV BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"I've seen lots of discussion of pole length for both skating andBRstriding. For example classic pole length used to be "armpit height",BRbut recent discussions state "top of the shoulder height".BRFor skate I've seen "cleft of the chin" or "tip of the nose".BRBRLast night I saw a reference to ideal pole length that went as follows:BRBRskate pole length=users height in CM x .90BRclassic pole length=users height in CM x .85BRBRThe formula SEEMS much less subjective than the "cleft of the chin"BRmethod.....but which is really the true measure? What other factorsBRshould be taken into account?BRBRTIABRBRe.BRBRBRBRBR BRBR/BLOCKQUOTEphr SIZE=1 Do you Yahoo!?br Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=21608/*http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/"bTry it!/b/a --0-1555813654-1075314405=:95292-- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
pole length question
Griss and Chris:
However, I've decided that for my purposes (and those of my own and ski club kids, and most adults), the methods using body landmarks are easiest and best. It makes sense....and fits with the way I purchaced my gear. What didn't make sense, was the discrepancy between the number yielded by the formula, and my actual pole length (nearly 5 cm in one case). clear as mud? Absolutely! "referential" makes much more sense. It did make me wonder though. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
pole length question
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
pole length question
"Nevalainen, Eric" wrote in message news:43299D65FC3D8847ACB9E8C44A49256E013282B6@BPEX U1VM1.andersencorp.com... Last night I saw a reference to ideal pole length that went as follows: skate pole length=users height in CM x .90 classic pole length=users height in CM x .85 This sounds like Exel's "rule of thumb". Using this, I would need 144,5cm poles for classic (170cm x .85). Poles this lenght are above the top of my shoulders. I did try 145cm (that's about a 1/4 inch longer) poles but they felt too long. I ended up cutting down to 142cm, just below my shoulder top. These ratios are averages. Nobody is average. In case of doubt, buy longer poles and cut down until you feel they are the right lenght. JMC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
pole length question
Griss wrote:
Classic/striding: pole should be somewhere between armpit and top of shoulder. I've settled on pretty much lower mid point - definitely shorter than the shoulder, but very, very snug when forced up under the armpit. I found your introductory discussion good, but this specific classical one is why I suggest students walk out if someone starts the armpit measurement. If you stop and think about the soft skin there, varying arm angles, and vague descriptions like the one above, then it's clear that the armpit can generate very different measurements. "Mid shoulder" is common, top of the shoulder ok if the sloping shoulder angle is recognized, but the bone on the side of the shoulder is easily identifiable and, according to Marty Hall, the max. Occasionally, I'll hear or see longer recs, but one concern is that the poles not be so long that the skier is forced too upright. Gene |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
pole length question
Is that on or off skis?......etc
Sarissa Gene Goldenfeld wrote: Griss wrote: Classic/striding: pole should be somewhere between armpit and top of shoulder. I've settled on pretty much lower mid point - definitely shorter than the shoulder, but very, very snug when forced up under the armpit. I found your introductory discussion good, but this specific classical one is why I suggest students walk out if someone starts the armpit measurement. If you stop and think about the soft skin there, varying arm angles, and vague descriptions like the one above, then it's clear that the armpit can generate very different measurements. "Mid shoulder" is common, top of the shoulder ok if the sloping shoulder angle is recognized, but the bone on the side of the shoulder is easily identifiable and, according to Marty Hall, the max. Occasionally, I'll hear or see longer recs, but one concern is that the poles not be so long that the skier is forced too upright. Gene |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
pole length question
Sarissa wrote:
Is that on or off skis?......etc Sarissa Preferably in ski boots, either off skis or on ski with pole tip (or tape measure) resting on the ski surface. Generally, the measurement should be to the top of the grip. However, with the Toko/Yoko 232s a good 1-2 cm longer and other grips not exactly the same to top or strap opening, it's best to start on the long side and work down. Gene |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Infinity Pole Report - Didn't Snap It | Dell Todd | Nordic Skiing | 0 | January 5th 04 03:46 PM |
HOW is a pole measured? | Erik Brooks | Nordic Skiing | 3 | January 5th 04 12:14 AM |
Pole Length and New Skate | Jay Tegeder | Nordic Skiing | 20 | December 20th 03 02:10 AM |
Bit off-topic question about ski's | Marinus | European Ski Resorts | 28 | November 27th 03 01:36 PM |
Not another board length question | Serena | Snowboarding | 5 | October 2nd 03 06:04 AM |