Two Peas in a Pod

Near the end of the article:

"They [FBI] stayed for five minutes," he [Dan Borchers of
coulterwatch.com] said, "told me to be careful not to scare Ann
Coulter. She hollers stalker at anybody who opposes her."

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localne..._col_0511.html

Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake.
A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing
board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so,
whines about being labeled a stalker.
Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking.
Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy from
lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a
defamatory lie.
Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you conspire
to harm the truthteller.
Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he
doesn't have the balls to do so in person.....

--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com
"Richard Henry" wrote in message
oups.com...
Near the end of the article:

"They [FBI] stayed for five minutes," he [Dan Borchers of
coulterwatch.com] said, "told me to be careful not to scare Ann
Coulter. She hollers stalker at anybody who opposes her."

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localne..._col_0511.html

On May 13, 1:31 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake.
A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing
board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so,
whines about being labeled a stalker.
Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking.
Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy from
lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a
defamatory lie.
Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you conspire
to harm the truthteller.
Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he
doesn't have the balls to do so in person.....

--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com"Richard Henry" wrote in message

oups.com...



Near the end of the article:

"They [FBI] stayed for five minutes," he [Dan Borchers of
coulterwatch.com] said, "told me to be careful not to scare Ann
Coulter. She hollers stalker at anybody who opposes her."

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localne...paper/2007...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There you go with those "false allegations to your licensing agency
again". My challenge still stands: post proof:

Bluff called.

(I like this game - undefeated so far.)

"Richard Henry" wrote in message
oups.com...
On May 13, 1:31 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake.
A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing
board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so,
whines about being labeled a stalker.
Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking.
Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy
from
lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a
defamatory lie.
Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you
conspire
to harm the truthteller.
Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he
doesn't have the balls to do so in person.....

--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com"Richard Henry"
wrote in message

oups.com...



Near the end of the article:

"They [FBI] stayed for five minutes," he [Dan Borchers of
coulterwatch.com] said, "told me to be careful not to scare Ann
Coulter. She hollers stalker at anybody who opposes her."

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localne...paper/2007...-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There you go with those "false allegations to your licensing agency
again". My challenge still stands: post proof:

Your lies still go onward: you did it anonymously and you are well aware
that such complaints are kept anonymous. Knowing that, you issue a bull****
challenge, lying your ass off.
Funny how the language was identical to what you used to encourage others to
make false complaints, freak. And when you did that, you stalked.
How pathetic do you have to be to encourage freaks to lie about me to a
licensing agency, when NONE of you were ever my clients?
You tried to harm me in the real world.
Meet me in the real world, and you will be treated as what you are.

Bluff called.

(I like this game - undefeated so far.)

You were defeated the moment you stalked me in real life. You pathetic,
dickless wimp.

On May 13, 5:46 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
"Richard Henry" wrote in message

oups.com...



On May 13, 1:31 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake.
A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing
board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so,
whines about being labeled a stalker.
Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking.
Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy
from
lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a
defamatory lie.
Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you
conspire
to harm the truthteller.
Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he
doesn't have the balls to do so in person.....

--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com"Richard Henry"
wrote in message

groups.com...

Near the end of the article:

"They [FBI] stayed for five minutes," he [Dan Borchers of
coulterwatch.com] said, "told me to be careful not to scare Ann
Coulter. She hollers stalker at anybody who opposes her."

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localne...ws/epaper/2007...
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There you go with those "false allegations to your licensing agency
again". My challenge still stands: post proof:

Your lies still go onward: you did it anonymously and you are well aware
that such complaints are kept anonymous. Knowing that, you issue a bull****
challenge, lying your ass off.
Funny how the language was identical to what you used to encourage others to
make false complaints, freak. And when you did that, you stalked.
How pathetic do you have to be to encourage freaks to lie about me to a
licensing agency, when NONE of you were ever my clients?
You tried to harm me in the real world.
Meet me in the real world, and you will be treated as what you are.



Bluff called.

(I like this game - undefeated so far.)

You were defeated the moment you stalked me in real life. You pathetic,
dickless wimp.

Translation : You have no proof.

It's all Usenet Scott. Find the proof, post it, or crawl back into
the proverbial sewers.

In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Your lies still go onward: you did it anonymously and you are well aware
that such complaints are kept anonymous.

Wow! DOUBLE anonymous!!!

