If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Note to the observer: this freak is allowed to post to rsa.moderated
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:43:35 -0800, scottabe
wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/27/04 5:06 PM: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:07:37 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/27/04 1:03 PM: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:06:39 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Scottabe at wrote on 2/27/04 8:30 AM: scottabe wrote in message ... in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/26/04 6:17 PM: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:34:55 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/26/04 4:07 PM: On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:04:07 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article cGhhdHBoaWw=.229f3c5dfe8da948f50a7f5e78a9396e@107 7763569.nulluser.com , Karl with a K at wrote on 2/25/04 6:46 PM: scottabe wrote: So does Bob Thompson. That's why the freak commits his crimes from the safety of his computer and phone: he ain't got the balls to say in person what he says on the net. What crime, dumbass? Call the law. By the way, even when in town you ain't got the gonads to look him up. Snooozzzzzeeeeee. Neither one of you ever had the gonads to show up on neutral ground. Gutless freaks, both of you. I will meet you fat ass post your gay-pad address Sure. Right after I get a verifiable name and address, Dickgoesinyourownass. hey brave Vietnam karate slave marcher, post it I dare you ]Sure. Right after I get a verifiable name and address. I dare you. Ok, here's one: George W. Bush 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington DC. This one should be easily verifiable. Now, lets see yours, Fatman. Right after I get a verifiable name and address. I dare you, freak. Scott, you miss the point. Post your address, I asked you first. Failure to do so proves you are what we say you are, a gutless troll who posts here because no one else will have anything to do with you. This from Dick Gozinya? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHA nice come back **** head i would profile your childhood of long "lets abuse each other" episode in the 'ol abraham ******** This from Dick Gozinya? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH you RAPED your brother????????????????????????? u sick **** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Note to the observer: this freak is allowed to post torsa.moderated
in article , Dick Gozinya at
wrote on 2/27/04 5:58 PM: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:43:35 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/27/04 5:06 PM: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:07:37 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/27/04 1:03 PM: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:06:39 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Scottabe at wrote on 2/27/04 8:30 AM: scottabe wrote in message ... in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/26/04 6:17 PM: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:34:55 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/26/04 4:07 PM: On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:04:07 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article cGhhdHBoaWw=.229f3c5dfe8da948f50a7f5e78a9396e@1077 763569.nulluser.com , Karl with a K at wrote on 2/25/04 6:46 PM: scottabe wrote: So does Bob Thompson. That's why the freak commits his crimes from the safety of his computer and phone: he ain't got the balls to say in person what he says on the net. What crime, dumbass? Call the law. By the way, even when in town you ain't got the gonads to look him up. Snooozzzzzeeeeee. Neither one of you ever had the gonads to show up on neutral ground. Gutless freaks, both of you. I will meet you fat ass post your gay-pad address Sure. Right after I get a verifiable name and address, Dickgoesinyourownass. hey brave Vietnam karate slave marcher, post it I dare you ]Sure. Right after I get a verifiable name and address. I dare you. Ok, here's one: George W. Bush 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington DC. This one should be easily verifiable. Now, lets see yours, Fatman. Right after I get a verifiable name and address. I dare you, freak. Scott, you miss the point. Post your address, I asked you first. Failure to do so proves you are what we say you are, a gutless troll who posts here because no one else will have anything to do with you. This from Dick Gozinya? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHA nice come back **** head i would profile your childhood of long "lets abuse each other" episode in the 'ol abraham ******** This from Dick Gozinya? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH you RAPED your brother????????????????????????? u sick **** Thanks. Appreciate you making my point for me, you sick ****. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Note to the observer: this freak is allowed to post to
