Interesting Thought

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:08:02 -0700 (PDT), twobuddha
wrote this crap:

At the other end of the spectrum, Washington had men whipped for not

using proper latrines at Valley Forge.



That policy should be upheld today.


Starting with you.

?? I use the officer's latrines.


This signature is now the ultimate
power in the universe

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:34:00 -0700 (PDT), Goober Jones
wrote this crap:

Question: Who defines what is mentally ill. Politicians and
Bureaucrats cannot be trusted on any account. Are you advocating
Establishing a national database on mental disorders. That's a dangerous
Precedent.

Actually a Universal background check is dangerous. You could have
your name and record put on a national data base which could be
available to the public. Don't scoff. A newspaper in NY posted the
names of all gun owners in the area on their website.
I'm not making this up.


Don't drink and drive. Unless you have a good cup holder.

Bucky Beaver, with your legal record, your postings and eye-witness account,
You'd be first on the list. How do think they would react to your felony defiance
Of a court order, eh bobaloobob? Come to think about your account about
Scaring teenagers with a gun and what about kneecapping Eric. If I were you,
I'd keep that buck toothed mouth of yours shut, then again you're a drug addled
Brain damaged moron.

On 3/18/2013 5:34 PM, Goober Jones wrote:
Question: Who defines what is mentally ill. Politicians and
Bureaucrats cannot be trusted on any account. Are you advocating
Establishing a national database on mental disorders. That's a dangerous
Precedent.

DSM 5

Do you think it's really that simple? Who makes the determination?
Does everyone have to be evaluated prior to acquiring a firearm? If so, since far
more people die from traffic accidents, shouldn't people have psych
Evaluations before getting a driver's license or buying a car. Where are you
Going to find all the psychiatrists to do the work.

On 3/18/2013 3:02 PM, lal_truckee wrote:
On 3/18/13 11:15 AM, VtSkier wrote:

Common sense works better for a group than it
does for an individual.

Mass hysteria counter statement.
Part of our problem is group-think claiming to have "common sense" on
their side while spouting some truly alarming and nonsensical ideas.

Well, if enough people start thinking in a mass-hysterical way it
becomes "common" even if it only makes sense to those who have partaken
of the Kool-ade.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_movement for instance.

//Walt

You really are a brain damaged stooge. Your court room performance, your tirade at
Whistler, your behavior at McLean's place of work, the Al-Anon meeting, the incidents
leading to your restraining orders on and on.

As far as your threats are concerned, ROTFLAO. Your pathetic fat diabetic ass would
Collapse after 2 steps. You're just a impotent pathological lying blowhard pussy.
Linda Lovelace said that you choke on the little ones.

What lies. SpongeBob Pussypants? or is it Runaway Bob?
Good news. I saw a pamphlet about the long term effects of
Alcoholism and guess what, it does cause permanent brain
damage including Parkinson's and permanently damages
the pancreas causing diabetes which leads to irreversible
neuropathy. You're getting what you earned and deserve and
no amount of screaming, threatening or slobbering is going to
stop it. You're toast and you did it all to yourself. LOL.

On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:15:22 PM UTC-6, VtSkier wrote:

When they wrote the Constitution, guns only fired one shot at a time
before a lengthy reload too.

So, it meant that if one wanted/needed many shots to be fired in a
short period of time it took many people (a militia, it the words
of the Constitution). Common sense works better for a group than it
does for an individual.

So yes, common sense was definitely in play at that time, but the
actions of an individual were of less importance too. The reason for
keeping guns out of the hands of a mentally ill person is that the
mentally ill person can do ever so much more damage that he could
back then.

Intersting. Things took a long time to print then too. There was no broadcast TV or radio. You must be in favor of restricting the 1st Ammendment too? Which other rights would you "edit" to pursue your own idea of "freedom"?

Nice to see some chatting though. With trunky, via any posts with it's emails in them wiped off of my computer, this group is really quiet! Looks like it's still standing on the street corner yelling at all the invisible (to everyone else) demons that walk past.

On Monday, March 18, 2013 7:28:52 PM UTC-6, twobuddha wrote:
On Monday, March 18, 2013 6:22:37 PM UTC-7, Goober Jones wrote:

You really are a brain damaged stooge. Your court room performance, your tirade at



Whistler, your behavior at McLean's place of work, the Al-Anon meeting, the incidents



leading to your restraining orders on and on.



Holy ****. You really believe that bull****, don't you? Amazing how one freak lies and the rest of the freaks repeat the lies. You really have to be a brain damaged stooge to be that stupid, you brain damaged stooge.







As far as your threats are concerned, ROTFLAO. Your pathetic fat diabetic ass would



Collapse after 2 steps. You're just a impotent pathological lying blowhard pussy.



One thing for su you know you are lying your ass off with that sentence. ROTFLAO. That's why you'll never have the balls to spew your **** in person, you impotent pathological lying blowhard pussy.



Linda Lovelace said that you choke on the little ones.



Oddly enough, I know a guy Lovelace blew. On film. Whereas the only blowjob you ever got you had to pay for.

So who did he think was better? You or Linda?