If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
MoonMan wrote:
I forget who wrote: Also, if poles don't help balance, why do downhill racers carry them? Two main reasons, 1) to get out of the start gate. 2) (in slalom) to protect oneselfe from the slalom poles. And let's not forget 3) FIS regulations -- //-Walt // // Those who feed trolls will have trolls in abundance |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Walt wrote:
MoonMan wrote: I forget who wrote: Also, if poles don't help balance, why do downhill racers carry them? Two main reasons, 1) to get out of the start gate. 2) (in slalom) to protect oneselfe from the slalom poles. And let's not forget 3) FIS regulations Oh yeah, you have to have at least three items (ski's and poles) when you pass the finish gate to get a time Forgot about that. -- Chris *:-) Downhill Good, Uphill BAD! www.suffolkvikings.org.uk |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
yunlong wrote:
mercy snip Terribly tedious tendentious twaddle. Dave M. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Lee wrote:
yunlong wrote: Bob Lee wrote: I feel like playing around with yunlong because he wrote: Jim Strohm wrote: [...] Which means -- poles give balance, Not really, balance is held at the feet/skis, not at the poles, Couple of points. Balance is in the core - the abdomen and center of gravity, not the feet. The center of gravity is supported/held up by the feet. Only the feet of fools in funny shoes! So what do you think supported/held up your center of gravity? "feet of fools in funny shoes"? Also, if poles don't help balance, why do downhill racers carry them? Security crutches, maybe. Indeed. for without the crutches of security, falling lacks wisdom. Even worse when you fall due to tangling with poles, it is lacked wisdom before the falling. and poling breaks the traction (so is the focus) of the turning force and produces unstable turns. Ex-****ing-scuse me? You are "ex-****ing-scused," nevertheless, watch your foul-mouth language. Perhaps tiny mind is unable to comprehend the depths of my sincere incredulity? Or just you a small mind with a foul mouth. Proper poling increases turn stability... Not really, the pole-planting is to create an instability so the skier can initiate the edge changing... and the first part of that sentence gets a bunny with a pancake on its head. Not if you teach them stand properly on the skis. Even a properly create instable stance will receive the bunny with a pancake on its head. You must show the skills for its contradiction. When you lower your center of gravity, you won't tumble; it's only common sense. The question is now how do you stand on the skis? Ski like skate, no poles are needed. If you could skate in powder or crud, or on a slope over 40degrees, then what you wrote might not be viewed as bull****. I did, as flat-boarding. But until then... Let's hear it what skills you have to handle the "powder or crud, on a slope over 40 degrees"? How to use poles? My skills is such that the beginners will show inability to follow my pole use in powder or crud on a slope over 40 degrees. It sounded like all mouth skills, how do you turn on the cruds again? Until you learn to use your poles properly, you're going to have a difficult time becoming a proficient skiier. Not really, the most proficient skiers I see are those ski patrollers ski without poles. I assume that's because you only ski on easier slopes. You may assume, even self-deceiving. The only fool here is not to believe that patrollers obvious. Or the only fool here is to deny the obvious. If you'd ski difficult terrain, you'll find the patrollers using poles - unless they're carrying something or tieing rope. Yup, "the most proficient skiers I see are those ski patrollers ski without poles." Are they not the poles of idiots? That cannot see through skulls? You cannot read, or you don't read beyond your skull? I had my students threw away their poles already. But you have them pick them up at some point... No, among hundreds students I taught, only one teenager would like to keep his poles. You must have sold the others for reasons of foolishness. Or they smart enough to follow the good thing when they see one. or do you only teach beginners? So you think people ski without poles are beginners? The cost of polarity is proficiency. Huh? Tongue-tie? IS Bob IS Bob |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
AstroPax wrote:
On 16 Jan 2005 20:07:48 -0800, "yunlong" wrote: Of course, because they can do "all-terrain" without using poles. O.K., dumblong, one more time. Maybe you might actually answer a few of my simple questions this time instead of just ignoring them. After all, you are a professional ski instructor, right? Poles are a necessity for more than just planting and coordinating turns. [Fact] What else? And think about what you can do now with the free hands. What if you are wiped-out in near-armpit deep powder, and have to release a heel binding in order to "swim" out, because one of your skis is acting like an anchor? But the problem is, due to the orientation of the ski, you can't twist out of the toe. Nor can you reach the binding(s) with your hand. How in the hell are you supposed to release a binding without a ski pole? We have been through that, you don't release your ski in "near-armpit deep powder," it is a good way to loose your ski. The solution is to remove most the snow on top of the ski (with your hands, and don't loose your poles in that