If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
PG wrote:
"Pip Luscher" wrote in message ... | On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:50:42 +0100, "PG" | wrote: | | | "Pip Luscher" wrote in | message ... | | On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 20:02:57 +0000, Sue wrote: | | | | Why on Earth you have to take stairs to get into a lift is beyond me. | | And why you need a lift to get around the village without walking | | round the roads or on the pistes at all is very odd. The entire | | village appears to have been built on a mound. | | | | Actually, thinking about it, I suspect that they were playing the | | numbers game and by building it on the mound, gave it the magic | | "2000". | | Er - no. | | Fair enough, it was just a thought. That was a pretty definite answer | - care to elucidate? Resort villages are positioned for a number of reasons - planning permission, the terrain, accessibility, invulnerability (inasfar as this is possible) to avalanche... but not because they wanted to give it a specific name. I know of one resort in the southern Alps that is commonly known as Céüse 2000 but not because it is positioned at 2000 - it just happens to be the altitude at which the highest run starts! From what I heard, Arc 2000 was build back in the days (80s?) when snow cover was reliable and people were more worried about staying too high up the mountain and getting altitude sickness. So it's actually at 2100m, but called Arc 2000. This led to problems when building the new village as now it's more popular to be higher, but they could hardly rename the old one... so it's actually at 2000m but called Arc 1950. | | As for crowds, I suppose that as a local you get to see the full | horror of the bank holiday rush, so it would seem "virtually empty" at | the time I went. As one who intensely dislikes crowds, I'd just like | it to stay that way! | | Don't get me wrong, I had a great week's skiing on nicely groomed | pistes, it's just that the village itself, and its location, left me | completely underwhelmed. I skied all the first week of Jan. I don't think I found a queue anywhere. The older section of 2000 is pretty ugly, although the new MGM constructions that form part of the same village are very pleasant and quite well designed. Arc 2000 is in the centre of a bowl, surrounded by some beautiful views. I really can't see why the location is not to your liking. I suspect Arc 2000 is a bit hit or miss depending on your specific accommodation. There aren't that many angles with views from the village, so it depends on which specific block you're in whether you get views or not. You can't ski through the village itself, which means most locations are not "ski-from-door", and skiing to the lower section (where most of the accommodation is, and avoiding the lift) involves a fairly steep and extremely narrow "blue" (home) or button tow (out) both of which were beyond our beginners. The button was pretty busy in the mornings too. Once you've got to the main piste area, IMO you do a lot less queueing mornings and evenings than if you start from bases like 1800 and 1600. This is probably more useful for late intermediates and advanced skiers than beginners. It's a trek over to La Plagne but can be done in a day by intermediates. Unfortunately an inopportune cliff (the kind that snow doesn't stick on) means you can't really ski down from [lower] 2000 to 1950 and join the pistes there, which looks like it should be an alternative on the piste map. Mind you, you'd think they could fix that with a couple of really big JCBs... -Sarah |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Sarah Eggleston
writes I suspect Arc 2000 is a bit hit or miss depending on your specific accommodation. There aren't that many angles with views from the village, so it depends on which specific block you're in whether you get views or not. You don't need much of a view from your apartment - we could see the cranes of 1950 from ours, more than adequate to tell us what the visibility was like so we could start planning over breakfast. You can't ski through the village itself, which means most locations are not "ski-from-door", and skiing to the lower section (where most of the accommodation is, and avoiding the lift) involves a fairly steep and extremely narrow "blue" (home) or button tow (out) both of which were beyond our beginners. The button was pretty busy in the mornings too. I thought the 20m long "resort run" would've been sweet in worse conditions. There was a *permanent* sign warning you of verglas and telling you to walk down (no way do I walk on ice in ski boots, I like sharp steel edges for that) At the end of the day it had the biggest bumps ever seen on a piste that short, because it stops at the road so you do too. It can't be icy all the time, slush and bare patches must be an option, and there was nothing dividing it from the drag track. The draglift's a fixed grip one so you can do a short slalom if there's nobody on it. Once you've got to the main piste area, IMO you do a lot less queueing mornings and evenings than if you start from bases like 1800 and 1600. This is probably more useful for late intermediates and advanced skiers than beginners. It's a trek over to La Plagne but can be done in a day by intermediates. Unfortunately an inopportune cliff (the kind that snow doesn't stick on) means you can't really ski down from [lower] 2000 to 1950 and join the pistes there, which looks like it should be an alternative on the piste map. Mind you, you'd think they could fix that with a couple of really big JCBs... You can if you're starting from the little draglift. In fact it's hard to avoid - you normally start your day by skating to the piste where you can ski down to the Marmottes chairlift (below 1950) and riding up that, so you can skate to the lift you actually want! The best way home to 2000 is to ski down to 1950 and take the Cabriolet lift back up. There aren't any signs to help you find the lift, which may be a hint that you can't ski to it when there isn't as much snow. -- Sue ];( Deep perfect powder's all the same - a resort run's always different and often interesting. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Sue wrote:
In message , Sarah Eggleston writes You can't ski through the village itself, which means most locations are not "ski-from-door", and skiing to the lower section (where most of the accommodation is, and avoiding the lift) involves a fairly steep and extremely narrow "blue" (home) or button tow (out) both of which were beyond our beginners. The button was pretty busy in the mornings too. I thought the 20m long "resort run" would've been sweet in worse conditions. There was a *permanent* sign warning you of verglas and telling you to walk down (no way do I walk on ice in ski boots, I like sharp steel edges for that) At the end of the day it had the biggest bumps ever seen on a piste that short, because it stops at the road so you do too. It can't be icy all the time, slush and bare patches must be an option, and there was nothing dividing it from the drag track. The draglift's a fixed grip one so you can do a short slalom if there's nobody on it. Ah, we must have been lucky. Had plenty of snow in Jan 2004 - and a somewhat weird effect resulting from 4 inches of powder on one side. With skis across the slope you'd often have the tips in powder and and the heel on hardscrape (or vice versa), which made for weird ski handling. Unfortunately an inopportune cliff (the kind that snow doesn't stick on) means you can't really ski down from [lower] 2000 to 1950 and join the pistes there, which looks like it should be an alternative on the piste map. Mind you, you'd think they could fix that with a couple of really big JCBs... You can if you're starting from the little draglift. Agreed, but that doesn't help beginners with an alternative to walking through the shopping centre and using the lift. In fact it's hard to avoid - you normally start your day by skating to the piste where you can ski down to the Marmottes chairlift (below 1950) and riding up that, so you can skate to the lift you actually want! The best way home to 2000 is to ski down to 1950 and take the Cabriolet lift back up. There aren't any signs to help you find the lift, which may be a hint that you can't ski to it when there isn't as much snow. Hmmmm, I'll have to book a return trip and find that one! -Sarah |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trip report - Greensboro, Vermont - 14 Feb 2004 | Lew Lasher | Nordic Skiing | 0 | February 15th 04 03:52 AM |
Trip report - Arc 2000 - long | Sarah Eggleston | European Ski Resorts | 9 | February 12th 04 08:39 AM |
Trip report: Big powder over the holidays | Seth Masia | Alpine Skiing | 2 | January 6th 04 04:12 PM |
Trip Report - Mt. Baker / Mt. Bachelor | toddjb | Snowboarding | 10 | January 5th 04 11:34 PM |
Czech Republic trip report | PG | European Ski Resorts | 43 | November 28th 03 12:38 PM |