King William I of America.

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

in article , Vern93 at
wrote on 11/14/03 7:46 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

One problem, asshole. I never did it. But you're really tempting me
to
falsely accuse you of molesting children, since it doesn't make sense
to
you. After YOU are targeted, perhaps you will understand why we get
upset
when assholes like you ain't got the integrity to condemn such
behavior
and
are civil to those who do.


You did it to me. Or had it done -- same difference.

Time to turn tables.
Cite the post. Cite any evidence you have that I had anything to do
with
it. Or are you just lying your ass off again as you always have?
You continually demand proof, then ignore proof when it is presented to
you.

Do you really have memories of providing proof?

All the time, asshole.

Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.

I don't really have time to research this, but I quickly found a thread
where you are the first poster titled " Alan Baker is a Baby Raper."
It looks like you changed the thread title from the original to a
slanderous one, like Bert apparently taught you to do.

http://makeashorterlink.com/?K33143C86



You really do get your jollies telling whoppers? How transparently
dishonest can you get? Why do I ask?
Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.


Sure, Scott. And it's just a coincidence that another such post popped
up today....

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect
if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

in article , Alan Baker at
wrote on 11/15/03 1:40 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

in article , Vern93 at
wrote on 11/14/03 7:46 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

One problem, asshole. I never did it. But you're really tempting me
to
falsely accuse you of molesting children, since it doesn't make sense
to
you. After YOU are targeted, perhaps you will understand why we get
upset
when assholes like you ain't got the integrity to condemn such
behavior
and
are civil to those who do.


You did it to me. Or had it done -- same difference.

Time to turn tables.
Cite the post. Cite any evidence you have that I had anything to do
with
it. Or are you just lying your ass off again as you always have?
You continually demand proof, then ignore proof when it is presented to
you.

Do you really have memories of providing proof?

All the time, asshole.

Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.

I don't really have time to research this, but I quickly found a thread
where you are the first poster titled " Alan Baker is a Baby Raper."
It looks like you changed the thread title from the original to a
slanderous one, like Bert apparently taught you to do.

http://makeashorterlink.com/?K33143C86



You really do get your jollies telling whoppers? How transparently
dishonest can you get? Why do I ask?
Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.


Sure, Scott. And it's just a coincidence that another such post popped
up today....

Sure, Allan. Maybe there is somebody out there who thinks you are an
asshole and decided to **** with you some more after you lied about me. No
coincidence, you prompted him and then falsely accuse me. As usual. Proof.
Cites. Double standards, eh?

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

in article , Alan Baker at
wrote on 11/15/03 1:40 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

in article , Vern93 at
wrote on 11/14/03 7:46 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

One problem, asshole. I never did it. But you're really tempting me
to
falsely accuse you of molesting children, since it doesn't make sense
to
you. After YOU are targeted, perhaps you will understand why we get
upset
when assholes like you ain't got the integrity to condemn such
behavior
and
are civil to those who do.


You did it to me. Or had it done -- same difference.

Time to turn tables.
Cite the post. Cite any evidence you have that I had anything to do
with
it. Or are you just lying your ass off again as you always have?
You continually demand proof, then ignore proof when it is presented to
you.

Do you really have memories of providing proof?

All the time, asshole.

Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.

I don't really have time to research this, but I quickly found a thread
where you are the first poster titled " Alan Baker is a Baby Raper."
It looks like you changed the thread title from the original to a
slanderous one, like Bert apparently taught you to do.

http://makeashorterlink.com/?K33143C86



You really do get your jollies telling whoppers? How transparently
dishonest can you get? Why do I ask?
Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.


Sure, Scott. And it's just a coincidence that another such post popped
up today....

Sure, Allan. Maybe there is somebody out there who thinks you are an
asshole and decided to **** with you some more after you lied about me. No
coincidence, you prompted him and then falsely accuse me. As usual. Proof.
Cites. Double standards, eh?


So tell me -- tell everyone -- why in your response to that thread, you
changed subject back to one that was slanderous?

Who did that, Scotty?

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect
if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

In article ,
Alan Baker wrote:

snip

I don't really have time to research this, but I quickly found a thread
where you are the first poster titled " Alan Baker is a Baby Raper."
It looks like you changed the thread title from the original to a
slanderous one, like Bert apparently taught you to do.

http://makeashorterlink.com/?K33143C86



You really do get your jollies telling whoppers? How transparently
dishonest can you get? Why do I ask?
Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.


Sure, Scott. And it's just a coincidence that another such post popped
up today....

