If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Jonathan Shefftz schrieb:
Also also, a German ski touring magazing last year conducted a test that essentially measured the coupling rigidity of rando bindings, and the Diamir came out best. I have a copy I can e-mail to any interested folks. Although it might be interesting, i wouldn't trust that kind of tests. In my experience all the ski related tests in german magazines i know are kind of "guided" (by interests, relationships, dependency ...). The only independent instance i'd accept is the Swiss Institute for Research of avalanches (SLF) :-)) Greetings, Ulrich |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I know that this is old business, but...
In article , lac.stanford.edu wrote: _ I'm sold, I don't see any reason to buy another pair of regular alpine bindings again, at least for the kind of skiing at a resort that I do ( mostly steeps, powder). If you really want to bash moguls all day then you might want to consider a regular alpine binding. ....I thought about this too when I was lining my daughter out with her skiing kit; then I learned that the release technology on AT bindings is of the early-70's full alpine class, and I reconsidered. Maybe this point should be researched more fully... cheers, john |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article , John Red-Horse wrote: I know that this is old business, but... In article , bbense+rec.skiing.backcountry.Aug.17.04@telemark. slac.stanford.edu wrote: _ I'm sold, I don't see any reason to buy another pair of regular alpine bindings again, at least for the kind of skiing at a resort that I do ( mostly steeps, powder). If you really want to bash moguls all day then you might want to consider a regular alpine binding. ...I thought about this too when I was lining my daughter out with her skiing kit; then I learned that the release technology on AT bindings is of the early-70's full alpine class, and I reconsidered. Maybe this point should be researched more fully... _ I entirely argee with you and should have said so in my post. That's the one place that AT bindings fall short. I think they are "safe enough" for me and the generally cautious controlled way that I ski. I rarely fall and even more rarely do my alpine bindings release. I was just thinking of durablity in the above post and not release safety. _ The problem is that I don't think there is any available data to research. Reading the release setting section of any AT binding instructions is a sobering experience. As far as I know there is no standardized test/setting procedure for AT bindings as there are for standard alpine bindings. Here's a reasonably good summary of the DIN issue from a reliable shop http://thebackcountry.net/backskiing...eebindings.htm _ Booker C. Bense -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBQSz+nGTWTAjn5N/lAQEsugP/T8bNyNdjWVd6UqodHikWYL3Th6AyKIhC OWOYo3nS276F03+XzRwCjVlfjmWL4ikcS955whtUZfI2NKEgqs +nlBNbG2/4mdY9 IZ0Jf3uAnh8OXPixBNb1mmgOABYVDk2kRYmotom4ueIjFBxoWm IFby6hw0M/nw2t lVnofr55OU4= =zXjU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
(John Red-Horse) wrote in message ...
...I thought about this too when I was lining my daughter out with her skiing kit; then I learned that the release technology on AT bindings is of the early-70's full alpine class, and I reconsidered. Maybe this point should be researched more fully... Well, yes and no. First, I think it was more like the late 70s (rather than the early 70s) that bindings (e.g., Salomon 727, Tyrolia 350) first achieved a safe lateral toe release function with effective anti-friction devices, along with a reliable vertical heel release. The incidence of lower-leg fractures plummeted. Unfortunately, this beneficial development was offset to a large extent by a rapid rise in injuries to various soft tissues in the knee joint (particularly the ACL), mainly because ski boots became taller and stiffer (and not because of any changes in bindings). Almost three decades later, alpine downhill ski bindings have become far more sophisticated in their design and materials. (Atomic now has an electronic binding for over a grand that features radio communication between the toe and heel.) And what his happened to injury rates? Basically nothing. In economics-speak, the marginal utility of binding technology advancement has been essentially zero. (ACL injuries seem to be lessening slightly in recent years because of new ski design, with the "phantom foot" injury mode mitigated by shorter ski lengths at the same that deeper sidecuts unfortunately offset this mitigation - more background of that stuff available he http://www.vermontskisafety.com/faq_...iers_menu.html ) So do the Diamir and Naxo use late 70s binding technology? Yes. Do the historical statistics therefore imply any compromised safety? No. By contrast, the Silvretta 404/500/505/555 and Dynafit TLT/TriStep/Comfort lack a lateral release ability at the toe, instead substituting lateral release at the heel. (The Silvretta Pure seems to offer a lateral toe release, although somehow controlled by a mechanism at the heel?) I am unable to speak to the engineering implications of this, but I do know that no modern alpine downhill binding has ever lacked a lateral toe release - draw your own conclusions (if any) from this. And until Line finally introduces its alpine downhill binding (been promised for several years now), no alpine downhill binding with separate toe and heel units (as opposed to the plate bindings that briefly flourished, e.g., Spademan, Burt) has ever had a lateral heel release even in conjunction with a lateral toe release. (No, the Tyrolia "diagonal" heels did not release laterally, nor did the Marker turntables.) As for The Backcountry's