Jeeesh, the first post I read, the first minute I get back online after getting snowed in, literally ... scottabe wrote: [snip] Scott. RSA-M moderates _content_, not posters. You are always free to read stuff there. You are always free to post. What you choose to post will be moderated, based on its CONTENT. Should you choose to verify this concept, try creating a sockpuppet and posting some on-topic content to RSA-M. Because there are not enough moderators it WILL take a few days for a post to be approved (I speak from personal experience as a moderator on a usenet group, there are never enough of us) but if it's reasonably on-topic and reasonably appropriate and defamation-free, it will be approved. Try it. If you can be civil, you might be surprised. Of course, your posting on-topic and without defamation to RSA-M would seriously undermine the case you've been building here for longer than my youngest child has been alive. BTW -- she is now old enough to read your rants, and it is one of my more fervent wishes that she read your informative comments like you used to post about 10 years ago, but not the hateful crap that is your usual fare nowadays. Occasionally you now show that you CAN post something to RSA that is relevant, on-topic, informative, and NOT defamatory or hateful. Please seek to achieve this in the future. ============ Now I am going to get on MY hate-box. I would like to thank NOAA, the National Weather Service, and the Park ****ty snow removal retards for collaborating to produce the 7-foot-long, 1-foot-deep crease in the side of my friend's Ramcharger. Stupid F*CKS. The truck is red on most parts and it had multiple antennas standing up higher than the snowbank you buried it in twice and then subsequently tried to extract it from with your now inoperative snowplow. Our lawyers will talk to your lawyers about how much money you owe us for ruining the Ramcharger. The damages to the blade on your snowplow are inconsequential and should be considered a standard expense, a risk of doing business. The bent frame on your snowplow should be a testament both to the incompetence of your snowplow operator and to your failed procurement practices, as it is patently clear that you bought an inferior and inapproprite product to use for snow removal. As far as the smashed in side of the snowplow? Screw you. Who said a snow plow had to look nice? Anyway, you can still open the doors on your snowplow, which is a lot more than I can say about the ruined Ramcharger. BTW -- if you can tear the blade off a snowplow just by hitting a truck from Texas, you need to get bigger a snowplow. PC will deny this, but when they hit the Ramcharger and the plow blade broke, it levered ther snowplow onto its side and it ultimately took an 18-wheeler-size wrecker to pull the plow back onto its wheels so it could get towed off. Fortunately I was parked the wrong direction so I can still get in the driver's side and I've already paid the ficking $80 parking ticket for (semi) illegally parking 30 minutes before a killer dump occurred. I'm just not sure how I can square all of this with the owner of the Ramcharger, other than to pay him for a rental truck. He needed this thing in CA in April for some major network install stuff. Well, I'm pretty bummed out, this is the first chance I've had to get online since Wednesday night. Hell, I haven't even touched my Mac since the last report -- I was stuck somewhere else. When all this is over, I'll file the whole week under that old Chinese curse, "May you live in interesting times." A few pieces of duct tape sealed up the new body-panel gaps on the Ram -- and fortunately the plow didn't pop out any glass -- so I should be good to drive up to the Seattle area Sunday and start my little job Monday. I will post updates to "Germania Diary, Day One" as soon as I have a chance to write and get online. Jim (not) inTexus |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Note to the observer: this freak is allowed to post to rsa.moderated
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:57:49 -0800, scottabe
wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/27/04 5:58 PM: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:43:35 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/27/04 5:06 PM: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:07:37 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/27/04 1:03 PM: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:06:39 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Scottabe at wrote on 2/27/04 8:30 AM: scottabe wrote in message ... in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/26/04 6:17 PM: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:34:55 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Dick Gozinya at wrote on 2/26/04 4:07 PM: On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:04:07 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article cGhhdHBoaWw=.229f3c5dfe8da948f50a7f5e78a9396e@1077 763569.nulluser.com , Karl with a K at wrote on 2/25/04 6:46 PM: scottabe wrote: So does Bob Thompson. That's why the freak commits his crimes from the safety of his computer and phone: he ain't got the balls to say in person what he says on the net. What crime, dumbass? Call the law. By the way, even when in town you ain't got the gonads to look him up. Snooozzzzzeeeeee. Neither one of you ever had the gonads to show up on neutral ground. Gutless freaks, both of you. I will meet you fat ass post your gay-pad address Sure. Right after I get a verifiable name and address, Dickgoesinyourownass. hey brave Vietnam karate slave marcher, post it I dare you ]Sure. Right after I get a verifiable name and address. I dare you. Ok, here's one: George W. Bush 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington DC. This one should be easily verifiable. Now, lets see yours, Fatman. Right after I get a verifiable name and address. I dare you, freak. Scott, you miss the point. Post your address, I asked you first. Failure to do so proves you are what we say you are, a gutless troll who posts here because no one else will have anything to do with you. This from Dick Gozinya? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHA nice come back **** head i would profile your childhood of long "lets abuse each other" episode in the 'ol abraham ******** This from Dick Gozinya? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH you RAPED your brother????????????????????????? u sick **** Thanks. Appreciate you making my point for me, you sick ****. scott admit your stalking |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Strohm, Terrorist and Pathological Liar.