snow; well, without poles you don't have this problem), then roll downhill "upside down" until your skis come out the surface. What if you are trapped upside-down, head first orientation in a deep tree well, and can't twist out of a toe. Nor can you reach the binding(s) with your hand. The only way to release is by using a pole to pressure a heel binding. Bend your knees to unstuck the skis, and move your "whole" body to unjam yourself. Again, one more ****ing time, how in the hell are you supposed to release an unreachable heel binding without a ski pole? Simple, step on it with another ski, or borrow a ski pole from a cute female? Both of these situations have happened to me, and if not for your obsolete and useless ski poles, I would have been ****ed. [Fact] Well, you have to go with the "line" and don't stop in the powder, if you do, you may be stuck in it. Also, I would like to see your poor student skiers attempting to maneuver in low density, waste deep powder, or traverse along the flats of a narrow and rutted track (unable to skate) without the benefit of ski poles. Good luck. "all-terrain" without poles, my ass. [Fact] Yup, it's your ass. Bwaaahaahaaaha !!! Don't be silly. IS -Astro |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Astro,
You forgot, you need poles to help probe for stupid instructor avalanche victims who forgot their poles, fell over and caused a slide that they got buried in. Why even bother arguing with guy, he's obviously just another clueless instructor with no idea that real skiing happens once you get off of groomed runs or even in areas that are not lift served. I'll bet he doesn't even own a beacon. snoig |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard Henry" wrote in message news:NbHGd.3721$hu.103@fed1read01... "yunlong" wrote in message oups.com... Bob Lee wrote: Proper poling increases turn stability... Not really, the pole-planting is to create an instability so the skier can initiate the edge changing... Actually, I have found that moving the pole as if it were to be planted, without actually planting it, is sufficient to complete the act. Or at least initiate it. All attempts at humor aside, phantom pole planting gets the body into the right position for turning. I usually don't bother to actually plant the pole with any force unless I am in an extreme situation (going slow on the steep, for instance) where not making the turn would have serious consequences. and the first part of that sentence gets a bunny with a pancake on its head. Not if you teach them stand properly on the skis. Whoosh! Ski like skate, no poles are needed. If you could skate in powder or crud, or on a slope over 40 degrees, then what you wrote might not be viewed as bull****. I did, as flat-boarding. Some might interpret that staement to mean that flat-boarding is bs. tai-chi/flatboarding is BS because Some dumbyoung, errrr some youngdumb.is just a TROLL this guy has proven the only thing he knows about skiing is what he read in some very old ski mags. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"yunlong" wrote in message The only fool here is not to believe that patrollers obvious. Or the only fool here is to deny the obvious. The only thing obvious here is that your obviously a fool who doesn't believe the obvious facts that keep getting in the way of your trolling. 1 you don't know how to ski beyond the beginner level. 2 you don't teach anything due to your inability to communicate. you yoda like talk. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
rosco wrote:
How about ski instructors... any of you recommend skiing without poles other than as a drill? Most of the kids I teach aren't using poles, _yet_. A lot of that has to do with their size and stage of development of physical coordination and whatnot, though. Put another way, if I were teaching adults who were skiing at the level of the kids I taught today, I'd have 'em using poles, but with the kids I think it would have just created confusion. -- Mary Malmros Some days you're the windshield, other days you're the bug. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
MoonMan wrote:
David Harris wrote: "yunlong" wrote in groups.com: Also, if poles don't help balance, why do downhill racers carry them? Security crutches, maybe. Okay, following along this increasingly silly thread, this line jumped out at me. First, I wouldn't restrict the question to downhillers, but include ALL alpine racers. Every one of them. For ever. Two main reasons, 1) to get out of the start gate. 2) (in slalom) to protect oneselfe from the slalom poles. Nonsense to both. The start gate could easily be constructed to perform the function that the poles are used from in the start, and the "protection" from the slalom gates is performed (in part) by the guard on the top of the poles. You could accomplish the same thing by carrying a small, similarly-shaped piece of plastic, not an entire pole. -- Mary Malmros Some days you're the windshield, other days you're the bug. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pole length | steve | Nordic Skiing | 6 | December 22nd 04 04:21 AM |
Pole Planting. | Mark A Framness | Alpine Skiing | 4 | March 26th 04 04:50 PM |
Palm side exit point for pole length measure | -JP- | Nordic Skiing | 1 | March 22nd 04 03:02 AM |
pole length question | Nevalainen, Eric | Nordic Skiing | 8 | February 2nd 04 03:11 AM |
Infinity Pole Report - Didn't Snap It | Dell Todd | Nordic Skiing | 0 | January 5th 04 02:46 PM |