claim: "In other words, we hope YOUR Dynafit or Fritchi [sic] binding thinks a DIN of 8 is truly an 8, but we can't test it to make sure." Once again, yes and no: no, The Backcountry can't test it; but yes, anyone can who has access to a testing machine. By contrast, backcountry.com, which already owns a tester for their alpine downhill gear, tests all the bindings they mount. (The rest of that webpage at The Backcountry contains a similarly frustrating mixture of helpful advice and unhelpful inaccuracies.) Regarding AT binding standards, yes they exist: they are available from iso.org or din.de (# SN ISO 13992, along with ISO 13992 AMD 1), although no, I haven't forked over the money to find out exactly what they are and how they compare with alpine downhill standards. And the release-setting instructions that come with my Diamirs are similar to those that come with my alpine racing bindings. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Jonathan Shefftz" wrote And the release-setting instructions that come with my Diamirs are similar to those that come with my alpine racing bindings. My experience, entirely on the slopes at resorts, is that I cannot tell the difference between my Diamirs and the Solomons they "replaced." Well, once I accidentally clipped the heel release and had a little instability until I figured where it came from... The cost was even similar. Anyone know if it is really unsafe to telemark on them? Store rep said so, and I haven't tried. My tele skills have corroded over the last 20 years or so, but I think it would be fun to try again on the lower shallower slopes... Dan |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Dan schrieb:
My experience, entirely on the slopes at resorts, is that I cannot tell the difference between my Diamirs and the Solomons they "replaced." I think, there is a slight difference between the Diamir and an alpine race binding as for the lateral stability over the longitudinal axis since the fixing points of the Fritschi are very narrow - compared to let's say a Marker. But, that's really a point only for those who really don races. Anyone know if it is really unsafe to telemark on them? Store rep said so, and I haven't tried. My tele skills have corroded over the last 20 years or so, but I think it would be fun to try again on the lower shallower slopes... I'd think the rotating axis of all the Fritschi when the heel is open, would not resist in the long run. In real telemarking much of this force is done by the boot (which, because of this, tends to break earlier thank the bindings). Not speaking about a totally different feeling. If you like free heel skiing use free heel equipment :-)) Greetings, Ulrich |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Jonathan Shefftz wrote:
Interesting stuff. I'm still a bit baffled by the Pure marketing blurb. The toe unit is solid, the heel can move backwards and vertically. Silvretta claim that a lateral force at the toe will cause the boot to move backwards and the toe to push out. It seems like a heel release to me but lots of people argue otherwise. The Dynafits, while they lack a DIN controlled lateral toe release will release at the toe never-the-less. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I think the one thing that almost all AT skiers *and* telemarkers
agree upon is that: - a binding that could switch between tele mode and locked-heel (yet fully releasable) mode would be kinda neato; yet, - tele skiing on an AT binding is sorta possible but not terribly fun and more importantly exposes the binding to high breakage risk. (That said, when I'm on rolling terrain, I often straightline down *very* short and *very* moderate inclines without bothering to lock down the heel on my Diamirs, making sure though that I keep the heel down - no elevator of course - so that the end of the central rail is supported laterally by the sides of the lock down mechanism. Oh, and about once a year I make a couple turns before realizing I forgot to lock down the heel, most recently at the top of Rainier's Russell Headwall on July 4th, whoops!) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Uli Hausmann wrote:
Although it might be interesting, i wouldn't trust that kind of tests. In my experience all the ski related tests in german magazines i know are kind of "guided" (by interests, relationships, dependency ...). In general I agree about such suspicions. In the USA we have a magazine called Consumer Reports (often sued by manufacturers who don't like the results), which accepts no advertising, allows no commercial use of its results, and buys all testing products from regular stores. The contrast between its truly objective tests (which alas do not include ski mountaineering gear) and those of specialized sports publications is quite striking. (If only there was a comparable Randonnee Reports magazine!) That said, the spreadsheet I have purports to show the results of quantitative lab tests, as opposed to qualitative skier judgements. Then again, the test could have been designed to favor certain models, and results from other tests that favored other models might not have been reported... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
removing rear fastener on sns profil binding | Chris Crawford | Nordic Skiing | 3 | February 26th 05 01:29 AM |
need help - not your avg binding settings question. | Squirrel123 | Snowboarding | 1 | February 16th 05 06:31 AM |
flow binding warning | [email protected] | Snowboarding | 8 | February 18th 04 04:04 PM |
can only ride with my back binding loose - why? | Dmitry | Snowboarding | 8 | December 12th 03 02:25 AM |
Pilot binding system -- what's the point? | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 1 | August 14th 03 03:28 PM |