in article , Jim[not]inTexus at
wrote on 2/28/04 3:30 AM: Jeeesh, the first post I read, the first minute I get back online after getting snowed in, literally ... Then why not complain about Bob Thompson falsely accusing me of molesting children? Hell, do it in person, since you are sick enough to ski with him. scottabe wrote: [snip] Scott. RSA-M moderates _content_, not posters. Excatly my point. You do not understand. That would take ethics and morality. No matter how vile or criminal, terrorists are welcome on rsa.terrorist. You are always free to read stuff there. You are always free to post. What you choose to post will be moderated, based on its CONTENT. Exactly my point. Shame you don't have a conscience and can understand why I object to criminals being allowed to post to a private terrorist newsgroup. Should you choose to verify this concept, try creating a sockpuppet and posting some on-topic content to RSA-M. Because there are not enough moderators it WILL take a few days for a post to be approved (I speak from personal experience as a moderator on a usenet group, there are never enough of us) but if it's reasonably on-topic and reasonably appropriate and defamation-free, it will be approved. I don't want to associate with sick ****s like you, psychopath. Try it. If you can be civil, you might be surprised. I am not civil to criminals and liars, terrorists and freaks. Why would I be civil to an asshole like you who has defamed me, stalked me, and participated in a criminal conspiracy of harassment and terrorism? Of course, your posting on-topic and without defamation to RSA-M would seriously undermine the case you've been building here for longer than my youngest child has been alive. Truth is not defamation, liar. RSA.Terrorist censors the truth about the criminal acts of the moderators and participants. BTW -- she is now old enough to read your rants, and it is one of my more fervent wishes that she read your informative comments like you used to post about 10 years ago, but not the hateful crap that is your usual fare nowadays. I find this lying, manipulative post hateful, freak. It is my fervent wish that your wife divorce you and marry a man that can teach your daughter ethical and moral standards, since you obviously have none. Occasionally you now show that you CAN post something to RSA that is relevant, on-topic, informative, and NOT defamatory or hateful. Please seek to achieve this in the future. You have never shown any morals or ethics. This post is defamatory and hateful with its lies, half-truths, and sick rationale of censorship. Tell me again, asshole. Why are you skiing with a known criminal who lies to cops, stalks me in real life, and grossly defames me on a regular basis? Truly amazing insanity. You have the utter gall to call truth-telling defamatory and hateful, yet you allow hateful defamers to be a part of your sick, amoral terrorist newsgroup. A few pieces of duct tape sealed up the new body-panel gaps on the Ram -- and fortunately the plow didn't pop out any glass -- so I should be good to drive up to the Seattle area Sunday and start my little job Monday. Why not stop by and spew your filth in person, you gutless stalking freak? Make a death threat in person. Hell, you're skiing with a freak that does it, why not? You approve him posting to your terrorist newsgroup, obviously you agree with his threats and support his threats. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Strohm, Terrorist and Pathological Liar.