Sure, Allan. Maybe there is somebody out there who thinks you are an
asshole and decided to **** with you some more after you lied about me. No
coincidence, you prompted him and then falsely accuse me. As usual.
Proof.
Cites. Double standards, eh?


So tell me -- tell everyone -- why in your response to that thread, you
changed subject back to one that was slanderous?

Who did that, Scotty?


And while you're at it, tell us why both you and this "anonymous" person
misspelled my name as "Allan" in the body of your posts...

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect
if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

in article , Alan Baker at
wrote on 11/15/03 3:54 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

in article , Alan Baker at
wrote on 11/15/03 1:40 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

in article , Vern93 at
wrote on 11/14/03 7:46 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

One problem, asshole. I never did it. But you're really tempting me
to
falsely accuse you of molesting children, since it doesn't make sense
to
you. After YOU are targeted, perhaps you will understand why we get
upset
when assholes like you ain't got the integrity to condemn such
behavior
and
are civil to those who do.


You did it to me. Or had it done -- same difference.

Time to turn tables.
Cite the post. Cite any evidence you have that I had anything to do
with
it. Or are you just lying your ass off again as you always have?
You continually demand proof, then ignore proof when it is presented to
you.

Do you really have memories of providing proof?

All the time, asshole.

Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.

I don't really have time to research this, but I quickly found a thread
where you are the first poster titled " Alan Baker is a Baby Raper."
It looks like you changed the thread title from the original to a
slanderous one, like Bert apparently taught you to do.

http://makeashorterlink.com/?K33143C86



You really do get your jollies telling whoppers? How transparently
dishonest can you get? Why do I ask?
Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.


Sure, Scott. And it's just a coincidence that another such post popped
up today....

Sure, Allan. Maybe there is somebody out there who thinks you are an
asshole and decided to **** with you some more after you lied about me. No
coincidence, you prompted him and then falsely accuse me. As usual. Proof.
Cites. Double standards, eh?


So tell me -- tell everyone -- why in your response to that thread, you
changed subject back to one that was slanderous?

Your tactics. You continue to p[ost defaming headers me all the time. Why
are you complaining?

Who did that, Scotty?

Me. How do you like me playing by YOUR rules, kiddy diddler?

in article , Alan Baker at
wrote on 11/15/03 4:05 PM:

In article ,
Alan Baker wrote:

snip

I don't really have time to research this, but I quickly found a thread
where you are the first poster titled " Alan Baker is a Baby Raper."
It looks like you changed the thread title from the original to a
slanderous one, like Bert apparently taught you to do.

http://makeashorterlink.com/?K33143C86



You really do get your jollies telling whoppers? How transparently
dishonest can you get? Why do I ask?
Your rules. Your standards. Proof, you lying asshole.


Sure, Scott. And it's just a coincidence that another such post popped
up today....

Sure, Allan. Maybe there is somebody out there who thinks you are an
asshole and decided to **** with you some more after you lied about me. No
coincidence, you prompted him and then falsely accuse me. As usual.
Proof.
Cites. Double standards, eh?


So tell me -- tell everyone -- why in your response to that thread, you
changed subject back to one that was slanderous?

Who did that, Scotty?


And while you're at it, tell us why both you and this "anonymous" person
misspelled my name as "Allan" in the body of your posts...

I don't misspell asshole, asshole. BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! I love it! More!
More!

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

in article , Alan Baker at
wrote on 11/15/03 3:54 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

in article , Alan Baker at
wrote on 11/15/03 1:40 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

in article , Vern93 at
wrote on 11/14/03 7:46 PM:

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

snip

Sure, Scott. And it's just a coincidence that another such post popped
up today....

Sure, Allan. Maybe there is somebody out there who thinks you are an
asshole and decided to **** with you some more after you lied about me.
No
coincidence, you prompted him and then falsely accuse me. As usual.
Proof.
Cites. Double standards, eh?


So tell me -- tell everyone -- why in your response to that thread, you
changed subject back to one that was slanderous?

Your tactics. You continue to p[ost defaming headers me all the time. Why
are you complaining?

I do, do I? Care to post any? Didn't think so. g

BTW, I thought it was in the interests of "accuracy". And didn't you
also claim that someone was lying when they claimed you changed it back?

Pity you can't come up with one story for your behaviour.


Who did that, Scotty?

Me. How do you like me playing by YOUR rules, xxx xxx?

I thought you'd never do that, regardless of whether you thought it was
"fair" or not.

How quickly your song changes...


--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect
if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."