So what makes you so sure that Richard made a complaint against you?
Besides your finally tuned conspiracy sensing apparatus, that is.

Ran into a story on this guy in the paper today. He posts
"gangbusting" videos on Youtube, starring his neighbors. Here's a
link to a typical one - a trip to a neighborhood park to expose drug
dealers and gangbangers. Even though he doesn't find any, he doesn't
change the title or much of the dialog, and certailnly not his heroic
stance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBGqI09Uf3k

On May 13, 4:46 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
"Richard Henry" wrote in message

oups.com...





On May 13, 1:31 pm, "Two Buddha" wrote:
Of all the absurd insanities of rsa, this one takes the cake.
A dickless stalking wimp who has made false allegations to my licensing
board while hiding his identity, and encouraged other freaks to do so,
whines about being labeled a stalker.
Clue time. If you have tried to harm me with lies, you're stalking.
Coulter, like Richard Henry, is a pathological liar who takes great joy
from
lying: for him to compare me to her is not only laughable, it is a
defamatory lie.
Stalking. Usenet stalking. Where you lie and you harass and you
conspire
to harm the truthteller.
Richard Henry, dickless and nutless stalker. And like all stalker, he
doesn't have the balls to do so in person.....

--
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com"Richard Henry"
wrote in message

groups.com...

Near the end of the article:

"They [FBI] stayed for five minutes," he [Dan Borchers of
coulterwatch.com] said, "told me to be careful not to scare Ann
Coulter. She hollers stalker at anybody who opposes her."

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localne...ws/epaper/2007...
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There you go with those "false allegations to your licensing agency
again". My challenge still stands: post proof:

Your lies still go onward: you did it anonymously and you are well aware
that such complaints are kept anonymous. Knowing that, you issue a bull****
challenge, lying your ass off.
Funny how the language was identical to what you used to encourage others to
make false complaints, freak. And when you did that, you stalked.
How pathetic do you have to be to encourage freaks to lie about me to a
licensing agency, when NONE of you were ever my clients?
You tried to harm me in the real world.
Meet me in the real world, and you will be treated as what you are.



Bluff called.

(I like this game - undefeated so far.)

You were defeated the moment you stalked me in real life. You pathetic,
dickless wimp.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As I expected, no proof. I win again!

Scott, if you are really serious about this, we can each send
notarized permissions to the licensing board authorizing them to
release the anonymity of any statements I might have made to them.
Then we can publish them here and everyone can see what you are
talking about. As a starter, you should copy out the notice you got
from the agency, or, even better, scan it and post on a photo-sharing
site.

Bluff called.

On May 13, 6:09 pm, Dave Cartman wrote:
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Your lies still go onward: you did it anonymously and you are well aware
that such complaints are kept anonymous.

Wow! DOUBLE anonymous!!!

So what makes you so sure that Richard made a complaint against you?
Besides your finally tuned conspiracy sensing apparatus, that is.

And let us not forget that there is no "licensing" involved. It is
merely a _registration_. Licensing infers that there are
qualifications and oversight. Registration means just sign up. There
is quite a large controversy in Washington over the unqualified and
inept people _registered_ as counselors with no training at all.

In article .com,
pigo wrote:

On May 13, 6:09 pm, Dave Cartman wrote:
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote:

Your lies still go onward: you did it anonymously and you are well aware
that such complaints are kept anonymous.

Wow! DOUBLE anonymous!!!

So what makes you so sure that Richard made a complaint against you?
Besides your finally tuned conspiracy sensing apparatus, that is.

And let us not forget that there is no "licensing" involved. It is
merely a _registration_. Licensing infers that there are
qualifications and oversight. Registration means just sign up. There
is quite a large controversy in Washington over the unqualified and
inept people _registered_ as counselors with no training at all.

OMG you're right! They don't require ANY training but they do require
this:

"To be certified as a Peer Counselor a person must meet these criteria:

1) self-identify as a consumer who is receiving or has received mental
health services."

http://www1.dshs.wa.gov/word/hrsa/mh/peerfactsheet.doc

And here is an excerpt from the application: (and I swear I didn't make
this up)

"Question 1 Describe your experiences as a mental health consumer? Was
it with the public or private system?"

http://www1.dshs.wa.gov/word/hrsa/mh...Questions_8_1_
06_Bonnie.doc -

Looks like you *do* have to be crazy to work there

Dave