"scottabe" wrote in message ... Why not stop by and spew your filth in person, you gutless stalking freak? Make a death threat in person. Hell, you're skiing with a freak that does it, why not? You approve him posting to your terrorist newsgroup, obviously you agree with his threats and support his threats. Let it lie. Acknowledging it only encourages it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Strohm, Terrorist and Pathological Liar.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:13:44 -0800, "Richard Henry"
wrote: "scottabe" wrote in message ... Why not stop by and spew your filth in person, you gutless stalking freak? Make a death threat in person. Hell, you're skiing with a freak that does it, why not? You approve him posting to your terrorist newsgroup, obviously you agree with his threats and support his threats. Let it lie. Acknowledging it only encourages it. Me thinks that the Trunckmeister needs a vacation.... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Strohm, Terrorist and Pathological Liar.
in article _630c.4632$h23.4373@fed1read06, Richard Henry at
wrote on 2/28/04 8:13 AM: "scottabe" wrote in message ... Why not stop by and spew your filth in person, you gutless stalking freak? Make a death threat in person. Hell, you're skiing with a freak that does it, why not? You approve him posting to your terrorist newsgroup, obviously you agree with his threats and support his threats. Let it lie. Acknowledging it only encourages it. I'd rather confront liars, terrorists, and assholes, freak. Stop stalking. Stop stalking. Stop stalking. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Strohm, Tourist and Pathological Texan
scottabe wrote: [snip] Why not stop by and spew your filth in person, you gutless stalking freak? Is that an invitation for me to come over to your house at 1416? Because if you're inviting me over, I can stop by next Saturday afternoon (6 March 2004), since I'll be in the neighborhood -- at least, more so than when I'm in my usual stomping grounds in Texas. New job, eh. I'm a little torqued because this deal with the Ramcharger and the snowplow means I had to lose a ski day today to get up to Everett by Monday, and everybody in PC and the canyons is using snorkel extenders in their new-found pow. At least I get to make herringbones in the motel parking lot while the Ramcharger gets some stuff worked on .... Jim (not) in Texas PS -- Scott, if you are serious about inviting me over to your home so we can have a sane, calm chat out by the curb, I can accept that offer. We have some long-standing issues to discuss that ought to be settled face-to-face without calling in the National Guard etc., and I honestly would like to try to settle some of this amicably, hopefully once and for all. I have no "filth" to "spew." I do have two or three points to tell you, and after that you can share comparable issues with me. Heck, you can even talk first if you want. So if you are inviting me over to your house, I am willing to accept such an invitation -- conditional only on our standing out at the curb in the daytime and talking for about 10 or 15 minutes. What I have to say to you can be said in public -- in front of ANYBODY -- and will take about 45 seconds. After that 45 seconds, we can share views and agree, agree to disagree, or strive to reach an agreement. I truly hope we can reach an agreement. Because of some things you've said in the past, if you agree to a meeting at your home, I am going to ring the doorbell (or knock) and then step off the porch and stand on your sidewalk about 15 feet away from the stoop. I mean no disrespect, but I don't want the actions of either of us to be misinterpreted. If you still drank beer, I think we could settle all of this over a beer or two -- that quaint practice still works pretty well in Texas -- but I understand your feelings regarding that, so I think that our best meeting protocol will be to stand out by the street in broad daylight for 10 minutes and chat. Does this sound like something you can do? I am completely willing to listen to and consider your alternative terms to meet in a public place and discuss stuff. I cannot deny that we have differences between us. For my part, I would like to swiftly resolve these differences between us in some way that is both mutually agreeable and mutually beneficial. If this sounds like a plan, please issue your conditional agreement here in RSA. Your agreeing now in no way commits you to anything later. If you get a better offer -- like, for example, bashing bumps at Alpental with Picabo Street next Saturday or something -- I will respect your choosing to change plans, and I only request that you tell me by midnight Friday (5 March), and offer an alternative future date when we can meet. Let me know. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|